/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 47 The article "Portable MP3 Player... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The article "Portable MP3 Player Ownership Reaches New High" (Ipsos Insight, June 29,2006 ) reported that in \(2006,20 \%\) of those in a random sample of 1112 Americans age 12 and older indicated that they owned an MP3 player. In a similar survey conducted in 2005, only \(15 \%\) reported owning an MP3 player. Suppose that the 2005 figure was also based on a random sample of size \(1112 .\) Estimate the difference in the proportion of Americans age 12 and older who owned an MP3 player in 2006 and the corresponding proportion for 2005 using a 95\% confidence interval. Is zero included in the interval? What does this tell you about the change in this proportion from 2005 to \(2006 ?\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The short answer will depend on the exact numerical calculations from the steps above. It will state the estimated 95% confidence interval for the difference in proportions and whether the change between 2005 and 2006 was statistically significant or not.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Proportion for each year

The proportion of Americans who owned MP3 players in 2006 is \(0.20\) (from \(20\% \)) and in 2005 it was \(0.15\) (from \(15\%\)). Let's denote these as \(P_{2006}\) and \(P_{2005}\)
02

Calculate Standard Errors

The standard error for each proportion is given by the formula: \(\sqrt{P(1 - P) / n} \) where \(P\) is the proportion and \(n\) is the number of observations. So, the standard error for the 2006 proportion (let's call it \(SE_{2006}\)) is \(\sqrt{0.20 * (1 - 0.20) / 1112} \) and for 2005 proportion (\(SE_{2005}\)): \(\sqrt{0.15 * (1 - 0.15) / 1112} \)
03

Calculate Difference and Standard Error

The difference in proportions (\(d\)) is \(P_{2006} - P_{2005} = 0.20 - 0.15 = 0.05\) . And, the standard error for the difference (\(SE_{d}\)) is given by formula: \(\sqrt{(SE_{2006})^2 + (SE_{2005})^2}\).
04

Compute 95% Confidence Interval

A 95% confidence interval for the difference is given by \(d ± 1.96 * SE_{d}\). Calculate this interval using the values obtained in the previous step.
05

Interpret the Result

Check whether zero is included in the interval. If it is, this tells us that the change in the proportion of people owning MP3 players is not statistically significant at the 5% level. If zero is not included in the interval, it means the change is significant.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Proportions
In statistics, a **proportion** is a simple and useful way to express how often a particular event occurs compared to the total possible outcomes. Take this for example: when we say the proportion of Americans owning MP3 players in 2006 was 0.20, we mean 20% of the surveyed individuals said they own an MP3 player. In the survey, this percentage is obtained by dividing the number of people who own an MP3 player by the total number of people surveyed.

Proportions are crucial because they help researchers and statisticians compare different groups and spot trends over time. In the calculation of confidence intervals, it helps in estimating the likelihood of certain outcomes in a population based on sample data. It's vital to remember that the precision of any proportion largely depends on the sample size from which it was derived. A larger sample size typically gives a more precise estimate of the true population proportion.
Standard Error
The **standard error (SE)** measures the variability or uncertainty of a sample proportion compared to the true proportion of the population. It's essential for constructing confidence intervals and determining statistical significance.

To calculate the SE for a proportion, we use the formula: \[SE = \sqrt{ \frac{P(1 - P)}{n} }\] where \( P \) is the sample proportion, and \( n \) is the sample size. This equation reflects that the SE decreases with a larger sample, giving more reliable results.

In the MP3 player example, the SE helps us know how much our sample proportion might differ from the true proportion in the population. By calculating the SE for both years, 2005 and 2006, the analysis becomes easier and more accurate, ensuring the results are trustworthy when making conclusions based on the data collected.
Statistical Significance
**Statistical significance** is a mathematical tool used to decide whether an observed effect in a sample is likely to reflect an actual effect in the population or is just due to random variation or chance. In confidence interval analysis, statistical significance can be observed by examining whether a particular value, most commonly zero, falls inside the interval.

For the MP3 ownership example, when we compute a confidence interval for the difference between two proportions, we're interested in whether zero lies within this interval. If zero is not included, it implies there's a significant difference between the two proportions. This means the observed changes from 2005 to 2006 are unlikely due to chance alone.

Conversely, if zero is included, it suggests that the difference might not be significant, implying potential random fluctuations. Understanding and identifying statistical significance helps you make informed decisions about the reliability and relevance of your findings.
Sample Size
A **sample size** represents how many subjects were included in a study or a portion of the larger population being analyzed. In our example, a sample size of 1112 Americans was measured both years. A larger sample size generally leads to more accurate results and a better reflection of the true population, as it minimizes random error and increases reliability.

