/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 50 Herbs and the common cold A rece... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Herbs and the common cold A recent randomized experiment of a multiherbal formula (Immumax) containing echinacea, garlic, ginseng, zinc, and vitamin C was found to improve cold symptoms in adults over a placebo group. "At the end of the study, eight ( \(39 \%\) ) of the placebo recipients and \(18(60 \%)\) of the Immumax recipients reported that the study medication had helped improve their cold symptoms (chi-squared P-value \(=0.01\) )." (M. Yakoot et al., International Joumal of General Medicine, vol. 4,2011 , pp. \(45-51\) ). a. Identify the response variable and the explanatory variable and their categories for the \(2 \times 2\) contingency table that provided this particular analysis.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Response variable: improvement in cold symptoms; Explanatory variable: type of treatment (placebo or Immumax).

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Problem

In this exercise, we need to identify the response variable and the explanatory variable used in the study that tested the effectiveness of the Immumax herbal formula in improving cold symptoms. This involves looking at how different variables are organized in the study and how they relate to each other.
02

Define the Response Variable

The response variable is the outcome of interest that the study aims to measure or explain. In this study, the response variable is whether or not the cold symptoms improved, as reported by the participants. The categories for this variable are 'improved' or 'not improved.'
03

Define the Explanatory Variable

The explanatory variable is the one that is manipulated or considered as the cause that affects the response variable. In this study, the explanatory variable is the type of treatment received. The categories for this variable are 'placebo' and 'Immumax (multiherbal formula).'
04

Organize Variables in a Contingency Table

To create a contingency table, we place the explanatory variable categories along one axis (columns) and the response variable categories along the other axis (rows). For this study, the table will have two columns (placebo and Immumax) and two rows (improved and not improved).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Response Variable
The response variable is a crucial element in any experiment or study, representing the primary outcome of interest. In our study about the effectiveness of the "Immumax" herbal formula, the response variable is chosen based on what the researchers aim to measure or explain. Here, it is clearly 'Improvement in Cold Symptoms', as the study seeks to determine whether participants experienced betterment in their cold symptoms after using either the Immumax herbal treatment or a placebo.
This variable is categorized into two distinct outcomes:
  • Improved: Participants who reported feeling better after consuming the treatment.
  • Not Improved: Participants who reported no improvement in symptoms.
The response variable captures the direct effect of the herbal formula compared to the placebo effect and is vital for deducing whether the treatment has a statistical significance in improving cold symptoms.
Explanatory Variable
An explanatory variable, sometimes called an independent variable, is what researchers think might cause an effect or explain changes in the response variable. In this study, the type of treatment given to participants acts as the explanatory variable.
Participants were assigned to one of two treatment types:
  • Placebo: A control group that did not receive the active herbal formula. This helps measure the baseline response without an actual treatment.
  • Immumax: The experimental group that received the multiherbal formula which is suspected to improve cold symptoms.
The explanatory variable is essential as it provides a basis for comparison and helps determine if any observed differences in the response variable can be attributed to the treatment itself rather than random chance. Understanding this variable aids in structuring the experiment to isolate the treatment's true effects.
Chi-Squared Test
The Chi-Squared Test is a statistical method used to examine if there is a significant association between two categorical variables in a contingency table. In this context, it helps test whether the improvement in cold symptoms (response variable) is related to the treatment type (explanatory variable).
Here’s a quick breakdown of how it works:
  • The test compares the observed frequencies (actual counts of participants who reported improvement) in each category to the expected frequencies if there were no association.
  • A Chi-Squared statistic is calculated, and a P-value is generated to determine statistical significance.
  • In our study, the P-value is reported as 0.01, indicating a statistically significant difference in symptom improvement between the placebo group and the Immumax group, implying the herbal formula's efficacy.
By understanding and using the Chi-Squared Test, researchers can make inferences about whether variations in data are due to the explanatory variable, ensuring the results are not just due to chance.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Down syndrome diagnostic test The table shown, from Example 8 in Chapter \(5,\) cross-tabulates whether a fetus has Down syndrome by whether the triple blood diagnostic test for Down syndrome is positive (that is, indicates that the fetus has Down syndrome). a. Tabulate the conditional distributions for the blood test result, given the true Down syndrome status. b. For the Down cases, what percentage was diagnosed as positive by the diagnostic test? For the unaffected cases, what percentage got a negative test result? Does the diagnostic test appear to be a good one? c. Construct the conditional distribution on Down syndrome status for those who have a positive test result. (Hint: You condition on the first column total and find proportions in that column.) Of those cases, what percentage truly have Down syndrome? Is the result surprising? Explain why this probability is small. \begin{tabular}{lrrr} \hline & \multicolumn{2}{c} { Blood Test Result } & \\ \cline { 2 - 3 } Down Syndrome Status & Positive & Negative & Total \\ \hline D (Down) & 48 & 6 & 54 \\ D \(^{c}\) (unaffected) & 1307 & 3921 & 5228 \\ Total & 1355 & 3927 & 5282 \\ \hline \end{tabular}

Pesticides The following table, on the presence of pesticide residues in samples of organic and conventional food, was analyzed in Examples 2 and 3 in Chapter 3 . \begin{tabular}{lrr} \hline & \multicolumn{2}{c} { Pesticides } \\ \cline { 2 - 3 } Food Type & Yes & \multicolumn{1}{c} { No } \\ \hline Organic & 29 & 98 \\ Conventional & 19485 & 7086 \\ \hline \end{tabular} a. Compute the relative risk and interpret. b. Find the reciprocal of your answer to part a and interpret. c. Compute the odds ratio and interpret. d. Find the reciprocal of your answer to part \(\mathrm{c}\) and interpret. e. What's wrong with this statement: The proportion of conventional food samples with pesticide residues present is more than 9 times larger than the proportion of organic food samples with pesticide residues present.

Another predictor of happiness? Go to sda.berkeley.edu/ GSS and find a variable that is associated with happiness, other than variables used in this chapter. Use methods from this chapter to describe and make inferences about the association, in a one-page report.

Gender gap in employment? In a town, 7600 out of 8500 graduates are males. Out of 1750 graduate employees, 1620 are males. a. For these data, \(X^{2}=23.24 .\) What is its \(d f\) value, and what is its approximate sampling distribution, if \(\mathrm{H}_{0}\) is true? b. For this test, the P-value \(<0.001\). Interpret in the context of these variables. c. What decision would you make with a 0.05 significance level? Can you accept \(\mathrm{H}_{0}\) and conclude that employment is independent of gender?

Babies and gray hair A young child wonders what causes women to have babies. For each woman who lives on her block, she observes whether her hair is gray and whether she has young children, with the results shown in the table that follows. a. Construct the \(2 \times 2\) contingency table that cross-tabulates gray hair (yes, no) with has young children (yes, no) for these nine women. b. Treating has young children as the response variable, obtain the conditional distributions for those women who have gray hair and for those who do not. Does there seem to be an association? c. Noticing this association, the child concludes that not having gray hair is what causes women to have children. Use this example to explain why association does not necessarily imply causation. \begin{tabular}{lcc} \hline Woman & Gray Hair & Young Children \\ \hline Andrea & No & Yes \\ Mary & Yes & No \\ Linda & No & Yes \\ Jane & No & Yes \\ Maureen & Yes & No \\ Judy & Yes & No \\ Margo & No & Yes \\ Carol & Yes & No \\ Donna & No & Yes \\ \hline \end{tabular}

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.