/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 63 A USA Today story (May 22, 2010)... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A USA Today story (May 22, 2010) about the medical benefits of moderate drinking of alcohol stated that a major French study links those who drink moderately to a lower risk for cardiovascular disease but challenges the idea that moderate drinking is the cause. "Instead, the researchers say, people who drink moderately tend to have a higher social status, exercise more, suffer less depression and enjoy superior health overall compared to heavy drinkers and lifetime abstainers. A causal relationship between cardiovascular risk and moderate drinking is not at all established." The study looked at the health status and drinking habits of 149,773 French adults. a. Explain how this story refers to an analysis of three types of variables. Identify those variables. b. Suppose socioeconomic status is treated as a control variable when we compare moderate drinkers to abstainers in their heart attack rates. Explain how this analysis shows that an effect of an explanatory variable on a response variable can change at different values of a control variable.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The analysis involves three variables: cardiovascular risk, drinking habits, and socioeconomic status. Controlling for socioeconomic status can reveal how drinking habits independently influence cardiovascular risk.

Step by step solution

01

Identifying Variables

In the story, three main types of variables are present: 1) Cardiovascular risk (response variable), 2) Drinking habit (explanatory variable), which includes categories like moderate drinkers, heavy drinkers, and abstainers, and 3) Socioeconomic status along with factors like exercise and depression (confounding/control variables).
02

Understanding the Role of the Control Variable

Socioeconomic status is considered a control variable when comparing moderate drinkers to abstainers. By keeping this variable constant or controlling for it, the analysis attempts to isolate the effect of moderate drinking on heart attack rates without the influence of socioeconomic status.
03

Analyzing Effects of Explanatory Variable

The effect of the explanatory variable (drinking habits) on the response variable (cardiovascular risk) can appear different when controlling for socioeconomic status. For example, without control, moderate drinkers may appear to have lower cardiovascular risk. However, once socioeconomic status is controlled for, it may reveal that the lower risk is really due to socioeconomic factors rather than drinking habits.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Response Variable
In statistical analysis, the response variable, also known as the dependent variable, is what researchers are interested in understanding or predicting. It is the outcome that changes due to the influence of other variables. In the context of the USA Today story, the response variable is the cardiovascular risk, which reflects the likelihood of experiencing a heart-related event. Researchers aim to study how this risk is affected by different drinking habits and other factors.

The response variable is crucial because it directly ties to the objective of the study or analysis. For example, lowering the cardiovascular risk can lead to increased longevity and better quality of life. Therefore, understanding what impacts this variable is valuable for public health recommendations. It’s important to note that while the response variable offers insights into outcomes, it doesn't necessarily establish causation unless other methodological factors, such as a controlled experiment, clearly define it.
Explanatory Variable
The explanatory variable, also referred to as the independent variable, is what researchers manipulate or observe to determine its impact on the response variable. In the aforementioned study, the drinking habit is considered the explanatory variable. This includes distinguishing among moderate drinkers, heavy drinkers, and abstainers to observe its effect on the cardiovascular risk.

Understanding the role of the explanatory variable helps in examining potential relationships and influences on the response variable. While the data might suggest an association between moderate drinking and lower cardiovascular risk, researchers in the study caution against inferring causation merely from this observed pattern.
  • It is important to consider how other variables might influence both the explanatory variable and the response variable simultaneously.
  • Inferences made solely from an uncontrolled observational study cannot claim causality but rather suggest possible trends worth exploring further.
Recognizing the limitations in interpreting the influence of explanatory variables without additional analysis is key in scientific research.
Control Variable
A control variable is a factor that researchers hold constant or monitor to prevent it from influencing the primary variables being studied. Socioeconomic status acts as a control variable in the analysis of heart attack rates among drinkers and abstainers. By controlling for socioeconomic status, researchers aim to isolate the effect of moderate drinking from the possible confounding effects that arise from different socio-economic conditions.

Control variables are essential in ensuring that the potential effect of the explanatory variable on the response variable isn’t mistakenly attributed to an extraneous factor. In this case, while moderate drinking may initially seem to correlate with lower cardiovascular risk, controlling for socio-economic status may reveal that the lifestyle associated with higher socio-economic status is actually what's reducing cardiovascular risk.
  • Control variables help clarify complex relationships by filtering out background noise and other influences.
  • They ensure the data analysis is more precise in isolating the impact of specific explanatory variables.
Therefore, identifying and appropriately managing control variables is a cornerstone of robust statistical analysis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The methods of this section make the assumption of a normal population distribution. Why do you think this is more relevant for small samples than for large samples?

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the official unemployment rate was \(15.5 \%\) among Blacks and \(7.9 \%\) among Whites as of March 2011 . During the recession of \(2009-2011,\) the Black levels of unemployment have been similar or in many locations higher than those during the Great Depression era (www .bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t02.htm). a. Identify the response variable and the explanatory variable. b. Identify the two groups that are the categories of the explanatory variable. c. The unemployment statistics are based on a sample of individuals. Were the samples of white individuals and black individuals independent samples, or dependent samples? Explain.

Two TV commercials are developed for marketing a new product. A volunteer test sample of 200 people is randomly split into two groups of 100 each. In a controlled setting, Group \(\mathrm{A}\) watches commercial A and Group B watches commercial B. In Group A, 25 say they would buy the product. In group B, 20 say they would buy the product. The marketing manager who devised this experiment concludes that commercial A is better. Is this conclusion justified? Analyze the data. If you prefer, use software (such as MINITAB) for which you can enter summary counts. a. Show all steps of your analysis, including assumptions. b. Comment on the manager's conclusion, and indicate limitations of the experiment.

Several recent studies have suggested that people who suffer from abnormally high blood pressure can benefit from regular exercise. A medical researcher decides to test her belief that walking briskly for at least half an hour a day has the effect of lowering blood pressure. She conducts a small pilot study. If results from it are supportive, she will apply for funding for a larger study. She randomly samples three of her patients who have high blood pressure. She measures their systolic blood pressure initially and then again a month later after they participate in her exercise program. The table shows the results. $$ \begin{array}{ccc} \hline \text { Subject } & \text { Before } & \text { After } \\ \hline 1 & 150 & 130 \\ 2 & 165 & 140 \\ 3 & 135 & 120 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Explain why the three before observations and the three after observations are dependent samples. b. Find the sample mean of the before scores, the sample mean of the after scores, and the sample mean of \(d=\) before \(-\) after. How are they related? c. Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference between the population means of subjects before and after going through such a study. Interpret.

A study of the death penalty in Kentucky reported the results shown in the table. (Source: Data from T. Keil and G. Vito, Amer. \(J .\) Criminal Justice, vol. \(20,1995,\) pp. \(17-36 .)\) a. Find and compare the percentage of white defendants with the percentage of black defendants who received the death penalty, when the victim was (i) white and (ii) black. b. In the analysis in part a, identify the response variable, explanatory variable, and control variable. c. Construct the summary \(2 \times 2\) table that ignores, rather than controls, victim's race. Compare the overall percentages of white defendants and black defendants who got the death penalty (ignoring, rather than controlling, victim's race). Compare to part a.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.