/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 56 Women's role A recent GSS presen... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Women's role A recent GSS presented the statement, "Women should take care of running their homes and leave running the country up to men," and \(14.8 \%\) of the male respondents agreed. Of the female respondents, \(15.9 \%\) agreed. Of respondents having less than a high school education, \(39.0 \%\) agreed. Of respondents having at least a high school education, \(11.7 \%\) agreed. a. Report the difference between the proportion of males and the proportion of females who agree. b. Report the difference between the proportion at the low education level and the proportion at the high education level who agree. c. Which variable, gender or educational level, seems to have the stronger association with opinion? Explain your reasoning.

Short Answer

Expert verified
1.1% difference by gender. 27.3% difference by education. Educational level has a stronger association.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Difference in Proportions by Gender

First, identify the proportions of agreement by gender: for males it is 14.8% and for females it is 15.9%. To find the difference, subtract the proportion for males from the proportion for females: \[15.9\% - 14.8\% = 1.1\%\]
02

Calculate Difference in Proportions by Educational Level

Identify the proportions of agreement by educational level: for those with less than high school education it is 39.0% and for at least high school education it is 11.7%. To find the difference, subtract the high education proportion from the low education proportion: \[39.0\% - 11.7\% = 27.3\%\]
03

Analyze and Compare the Differences

Compare the differences calculated: the gender difference is 1.1% and the educational level difference is 27.3%. The difference associated with educational level is significantly larger than the gender difference, indicating a stronger association between educational level and opinion.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Gender Differences
When exploring statistical analysis involving social opinions, it's important to consider how gender differences can influence perspectives. In this context, we are examining how men and women differ in their agreement with a particular statement. In the study, it was reported that 14.8% of male respondents agreed with the statement "Women should take care of running their homes and leave running the country up to men," compared to 15.9% of female respondents.
This indicates that a slight higher percentage of females agreed compared to males. The difference in agreement between genders is calculated as a simple subtraction of these percentages:
  • Female agreement: 15.9%
  • Male agreement: 14.8%
The difference is egin{align*} ext{15.9 ext{%}} - ext{14.8 ext{%}} = ext{1.1 ext{%}} ext{. These figures suggest that gender differences, at least within this context, are relatively minor across the surveyed group.} ext{. Although this percentage might seem minor, gender differences play a crucial role in how societal norms and opinions are perceived and formed.} ext{Understanding these differences helps to highlight challenges in different societal structures and perceptions based on gender stereotypes.} ext{.}
Educational Level
Educational level is another key factor that can significantly influence personal opinions and societal views. In this investigation, a noticeable distinction was observed among individuals with varying levels of education regarding the statement at hand. Comparing respondents with educational levels below a high school diploma to those who have at least a high school diploma illustrates this.
  • Less than a high school education: 39.0% agreed
  • At least a high school education: 11.7% agreed
The calculation to determine this difference in agreement based on education is: egin{align*} ext{39.0 ext{%}} - ext{11.7 ext{%}} = ext{27.3 ext{%}} ext{. This difference illuminates the impact of education on opinions, suggesting that education might contribute to forming more progressive ideologies.} ext{. Individuals with higher education levels often have broader exposure to diverse viewpoints, encouraging more critical analysis of traditional roles.} ext{.}
Proportional Differences
Proportional differences in statistical analysis refer to the variation in the percentage of one group agreeing to a statement compared to another group. This is important as it helps to identify which differentiating factor (such as gender or educational level) contributes more significantly to differing opinions.
For this exercise, the proportional differences have been calculated for both gender and educational level. The difference by gender was found to be just 1.1%, while by educational level it was a much larger 27.3%. This comparison shows us that the proportional difference is markedly greater when segmented by educational level rather than by gender.
Analyzing these differences allows researchers to understand which factors might be more influential in shaping opinions, providing insights that can be used for educational campaigns, policy-making, and further sociological studies. It also helps to highlight where potential disparities might lie, urging the need for more targeted interventions to promote equality or understand community sentiments better.
Association Strength
Association strength in statistical contexts refers to how strongly two variables are related to each other. In the case of this exercise, we looked at how strongly age associations of either gender or educational level with agreement on the statement. When comparing the calculated differences:
  • The association strength with gender is 1.1%
  • The association strength with educational level is 27.3%
These findings clearly indicate that educational level has a much stronger association with the statement than gender does.
This significant difference in association strength suggests that factors related to education might play a more crucial role in shaping opinions on traditional gender roles than the gender of an individual. Understanding association strengths can be pivotal in designing interventions, where focusing on education could have a more profound impact on altering opinions and reducing stereotypes compared to focusing on gender-based approaches. ext{.}

