/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 65 Basketball paradox The following... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Basketball paradox The following list summarizes shooting percentage in the \(2001-2002\) season in the National Basketball Association by Brent Barry and Shaquille O'Neal. 2-point shots \(\bullet\) Brent Barry: \(58.8 \%(237 / 403)\) \(\bullet\) Shaquille O'Neal: \(58.0 \%(712 / 1228)\) 3-point shots \(\bullet\) Brent Barry: \(42.4 \%(164 / 387)\) \(\bullet\) Shaquille O'Neal: \(0 \%(0 / 1)\) Overall \(\bullet\) Brent Barry: \(50.8 \%(401 / 790)\) \(\bullet\) Shaquille O'Neal: \(57.9 \%(712 / 1229)\) a. Treating the type of shot as a control variable, whether a shot is made as the response variable, and the player as the explanatory variable, explain how these results illustrate Simpson's paradox. b. Explain how O'Neal could have the higher overall percentage, even though he made a lower percentage of each type of shot.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Simpson's paradox arises here because Barry excels in both 2-point and 3-point shots, but his high number of 3-point attempts lowers his overall percentage, unlike Shaq, who mostly takes 2-point shots.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Data

Two players have their shooting percentages broken down by 2-point and 3-point shots. Brent Barry has percentages of 58.8% for 2-point shots and 42.4% for 3-point shots, while Shaquille O'Neal has 58% for 2-point shots and 0% for 3-point shots.
02

Interpret Overall Averages

Despite neither shooting type showing O'Neal with higher percentages than Barry, O'Neal has an overall shooting percentage of 57.9%, which is surprisingly higher than Barry's 50.8%.
03

Recognize Simpson's Paradox

Simpson's Paradox occurs because aggregated data (overall percentages) show the opposite trend from subgroup data (individual shooting types). In both 2-point and 3-point categories, Barry has better percentages, but Shaq's overall shooting statistic is better.
04

Analyze Shot Distribution

Brent Barry attempts more 3-point shots than 2-point shots (387 vs. 403), while Shaq mostly attempts 2-point shots (1228 vs. 1). Since 3-point shots generally have lower success rates, Barry's heavy 3-point shooting decreases his overall percentage.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis is a powerful tool used to understand patterns and trends within datasets. In the context of basketball statistics, analyzing players' shooting percentages allows us to gain insights into their performance. It involves looking at breakdowns, such as the percentages from different types of shots like 2-point and 3-point shots. By observing these smaller parts of data, we can better understand individual performance.

One essential aspect of statistical analysis is recognizing scenarios where aggregated data can mislead. This is where Simpson's Paradox comes in. It occurs when a trend appears in different groups of data but disappears or reverses when the groups are combined. In the case of Brent Barry and Shaquille O'Neal, we see that O'Neal has a higher overall shooting percentage even though Barry has better percentages for each individual shot type. This counterintuitive result arises because of how the shot data are distributed between the players and shot types.

Shaquille O'Neal's attempts are heavily concentrated on 2-point shots, which he makes frequently, while Brent Barry attempts a significant number of 3-point shots, which generally have lower success rates. By understanding the data distribution and applying statistical analysis, we can unravel these seemingly paradoxical situations and arrive at accurate conclusions.
Data Interpretation
Interpreting data effectively is crucial for making informed decisions and understanding outcomes correctly. In our exercise, the interpretation of shooting percentages involves looking beyond the numbers to understand the factors contributing to the statistics.

First, consider the shooting performance of both players individually. Brent Barry achieves high two-point and three-point percentages when considering each shot type separately. However, when we interpret these numbers in the context of overall performance, we find that Shaquille O'Neal, who performs well in two-point shots, has a higher aggregate shooting percentage due to his one-sided shot selection.

When interpreting data, it's essential not only to look at raw numbers but also how they interact in context.
  • How are these players utilizing their shot opportunities?
  • What might affect the overall contributions to their team’s success?

Each player's strategy plays a vital role in interpreting data results to discover underlying patterns or anomalies. This exercise highlights how understanding the context behind numbers is as important as the numbers themselves.
Basketball Statistics
Basketball statistics are pivotal for analyzing player and team performance, helping coaches, players, and fans understand the game more profoundly. In our example, the statistics provide insights into the shooting abilities of Brent Barry and Shaquille O'Neal.

