/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 31 Risk of dying for teenagers \(\q... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Risk of dying for teenagers \(\quad\) According to summarized data from 1999 to 2006 accessed from the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention, the annual probability that a male teenager at age 19 is likely to die is about 0.00135 and 0.00046 for females age 19 . (www.cdc.gov) a. Compare these rates using the difference of proportions, and interpret. b. Compare these rates using the relative risk, and interpret. c. Which of the two measures seems more useful when both proportions are very close to 0 ? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The difference of proportions is 0.00089, and the relative risk is 2.935. Relative risk is more useful here because it shows the multiplicative difference when probabilities are small.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Difference of Proportions

The difference of proportions is a simple subtraction of one rate from the other. It quantifies how much higher or lower one risk is compared to another. Let's denote the probability of death for male teenagers as \( p_m = 0.00135 \) and for female teenagers as \( p_f = 0.00046 \). The difference of proportions is calculated as \( p_m - p_f \).
02

Calculate the Difference of Proportions

To find the difference of proportions, subtract the female probability from the male probability:\[p_m - p_f = 0.00135 - 0.00046 = 0.00089\]This means the risk of death is 0.00089 higher for male teenagers compared to female teenagers.
03

Interpret the Difference of Proportions

The difference of 0.00089 indicates that male teenagers have a slightly higher risk of dying compared to female teenagers. This measure gives a direct sense of the additional absolute risk in terms of probabilities.
04

Understand the Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is the ratio of the probabilities, comparing the likelihood of an event occurring in two groups. It is calculated as the probability of death for male teenagers divided by the probability of death for female teenagers: \( RR = \frac{p_m}{p_f} \).
05

Calculate the Relative Risk

Using the probabilities given, compute the relative risk:\[RR = \frac{0.00135}{0.00046} = 2.935\]This result shows that male teenagers are approximately 2.935 times more likely to die compared to female teenagers.
06

Interpret the Relative Risk

The relative risk of 2.935 suggests that, relative to females, males at this age have nearly three times the risk of dying. This measure shows how much more likely one group is to experience the event compared to another group.
07

Determine the Most Useful Measure

When the absolute risks (proportions) are very close to zero, as in this case, relative risk may be more informative because it quantifies the strength of the association between gender and the risk of death. It highlights the multiplicative difference between the two probabilities.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Probability
Probability is a fundamental concept in statistics. It measures how likely an event is to occur. We express probability as a number between 0 and 1. A probability of 0 means an event will not happen, while a probability of 1 indicates certainty that the event will occur. In many real-world situations, such as calculating the likelihood of events like winning a lottery or predicting weather conditions, it is important to understand probability.

For the exercise at hand, the probabilities provided represent the risk of death for teenage males and females. A male teenager's probability of dying at age 19 is 0.00135, while for females it is 0.00046. When dealing with probabilities, it is helpful to think of them as relative frequencies over many similar trials. In this context, a probability of 0.00135 suggests that out of 1000 male teenagers, about 1 might die in a year, whereas out of 1000 female teenagers, fewer than half might experience the same fate.

Understanding probability allows us to subsequently explore other related concepts such as relative risk and difference of proportions, which provide more contextual interpretations of these numbers.
Relative Risk
Relative risk is a comparative measure used in statistics to understand the strength of an association between two groups regarding the occurrence of an event. In our case, the event is the risk of death, and the groups are male and female teenagers. Relative risk is calculated by taking the ratio of the probabilities for each group.

To find the relative risk of male teenagers dying compared to female teenagers, we divide the probability of death for males by that for females. Using the values from the exercise, \[RR = \frac{p_m}{p_f} = \frac{0.00135}{0.00046} = 2.935\]This calculation indicates that male teenagers have a 2.935 times higher risk of dying than females.

Relative risk is particularly useful when both probabilities or rates being compared are low. This is because it provides a multiplicative comparison, highlighting how many more times likely one event is compared to another, rather than just the absolute difference. Thus, in situations where probabilities are close to zero, this measure can be more insightful than just looking at the raw differences.
Difference of Proportions
The difference of proportions is an absolute measure that tells us the difference between two probabilities. This measure is helpful when you need to understand how much greater or lesser one probability is compared to another in absolute terms.

In the context of our exercise, the difference of proportions between the risk of death for male and female teenagers is calculated by subtracting the female probability from the male probability:\[p_m - p_f = 0.00135 - 0.00046 = 0.00089\] This indicates that the probability of a male teenager dying is 0.00089 higher than that of a female teenager.