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Risk of dying for teenagers \(\quad\) According to summarized data from 1999 to 2006 accessed from the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention, the annual probability that a male teenager at age 19 is likely to die is about 0.00135 and 0.00046 for females age 19 . (www.cdc.gov) a. Compare these rates using the difference of proportions, and interpret. b. Compare these rates using the relative risk, and interpret. c. Which of the two measures seems more useful when both proportions are very close to 0 ? Explain.

Herbs and the common cold A recent randomized experiment of a multiherbal formula (Immumax) containing echinacea, garlic, ginseng, zinc, and vitamin C was found to improve cold symptoms in adults over a placebo group. "At the end of the study, eight ( \(39 \%\) ) of the placebo recipients and \(18(60 \%)\) of the Immumax recipients reported that the study medication had helped improve their cold symptoms (chi-squared P-value \(=0.01\) )." (M. Yakoot et al., International Joumal of General Medicine, vol. 4,2011 , pp. \(45-51\) ). a. Identify the response variable and the explanatory variable and their categories for the \(2 \times 2\) contingency table that provided this particular analysis.

Colon cancer and race The State Center for Health Statistics for the North Carolina Division of Public Health released a report in 2010 that indicates that there are racial disparities in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality rates. The report states, "African Americans are less likely to receive appropriate screenings that reduce the risk of developing or dying from colorectal cancer." During \(2002-2006,\) the rate of incidence for African Americans was 57.3 per 100,000 versus 46.5 per 100,000 for white residents (www.schs.state.nc.us). African Americans were \(19 \%\) more likely to have been diagnosed with colon cancer. Explain how to get this estimate.

In the GSS, subjects who were married were asked about the happiness of their marriage, the variable coded as HAPMAR. a. Go to the GSS website sda.berkeley.edu/GSS/, click GSS with no weight as the default, and construct a contingency table for 2012 relating family income (measured as in Table 11.1 ) to marital happiness: Enter FINRELA(r:4;3;2) as the row variable (where \(4=\) "above average," \(3=\) "average, \("\) and \(2=\) "below average") and HAPMAR(r:3;2;1) as the column variable \((3=\) not \(t o 0,2=\) pretty \(,\) and \(1=\) very happy \()\) As the selection filter, enter YEAR(2012). Under Output Options, put a check in the row box (instead of in the column box) for the Percentaging option and put a check in the Summary Statistics box further below. Click on Run the Table. b. Construct a table or graph that shows the conditional distributions of marital happiness, given family income. How would you describe the association? c. Compare the conditional distributions to those in Table \(11.2 .\) For a given family income, what tends to be higher, general happiness or marital happiness for those who are married? Explain.

Serious side effects In \(2007,\) the FDA announced that the popular drug Zelnorm used to treat irritable bowel syndrome was withdrawn from the market, citing concerns about serious side effects. The analysis of several studies revealed that 13 of 11,614 patients receiving the drug had a serious side effect such as heart attack or stroke, compared to just 1 out of 7,031 on placebo. a. Construct a \(2 \times 2\) contingency table from these data. b. Compute the relative risk and interpret. c. Compute the odds ratio and interpret. d. In a letter to health care professionals, the drug maker quoted a P-value of 0.024 for the comparison between the probability of a serious side effect in the drug and placebo group. By entering the data into the Fisher's Exact Test web app (or other software), show that this is the P-value for Fisher's exact test with a two-sided alternative hypothesis. What are the conclusions at a 0.05 significance level?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.