/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 53 In a study of bacterial concentr... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In a study of bacterial concentration in surface and subsurface water ("Pb and Bacteria in a Surface Microlayer" journal of Marine Research [1982]: \(1200-\) 1206 ), the accompanying data were obtained. Concentration \(\left(\times 10^{6} / \mathrm{mL}\right)\) \(\begin{array}{llllll}\text { Surface } & 48.6 & 24.3 & 15.9 & 8.29 & 5.75 \\\ \text { Subsurface } & 5.46 & 6.89 & 3.38 & 3.72 & 3.12 \\ \text { Surface } & 10.8 & 4.71 & 8.26 & 9.41 & \\ \text { Subsurface } & 3.39 & 4.17 & 4.06 & 5.16 & \end{array}\) Summary quantities are \(\sum x=136.02 \sum y=39.35\) \(\sum x^{2}=3602.65 \sum y^{2}=184.27 \quad \sum x y=673.65\) Using a significance level of \(.05,\) determine whether the data support the hypothesis of a linear relationship between surface and subsurface concentration.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Perform all the necessary calculations using the formulas and data provided. After getting the calculated correlation value, check if it exceeds the critical value at a .05 significance level. If it does, the null hypothesis is rejected, indicating a linear relationship between the datasets. If not, we cannot reject the hypothesis that there is no correlation between the datasets. The actual answer will depend on the values obtained during computations.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the mean of both sets of data

Use the formula for calculating mean. The mean of the surface concentration \(x\) can be calculated as \(\bar{x} = \frac{\sum x}{n}\), where \(n\) is the total number of observations for surface concentrations. Similarily, calculate mean of the subsurface concentration \(y\), \(\bar{y} = \frac{\sum y}{n}\).
02

Calculate the correlation coefficient

Now, we calculate the correlation coefficient using the formula: \(r = \frac{n\sum xy - \sum x\sum y}{\sqrt{n\sum x^2 - (\sum x)^2} \sqrt{n\sum y^2 - (\sum y)^2}}\). Here, \(n\) is the total number of observations, \(\sum xy\) is the sum of the product of corresponding \(x\) and \(y\) values, \(\sum x\) and \(\sum y\) are the sums of \(x\) values and \(y\) values respectively and \(\sum x^2\) and \(\sum y^2\) are the sums of the squares of \(x\) and \(y\) values respectively.
03

Determine the critical value for correlation coefficient

To test the hypothesis of a linear relationship, we need to determine the critical value for correlation coefficient. If our calculated correlation coefficient is beyond this critical value, we will reject the null hypothesis (that the two sets of data have no correlation). The critical value can be found on a table of critical values for correlation. We are testing at a significance level of .05, which will be used to find the critical value.
04

