/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 4 For each of the statistical stud... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

For each of the statistical studies described, indicate whether the study is an observational study or an experiment. Give a brief explanation for your choice. In a survey of 2500 U.S. adults, \(69 \%\) responded that they were confident that "smart homes" will be a commonplace as smartphones within 10 years (Intel Survey: Architecting the Future of the Smart Home 2025, [2015]: download.intel.com /newsroom/kits/iot/pdfs/IntelSmartHomeSurveyBackgrounder .pdf, retrieved September 25,2016 ).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The given statistical study is an \(observational\) study, as the researcher simply collected data on the subjects' opinions without any intervention or control. The 2500 U.S. adults were surveyed on their thoughts about "smart homes" and their responses were recorded, which classifies this study as observational.

Step by step solution

01

From the description, we can conclude that this study is an observational study. #Step 2: Provide an explanation# Since, in this case, the researcher is not applying any treatment or intervention to the subjects but merely observing their responses to a question, the study must be classified as an observational study.

The reasoning behind this is that the data has been collected without any intervention or control from the researcher – they have observed the subjects' opinions and recorded the results.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical Studies
Understanding the nature of statistical studies is crucial in the realm of research. These studies come in various forms, primarily categorized as observational studies or experiments. In an observational study, researchers collect data without interference or manipulation of the subject's environment or behavior. They observe natural occurrences and draw conclusions from the patterns they notice. On the other hand, an experiment involves manipulation by introducing a treatment or intervention to observe its effect on subjects.

The survey described in the exercise is a perfect example of an observational study. Here, the researchers surveyed U.S. adults about their predictions for 'smart homes'. They were interested in attitudes, not in changing them. Hence, no intervention was applied, distinguishing it from an experiment where researchers would actively try to change participants' opinions or behaviors to gauge the effects.
Survey Research
Survey research is a widely utilized method of data collection in statistical studies. It involves gathering information from a sample of people through their responses to questions. The primary goal is to generalize the findings to a larger population. This type of research can be conducted through various means, including telephone interviews, online questionnaires, or face-to-face interactions.

The effectiveness of survey research hinges on how well the survey is designed. Good surveys are clear, concise, and unbiased in their questioning. The survey from the Intel study aimed to gather opinions about smart homes from a sizeable demographic of U.S. adults. To extrapolate reliable insights from their study, it is imperative that the sample is representative and the questions are structured to minimize the chances of misinterpretation or bias.
Data Collection Methods
There are several methods through which data can be collected in statistical studies, and the technique adopted can have a substantial impact on the outcomes of the study. Some common data collection methods include interviews, questionnaires, observations, and records or documents.

Each method has its advantages and drawbacks. For example, interviews can provide in-depth data but are time-consuming and potentially subject to interviewer bias. Questionnaires are less expensive and can be disseminated to a wide audience quickly, but they depend heavily on the respondent's willingness and ability to provide accurate answers. Observations can yield rich data but may be subject to the observer's interpretation. Lastly, existing records can be a valuable source of information but can be limited by what data was recorded and its relevance to the new research question.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For each of the statistical studies described, indicate whether the study is an observational study or an experiment. Give a brief explanation for your choice. In a study of whether taking a garlic supplement reduces the risk of getting a cold, 146 participants were assigned to either a garlic supplement group or to a group that did not take a garlic supplement (“Garlic for the Common Cold," Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2009). Based on the study, it was concluded that the proportion of people taking a garlic supplement who get a cold is lower than the proportion of those not taking a garlic supplement who get a cold.

