/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 53 The paper "Teens and Distracted ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The paper "Teens and Distracted Driving"" (Pew Internet \& American Life Project, 2009 ) reported that in a representative sample of 283 American teens age 16 to \(17,\) there were 74 who indicated that they had sent a text message while driving. For purposes of this exercise, assume that this sample is a random sample of 16- to 17 -year-old Americans. Do these data provide convincing evidence that more than a quarter of Americans age 16 to 17 have sent a text message while driving? Test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of 0.01 . (Hint: See Example 10.11 .)

Short Answer

Expert verified
In conclusion, based on the sample data of 283 American teens aged 16-17, there is insufficient evidence to claim that more than a quarter of Americans age 16 to 17 have sent a text message while driving, as the p-value (0.121) is greater than the given significance level (0.01).

Step by step solution

01

Calculate sample proportion and test statistic

The sample proportion, \(\bar{p}\), is the number of teens who sent text messages while driving divided by the total number of teens in the sample: \(\bar{p} = \frac{74}{283} \approx 0.262\) To find the test statistic (z), we can use the formula: \(z = \frac{\bar{p} - p_0}{\sqrt{\frac{p_0(1-p_0)}{n}}}\) where \(p_0\) is the proportion in the null hypothesis, 0.25, and n is the sample size, 283.
02

Find the test statistic value

Substituting the values, we can find the z value: \(z = \frac{0.262 - 0.25}{\sqrt{\frac{0.25(1-0.25)}{283}}}\) Calculating the values inside the radical: \(z = \frac{0.262 - 0.25}{\sqrt{\frac{0.1875}{283}}}\) Now, solving for z: \(z \approx 1.171\)
03

Find the p-value

Since this is a one-tailed test, and we are looking for evidence that more than a quarter of teens have sent a text message while driving, we will find the area to the right of the z value: p-value = P(Z > 1.171) Using a z-table or calculator, we find: p-value ≈ 0.121
04

Compare p-value with the significance level

We now compare the p-value to the significance level (α) given to us, which is 0.01: 0.121 > 0.01 The p-value is greater than the significance level.
05

Make a conclusion

Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. This means that there is insufficient evidence to claim that more than a quarter of Americans age 16 to 17 have sent a text message while driving, based on this sample data.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sample Proportion
The sample proportion is a crucial part of hypothesis testing because it provides an estimate about the population parameter based on sample data. In this exercise, the sample proportion, denoted as \(\bar{p}\), is the ratio of individuals in the sample that meet a certain criterion—in this case, American teens who have texted while driving. To compute it, we divide the number of teens who reported texting while driving (74) by the total number in the sample (283).
Thus, the sample proportion is \(\bar{p} = \frac{74}{283} \approx 0.262\).
This means about 26.2% of the surveyed teens admitted to texting while driving. This proportion will be used to compare against what is expected, according to the null hypothesis.
Significance Level
The significance level, often denoted by \(\alpha\), is an essential component in hypothesis testing used to determine the threshold for statistical significance. It represents the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is, in fact, true.
In this exercise, the significance level is set at 0.01. This signifies that there is a 1% risk of concluding that more than a quarter of American teens text while driving, assuming that this is not actually the case.
Choosing a significance level is a balance between type I errors (false positives) and type II errors (false negatives). A lower significance level, like 0.01, indicates a stringent test to reduce the likelihood of a false positive.
P-value
The p-value helps us understand the strength of the evidence against the null hypothesis. It is the probability, under the null hypothesis, of obtaining a result at least as extreme as the one observed.
To calculate the p-value, we find the probability that a sample proportion is as extreme as, or more extreme than, what we observed, given that the null hypothesis is true.
From our exercise, with a test statistic of approximately 1.171, the p-value was calculated as 0.121. This is done by assessing the area to the right of the z-value on a standard normal distribution.
A p-value greater than the chosen significance level (0.01) suggests that the evidence is insufficient to reject the null hypothesis.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis is a statement used in hypothesis testing that suggests there is no effect or no difference. It serves as the starting point, or a default position, which indicates no change from the current understanding.
In this particular case, the null hypothesis \(H_0\) can be stated as the proportion of American teens texting while driving being equal to or less than 25% (\(p_0 = 0.25\)).
Testing aims to provide evidence to either reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis. If the evidence from the sample data is strong enough (based on the significance level and p-value calculations), the null hypothesis can be rejected. Otherwise, as in this exercise, the data does not provide sufficient evidence to reject it.
Test Statistic
The test statistic is a standardized value used in hypothesis testing to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis. It represents the number of standard deviations the sample proportion is from the hypothesized population proportion.
For our exercise, the z-test statistic is calculated using the formula:\[z = \frac{\bar{p} - p_0}{\sqrt{\frac{p_0(1-p_0)}{n}}}\]where \(\bar{p}\) is the sample proportion, \(p_0\) is the hypothesized population proportion, and \(n\) is the sample size.
Substituting the given values, the z-test statistic comes out to be approximately 1.171. This statistic is then used to find the p-value to assess the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

