/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 25 Happiness and highest degree The... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Happiness and highest degree The table shows 2008 GSS data on happiness and the highest degree attained. a. The chi-squared test of independence has \(X^{2}=64.41\). What conclusion would you make using a significance level of 0.05 ? Interpret. b. Does this large chi-squared value mean there is a strong association between happiness and highest degree? Explain. c. Estimate the difference between the lowest and highest education groups in the proportion who report being not too happy. Interpret. d. Find and interpret the relative risk of being not too happy, comparing the lowest and highest education groups. Interpret.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Happiness and education level are not independent. b. Chi-squared shows significance, not strength. c. Find the difference between the 'not too happy' proportions for lowest and highest education. d. Relative risk indicates how much more or less likely 'not too happy' is in lowest versus highest education.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Chi-Squared Test

A chi-squared test evaluates whether two categorical variables are independent. The null hypothesis ( H_0 ) states that the variables are independent, while the alternative hypothesis ( H_a ) believes they are not independent.
02

Analyze Chi-Squared Test Result

The chi-squared statistic is X^{2} = 64.41 . For a significance level of 0.05, find the critical value from the chi-squared distribution with appropriate degrees of freedom. If the test statistic exceeds the critical value, reject the null hypothesis.
03

Conclusion from Chi-Squared Test

Given X^{2} = 64.41 and typically large degrees of freedom (depending on education levels and happiness categories), this value would likely be quite high. Hence, the null hypothesis is rejected, suggesting happiness and education level are not independent at the 0.05 significance level.
04

Interpret Strength of the Association

A large chi-squared value indicates a significant result but doesn't measure the strength of association directly. To determine the strength, consider measures such as Cramér's V or compare observed proportions to expected values.
05

Estimation of Proportion Differences

Estimate the proportion of 'not too happy' individuals in the lowest and highest education categories. Subtract the proportion in the highest education category from the proportion in the lowest to find the difference.
06

Relative Risk Calculation

Relative risk compares the probability of a 'not too happy' response in the lowest versus highest education group. It's calculated as the proportion in the lowest education group divided by that in the highest group.
07

Interpretation of Relative Risk

If the relative risk is greater than 1, 'not too happy' is more likely among those with the lowest education compared to the highest. If less than 1, it's less likely.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Significance Level
In statistics, the significance level, often represented by the Greek letter \( \alpha \), is a threshold used to determine whether the results of a test are statistically significant. It represents the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true, known as a Type I error. Common significance levels are 0.05, 0.01, or 0.10.

When performing a chi-squared test of independence, a significance level of 0.05, for instance, suggests that there is a 5% risk of concluding that there is a relationship between the variables when there isn't one. In the problem context, with \( X^2 = 64.41 \), if this statistic exceeds the critical value at the 0.05 level, it indicates that we reject the null hypothesis. This means there is strong evidence to suggest that happiness and the highest degree attained are not independent variables.
  • Significance level helps control the likelihood of incorrect conclusions.
  • A lower significance level means stricter criteria for rejecting a hypothesis, reflecting greater confidence in a finding if it is significant.
Degrees of Freedom
Degrees of freedom (df) in a statistical test refer to the number of values or quantities that are free to vary after certain constraints are introduced. In a chi-squared test, degrees of freedom are crucial in determining the critical value from the chi-squared distribution table.

For a test of independence using a contingency table, the degrees of freedom are calculated as \( (r-1)(c-1) \), where \( r \) is the number of rows, and \( c \) is the number of columns in the table. In the context of the exercise, if the table has several happiness categories and education levels, this means our test might have many degrees of freedom.
  • Understanding degrees of freedom allows you to interpret the test's results correctly.
  • More degrees of freedom generally indicate a more complex data structure.
Strength of Association
While a chi-squared test can tell us that two variables are not independent, it does not directly inform us about the strength of their association. For that, we need to look at additional statistics like Cramér's V.

