/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 22 In the article "Reproductive Bio... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In the article "Reproductive Biology of the Aquatic Salamander Amphiuma tridactylum in Louisiana" (Journal of Herpetology [1999]: \(100-105\) ), 14 female salamanders were studied. Using regression, the researchers predicted \(y=\) clutch size (number of salamander eggs) from \(x=\) snout-vent length (in centimeters) as follows: $$ \hat{y}=-147+6.175 x $$ For the salamanders in the study, the range of snout-vent lengths was approximately 30 to \(70 \mathrm{~cm}\). a. What is the value of the \(y\) intercept of the least-squares line? What is the value of the slope of the least-squares line? Interpret the slope in the context of this problem. b. Would you be reluctant to predict the clutch size when snout-vent length is \(22 \mathrm{~cm}\) ? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The y-intercept is -147 and the slope is 6.175. The slope suggests that for each 1 cm increase in snout-vent length, the number of salamander eggs increases by 6.175 on average. While, the y-intercept can be interpreted as the expected clutch size when the snout-vent length equals 0, in this case it's not applicable. For the prediction at 22 cm, because it is outside the data range (30 to 70 cm), it is not reliable.

Step by step solution

01

Identify y-intercept and slope

The y-intercept is the value of \(\hat{y}\) when \(x=0\). This is the constant term in the given equation and it’s -147. The slope of the least-squares line is the multiplier of the \(x\)-value. Given, \(\hat{y} = -147 + 6.175x\), the slope is 6.175.
02

Interpret the slope

The slope of the line is the predicted increase in the dependent variable (\(y\) = clutch size) for each unit increase in the independent variable (\(x\) = snout-vent length). For each 1 cm increase in snout-vent length, the number of salamander eggs increases by 6.175, on average.
03

Evaluate prediction

The regression equation was obtained from data points with a range from approximately 30 cm to 70 cm. The prediction at \(x = 22 \, cm\) is outside of this interval. This is extrapolation, extending the line beyond the given range of the data. Extrapolation may not be reliable because the relationship between \(x\)- and \(y\)-values may change outside the given data range. It is advised to be cautious when using the model outside of the data range.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding the Y-Intercept in Regression Analysis
The y-intercept in a regression analysis is a key element which indicates the point where the least-squares line crosses the y-axis. This occurs when the independent variable, represented by x, is zero. In essence, it represents the expected outcome of the dependent variable if the independent variable were to have a value of zero.

In the context of our salamander study, the y-intercept is -147. This might seem puzzling in practical terms because it suggests a negative number of salamander eggs at a snout-vent length of zero. Nonetheless, this value is part of the linear model based on the data provided and is useful in the construction of the least-squares line. Interpretation of the y-intercept should always be done with context in mind, and sometimes, as in this case, the y-intercept may not have a sensible interpretation.
Interpreting the Slope of the Regression Line
In regression analysis, the slope carries crucial information about the relationship between the two variables involved. It signifies the average rate of change in the dependent variable for each unit change in the independent variable.

For the salamanders' case, our slope of 6.175 means that on average, the clutch size increases by 6.175 eggs for each 1 cm increase in the snout-vent length of the salamanders. This enables researchers to understand how characteristics of the salamanders are related to their reproductive output, which can be valuable information for ecological and conservation studies.
Least-Squares Line: Crafting the Best-Fit Line
The least-squares line, also known as the line of best fit, is the backbone of linear regression analysis. It is mathematically determined to minimize the sum of the squares of the vertical distances (residuals) of the points from the line. This method ensures that the overall deviations of the data points from the line are as small as possible, making the line a well-suited representation of the dataset.

Regarding our research on Amphiuma tridactylum, the least-squares line equation: \(\bar{y} = -147 + 6.175x\) encapsulates the overall trend in the relationship between body size and clutch size of the female salamanders. This line serves as a predictive tool for the researchers to estimate clutch size when provided with the snout-vent length of a salamander within a certain range.
Extrapolation: Predicting Beyond the Observed Data
Extrapolation is a predictive technique where the regression line is used to make predictions for values of the independent variable that fall outside the range of the observed data. While it can offer insights, it often accompanies increased uncertainty as it assumes the established relationship between variables remains consistent beyond the studied range.

