/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 11 A press release about a paper th... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A press release about a paper that appeared in The Journal of Youth and Adolescence (www.springer.com/ about1springer/media/springertselect?SGWID50-11001-6 \(-1433942-0,\) August \(26,2013,\) retrieved May 8,2017\()\) was titled "Video Games Do Not Make Vulnerable Teens More Violent." The press release includes the following statement about the study described in the paper: "Study finds no evidence that violent video games increase antisocial behavior in youths with pre- existing psychological conditions." In the context of a hypothesis test with the null hypothesis being that video games do not increase antisocial behavior, explain why the title of the press release is misleading.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The title of the press release is misleading because it claims that video games do not make vulnerable teens more violent, which aligns with the null hypothesis. However, the study only found no evidence supporting the alternative hypothesis, not proving the null hypothesis to be true. In a hypothesis test, not finding evidence to support the alternative hypothesis means there is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, not that the null hypothesis is proven true. A more accurate title might have been: "Study Finds No Evidence to Suggest Video Games Make Vulnerable Teens More Violent."

Step by step solution

01

Identify the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis

The null hypothesis (H0) is the statement that video games do not increase antisocial behavior among vulnerable teens. The alternative hypothesis (H1) is the statement that video games do increase antisocial behavior among vulnerable teens. #Step 2: Analyze the press release title#
02

Analyze the press release title

The title of the press release is: "Video Games Do Not Make Vulnerable Teens More Violent". This statement is in line with the null hypothesis, as it claims that video games do not have any effect on the violent behavior of vulnerable teens. #Step 3: Analyze the statement of the study#
03

Analyze the statement of the study

The statement from the study is: "Study finds no evidence that violent video games increase antisocial behavior in youths with pre-existing psychological conditions." This statement suggests that the researchers did not find any significant evidence to support the alternative hypothesis, i.e., that violent video games increase antisocial behavior in vulnerable teens. #Step 4: Explain why the title is misleading#
04

Explain why the title is misleading

In a hypothesis test, not finding evidence to support the alternative hypothesis does not mean that the null hypothesis is proven true. The correct interpretation would be that there is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. So, the title of the press release is misleading because it claims that video games do not make vulnerable teens more violent, even though the study only states that there is no evidence supporting the alternative hypothesis. A more accurate title might have been: "Study Finds No Evidence to Suggest Video Games Make Vulnerable Teens More Violent."

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
Understanding the null hypothesis is key to any statistical investigation. In essence, the null hypothesis (\( H_0 \)) represents the default position or the status quo; it assumes that there is no effect or no difference between certain groups in an experiment. In the context of our discussion on video games and antisocial behavior, the null hypothesis would suggest that video games have no impact on increasing antisocial behavior among vulnerable teens.

When researchers conduct a study, they typically start by assuming the null hypothesis is true. They then collect data to test whether there is significant evidence to support an alternative stance. If the evidence strongly contradicts the null hypothesis, researchers may reject it in favor of the alternative hypothesis. However, they never 'prove' the null hypothesis; they can only fail to find evidence against it.

For students to better understand and improve upon their comprehension of hypothesis testing, it's important to recognize that the null hypothesis acts as a baseline. Only with substantial evidence from data can we move away from this assumption.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis (\( H_1 \) or \( H_a \)), on the other hand, is the counterclaim to the null hypothesis. It represents the outcome that the experiment was set up to support. This is the hypothesis that researchers really want to investigate and provides evidence for. In the scenario of the video game study, the alternative hypothesis posits that video games increase antisocial behavior in youths, especially those with preexisting psychological conditions.

The determination of the alternative hypothesis is critical as it helps to focus the research. In hypothesis testing, if the data aligns more closely with the alternative hypothesis than the null, then there may be grounds to reject the null hypothesis, though this must be done with caution and the recognition that statistical tests are not foolproof.
Statistical Significance
One of the most fundamental concepts in hypothesis testing is statistical significance. Statistical significance measures the likelihood that the relationship observed in the data occurred by chance. It helps quantify the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis and is often represented by a P-value. A lower P-value indicates that the observed data would be very unlikely if the null hypothesis were true, leading to consideration of the alternative hypothesis.

Statistical significance is typically determined by a predesignated threshold, known as the alpha level (commonly set at 0.05). If the calculated P-value is less than the alpha level, we say the results are statistically significant, and there is sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis. However, this does not inherently mean that the finding is meaningful or noteworthy beyond the statistics; it merely indicates that it is unlikely to be due to random chance.
Antisocial Behavior
Antisocial behavior is a term used to describe actions that violate social norms in ways that reflect disregard for others or that result in harm or distress to society. This can include behaviors like aggression, deceitfulness, or severe rule-breaking. The study of antisocial behavior often looks at various factors that might contribute to such conduct, including environmental influences like media exposure.

