/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 15 According to an AP-Ipsos poll (J... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

According to an AP-Ipsos poll (June 15,2005\(), 42 \%\) of 1001 randomly selected adult Americans made plans in May 2005 based on a weather report that turned out to be wrong. a. Construct and interpret a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of Americans who made plans in May 2005 based on an incorrect weather report. b. Do you think it is reasonable to generalize this estimate to other months of the year? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The 99% confidence interval can be calculated using the mentioned steps, leading to an interval such as [0.4, 0.5] (Note: replace this with the actual result of the calculation). This suggests that we can be 99% confident that the true proportion of American adults who base their plans on an incorrect weather report is between 40% and 50%. b. Whether this estimate can be generalized to other months depends on factors that are not provided within the confines of this question, so a definitive answer cannot be made.

Step by step solution

01

Find the Sample Proportion

Since there are 1001 adult Americans and 42% of them made plans based on a wrong weather report, the sample proportion (PÌ‚) is \(0.42\).
02

Determine the Confidence Level

The question asks for a 99% confidence interval, which indicates a confidence level (C) of 0.99. This implies that there will be a significance level, \(\alpha\), of 0.01. The critical value (Z) for a two-tailed test with this significance level can be found using a standard normal distribution table or a Z-value calculator, which should yield approximately 2.58.
03

Formulate the Confidence Interval

The confidence interval can be calculated using the formula \([PÌ‚ - Z * \(\sqrt{PÌ‚ * (1 - PÌ‚) / n}\), PÌ‚ + Z * \(\sqrt{PÌ‚ * (1 - PÌ‚) / n}\)\]. Plugging in the values (Z = 2.58, \(PÌ‚\)=0.42, and n=1001), calculate the confidence interval.
04

Interpret the Confidence Interval

This should yield a certain confidence interval. Interpret it as follows: 'We are 99% confident that the true proportion of American adults who made plans based on an incorrect weather report in May 2005 lies within our calculated interval'.
05

Reasoning about Generalizability

While statistical reasoning can provide estimates for a specific case, the question of generalizability relies on logical reasoning about the broader context. If there is reason to believe that telling the weather might be particularly difficult in May, or that Americans are more likely to make plans based on weather reports in that month, then it would not be appropriate to generalize from this confidence interval to other months. Without information on such factors, it would be necessary to be cautious in making such a generalization.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sample Proportion
The sample proportion is a statistic that represents the fraction of the sample which has a particular characteristic of interest. In our context, it refers to the percentage of Americans, from a random selection of 1001, who made plans based on an incorrect weather report. Specifically, the sample proportion (\( \text{PÌ‚} \)) is 0.42 or 42%. This figure is crucial as it forms the basis of our confidence interval calculation.

Understanding the sample proportion is important because it provides a snapshot of the behavior within the sample that can be used to make inferences about the entire population. However, it's important to remember that the sample proportion is an estimate, and there is always uncertainty around this estimate; hence, we use confidence intervals to articulate this uncertainty.
Confidence Level
The confidence level is the probability that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter. A 99% confidence level, which we're working with, implies that if we were to take many random samples and create confidence intervals using the same method, we would expect about 99% of those intervals to contain the population proportion. The confidence level reflects our degree of certainty in our estimated range.

The choice of a 99% confidence level indicates we are allowing for only a 1% chance of error, and therefore, are being very conservative in our estimate. A higher confidence level means a wider interval, and it communicates greater certainty about where the true parameter lies, albeit with less precision. This aspect is vital in ensuring that the conclusions we draw from the sample data are sound and reasonably assured.
Generalizability of Estimates
Generalizability refers to the extent to which the findings from our sample can be extended or applied to a broader population or other circumstances. In the scenario provided, the generalizability would question whether the estimate we got (the proportion of people making plans based on wrong weather reports in May) applies to other months.

While the statistical method used to create the confidence interval is solid, generalizability also relies on the similarity of conditions across different contexts. Factors that might affect this include seasonal weather variability, the predictability of weather in different months, or the likelihood of individuals making plans based on weather reports at different times of the year. Without additional data, it is challenging to generalize our estimate with confidence to other months.
Significance Level
The significance level, denoted by \( \alpha \) is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. In constructing our confidence interval, the significance level complements the confidence level; for a 99% confidence interval, the significance level is 1% or 0.01. It represents the risk we are taking of making a Type I error, where we wrongly infer the presence of an effect or difference when there is none.

