/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 29 Prison and gender \(\quad\) Acco... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 11: Problem 29

Prison and gender \(\quad\) According to the U.S. Department of Justice, in 2009 the incarceration rate in the nation's prisons was 949 per 100,000 male residents, and 67 per 100,000 female residents. a. Find the relative risk of being incarcerated, comparing males to females. Interpret. b. Find the difference of proportions of being incarcerated. Interpret. c. Which measure do you think is more appropriate for these data? Why?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Relative risk is approximately 14.16. The relative risk is more informative for highlighting the disparity.

Step by step solution

01

Find the Relative Risk

To find the relative risk (RR) of being incarcerated by comparing males to females, use the formula: \[ RR = \frac{\text{Incidence Rate in Males}}{\text{Incidence Rate in Females}} \]Given the incidence rate is 949 per 100,000 for males and 67 per 100,000 for females,\[ RR = \frac{949}{67} \approx 14.16 \]This means that males are about 14 times more likely to be incarcerated than females.
02

Find the Difference of Proportions

The difference in proportions between males and females can be calculated as:\[ \text{Difference} = \frac{949}{100,000} - \frac{67}{100,000} \]\[ \text{Difference} = 0.00949 - 0.00067 = 0.00882 \]This means the proportion difference in incarceration rates is 0.00882, or 0.882% more males are incarcerated compared to females.
03

Interpretation of Measures

The relative risk tells us how many times more likely one group is to experience an event compared to another group, while the difference of proportions gives the actual difference in event rates. The relative risk (14.16) indicates a large disparity between genders in incarceration rates, whereas the difference (0.00882) shows the magnitude of the difference as a proportion.
04

Determine the More Appropriate Measure

For these data, the relative risk may be more informative because it gives a sense of how much more likely the event is for one group, highlighting the disparity between different groups, which is useful in policy-making or understanding societal issues. The difference in proportions provides an actual magnitude difference but might appear less impactful in such a large population context.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Relative Risk
Relative risk is a helpful statistical measure when comparing the likelihood of an event occurring between two different groups. In the context of incarceration rates based on gender, it compares the probability of males being incarcerated versus females. To calculate it, we use the formula:
  • For males, the incarceration rate is 949 per 100,000 residents.
  • For females, it is 67 per 100,000 residents.
  • Relative risk (RR) is calculated as the ratio of these two rates: \(RR = \frac{949}{67} \approx 14.16\)
This indicates that males are about 14 times more likely to be incarcerated than females. This dramatic difference highlights the gender disparity in incarceration rates, underscoring critical social issues that may need addressing.
Difference of Proportions
The difference of proportions provides another way to understand how two groups differ regarding some characteristic, here focusing on incarceration rates. Unlike relative risk, which gives a ratio, the difference of proportions tells us the actual numeric difference between the groups:
  • Proportion of males incarcerated: \( \frac{949}{100,000} = 0.00949 \) or 0.949%.
  • Proportion of females incarcerated: \( \frac{67}{100,000} = 0.00067 \) or 0.067%.
  • Difference: \( 0.00949 - 0.00067 = 0.00882 \), or 0.882%.
This method shows that there are 0.882% more males than females being incarcerated. While this might seem small in percentage terms, because we're dealing with such large populations, even minor differences can be significant in terms of actual numbers. This simple measure allows us to see the raw difference between the two groups, providing tangible insights.
Incarceration Rates
Incarceration rates are critical statistics that reflect how often individuals from different demographic groups end up in prison. For any given population, the rate is usually presented per 100,000 individuals, making it easier to compare groups of vastly different sizes. In the U.S., these rates can uncover disparities in how different groups are subject to incarceration, often shedding light on systemic social issues.
  • For example, as we've seen, the staggering difference between male and female incarceration rates highlights gender-specific issues that may affect crime rates and judicial practices.
  • These statistics provoke important questions: Why are males incarcerated at such a higher rate than females?
  • Are societal expectations, systemic biases, or particular offenses leading to these differences?
These questions are crucial in facilitating conversations around reform and equitable treatment for all genders in the judicial system.
Gender Disparities in Statistics
Gender disparities in statistics denote differences between males and females regarding measured characteristics, like incarceration rates. These disparities can provide vital insights into social and biological differences, and how society treats different genders.
  • The male incarceration rate being vastly higher than the female rate could suggest deeper societal or behavioral norms and policies affecting genders differently.
  • Analyzing these disparities can point toward potential biases within the legal system or cultural factors that predispose one gender to higher incarceration rates.
  • Addressing gender disparities often involves looking into factors such as access to resources, societal roles, crime propensity, legal practices, and potential discrimination.
By carefully evaluating these statistics, researchers and policymakers can propose more equitable systems that promote justice and fairness across all gender lines.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Down syndrome diagnostic test The table shown, from Example 8 in Chapter \(5,\) cross-tabulates whether a fetus has Down syndrome by whether or not the triple blood diagnostic test for Down syndrome is positive (that is, indicates that the fetus has Down syndrome). a. Tabulate the conditional distributions for the blood test result, given the true Down syndrome status. b. For the Down cases, what percentage was diagnosed as positive by the diagnostic test? For the unaffected cases, what percentage got a negative test result? Does the diagnostic test appear to be a good one? c. Construct the conditional distribution on Down syndrome status, for those who have a positive test result. (Hint: You condition on the first column total and find proportions in that column.) Of those cases, what percentage truly have Down syndrome? Is the result surprising? Explain why this probability is small.