To better comprehend these stats, it's crucial to note the distinctions between 2-point and 3-point shooting efficiencies. 2-point shots, typically made closer to the basket, have higher success rates compared to 3-point shots, which require more precision due to longer distance.

In analyzing basketball statistics, it's also important to consider the volume of shots taken:
  • Brent Barry’s shooting strategy involves a balanced approach, yet his significant attempts from the three-point line lower his overall percentage.
  • Shaquille O'Neal’s statistics show focus on 2-point shots, enhancing his overall shooting percentage due to the high volume and efficiency.

Understanding these dynamics allows stakeholders to evaluate player strategies effectively, adjust training focuses, or strategize game tactics. The insights gained from basketball statistics equip teams with the knowledge needed for optimal performance analysis and improvement.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A graduate teaching assistant for Introduction to Statistics (STA 2023) at the University of Florida collected data from students in one of her classes in spring 2007 to investigate whether study time per week (average number of hours) differed between students in the class who planned to go to graduate school and those who did not. The data were as follows: Graduate school: \(\quad 15,7,15,10,5,5,2,3,12,16,15,37,\) 8,14,10,18,3,25,15,5,5 No graduate school: 6,8,15,6,5,14,10,10,12,5 Using software or a calculator, a. Find the sample mean and standard deviation for each group. Interpret. b. Find the standard error for the difference between the sample means. Interpret. c. Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval comparing the population means. Interpret.

Last month a random sample of 1000 subjects was interviewed and asked whether they thought the president was doing a good job. This month the same subjects were asked this again. The results are: 450 said yes each time, 450 said no each time, 60 said yes on the first survey and no on the second survey, and 40 said no on the first survey and yes on the second survey. a. Form a contingency table showing these results. b. Estimate the proportion giving a favorable rating (i) last month and (ii) this month. c. Show how each of the proportions in part b can be obtained as a sample mean. d. Find the test statistic and P-value for applying McNemar's test that the population proportion was the same each month. Interpret.

Chelation useless? Chelation is an alternative therapy for heart disease that uses repeated intravenous administration of a human-made amino acid in combination with oral vitamins and minerals. Practitioners believe it removes calcium deposits from buildup in arteries. However, the evidence for a positive effect is anecdotal or comes from nonrandomized, uncontrolled studies. A double-blind randomized clinical trial comparing chelation to placebo used a treadmill test in which the response was the length of time until a subject experienced ischemia (lack of blood flow and oxygen to the heart muscle). a. After 27 weeks of treatment, the sample mean time for the chelation group was 652 seconds. A \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the population mean for chelation minus the population mean for placebo was -53 to 36 seconds. Explain how to interpret the confidence interval. b. A significance test comparing the means had P-value = 0.69. Specify the hypotheses for this test, which was two-sided. c. The authors concluded from the test,"There is no evidence to support a beneficial effect of chelation therapy" (M. Knudtson et al., JAMA, vol. 287, p. 481 ,2002). Explain how this conclusion agrees with inference based on the values in the confidence interval.

Female college student participation in athletics has increased dramatically over the past few decades. Sports medicine providers are aware of some unique health concerns of athletic women, including disordered eating. A study (M. Reinking and L. Alexander, Journal of Athletic Training, vol. \(40,2005, \mathrm{p}\). 47-51) compared disordered-eating symptoms and their causes for collegiate female athletes (in lean and nonlean sports) and nonathletes. The sample mean of the body dissatisfaction assessment score was \(13.2(s=8.0)\) for 16 lean sport athletes (those sports that place value on leanness, including distance running, swimming, and gymnastics) and \(7.3(s=6.0)\) for the 68 nonlean sport athletes. Assuming equal population standard deviations, a. Find the standard error for comparing the means. b. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference between the mean body dissatisfaction for lean sport athletes and nonlean sport athletes. Interpret.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the official unemployment rate was \(15.5 \%\) among Blacks and \(7.9 \%\) among Whites as of March 2011 . During the recession of \(2009-2011,\) the Black levels of unemployment have been similar or in many locations higher than those during the Great Depression era (www .bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t02.htm). a. Identify the response variable and the explanatory variable. b. Identify the two groups that are the categories of the explanatory variable. c. The unemployment statistics are based on a sample of individuals. Were the samples of white individuals and black individuals independent samples, or dependent samples? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.