One type of error in a hypothesis test is rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true. What is the other type of error that might occur when a hypothesis test is carried out?

In a representative sample of adult Americans ages 26 to 32 years, \(27 \%\) indicated that they owned a fitness band that kept track of the number of steps walked each day and their daily activity levels ("Digital Democracy Survey", Deloitte Development LLC, 2016, www2, deloitte.com/us/en.html, retrieved November 30 , 2016). Suppose that the sample size was 500 . Is there convincing evidence that more than one-quarter of all adult Americans in this age group own a fitness band?

In the report "Healthy People 2020 Objectives for the Nation," The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) set a goal of 0.341 for the proportion of mothers who will still be breastfeeding their babies one year after birth (www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/policy /hp2020.htm, April 11, 2016, retrieved November 28, 2016). The CDC also estimated the proportion who were still being breastfed one year after birth to be 0.307 for babies born in 2013 (www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding /pdf/2016breastfeedingreportcard.pdf, retrieved November 28,2016) . This estimate was based on a survey of women who had given birth in 2013 . Suppose that the survey used a random sample of 1000 mothers and that you want to use the survey data to decide if there is evidence that the goal is not being met. Let \(p\) denote the population proportion of all mothers of babies born in 2013 who were still breast-feeding at 12 months. (Hint: See Example \(10.10 .)\) a. Describe the shape, center, and variability of the sampling distribution of \(\hat{p}\) for random samples of size 1000 if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.341\) is true. b. Would you be surprised to observe a sample proportion as small as \(\hat{p}=0.333\) for a sample of size 1000 if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.341\) were true? Explain why or why not. c. Would you be surprised to observe a sample proportion as small as \(\hat{p}=0.310\) for a sample of size 1000 if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.341\) were true? Explain why or why not. d. The actual sample proportion observed in the study was \(p=0.307\). Based on this sample proportion, is there convincing evidence that the goal is not being met, or is the observed sample proportion consistent with what you would expect to see when the null hypothesis is true? Support your answer with a probability calculation.

Refer to the instructions prior to Exercise \(10.90 .\) The paper "I Smoke but I Am Not a Smoker" ( Journal of American College Health [2010]: \(117-125\) ) describes a survey of 899 college students who were asked about their smoking behavior. Of the students surveyed, 268 classified themselves as nonsmokers, but said "yes" when asked later in the survey if they smoked. These students were classified as "phantom smokers" meaning that they did not view themselves as smokers even though they do smoke at times. The authors were interested in using these data to determine if there is convincing evidence that more than \(25 \%\) of college students fall into the phantom smoker category.

Occasionally, warning flares of the type contained in most automobile emergency kits fail to ignite. A consumer group wants to investigate a claim that the proportion of defective flares made by a particular manufacturer is higher than the advertised value of \(0.10 .\) A large number of flares will be tested, and the results will be used to decide between \(H_{0}: p=0.10\) and \(H_{a}: p>0.10,\) where \(p\) represents the actual proportion of defective flares made by this manufacturer. If \(H_{0}\) is rejected, charges of false advertising will be filed against the manufacturer. a. Explain why the alternative hypothesis was chosen to be \(H: p>0.10 .\) b. Complete the last two columns of the following table. (Hint: See Example 10.7 for an example of how this is done.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.