/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 46 "Doctors Praise Device That Aids... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

"Doctors Praise Device That Aids Ailing Hearts" (Associated Press, November 9,2004 ) is the headline of an article that describes the results of a study of the effectiveness of a fabric device that acts like a support stocking for a weak or damaged heart. In the study, 107 people who consented to treatment were assigned at random to either a standard treatment consisting of drugs or the experimental treatment that consisted of drugs plus surgery to install the stocking. After two years, \(38 \%\) of the 57 patients receiving the stocking had improved and \(27 \%\) of the patients receiving the standard treatment had improved. Do these data provide convincing evidence that the proportion of patients who improve is higher for the experimental treatment than for the standard treatment? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(.05\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The results from the hypothesis test need to be interpreted. If the p-value is less than 0.05, there is sufficient evidence to claim that the use of a heart stocking brings about better results. If not, there is no proof to claim that the use of a heart stocking brings about significantly better results.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the hypothesis and sample data

The null hypothesis \(H_0\) states that there's no difference in the proportions of patients who improve with experimental treatment and those who improve after the standard treatment. That is \(p_{1} - p_{2} = 0\). The alternate hypothesis \(H_1\) states that the proportion of patients who improve after the experimental treatment is higher than those improving after standard treatment i.e., \(p_{1} - p_{2} > 0\). Sample data extracted are: number of patients who improved with experimental treatment (n1) = 0.38 * 57 = 21.66, total number of patients who had experimental treatment (x1) = 57, number of patients who improved with standard treatment (n2) = 0.27 * 50 = 13.5, total patients who had standard treatment (x2) = 50.
02

Calculate Pooled Proportion and Standard Error

First compute the pooled sample proportion. That is \((n_1 + n_2) / (x_1 + x_2)\), which acts as an estimate of the population proportion. Standard error (SE) is computed as \(\sqrt{ p(1 - p) [ (1/x_1) + (1/x_2)] }\) where p is the pooled sample proportion.
03

Compute Test Statistic

After calculating SE, the next step is to compute the test statistic which is a z-score: it equals \((p_{1} - p_{2}) - 0 / SE\). In hypothesis testing, the denominator is always the standard error.
04

Find P-value

The p-value compares the z-score with a Normal distribution. If p-value is smaller than the significance level (alpha = 0.05), reject the null hypothesis.
05

Conclusion

Based on the calculated p-value and the significance level, state the conclusion. If the p-value is less than 0.05, it can be concluded that there is convincing evidence that the experimental treatment leads to a higher improvement in patients compared to the standard one. Otherwise, there's no significant evidence to suggest the experimental treatment is better.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a determination made during hypothesis testing that provides us with a measure to decide whether to reject or not reject a null hypothesis. It involves a threshold called the significance level, often denoted by \( \alpha \), which is predefined by the researcher. The commonly used significance level is \( 0.05 \), meaning that there is only a 5% probability that the observed results would occur if the null hypothesis were true. Simplifying this, it's like saying there's a 95% confidence the results are not just by random chance.
P-value
The p-value is a vital concept in hypothesis testing. It quantifies the probability of obtaining results at least as extreme as the observed ones, given that the null hypothesis is true. A lower p-value indicates that the observed data is less likely to occur under the null hypothesis, while a higher p-value suggests the opposite. If the p-value is less than or equal to the significance level \( \alpha \), we reject the null hypothesis, which implies that our findings may be \'statistically significant\'.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis, \( H_0 \), plays a core role in hypothesis testing as it represents a general statement or default position that there is no difference or effect. In the context of the provided exercise, the null hypothesis claims that there is no difference in the proportion of patients who improve between the experimental treatment and the standard treatment. It serves as the baseline for testing and is presumed true until evidence suggests otherwise.
Alternative Hypothesis
Contrasting the null hypothesis is the alternative hypothesis, labeled \( H_1 \). It represents what the researcher seeks to prove or is prepared to believe once there is sufficient evidence against the null hypothesis. In our example, the alternative hypothesis posits that the proportion of patients who improve is actually higher for the experimental treatment than for the standard treatment. It is a claim made when the null hypothesis fails to stand under scrutiny from our data.
Pooled Sample Proportion
The pooled sample proportion is a technique used when testing hypotheses about two population proportions. It creates a single, combined proportion by pooling the successes and total observations from both samples. The rationale behind this concept is to obtain a common estimate of the proportion that reflects both samples, which is then used to find the standard error and, subsequently, the test statistic. The formula that was used in the exercise is an example of how to calculate this combined measure.
Test Statistic
The test statistic is a value calculated from sample data during hypothesis testing which, when compared to a probability distribution, tells us how extreme the observed results are. The type of test statistic used depends on the distribution of the test. For proportions, a z-score is usually calculated, built upon the difference between sample proportion and null hypothesis value, divided by the standard error of the sampling distribution. If the test statistic lies in the extreme end of the distribution, it provides evidence against the null hypothesis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An Associated Press article (San Luis Obispo Telegram-Tribune, September 23,1995 ) examined the changing attitudes of Catholic priests. National surveys of priests aged 26 to 35 were conducted in 1985 and again in 1993\. The priests surveyed were asked whether they agreed with the following statement: Celibacy should be a matter of personal choice for priests. In \(1985,69 \%\) of those surveyed agreed; in \(1993,38 \%\) agreed. Suppose that the samples were randomly selected and that the sample sizes were both 200 . Is there evidence that the proportion of priests who agreed that celibacy should be a matter of personal choice declined from 1985 to 1993 ? Use \(\alpha=.05\).

