/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 69 The percentage of women who get ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The percentage of women who get breast cancer sometime during their lifetime is higher now than in 1900 . Suppose that breast cancer incidence tends to increase with age, and suppose that women tend to live longer now than in \(1900 .\) Explain why a comparison of breast cancer rates now with the rate in 1900 could show different results if we control for the age of the woman.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Controlling for age may show similar or stable rates across time, highlighting increased longevity rather than rising risk per age category.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Impact of Age on Incidence Rates

Breast cancer incidence is known to increase with age. This means that as women grow older, their likelihood of developing breast cancer rises. In 1900, the average life expectancy was lower, so fewer women reached an age where breast cancer risk was highest.
02

Impact of Increased Longevity

In contrast, women today tend to live longer due to medical advancements and improved living conditions. This increase in longevity means that more women reach older ages, where the incidence of breast cancer is greater.
03

Comparing Historical and Current Rates Without Age Control

Without considering age, comparing breast cancer rates from 1900 to now may imply that the disease has become more common overall. This is due to the larger portion of the population now reaching an age where breast cancer is more prevalent.
04

Adjusting Rates for Age Control

To make a fair comparison, breast cancer rates should be adjusted based on age cohorts. By controlling for age, we assess how breast cancer incidence at specific ages has changed over time, unaffected by shifts in life expectancy.
05

Expected Results with Age Consideration

If we control for age, we might find that the increase in rates is smaller or even non-existent, suggesting that modern increases are mainly due to more women living to older ages, the period when the risk is highest, rather than an increase in risk at each specific age.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Age-Specific Incidence Rates
Age-specific incidence rates are crucial in understanding health trends, particularly in diseases like breast cancer. These rates measure the number of new cases occurring in a specific age group within a certain time frame.
These values help us analyze the risk of developing a disease relative to age.
  • Since breast cancer incidence rises with age, women in older age brackets generally show higher rates in these statistics.
  • This rise is primarily because the risk increases as women age, largely due to longer exposure to risk factors such as hormonal changes over their lifespan.
By focusing on specific age groups, researchers can understand the true nature of breast cancer risk unattached by other variables, such as increasing life expectancy.
This approach is particularly beneficial in highlighting prevention efforts for those in high-risk age categories, offering a more 'apples to apples' comparison over time.
Historical Data Comparison
Historical data comparison involves analyzing data from different time periods to uncover trends and changes in disease incidence. Such an analysis can reveal significant insights into public health's progress and challenges.
For breast cancer, comparing today's incidence rates with those from 1900 may initially suggest an increase in cases.
However, without accounting for variables like age or life expectancy, these comparisons might be misleading.
  • Life expectancy was considerably lower in 1900, meaning fewer women lived to ages where breast cancer is most common.
  • Today's increased longevity means a larger portion of the population survives to develop age-related diseases.
To draw accurate conclusions, it is crucial to adjust historical rates for age.
In doing so, we better understand whether an actual increase in risk exists, or changes in population demographics are influencing the perception of rising incidence rates.
Impact of Longevity on Disease Incidence
Longevity has a significant influence on disease incidence rates. As people live longer, they have a higher likelihood of developing diseases that are more prevalent in older age, such as breast cancer.
In the early 1900s, shorter life spans meant many women did not reach the ages at which breast cancer becomes more common. Today's medical advancements have improved life expectancy, which affects the pattern of disease incidence.
This "survivorship bias" implies that more individuals are surviving to an age where they become susceptible to diseases such as cancer.
  • Longer life spans exponentially increase chances of developing certain conditions, skewing incidence rates higher in the present compared to historical data.
  • The focus thus shifts from an apparent increase in risk to acknowledging longer lifespans and better diagnostic practices.
Accounting for longevity is essential to distinguish between a real increase in disease risk and the natural outcome of increased life expectancy.
Breast Cancer Epidemiology
Breast cancer epidemiology is the study of breast cancer patterns and causes within populations. This branch of public health scrutinizes factors like age, environmental influences, and genetic predispositions that may contribute to the disease.
A key concept in this field is age-specific incidence rates, which help identify the most vulnerable age groups.
The history of breast cancer epidemiology shows a troubling pattern of rising incidence, but this needs clarification through age-adjusted analysis.
  • An era's medical technology, diagnostic capability, and societal factors play large roles in incidence statistics.
  • Awareness campaigns and early screening methods today have also led to more diagnoses compared to 1900.
In-depth epidemiological studies incorporate these factors to interpret whether increases are due to improved detection, longer life expectancies, or other causes.
Overall, breast cancer epidemiology aims to create better prevention and treatment strategies by understanding these dynamics comprehensively.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Sampling sleep The 2009 Sleep in America poll of a random sample of 1000 adults reported that respondents slept an average of 6.7 hours on weekdays and 7.1 hours on weekends, and that \(28 \%\) of respondents got eight or more hours of sleep on weekdays whereas \(44 \%\) got eight or more hours of sleep on weekends (www.sleepfoundation.org). a. To compare the means or the percentages using inferential methods, should you treat the samples on weekdays and weekends as independent samples, or as dependent samples? Explain. b. To compare these results to polls of other people taken in previous years, should you treat the samples in the two years as independent samples, or as dependent samples? Explain.

