/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 4 The article "That's Rich: More Y... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The article "That's Rich: More You Drink, More You Earn" (Calgary Herald, April 16,2002 ) reported that there was a positive correlation between alcohol consumption and income. Is it reasonable to conclude that increasing alcohol consumption will increase income? Give at least two reasons or examples to support your answer.

Short Answer

Expert verified
No, it's not reasonable to conclude that increasing alcohol consumption will increase income. This is a correlation and not causation. Reasons: 1) High income earners might be able to afford more or costly drinks which can lead to a positive correlation, but it's the income aiding the drinking. 2) There may be a third factor like education, affecting both income and alcohol consumption.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Correlation and Causation

Correlation refers to a statistical relationship between two variables, it does not imply causation. That is, if two things are correlated, it does not mean that one causes the other to occur. On the other hand, causation, or cause and effect, is when an observed event or action appears to have caused a second event or action.
02

Analyzing the Statement

According to the article, there is a positive correlation between alcohol consumption and income. This means as one increases, so does the other. However, this does not mean that drinking more alcohol will increase your income. Correlation can simply mean that the two variables move in the same direction together, but it doesn't necessarily mean that one causes the other to move.
03

Citing Counter Examples and Reasons

Examples and reasons supporting this interpretation would include: a) People who earn more might afford to buy more or expensive drinks, leading to a positive correlation, but it is the income facilitating the drinking and not vice versa. b) there may be a hidden variable that affects both, like education level where people with higher education tend to earn more and also consume alcohol more socially.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical Relationship
A statistical relationship is an observed connection between two or more variables. In contexts such as the report on alcohol consumption and income, a statistical relationship is presented as "correlation." This relationship suggests a pattern where two variables appear to be linked and tend to vary together. However, it's essential to understand that such a connection does not inherently indicate a cause-and-effect scenario.

When interpreting statistical relationships, it's crucial to distinguish between correlation and causation. While correlation indicates that a change in one variable is associated with a change in another, it does not suggest that one actually causes the change in the other. Many factors can contribute to a statistical relationship, including underlying trends or external influences. For example, two variables might appear related simply because they are both influenced by a third factor. It's essential when evaluating statistical information to consider these nuances, ensuring that conclusions are drawn carefully and accurately.
Positive Correlation
A positive correlation occurs when two variables increase together. In the article "That's Rich: More You Drink, More You Earn," there is a reported positive correlation between alcohol consumption and income. This means as alcohol consumption increases, income also tends to rise.

Positive correlation, however, should not be confused with causation. Just because two variables move in tandem does not mean one causes the other to move. In the case of alcohol consumption and income, the relationship might be influenced by other factors. For instance:
  • Individuals with higher income may have more disposable income to spend on alcohol, thus observing a higher consumption without alcohol being the direct cause of increased income.
  • Cultural or societal norms might dictate behavior patterns that link income and alcohol consumption without one directly affecting the other.
Hence, recognizing a positive correlation helps identify patterns but demands careful analysis before making any causal claims.
Hidden Variables
Hidden variables may influence statistical relationships between other analyzed variables. In the case of the reported correlation between alcohol consumption and income, hidden variables play an integral role in understanding this relationship.

One potential hidden variable could be education level. Generally, people with higher education levels tend to earn more. Additionally, they might participate more in social events where alcohol is consumed, which could increase their alcohol consumption. Thus, the observed correlation might be due to the influence of a third variable, like education, rather than a direct cause-and-effect relationship.

The presence of hidden variables emphasizes the necessity for comprehensive analysis. Researchers must consider all possible influencing factors when interpreting correlations to avoid incorrect conclusions. By acknowledging hidden variables, one can achieve a clearer, more accurate understanding of the dynamics at play.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Some straightforward but slightly tedious algebra shows that $$ \text { SSResid }=\left(1-r^{2}\right) \sum(y-\bar{y})^{2} $$ from which it follows that $$ s_{e}=\sqrt{\frac{n-1}{n-2}} \sqrt{1-r^{2}} s_{y} $$ Unless \(n\) is quite small, \((n-1) /(n-2) \approx 1\), so $$ s_{e} \approx \sqrt{1-r^{2}} s_{y} $$ a. For what value of \(r\) is \(s\), as large as \(s_{y} ?\) What is the least- squares line in this case? b. For what values of r will se be much smaller than \(s_{y} ?\) c. A study by the Berkeley Institute of Human Development (see the book Statistics by Freedman et al., listed in the back of the book) reported the following summary data for a sample of n 5 66 California boys: \(r \approx .80\) At age 6 , average height \(\approx 46\) in., standard deviation \(\approx\) \(1.7\) in. At age 18 , average height \(\approx 70\) in., standard deviation \(\approx\) \(2.5\) in. What would \(s_{e}\) be for the least-squares line used to predict 18-year-old height from 6-year-old height? d. Referring to Part (c), suppose that you wanted to predict the past value of 6 -year-old height from knowledge of 18 -year-old height. Find the equation for the appropriate least-squares line. What is the corresponding value of \(s_{e} ?\)

The article "The Epiphytic Lichen Hypogymnia physodes as a Bioindicator of Atmospheric Nitrogen and Sulphur Deposition in Norway" (Environmental Monitoring and Assessment \([1993]: 27-47\) ) gives the following data (read from a graph in the paper) on \(x=\mathrm{NO}_{3}\) wet deposition (in grams per cubic meter) and \(y=\) lichen (\% dry weight): $$ \begin{array}{llllll} x & 0.05 & 0.10 & 0.11 & 0.12 & 0.31 \\ y & 0.48 & 0.55 & 0.48 & 0.50 & 0.58 \\ x & 0.37 & 0.42 & 0.58 & 0.68 & 0.68 \\ y & 0.52 & 1.02 & 0.86 & 0.86 & 1.00 \\ x & 0.73 & 0.85 & 0.92 & & \\ y & 0.88 & 1.04 & 1.70 & & \end{array} $$ a. What is the equation of the least-squares regression line? b. Predict lichen dry weight percentage for an \(\mathrm{NO}_{3}\) deposition of \(0.5 \mathrm{~g} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\).

The data given in Example \(5.5\) on \(x=\) call-to-shock time (in minutes) and \(y=\) survival rate (percent) were used to compute the equation of the least- squares line, which was $$ \hat{y}=101.36-9.30 x $$ The newspaper article "FDA OKs Use of Home Defibrillators" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, November 13,2002 ) reported that "every minute spent waiting for paramedics to arrive with a defibrillator lowers the chance of survival by 10 percent." Is this statement consistent with the given least-squares line? Explain.

The paper "Effects of Canine Parvovirus (CPV) on Gray Wolves in Minnesota" (Journal of Wildlife Management \([1995]: 565-570\) ) summarized a regression of \(y=\) percentage of pups in a capture on \(x=\) percentage of \(\mathrm{CPV}\) prevalence among adults and pups. The equation of the least-squares line, based on \(n=10\) observations, was \(\hat{y}=62.9476-0.54975 x\), with \(r^{2}=.57\) a. One observation was \((25,70)\). What is the corresponding residual? b. What is the value of the sample correlation coefficient? c. Suppose that SSTo \(=2520.0\) (this value was not given in the paper). What is the value of \(s_{e} ?\)

Is the following statement correct? Explain why or why not. A correlation coefficient of 0 implies that no relationship exists between the two variables under study.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.