/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 70 Stafistical versus practical sig... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 11: Problem 70

Stafistical versus practical significance In any significance test, when the sample size is very large, we have not necessarily established an important result when we obtain statistical significance. Explain what this means in the context of analyzing contingency tables with a chi-squared test.

Short Answer

Expert verified
In chi-squared tests, large samples can result in statistical significance without practical importance. Practical significance should be assessed alongside statistical significance.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Statistical Significance

Statistical significance in a chi-squared test indicates that the observed difference between expected and actual frequencies in a contingency table is unlikely due to random chance alone. However, this does not mean the difference is large or important, just that it is statistically detectable.
02

Interpreting Practical Significance

Practical significance relates to whether the detected difference is of a size that has real-world relevance or impact. In some cases, especially with large datasets, a statistically significant result may correspond to a very minor difference, which might not have practical implications.
03

Large Sample Size Implications

When analyzing large contingency tables, even small differences between groups can yield statistically significant results due to the power of the statistical test increasing with sample size. This means that the p-value may be low, suggesting significance, but the effect size can still be minimal.
04

Chi-squared Test Limitation

The chi-squared test is sensitive to sample size, which means that a very large sample can detect very small differences as significant. Researchers should look at effect sizes and confidence intervals alongside p-values to assess the practical significance of their results.
05

Evaluating Both Significances

To fully understand findings, it's crucial to evaluate both statistical and practical significance. Statistical significance alone doesn't provide information on the effect's importance, which is necessary for making meaningful conclusions or decisions based on data analyses.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Practical Significance
Practical significance asks the question: "Does this statistical result matter in real-life applications?" Even if you find a statistically significant difference in your study, it may not always mean that the result is practically significant. Imagine you are studying a new drug that decreases symptoms by 0.5% more than the current medication. While statistically significant, this might not be enough of a difference to change medical practices.

  • Difference in Impact: Practical significance focuses on the size of the effect or difference and whether it holds any genuine value or import in decision-making scenarios.
  • Real-world Relevance: It's vital when working with data to interpret if the statistical results will have a tangible and meaningful impact on the field of study or everyday life.
Always think about the real-world implications. A significant mathematical result does not guarantee real-world importance.
Chi-squared Test
The chi-squared test helps us see if there's a relationship between two categorical variables. It's a staple in statistics for testing hypotheses about categorical data. What's special about it is how it analyzes the frequencies of categories across different groups.

Here's what you should keep in mind:
  • Testing for Independence: It helps determine if different variables are independent of each other. For example, whether people's choice of pizza topping is independent of their geographic location.
  • Expected vs. Observed: The test compares the observed frequencies of categories to the expected frequencies if there were no relationship.
The calculated chi-squared statistic is compared to a distribution to determine if the observed outcomes could happen by chance.
Contingency Tables
Contingency tables are like a secret weapon for visualizing and analyzing relationships between variables. They are grid-like structures that display the frequency distribution of different categories. Here's how they enhance our understanding of data:
  • Organization of Data: They effectively summarize the data in rows and columns, making it easier to analyze relationships.
  • Categorizing Variables: The two-way table setup is perfect for looking at how one categorical variable might influence another.
Whether you鈥檙e dealing with large or small datasets, contingency tables are a fantastic tool for preliminary data analysis and observations.
Effect Size
Effect size is all about the "how much" of a difference or relationship you're observing. Unlike p-values that tell you if a result is likely due to chance, effect size tells you the magnitude of that effect.

  • Measuring Impact: Effect size informs us how large or small the effect is, and whether it鈥檚 of practical importance.
  • Holistic View: While p-values tell us the likelihood that the effect is not due to chance, effect size adds depth by showing if that effect is substantial enough to be considered meaningful.
Combining both statistical significance and effect size gives a comprehensive view of your data's narrative, ensuring balanced and informed conclusions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

UGA enrollment statistics Data posted at the University of Georgia Web site indicated that of all female students in \(2011,78 \%\) were undergraduates, and of male students in \(2011,16 \%\) were graduate students. Let \(x\) denote gender of student and \(y\) denote type of student. a. Which conditional distributions do these statistics refer to, those of \(y\) at given categories of \(x,\) or those of \(x\) at given categories of \(y ?\) Set up a table with type of student as columns and gender of student as rows, showing the two conditional distributions. b. Are \(x\) and \(y\) independent or dependent? Explain. (Hint: These results refer to the population.)

Prison and gender \(\quad\) According to the U.S. Department of Justice, in 2009 the incarceration rate in the nation's prisons was 949 per 100,000 male residents, and 67 per 100,000 female residents. a. Find the relative risk of being incarcerated, comparing males to females. Interpret. b. Find the difference of proportions of being incarcerated. Interpret. c. Which measure do you think is more appropriate for these data? Why?

True or false: Group 1 becomes Group 2 Interchanging two rows or interchanging two columns in a contingency table has no effect on the value of the \(X^{2}\) statistic.

Variability of chi-squared For the chi-squared distribution, the mean equals \(d f\) and the standard deviation equals \(\sqrt{2(d f)}\) a. Explain why, as a rough approximation, for a large \(d f\) value, \(95 \%\) of the chi-squared distribution falls within \(d f \pm 2 \sqrt{2(d f)}\) b. With \(d f=8,\) show that \(d f \pm 2 \sqrt{2(d f)}\) gives the interval (0,16) for approximately containing \(95 \%\) of the distribution. Using the chi- squared table, show that exactly \(95 \%\) of the distribution actually falls between 0 and \(15.5 .\)

Claritin and nervousness \(\quad\) An advertisement by Schering Corporation for the allergy drug Claritin mentioned that in a pediatric randomized clinical trial, symptoms of nervousness were shown by 4 of 188 patients on Claritin and 2 of 262 patients taking placebo. Denote the population proportion who would show such symptoms by \(p_{1}\) for Claritin and by \(p_{2}\) for placebo. The computer printout shows results of significance tests for \(\mathrm{H}_{0}: p_{1}=p_{2}\) a. Report the P-value for the small-sample test, with \(\mathrm{H}_{a}: p_{1} \neq p_{2} .\) Interpret in the context of this study. b. Is it appropriate to conduct the chi-squared test for these data? Why or why not?
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Probability and Statistics

Read Explanation

Mechanics Maths

Read Explanation

Applied Mathematics

Read Explanation

Pure Maths

Read Explanation

Geometry

Read Explanation

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.