In the salamander study, using the regression model to predict clutch size for a snout-vent length of 22 cm is extrapolation, as the measured data range from 30 to 70 cm. This could lead to unreliable predictions because the relationship between snout-vent length and clutch size might not hold outside the observed range. Therefore, biologists and statisticians exercise caution and often refrain from making definitive statements based on extrapolated data.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Peak heart rate (beats per minute) was determined both during a shuttle run and during a 300 -yard run for a sample of \(n=10\) individuals with Down syndrome ("Heart Rate Responses to Two Field Exercise Tests by Adolescents and Young Adults with Down Syndrome," Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly [1995]: 43-51), resulting in the following data: $$ \begin{array}{llllllll} \text { Shuttle } & 168 & 168 & 188 & 172 & 184 & 176 & 192 \\ \text { 300-yd } & 184 & 192 & 200 & 192 & 188 & 180 & 182 \\ \text { Shuttle } & 172 & 188 & 180 & & & & \\ \text { 300-yd } & 188 & 196 & 196 & & & & \end{array} $$ a. Construct a scatterplot of the data. What does the scatterplot suggest about the nature of the relationship between the two variables? b. With \(x=\) shuttle run peak rate and \(y=300\) -yd run peak rate, calculate \(r\). Is the value of \(r\) consistent with your answer in Part (a)? c. With \(x=300\) -yd peak rate and \(y=\) shuttle run peak rate, how does the value of \(r\) compare to what you calculated in Part (b)?

As part of a study of the effects of timber management strategies (Ecological Applications [2003]: \(1110-1123\) ) investigators used satellite imagery to study abundance of the lichen Lobaria oregano at different elevations. Abundance of a species was classified as "common" if there were more than 10 individuals in a plot of land. In the table below, approximate proportions of plots in which Lobaria oregano were common are given. $$ \begin{array}{llllllll} \hline \text { Elevation }(\mathrm{m}) & 400 & 600 & 800 & 1000 & 1200 & 1400 & 1600 \\ \hline \text { Prop. of plots } \\ \text { with Lichen } & & & & & & & \\ (>10 / \text { plot }) & 0.99 & 0.96 & 0.75 & 0.29 & 0.077 & 0.035 & 0.01 \\ & & & & & & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. As elevation increases, does Lobaria oregano become more common or less common? What aspect(s) of the table support your answer? b. Using the techniques introduced in this section, calculate \(y^{\prime}=\ln \left(\frac{p}{1-p}\right)\) for each of the elevations and fit the line \(y^{\prime}=a+b(\) Elevation \() .\) What is the equation of the best-fit line? c. Using the best-fit line from Part (b), estimate the proportion of plots of land on which Lobaria oregano are classified as "common" at an elevation of \(900 \mathrm{~m}\).

An article on the cost of housing in California that appeared in the San Luis Obispo Tribune (March 30, 2001) included the following statement: "In Northern California, people from the San Francisco Bay area pushed into the Central Valley, benefiting from home prices that dropped on average $$\$ 4000$$ for every mile traveled east of the Bay area." If this statement is correct, what is the slope of the least-squares regression line, \(\hat{y}=a+b x\), where \(y=\) house price (in dollars) and \(x=\) distance east of the Bay (in miles)? Explain.

Explain why the slope \(b\) of the least-squares line always has the same sign (positive or negative) as does the sample correlation coefficient \(r\).

The article "That's Rich: More You Drink, More You Earn" (Calgary Herald, April 16,2002 ) reported that there was a positive correlation between alcohol consumption and income. Is it reasonable to conclude that increasing alcohol consumption will increase income? Give at least two reasons or examples to support your answer.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.