A USA Today story (May 22, 2010) about the medical benefits of moderate drinking of alcohol stated that a major French study links those who drink moderately to a lower risk for cardiovascular disease but challenges the idea that moderate drinking is the cause. "Instead, the researchers say, people who drink moderately tend to have a higher social status, exercise more, suffer less depression and enjoy superior health overall compared to heavy drinkers and lifetime abstainers. A causal relationship between cardiovascular risk and moderate drinking is not at all established." The study looked at the health status and drinking habits of 149,773 French adults. a. Explain how this story refers to an analysis of three types of variables. Identify those variables. b. Suppose socioeconomic status is treated as a control variable when we compare moderate drinkers to abstainers in their heart attack rates. Explain how this analysis shows that an effect of an explanatory variable on a response variable can change at different values of a control variable.

Female college student participation in athletics has increased dramatically over the past few decades. Sports medicine providers are aware of some unique health concerns of athletic women, including disordered eating. A study (M. Reinking and L. Alexander, Journal of Athletic Training, vol. \(40,2005, \mathrm{p}\). 47-51) compared disordered-eating symptoms and their causes for collegiate female athletes (in lean and nonlean sports) and nonathletes. The sample mean of the body dissatisfaction assessment score was \(13.2(s=8.0)\) for 16 lean sport athletes (those sports that place value on leanness, including distance running, swimming, and gymnastics) and \(7.3(s=6.0)\) for the 68 nonlean sport athletes. Assuming equal population standard deviations, a. Find the standard error for comparing the means. b. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference between the mean body dissatisfaction for lean sport athletes and nonlean sport athletes. Interpret.

Bulimia CI A study of bulimia among college women (J. Kern and T. Hastings, Journal of Clinical Psychology, vol. \(51,1995,\) p. 499 ) studied the connection between childhood sexual abuse and a measure of family cohesion (the higher the score, the greater the cohesion). The sample mean on the family cohesion scale was 2.0 for 13 sexually abused students \((s=2.1)\) and 4.8 for 17 nonabused students \((s=3.2)\) a. Find the standard error for comparing the means. b. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference between the mean family cohesion for sexually abused students and non-abused students. Interpret.

A February 2007 story on www .redandblack.com stated, "Students who use laptops in class have lower GPAs, according to a study by Cornell University." a. Suppose this conclusion was based on a significance test comparing means. Defining notation in context, identify the groups and the population means and state the null hypothesis for the test. b. Suppose the study conclusion was based on a P-value of 0.01 obtained for the significance test mentioned in part a. Explain what you could learn from a confidence interval comparing the means that you are not able to learn from this P-value.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.