/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 6 A study reported in Newsweek (De... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A study reported in Newsweek (December 23,1991 ) involved a sample of 935 smokers. Each individual received a nicotine patch, which delivers nicotine to the bloodstream but at a much slower rate than cigarettes do. Dosage was decreased to 0 over a 12 -week period. Suppose that 245 of the subjects were still not smoking 6 months after treatment (this figure is consistent with information given in the article). Estimate the percentage of all smokers who, when given this treatment, would refrain from smoking for at least 6 months.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Approximately 26.2% of all smokers, when administered with the treatment, would refrain from smoking for at least 6 months.

Step by step solution

01

Identifying the Essential Data

The key numbers are the total number of smokers, which is 935, and the number of those smokers who were still not smoking 6 months after treatment, which is 245.
02

Calculating the Ratio

The ratio of smokers that refrained from smoking to all smokers participating in the program gives us the proportion of successful treatments. This is calculated as \( \frac{245}{935} \).
03

Converting Ratio to Percentage

To convert the ratio to percentage, multiply the obtained ratio by 100. That gives \( \frac{245}{935} * 100 \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Proportion Calculation
Understanding how to calculate a proportion is fundamental in statistics, particularly when interpreting the success rate of studies. In basic terms, a proportion is a type of ratio that compares a part to a whole. When you want to express this ratio in percentage terms, you multiply by 100 to make it more intuitive.
The process is straightforward:
  • Identify the part of interest (e.g., smokers who quit).
  • Identify the whole set (e.g., all smokers in the study).
  • Form the ratio by dividing the part by the whole.
  • Convert the ratio to a percentage by multiplying by 100.
For example, the proportion of smokers who remained non-smokers after six months is calculated as follows: 245 smokers remained non-smokers, and there were 935 smokers in total. Therefore, the proportion is computed as \( \frac{245}{935} \). Multiplying by 100 gives us the percentage, which represents the effectiveness of the treatment as a success rate. Such calculations are crucial for making data-driven decisions in studies.
Nicotine Treatment Study
The nicotine treatment study referenced in the exercise aimed to discover the effectiveness of nicotine patches as a smoking cessation aid. A nicotine patch delivers nicotine to the body but at a steadier rate than smoking, helping ease withdrawal symptoms over time.
This particular study engaged a sample of 935 smokers. The gradual reduction in nicotine dosage over 12 weeks aimed to wean participants off nicotine in a controlled manner. After six months, 245 individuals were successful in not returning to smoking habits.
Using these figures, researchers can estimate how effective this method might be on a larger scale.
The significance of this kind of study lies in its potential public health impact. If a substantial proportion of smokers in the study successfully quit, it can justify further investment in similar methods across broader populations. Such studies help determine best practices and effective solutions for smoking cessation.
Data Analysis in Statistics
Data analysis is crucial in understanding and interpreting results from studies like the nicotine treatment study. Through data analysis, we can extract meaningful insights and patterns that can aid in decision-making based on evidence rather than conjecture.
In the nicotine study, data analysis begins with collecting relevant data points: how many smokers began and how many successfully quit after treatment.
  • This data forms the basis for calculating the proportion of success, which can be generalized to larger populations.
  • Statistical analyses can also involve hypothesis testing to determine if the outcomes are statistically significant, suggesting that they are not due to random chance.
  • Regression analysis or logistic regression, especially in studies with more than one variable, allows researchers to control for other factors that might influence the outcome.
Effective data analysis allows researchers to translate numerical figures into actionable insights. In the context of public health, such analysis can guide policy-making and recommend best practices for smoking cessation initiatives. It underscores the power of data to inform, educate, and transform society-wide health strategies.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

115 residents, 38 reported that they worked moonlighting jobs and 22 reported a credit card debt of more than \(\$ 3000\). Suppose that it is reasonable to consider this sample of 115 as a random sample of all medical residents in the United States. a. Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of U.S. medical residents who work moonlighting jobs. b. Construct and interpret a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of U.S. medical residents who have a credit card debt of more than \(\$ 3000\). c. Give two reasons why the confidence interval in Part (a) is wider than the confidence interval in Part (b).

The article "National Geographic, the Doomsday Machine," which appeared in the March 1976 issue of the Journal of Irreproducible Results (yes, there really is a journal by that name-it's a spoof of technical journals!) predicted dire consequences resulting from a nationwide buildup of National Geographic magazines. The author's predictions are based on the observation that the number of subscriptions for National Geographic is on the rise and that no one ever throws away a copy of National Geographic. A key to the analysis presented in the article is the weight of an issue of the magazine. Suppose that you were assigned the task of estimating the average weight of an issue of National Geographic. How many issues should you sample to estimate the average weight to within 0.1 oz with \(95 \%\) confidence? Assume that \(\sigma\) is known to be 1 oz.

The Chronicle of Higher Education (January 13 , 1993) reported that \(72.1 \%\) of those responding to a national survey of college freshmen were attending the college of their first choice. Suppose that \(n=500\) students responded to the survey (the actual sample size was much larger). a. Using the sample size \(n=500\), calculate a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of college students who are attending their first choice of college. b. Compute and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of students who are not attending their first choice of college. c. The actual sample size for this survey was much larger than 500 . Would a confidence interval based on the actual sample size have been narrower or wider than the one computed in Part (a)?

In a survey of 1000 randomly selected adults in the United States, participants were asked what their most favorite and what their least favorite subject was when they were in school (Associated Press, August 17,2005 ). In what might seem like a contradiction, math was chosen more often than any other subject in both categories! Math was chosen by 230 of the 1000 as the favorite subject, and it was also chosen by 370 of the 1000 as the least favorite subject. a. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of U.S. adults for whom math was the favorite subject in school. b. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of U.S. adults for whom math was the least favorite subject.

searchers in the field of nutrition. The article "Effects of Fast-Food Consumption on Energy Intake and Diet Quality Among Children" (Pediatrics [2004]: \(112-118\) ) reported that 1720 of those in a random sample of 6212 U.S. children indicated that on a typical day they ate fast food. Estimate \(\pi\), the proportion of children in the U.S. who eat fast food on a typical day.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.