True or false: \(\boldsymbol{X}^{2}=\mathbf{0}\). The null hypothesis for the test of independence between two categorical variables is \(\mathrm{H}_{0}: X^{2}=0,\) for the sample chi-squared statistic \(X^{2}\). (Hint: Do hypotheses refer to a sample or the population?)

Education and religious beliefs \(\quad\) When data from a recent GSS were used to form a \(3 \times 3\) table that cross-tabulates highest degree \((1=\) less than high school, \(2=\) high school or junior college, \(3=\) bachelor or graduate) with religious beliefs \((\mathrm{F}=\) fundamentalist, \(\mathrm{M}=\) moderate \(, \mathrm{L}=\) liberal \(),\) the three largest standardized residuals were: 6.8 for the cell \((3, \mathrm{~F}), 6.3\) for the cell \((3, \mathrm{~L})\), and 4.5 for the cell \((1, \mathrm{~F})\) Summarize how to interpret these three standardized residuals.

Keeping old dogs mentally sharp In an experiment with beagles ages \(7-11\), the dogs attempted to learn how to find a treat under a certain black-colored block and then relearn that task with a white-colored block. The control group of dogs received standard care and diet. The diet and exercise group were given dog food fortified with vegetables and citrus pulp and vitamin \(\mathrm{E}\) and \(\mathrm{C}\) supplements plus extra exercise and social play. All 12 dogs in the diet and exercise group were able to solve the entire task, but only 2 of the 8 dogs in the control group could do so. (Background material from \(\mathrm{N}\). W. Milgram et al. Neurobiology of Aging, vol. \(26,2005,\) pp. \(77-90 .)\) a. Show how to summarize the results in a contingency table. b. Conduct all steps of Fisher's exact test of the hypothesis that whether a dog can solve the task is independent of the treatment group. Use the two- sided alternative hypothesis. Interpret. c. Why is it improper to conduct the chi-squared test for these data?

Stafistical versus practical significance In any significance test, when the sample size is very large, we have not necessarily established an important result when we obtain statistical significance. Explain what this means in the context of analyzing contingency tables with a chi-squared test.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Mechanics Maths

Read Explanation

Decision Maths

Read Explanation

Applied Mathematics

Read Explanation

Calculus

Read Explanation

Probability and Statistics

Read Explanation

Geometry

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.