The difference of proportions provides a direct sense of the additional risk that male teenagers face relative to females. However, when probabilities are small, the difference might not seem significant. Therefore, in such scenarios, especially when looking for the degree of association between groups, relative risk often provides deeper insight.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Explaining Fisher's exact test A pool of six candidates for three managerial positions includes three females and three males. Denote the three females by \(\mathrm{F} 1, \mathrm{~F} 2, \mathrm{~F} 3\) and the three males by \(\mathrm{M} 1, \mathrm{M} 2, \mathrm{M} 3 .\) The result of choosing three individuals for the managerial positions is (F2, M1, M3). a. Identify the 20 possible samples that could have been selected. Explain why the contingency table relating gender to whether chosen for the observed sample is \begin{tabular}{lcc} \hline & \multicolumn{2}{c} { Chosen For Position } \\ \cline { 2 - 3 } Gender & Yes & No \\ \hline Male & 2 & 1 \\ Female & 1 & 2 \\ \hline \end{tabular} b. For each of the 20 samples, find the corresponding contingency table as in part a. Show that of these 20 tables, 1 has a cell count of 0,9 have a cell count of 1 , another 9 have a cell count of \(2,\) and 1 has a cell count of 3 in the first cell. Hence, show that 10 of the 20 tables have a cell count in the first cell as large or larger than the observed table from part a. (Note that, if the managers were randomly selected, each of the 20 tables is equally likely to be observed. Then, the probability is \(10 / 20=0.5\) of observing a table that shows equal or even stronger evidence that males are selected more often, and 0.5 is the P-value for Fisher's exact test with \(\mathrm{H}_{a}: p_{1}>p_{2},\) where \(p_{1}\) is the proportion of males and \(p_{2}\) the proportion of females chosen for the position.)

Variability of chi-squared For the chi-squared distribution, the mean equals \(d\) f and the standard deviation equals \(\sqrt{2(d f)}\) a. Explain why, as a rough approximation, for a large \(d f\) value, \(95 \%\) of the chi-squared distribution falls within \(d f \pm 2 \sqrt{2(d f)}\) b. With \(d f=8,\) show that \(d f \pm 2 \sqrt{2(d f)}\) gives the interval (0,16) for approximately containing \(95 \%\) of the distribution. Using the chi- squared table, show that exactly \(95 \%\) of the distribution actually falls between 0 and 15.5 .

Keeping old dogs mentally sharp In an experiment with beagles ages \(7-11,\) the dogs attempted to learn how to find a treat under a certain black-colored block and then relearn that task with a white-colored block. The control group of dogs received standard care and diet. The diet and exercise group were given dog food fortified with vegetables and citrus pulp and vitamin \(E\) and C supplements plus extra exercise and social play. All 12 dogs in the diet and exercise group were able to solve the entire task, but only 2 of the 8 dogs in the control group could do so. (Background material from \(\mathrm{N}\). W. Milgram et al., Neurobiology of Aging, vol. \(26,2005,\) pp. \(77-90 .)\) a. Show how to summarize the results in a contingency table. b. Conduct all steps of Fisher's exact test of the hypothesis that whether a dog can solve the task is independent of the treatment group. Use the two- sided alternative hypothesis. Interpret. c. Why is it improper to conduct the chi-squared test for these data?

In an experiment on chlorophyll inheritance in corn, for 1,103 seedlings of self-fertilized heterozygous green plants, 854 seedlings were green and 249 were yellow. Theory predicts that \(75 \%\) of the seedlings would be green. a. Specify a null hypothesis for testing the theory. b. Find the value of the chi-squared goodness-of-fit statistic and report its \(d f\). c. Report the P-value and interpret.

Serious side effects In \(2007,\) the FDA announced that the popular drug Zelnorm used to treat irritable bowel syndrome was withdrawn from the market, citing concerns about serious side effects. The analysis of several studies revealed that 13 of 11,614 patients receiving the drug had a serious side effect such as heart attack or stroke, compared to just 1 out of 7,031 on placebo. a. Construct a \(2 \times 2\) contingency table from these data. b. Compute the relative risk and interpret. c. Compute the odds ratio and interpret. d. In a letter to health care professionals, the drug maker quoted a P-value of 0.024 for the comparison between the probability of a serious side effect in the drug and placebo group. By entering the data into the Fisher's Exact Test web app (or other software), show that this is the P-value for Fisher's exact test with a two-sided alternative hypothesis. What are the conclusions at a 0.05 significance level?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.