The paper "Effect of a Nutritional Supplement on Hair Loss in Women" (Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology \([2015]: 76-82)\) describes an experiment to see if a dietary supplement consisting of Omega \(3,\) Omega \(6,\) and antioxidants could reduce hair loss in women with stage 1 hair loss. One hundred twenty women volunteered to participate in the study and were randomly assigned to either the supplement group or a control group. The women in the supplement group took the supplement for 6 months. Photos of the top of the head were taken of all the women at the beginning of the study and 6 months later at the end of the study. The two photos of each woman were evaluated by an independent expert who visually determined the change in hair density. The expert who determined the change in hair density did not know which of the women had taken the supplement. Answer the following seven questions for the described experiment. (Hint: Reviewing Examples 1.6 and 1.7 might be helpful.) 1\. What question is the experiment trying to answer? 2\. What are the experimental conditions (treatments) for this experiment? 3\. What is the response variable? 4\. What are the experimental units and how were they selected? 5\. Does the design incorporate random assignment of experimental units to the different experimental conditions? If not, are there potentially confounding variables that would make it difficult to draw conclusions based on data from the experiment? 6\. Does the experiment incorporate a control group and/ or a placebo group? If not, would the experiment be improved by including one or both of these? 7\. Does the experiment involve blinding? If not, would the experiment be improved by making it single- or double-blind?

For each of the following statements, identify the number that appears in boldface type as the value of either a population characteristic or a statistic: a. A department store reports that \(84 \%\) of all customers who use the store's credit plan pay their bills on time. b. A sample of 100 students at a large university had a mean age of 24.1 years. c. The Department of Motor Vehicles reports that \(22 \%\) of all vehicles registered in a particular state are imports. d. A hospital reports that, based on the 10 most recent cases, the mean length of stay for surgical patients is \(\mathbf{6} . \mathbf{4}\) days. e. A consumer group, after testing 100 batteries of a certain brand, reported an average life of \(\mathbf{6 3}\) hours of use.

The article "Rethinking Calcium Supplements" (U.S. Airways Magazine, October 2010) describes a study investigating whether taking calcium supplements increases the risk of heart attack. Consider the following four study descriptions. For each study, answer the following five questions: Question 1: Is the study described an observational study or an experiment? Question 2: Did the study use random selection from some population? Question 3: Did the study use random assignment to experimental groups? Question 4: Based on the study description, would it be reasonable to conclude that taking calcium supplements is the cause of the increased risk of heart attack? Question 5: Would it be reasonable to generalize conclusions from this study to some larger population? If so, what population? Study 1: Every heart attack patient and every patient admitted for an illness other than heart attack during the month of December, 2010 , at a large urban hospital was asked if he or she took calcium supplements. The proportion of heart attack patients who took calcium supplements was significantly higher than the proportion of patients admitted for other illnesses who took calcium supplements. Study 2: Two hundred people were randomly selected from a list of all people living in Minneapolis who receive Social Security. Each person in the sample was asked whether or not they took calcium supplements. These people were followed for 5 years, and whether or not they had had a heart attack during the 5-year period was noted. The proportion of heart attack victims in the group taking calcium supplements was significantly higher than the proportion of heart attack victims in the group not taking calcium supplements. Study 3: Two hundred people were randomly selected from a list of all people living in Minneapolis who receive Social Security. Each person was asked to participate in a statistical study, and all agreed to participate. Those who had no previous history of heart problems were instructed not to take calcium supplements. Those with a previous history of heart problems were instructed to take calcium supplements. The participants were followed for 5 years, and whether or not they had had a heart attack during the 5 -year period was noted. The proportion of heart attack victims in the calcium supplement group was significantly higher than the proportion of heart attack victims in the no calcium supplement group. Study 4: Four hundred people volunteered to participate in a 10-year study. Each volunteer was assigned at random to either group 1 or group \(2 .\) Those in group 1 took a daily calcium supplement. Those in group 2 did not take a calcium supplement. The proportion who suffered a heart attack during the 10 -year study period was noted for each group. The proportion of heart attack victims in group 1 was significantly higher than the proportion of heart attack victims in group 2

A building contractor has a chance to buy an odd lot of 5000 used bricks at an auction. She is interested in determining the proportion of bricks in the lot that are cracked and therefore unusable for her current project, but she does not have enough time to inspect all 5000 bricks. Instead, she checks 100 bricks to determine whether each is cracked. Describe the population and the sample for this problem.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.