When calculating confidence intervals, the sample size is a key component because it affects why the standard error decreases as more data is gathered. This results in more precise interval estimates, providing greater assurance about the change in MP3 player ownership across the years.
  • Smaller sample sizes can lead to less reliable estimates and larger confidence intervals
  • Larger sample sizes typically result in smaller confidence intervals, indicating more reliable data
Hence, choosing an appropriate sample size is vital for achieving trustworthy and statistically significant results.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Religion and Well-Being Among Canadian University Students: The Role of Faith Groups on Campus" (Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion [1994]: \(62-73\) ) compared the self-esteem of students who belonged to Christian clubs and students who did not belong to such groups. Each student in a random sample of \(n=169\) members of Christian groups (the affiliated group) completed a questionnaire designed to measure self-esteem. The same questionnaire was also completed by each student in a random sample of \(n=124\) students who did not belong to a religious club (the unaffiliated group). The mean self-esteem score for the affiliated group was \(25.08\), and the mean for the unaffiliated group was \(24.55 .\) The sample standard deviations weren't given in the article, but suppose that they were 10 for the affiliated group and 8 for the unaffiliated group. Is there evidence that the true mean self- esteem score differs for affiliated and unaffiliated students? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(.01\).

Breast feeding sometimes results in a temporary loss of bone mass as calcium is depleted in the mother's body to provide for milk production. The paper "Bone Mass Is Recovered from Lactation to Postweaning in Adolescent Mothers with Low Calcium Intakes" (American Journal of Clinical Nutrition [2004]: \(1322-1326\) ) gave the following data on total body bone mineral content \((\mathrm{g})\) for a sample of mothers both during breast feeding (B) and in the postweaning period (P). Do the data suggest that true average total body bone mineral content during postweaning exceeds that during breast feeding by more than \(25 \mathrm{~g}\) ? State and test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of \(.05\). \(\begin{array}{lllllll}\text { Subject } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 \\ \text { B } & 1928 & 2549 & 2825 & 1924 & 1628 & 2175 \\ \text { P } & 2126 & 2885 & 2895 & 1942 & 1750 & 2184 \\ \text { Subject } & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 & & \\ \text { B } & 2114 & 2621 & 1843 & 2541 & & \\ \text { P } & 2164 & 2626 & 2006 & 2627 & & \end{array}\)

Two proposed computer mouse designs were compared by recording wrist extension in degrees for 24 people who each used both mouse types ("Comparative Study of Two Computer Mouse Designs," Cornell Human Factors Laboratory Technical Report RP7992). The difference in wrist extension was computed by subtracting extension for mouse type \(\mathrm{B}\) from the wrist extension for mouse type A for each student. The mean difference was reported to be \(8.82\) degrees. Assume that it is reasonable to regard this sample of 24 people as representative of the population of computer users. a. Suppose that the standard deviation of the differences was 10 degrees. Is there convincing evidence that the mean wrist extension for mouse type \(\mathrm{A}\) is greater than for mouse type B? Use a .05 significance level. b. Suppose that the standard deviation of the differences was 25 degrees. Is there convincing evidence that the mean wrist extension for mouse type \(A\) is greater than for mouse type \(\mathrm{B}\) ? Use a \(.05\) significance level. c. Briefly explain why a different conclusion was reached in the hypothesis tests of Parts (a) and (b).

Many people who quit smoking complain of weight gain. The results of an investigation of the relationship between smoking cessation and weight gain are given in the article "Does Smoking Cessation Lead to Weight Gain?" (American Journal of Public Health [1983]: \(1303-1305\) ). Three hundred twenty-two subjects, selected at random from those who successfully participated in a program to quit smoking, were weighed at the beginning of the program and again 1 year later. The mean change in weight was \(5.15 \mathrm{lb}\), and the standard deviation of the weight changes was \(11.45 \mathrm{lb}\). Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the true mean change in weight is positive? Use \(\alpha=.05\).

The effect of loneliness among college students was examined in the article "The Importance of Perceived Duration: Loneliness and Its Relationship to Self-Esteem and Academic Performance" (Journal College Student Development \([1994]: 456-460\) ). Based on reported frequency and duration of loneliness, subjects were divided into two groups. The first group was the short-duration loneliness group, and the second was the long-duration loneliness group. A self-esteem inventory was administered to students in both groups. For the short-duration group, the reported mean self-esteem score was \(76.78\) and the standard deviation was \(17.80\). For the long-duration group, the mean and standard deviation were \(64.00\) and \(15.68\), respectively. Do the data support the researcher's claim that mean self-esteem is lower for students classified as having long-duration loneliness? Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=.01\). Be sure to state any assumptions that are necessary for your test to be valid.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.