Do girls think they don't need to take as many science classes as boys? The article "Intentions of Young Students to Enroll in Science Courses in the Future: An Examination of Gender Differences" (Science Education [1999]: \(55-76\) ) gives information from a survey of children in grades 4,5, and 6 . The 224 girls participating in the survey each indicated the number of science courses they intended to take in the future, and they also indicated the number of science courses they thought boys their age should take in the future. For each girl, the authors calculated the difference between the number of science classes she intends to take and the number she thinks boys should take. a. Explain why these data are paired. b. The mean of the differences was \(-.83\) (indicating girls intended, on average, to take fewer classes than they thought boys should take), and the standard deviation was 1.51. Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean difference.

The article "Portable MP3 Player Ownership Reaches New High" (Ipsos Insight, June 29,2006 ) reported that in \(2006,20 \%\) of those in a random sample of 1112 Americans age 12 and older indicated that they owned an MP3 player. In a similar survey conducted in 2005, only \(15 \%\) reported owning an MP3 player. Suppose that the 2005 figure was also based on a random sample of size \(1112 .\) Estimate the difference in the proportion of Americans age 12 and older who owned an MP3 player in 2006 and the corresponding proportion for 2005 using a 95\% confidence interval. Is zero included in the interval? What does this tell you about the change in this proportion from 2005 to \(2006 ?\)

The article "Foraging Behavior of the Indian False Vampire Bat" (Biotropica \([1991]: 63-67)\) reported that 36 of 193 female bats in flight spent more than \(5 \mathrm{~min}\) in the air before locating food. For male bats, 64 of 168 spent more than \(5 \mathrm{~min}\) in the air. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of flights longer than \(5 \mathrm{~min}\) in length differs for males and females? Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=.01\).

The coloration of male guppies may affect the mating preference of the female guppy. To test this hypothesis, scientists first identified two types of guppies, Yarra and Paria, that display different colorations ("Evolutionary Mismatch of Mating Preferences and Male Colour Patterns in Guppies," Animal Behaviour \([1997]: 343-51\) ). The relative area of orange was calculated for fish of each type. A random sample of 30 Yarra guppies resulted in a mean relative area of \(.106\) and a standard deviation of .055. A random sample of 30 Paria guppies resulted in a mean relative area of \(.178\) and a standard deviation \(.058\). Is there evidence of a difference in coloration? Test the relevant hypotheses to determine whether the mean area of orange is different for the two types of guppies.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.