Cramér's V is a measure that can be used with chi-squared to gauge the strength of association between two categorical variables. It ranges from 0 to 1, where 0 indicates no association, and 1 indicates perfect association. However, a large chi-squared statistic, such as 64.41, suggests a significant association but does not fully reveal its extent or nature.
  • To find strength, compare observed values to expected values or use measures like Cramér's V.
  • A high chi-squared value signals significance but not necessarily a strong practical relationship.
Relative Risk
Relative risk is a ratio that compares the probability of an event occurring for one group against another. It is particularly useful in the context of comparing groups to see how much more (or less) likely one outcome is relative to another.

To compute relative risk in the exercise, if the proportion of people reporting 'not too happy' is higher in the lowest education group compared to the highest, the relative risk is calculated by dividing these two proportions.

For instance, if the lowest education group has a 'not too happy' proportion of 0.3 and the highest is 0.1, the relative risk would be 3. This means people in the lowest education group are three times more likely to report being 'not too happy' than those in the highest group.
  • A relative risk greater than 1 suggests a higher risk in the first group.
  • If less than 1, the first group is at a lower risk compared to the second.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Basketball shots independent? In pro basketball games during \(1980-1982,\) when Larry Bird of the Boston Celtic: missed his first free throw, 48 out of 53 times he made th second one, and when he made his first free throw, 251 out of 285 times he made the second one. a. Form a \(2 \times 2\) contingency table that cross-tabulates the outcome of the first free throw (with categories made and missed) and the outcome of the second fre throw (made and missed). b. When we use MINITAB to analyze the contingency table, we get the result $$ \begin{aligned} \text { Pearson Chi-Square } &=0.273, \mathrm{DF}=1, \\ \mathrm{P} \text { -Value } &=0.602 \end{aligned} $$ Does it seem as if his success on the second shot depends on whether he made the first? Explain how to interpret the result of the chi-squared test.

True or false: Statistical but not practical significance Even when the sample conditional distributions in a contingency table are only slightly different, when the sample size is very large it is possible to have a large \(X^{2}\) statistic and a very small P-value for testing \(\mathrm{H}_{0}\) independence.

Herbs and the common cold \(\quad\) A recent randomized experiment of a multiherbal formula (Immumax) containing echinacea, garlic, ginseng, zinc and vitamin C, was found to improve cold symptoms in adults over a placebo group. "At the end of the study, eight \((39 \%)\) of the placebo recipients and \(18(60 \%)\) of the Immumax recipients reported that the study medication had helped improve their cold symptoms (chi-squared \(\mathrm{P}\) -value \(=0.01\) )." (M. Yakoot et al., International Journal of General Medicine, vol. 4, 2011, pp. 45-51). a. Identify the response variable and the explanatory variable and their categories for the \(2 \times 2\) contingency table that provided this particular analysis. b. How would you explain to someone who has never studied statistics how to interpret the parenthetical part of the quoted sentence?

Female for president? When recent General Social Surveys have asked, "If your party nominated a woman for president, would you vote for her if she were qualified for the job?" about \(94 \%\) of females and \(94 \%\) of males answered yes, the rest answered no. (Source: Data from CSM, UC Berkeley.) a. For males and for females, report the conditional distributions on this response variable in a \(2 \times 2\) table, using outcome categories (yes, no). b. If results for the entire population are similar to these, does it seem possible that gender and opinion about having a woman president are independent? Explain.

Gun homicide in United States and Britain According to recent United Nations figures, the annual gun homicide rate is 62.4 per one million residents in the United States and 1.3 per one million residents in Britain. a. Show how to compare the proportion of residents of the two countries killed annually by guns using the difference of proportions. Show how the results differ according to whether the United States or Britain is identified as Group \(1 .\) b. Show how to compare the proportion of residents of the two countries using the relative risk. Show how the results differ according to whether the United States or Britain is identified as Group 1. c. When both proportions are very close to 0 , as in this example, which measure do you think is more useful for describing the strength of association? Why?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.