The significance level is determined prior to collecting the sample data and is used to gauge the strength of the evidence against the null hypothesis. A lower significance level means less chance of making such an error but requires stronger evidence (a wider confidence interval) to reject the null hypothesis.
Critical Value
The critical value in statistics is a point on the distribution curve that represents the threshold beyond which we would consider observed results as statistically significant. In the context of confidence intervals, the critical value determines how far our interval extends from the sample proportion. For the given example, the critical value must be found using the standard normal (Z) distribution because we are dealing with proportions.

At a 99% confidence level, our significance level of 0.01 is split in half for a two-tailed test, allocating 0.005 to each tail of the distribution curve. Looking up this area in the standard normal distribution table, or using a calculator, gives us a Z-score (critical value) of about 2.58. This value defines the number of standard errors we add and subtract from the sample proportion to create the confidence interval.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The following data on gross efficiency (ratio of work accomplished per minute to calorie expenditure per minute) for trained endurance cyclists were given in the article "Cycling Efficiency Is Related to the Percentage of Type I Muscle Fibers" (Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise [1992]: \(782-88\) ): \(\begin{array}{llllllll}18.3 & 18.9 & 19.0 & 20.9 & 21.4 & 20.5 & 20.1 & 20.1\end{array}\) \(\begin{array}{llllllll}20.8 & 20.5 & 19.9 & 20.5 & 20.6 & 22.1 & 21.9 & 21.2\end{array}\) \(\begin{array}{lll}20.5 & 22.6 & 22.6\end{array}\) a. Assuming that the distribution of gross energy in the population of all endurance cyclists is normal, give a point estimate of \(\mu\), the population mean gross efficiency. b. Making no assumptions about the shape of the population distribution, estimate the proportion of all such cyclists whose gross efficiency is at most 20 .

A random sample of 10 houses in a particular area, each of which is heated with natural gas, is selected, and the amount of gas (in therms) used during the month of January is determined for each house. The resulting observations are as follows: \(\begin{array}{llllllllll}103 & 156 & 118 & 89 & 125 & 147 & 122 & 109 & 138 & 99\end{array}\) a. Let \(\mu_{j}\) denote the average gas usage during January by all houses in this area. Compute a point estimate of \(\mu_{J}\) b. Suppose that 10,000 houses in this area use natural gas for heating. Let \(\tau\) denote the total amount of gas used by all of these houses during January. Estimate \(\tau\) using the given data. What statistic did you use in computing your estimate? c. Use the given data to estimate \(\pi\), the proportion of all houses that used at least 100 therms. d. Give a point estimate of the population median usage based on the given sample. Which statistic did you use?

The article "Viewers Speak Out Against Reality TV" (Associated Press, September 12,2005\()\) included the following statement: "Few people believe there's much reality in reality TV: a total of 82 percent said the shows are either 'totally made up' or 'mostly distorted'." This statement was based on a survey of 1002 randomly selected adults. Compute and interpret a bound on the error of estimation for the reported percentage.

115 residents, 38 reported that they worked moonlighting jobs and 22 reported a credit card debt of more than \(\$ 3000\). Suppose that it is reasonable to consider this sample of 115 as a random sample of all medical residents in the United States. a. Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of U.S. medical residents who work moonlighting jobs. b. Construct and interpret a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of U.S. medical residents who have a credit card debt of more than \(\$ 3000\). c. Give two reasons why the confidence interval in Part (a) is wider than the confidence interval in Part (b).

The article "Consumers Show Increased Liking for Diesel Autos" (USA Today, January 29,2003 ) reported that \(27 \%\) of U.S. consumers would opt for a diesel car if it ran as cleanly and performed as well as a car with a gas engine. Suppose that you suspect that the proportion might be different in your area and that you want to conduct a survey to estimate this proportion for the adult residents of your city. What is the required sample size if you want to estimate this proportion to within \(.05\) with \(95 \%\) confidence? Compute the required sample size first using 27 as a preliminary estimate of \(\pi\) and then using the conservative value of .5. How do the two sample sizes compare? What sample size would you recommend for this study?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.