In the study referenced in the press release, the focus is on whether playing violent video games can trigger or increase the occurrence of antisocial behavior in vulnerable teens. This aspect of behavior is crucial in social science and psychology research due to its impact on individuals and society. Clarifying this relationship helps in forming evidence-based policies and interventions aimed at reducing such behaviors.

It's important for education on features such as antisocial behavior to be clear on the variables involved, the manner in which they are measured, and the implications of the findings in a broader social context. As for the exercise, accurately interpreting the results of studies on antisocial behavior is essential for an unbiased representation of what the study concludes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The paper "Bedtime Mobile Phone Use and Sleep in Adults" (Social Science and Medicine [2016]: \(93-101\) ) describes a study of 844 adults living in Belgium. Suppose that it is reasonable to regard this sample as a random sample of adults living in Belgium. You want to use the survey data to decide if there is evidence that a majority of adults living in Belgium take their cell phones to bed with them. Let \(p\) denote the population proportion of all adults living in Belgium who take their cell phones to bed with them. (Hint: See Example \(10.10 .)\) a. Describe the shape, center, and variability of the sampling distribution of \(\hat{p}\) for random samples of size 844 if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.50\) is true. b. Would you be surprised to observe a sample proportion as large as \(\hat{p}=0.52\) for a sample of size 844 if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.50\) were true? Explain why or why not. c. Would you be surprised to observe a sample proportion as large as \(\hat{p}=0.54\) for a sample of size 844 if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.50\) were true? Explain why or why not. d. The actual sample proportion observed in the study was \(\hat{p}=0.59 .\) Based on this sample proportion, is there convincing evidence that the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=\) 0.50 is not true, or is \(\hat{p}\) consistent with what you would expect to see when the null hypothesis is true? Support your answer with a probability calculation. e. Do you think it would be reasonable to generalize the concusion of this test to adults living in the United States? Explain why or why not.

Past experience is that when individuals are approached with a request to fill out and return a particular questionnaire in a provided stamped and addressed envelope, the response rate is \(40 \%\). An investigator believes that if the person distributing the questionnaire were stigmatized in some obvious way, potential respondents would feel sorry for the distributor and thus tend to respond at a rate higher than \(40 \%\). To test this theory, a distributor wore an eye patch. Of the 200 questionnaires distributed by this individual, 109 were returned. Does this provide evidence that the response rate in this situation is greater than the previous rate of \(40 \%\) ? State and test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance plevel of 0.05 .

According to a survey of a random sample of 2278 adult Americans conducted by the Harris Poll ("Do Americans Prefer Name Brands or Store Brands? Well, That Depends" (theharrispoll.com, February 11, 2015, retrieved November 29,2016 ), 1162 of those surveyed said that they prefer name brands to store brands when purchasing frozen vegetables. Suppose that you want to use this information to determine if there is convincing evidence that a majority of adult Americans prefer name-brand frozen vegetables over store brand frozen vegetables. a. What hypotheses should be tested in order to answer this question? b. The \(P\) -value for this test is 0.173 . What conclusion would you reach if \(\alpha=0.05 ?\)

The report "Digital Democracy Survey" (Deloitte Development LLC, 2016, www2.deloitte.com/us/en.html, retrieved November 30,2016\()\) describes a large national survey. In a representative sample of Americans ages 14 to 18 years, \(45 \%\) indicated that they usually use social media while watching TV. Suppose that the sample size was 500 . a. Is there convincing evidence that less than half of Americans ages 14 to 18 years usually use social media while watching TV? Use a significance level of \(0.05 .\) b. Suppose that the sample size had been 100 rather than 500 and that \(45 \%\) of those in the sample indicated that they usually use social media while watching TV. Based on this sample of 100 , is there convincing evidence that less than half of Americans ages 14 to 18 years usually use social media while watching TV? Use a significance level of 0.05 . c. Explain why different conclusions were reached in the hypothesis tests of Parts (a) and (b).

Suppose that you are an inspector for the Fish and Game Department and that you are given the task of determining whether to prohibit fishing along part of the Oregon coast. You will close an area to fishing if it is determined that more than \(3 \%\) of fish have unacceptably high mercury levels. a. Which of the following pairs of hypotheses would you test: $$ H_{0}: p=0.03 \text { versus } H_{a}: p>0.03 $$ or $$ H_{0}: p=0.03 \text { versus } H_{\dot{a}}: p<0.03 $$ Explain the reason for your choice. b. Would you use a significance level of 0.10 or 0.01 for your test? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.