Test the hypothesis

Now that we have the calculated correlation value and critical value, we can test our hypothesis. If our calculated correlation coefficient is beyond the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the data supports the hypothesis of a linear relationship between surface and subsurface concentration. If the computed correlation is within the bounds of the critical value, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the data does not support a linear relationship.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Linear Relationship
A linear relationship indicates that as the value of one variable changes, the value of another variable changes in a predictable way. In a linear relationship, data points typically form a pattern that can be roughly approximated by a straight line when plotted on a graph.
Detecting a linear relationship involves looking for consistency in how two variables rise or fall together. This exercise examines whether surface and subsurface bacterial concentrations have such a relationship.
If you can fit a straight line through the plotted observations without substantial deviations, you likely have a linear relationship. Understanding if a linear trend exists is vital as it helps predict one variable's behavior based on another.
Correlation Coefficient
The correlation coefficient, often represented by the symbol \( r \), gauges the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables.
It is a numerical representation that ranges from -1 to 1. An \( r \) value of 1 suggests a perfect positive linear relationship, where both variables increase together, while -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship, where one variable increases as the other decreases.
A correlation coefficient close to 0 implies no linear relationship.
  • Positive \( r \): As one variable increases, the other also increases.
  • Negative \( r \): As one variable increases, the other decreases.
  • Zero \( r \): No linear relationship exists.
Calculating \( r \) for surface and subsurface concentrations indicates the strength of their linear connection, shedding light on how tightly the variables are interrelated.
Critical Value
The critical value is a threshold against which you compare your calculated statistic to determine statistical significance. For correlation coefficients, finding the critical value involves using a table that considers the degrees of freedom (which is the number of data pairs minus 2) and the desired significance level.
Given a significance level of 0.05, the critical value helps ascertain if the detected correlation is strong enough to conclude a linear relationship. If your \( r \) value exceeds the critical value, the linear relationship is deemed statistically significant.
This step safeguards against making premature conclusions about the strength of the correlation.
Significance Level
The significance level, denoted by \( \alpha \), is a probability threshold set to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis.
Commonly used significance levels include 0.05, 0.01, and 0.10, which correspond to 5%, 1%, and 10% chances, respectively, of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis (a false positive). In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis typically suggests no relationship.
In our case, with a significance level of 0.05, we are willing to accept a 5% risk of concluding that a linear relationship exists between surface and subsurface concentrations when it does not.
Setting a significance level is crucial as it frames the confidence with which we can make conclusions from the data. This measure helps ensure that results from the tests are reliable and valid.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Performance Test Conducted for a Gas Air-Conditioning System" (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating. and Alr Conditioning Engineering [1969]: 54\()\) reported the following data on maximum outdoor temperature \((x)\) and hours of chiller operation per day \((y)\) for a 3 -ton residential gas air- conditioning system: \(\begin{array}{rrrrrrr}x & 72 & 78 & 80 & 86 & 88 & 92 \\ y & 4.8 & 7.2 & 9.5 & 14.5 & 15.7 & 17.9\end{array}\) Suppose that the system is actually a prototype model, and the manufacturer does not wish to produce this model unless the data strongly indicate that when maximum outdoor temperature is \(82^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\), the true average number of hours of chiller operation is less than 12 . The appropriate hypotheses are then \(H_{0}: \alpha+\beta(82)=12 \quad\) versus \(\quad H_{d}: \alpha+\beta(82)<12\) Use the statistic \(t=\frac{a+b(82)-12}{s_{a+b(82)}}\) which has a \(t\) distribution based on \((n-2)\) df when \(H_{0}\) is true, to test the hypotheses at significance level .01 .

The figure at the top of the page is based on data from the article "Root and Shoot Competition Intensity Along a Soil Depth Gradient" (Ecology [1995] : \(673-682)\). It shows the relationship between aboveground biomass and soil depth within the experimental plots. The relationship is described by the estimated regression equation: biomass \(=-9.85+25.29(\) soil depth \()\) and \(r^{2}=.65 ; P<0.001 ; n=55 .\) Do you think the simple linear regression model is appropriate here? Explain. What would you expect to see in a plot of the standardized residuals versus \(x\) ?

A simple linear regression model was used to describe the relationship between \(y=\) hardness of molded plastic and \(x=\) amount of time elapsed since the end of the molding process. Summary quantities included \(n=\) \(15,\) SSResid \(=1235.470,\) and \(\mathrm{SSTo}=25,321.368 .\) a. Calculate a point estimate of \(\sigma .\) On how many degrees of freedom is the estimate based? b. What percentage of observed variation in hardness can be explained by the simple linear regression model relationship between hardness and elapsed time?

A sample of \(n=61\) penguin burrows was selected, and values of both \(y=\) trail length \((\mathrm{m})\) and \(x=\) soil hardness (force required to penetrate the substrate to a depth of \(12 \mathrm{~cm}\) with a certain gauge, in \(\mathrm{kg}\) ) were determined for each one ("Effects of Substrate on the Distribution of Magellanic Penguin Burrows," The Auk [1991]: \(923-933\) ). The equation of the least-squares line was \(\hat{y}=11.607-1.4187 x,\) and \(r^{2}=.386 .\) a. Does the relationship between soil hardness and trail length appear to be linear, with shorter trails associated with harder soil (as the article asserted)? Carry out an appropriate test of hypotheses. b. Using \(s_{\mathrm{e}}=2.35, \bar{x}=4.5,\) and \(\sum(x-\bar{x})^{2}=250,\) predict trail length when soil hardness is 6.0 in a way that conveys information about the reliability and precision of the prediction. c. Would you use the simple linear regression model to predict trail length when hardness is \(10.0 ?\) Explain your reasoning

If the sample correlation coefficient is equal to 1 , is it necessarily true that \(\rho=1\) ? If \(\rho=1\), is it necessarily true that \(r=1\) ?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.