/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 7 The article "Sensory and Mechani... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The article "Sensory and Mechanical Assessment of the Quality of Frankfurters" (Journal of Texture Studies [1990]: \(395-409\) ) reported the following salt content (percentage by weight) for 10 frankfurters: \(\begin{array}{llllllllll}2.26 & 2.11 & 1.64 & 1.17 & 1.64 & 2.36 & 1.70 & 2.10 & 2.19 & 2.40\end{array}\) a. Use the given data to produce a point estimate of \(\mu\), the true mean salt content for frankfurters. b. Use the given data to produce a point estimate of \(\sigma^{2}\), the variance of salt content for frankfurters. c. Use the given data to produce an estimate of \(\sigma\), the standard deviation of salt content. Is the statistic you used to produce your estimate unbiased?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The point estimate of the mean (\mu) salt content for frankfurters is calculated by summing up all the values and dividing by the total number of values. b. The point estimate of the variance (\sigma^{2}) of salt content for frankfurters is calculated by subtracting the mean from each value, squaring the results, summing them up, and then dividing by the total number. c. The estimate of the standard deviation (\sigma) of salt content is the square root of the calculated variance. The standard deviation statistic used in this case is slightly biased as it uses the sample mean instead of the population mean in the calculations, and this bias effect is greater for small sample sizes.

Step by step solution

01

Calculating the Mean

First, we will calculate the mean \(\mu\) of the salt content. This is done by summing up all the values and then dividing by the total number (10 frankfurters in this case): \(\mu = \frac{\sum x_{i}}{n} = \frac{2.26 + 2.11 + 1.64 + 1.17 + 1.64 + 2.36 + 1.70 + 2.10 + 2.19 + 2.40}{10}\)
02

Calculating the Variance

Next, we calculate the variance \(\sigma^{2}\). This is done by subtracting the mean from each value, squaring the results, summing them up and then dividing by the total number (in this case 10):\(\sigma^{2} = \frac{\sum (x_{i} - \mu)^{2}}{n}\)
03

Calculating the Standard Deviation

The standard deviation \(\sigma\) is simply the square root of the variance:\(\sigma = \sqrt{\sigma^{2}}\)
04

Checking Unbiasedness

Lastly, check whether the estimator used for the standard deviation calculation is unbiased. An estimator is considered unbiased if the expected value of the estimator is equal to the parameter it is estimating. When estimating the standard deviation from a sample as we did here, the method is slightly biased. This is because we’ve used sample mean instead of the population mean in the calculations. While this bias decreases as sample size increases, it’s still present with smaller sample sizes like in our case where n=10.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Mean Calculation
To calculate the mean, also known as the average, you need to add up all the values of a dataset and then divide by the number of values. This provides a central point that represents all the data. For the given dataset, which includes the salt content percentages for 10 frankfurters, we calculate the mean by:
  • First, summing all the salt content percentages: 2.26 + 2.11 + 1.64 + 1.17 + 1.64 + 2.36 + 1.70 + 2.10 + 2.19 + 2.40.
  • Next, divide this sum by the total number of frankfurters, which in this case is 10.
You will have: \[\mu = \frac{2.26 + 2.11 + 1.64 + 1.17 + 1.64 + 2.36 + 1.70 + 2.10 + 2.19 + 2.40}{10}\]This results in the mean salt content for the frankfurters. The mean gives a good central value that summarizes the dataset, providing a snapshot of the typical salt content for the frankfurters.
Variance Calculation
Variance measures how much the numbers in a dataset differ from the mean. It gives us an idea of the spread or dispersion of the data. To calculate variance, follow these steps:
  • Subtract the mean from each data point. This gives you how far each point is from the mean.
  • Square each of these differences. This ensures all differences are positive and larger differences weigh more than smaller ones.
  • Sum all the squared differences.
  • Divide the total by the number of data points, which is 10 in this example.
The formula looks like this:\[\sigma^{2} = \frac{\sum (x_{i} - \mu)^{2}}{n}\]Where \(x_{i}\) represents each data point and \(\mu\) is the mean. The result will give you the variance of the salt content. A higher variance means more variability, while a lower variance indicates the data points are closer to the mean.
Standard Deviation
The standard deviation is a measure of how spread out the numbers in your dataset are. It is simply the square root of the variance, making it a very useful tool. Since variance gives squared deviations, taking the square root brings it back to the original units of measurement, which are the same as the data.To compute the standard deviation:
  • Calculate the variance as explained previously.
  • Take the square root of the variance.
The formula is:\[\sigma = \sqrt{\sigma^{2}}\]Now, about unbiasedness: Estimations can be biased, especially in small samples like our 10 frankfurters. Typically, to reduce bias in a small sample, the variance formula divides by \(n-1\) instead of \(n\) due to Bessel's correction. This is not applied in our current calculation, meaning the estimator we used might intentionally underestimate the population standard deviation slightly. As your dataset grows larger, this bias becomes negligible.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "The Association Between Television Viewing and Irregular Sleep Schedules Among Children Less Than 3 Years of Age" (Pediatrics [2005]: \(851-856\) ) reported the accompanying \(95 \%\) confidence intervals for average TV viewing time (in hours per day) for three different age groups. \begin{tabular}{lcc} Age Group & \(95 \%\) Confidence Interval \\ \hline Less than 12 months & \((0.8,1.0)\) \\ 12 to 23 months & \((1.4,1.8)\) \\ 24 to 35 months & \((2.1,2.5)\) \\ & & \end{tabular} a. Suppose that the sample sizes for each of the three age group samples were equal. Based on the given confidence intervals, which of the age group samples had the greatest variability in TV viewing time? Explain your choice. b. Now suppose that the sample standard deviations for the three age group samples were equal, but that the three sample sizes might have been different. Which of the three age group samples had the largest sample size? Explain your choice. c. The interval \((.768,1.302)\) is either a \(90 \%\) confidence interval or a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the mean TV viewing time for children less than 12 months old. Is the confidence level for this interval \(90 \%\) or \(99 \% ?\) Explain your choice.

One thousand randomly selected adult Americans participated in a survey conducted by the Associated Press (June, 2006 ). When asked 'Do you think it is sometimes justified to lie or do you think lying is never justified?" \(52 \%\) responded that lying was never justified. When asked about lying to avoid hurting someone's feelings, 650 responded that this was often or sometimes OK. a. Construct a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of adult Americans who think lying is never justified. b. Construct a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of adult American who think that it is often or sometimes OK to lie to avoid hurting someone's feelings. c. Based on the confidence intervals from Parts (a) and (b), comment on the apparent inconsistency in the re-

The article "Viewers Speak Out Against Reality TV" (Associated Press, September 12,2005\()\) included the following statement: "Few people believe there's much reality in reality TV: a total of 82 percent said the shows are either 'totally made up' or 'mostly distorted'." This statement was based on a survey of 1002 randomly selected adults. Compute and interpret a bound on the error of estimation for the reported percentage.

The National Geographic Society conducted a study that included 3000 respondents, age 18 to 24, in nine different countries (San Luis Obispo Tribune, November 21 . 2002). The society found that \(10 \%\) of the participants could not identify their own country on a blank world map. a. Construct a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion who can identify their own country on a blank world map. b. What assumptions are necessary for the confidence interval in Part (a) to be valid? c. To what population would it be reasonable to generalize the confidence interval estimate from Part (a)?

Conducts an annual survey 6 of all households expe the past year. This esti102 randomly selected adults. The report states, "One can say with \(95 \%\) confidence that the margin of sampling error is \(\pm 3\) percentage points." Explain how this statement can be justified.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.