/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 82 Suppose that you are an inspecto... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose that you are an inspector for the Fish and Game Department and that you are given the task of determining whether to prohibit fishing along part of the Oregon coast. You will close an area to fishing if it is determined that more than \(3 \%\) of fish have unacceptably high mercury levels. a. Which of the following pairs of hypotheses would you test: $$ H_{0}: p=0.03 \text { versus } H_{a}: p>0.03 $$ or $$ H_{0}: p=0.03 \text { versus } H_{a}: p<0.03 $$ Explain the reason for your choice. b. Would you use a significance level of 0.10 or 0.01 for your test? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The suitable pair of hypotheses to test would be \(H_{0}: p=0.03\) versus \(H_{a}: p>0.03\). The choice of the significance level for the test would be 0.01 considering the importance of the decision.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the correct pair of Hypotheses

The appropriate pair of hypotheses would be: \(H_{0}: p=0.03\) versus \(H_{a}: p>0.03\). This is because we are interested in whether more than 3% of fish are affected, signifying \(p > 0.03\).
02

Identify the correct significance level

The significance level of a test indicates the risk of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. A lower significance level signifies a lower risk of making such an error. Since the decision potentially impacts the livelihood of fishermen and the conservation of the fish population, both of which are significant, it would be prudent to choose a lower significance level, i.e., 0.01, to minimize the risk of incorrectly closing the area to fishing.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Significance Level
The significance level is an essential aspect of hypothesis testing that refers to the probability of rejecting a true null hypothesis. It is represented by the Greek letter \( \alpha \) and is often used to denote the likelihood of making a Type I error—the error of incorrectly concluding that there is an effect or difference when there isn't one.
### Choosing the Right Significance LevelSelecting an appropriate significance level is crucial and should consider the context of the decision and its consequences. For critical decisions, such as those impacting environmental protection and livelihoods, a smaller \( \alpha \) level like 0.01 is often selected. This choice reduces the risk of wrongly finding significant results (Type I error), ensuring that any decision—such as closing fishing areas—is made on robust evidence.
- **Common Significance Levels:** Typically, significance levels like 0.05 or 0.01 are used, with 0.05 being accepted for many research areas.- **Higher Significance Level (e.g., 0.10):** Allows for more flexibility in detecting effects but increases the risk of a Type I error.- **Lower Significance Level (e.g., 0.01):** Requires more evidence to reject the null hypothesis and increases confidence in decisions.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis, denoted as \( H_0 \), is a fundamental concept in hypothesis testing. It represents a baseline assumption about a population parameter, often suggesting no effect or no difference.
### What Is a Null Hypothesis?In essence, the null hypothesis serves as a starting point for statistical testing. It posits that any observed differences or effects are due to chance, rather than a real influence or effect:
- **Formulation:** Generally takes the form of an equality, such as \( H_0: p = 0.03 \), indicating that the proportion of interest is hypothesized to be exactly 3%.- **Purpose:** Used as a default assumption to be challenged by the data.- **Testing:** Statistical tests are conducted to assess whether there is enough evidence to reject \( H_0 \). If the data shows a significant result (consistent with a low \( \alpha \)), \( H_0 \) is rejected.
The null hypothesis helps ensure that researchers do not make claims of difference unless there is sufficient statistical support, maintaining scientific rigor.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis, symbolized as \( H_a \), is the statement that expresses what researchers are looking to prove or explore. Unlike the null hypothesis, it presents an idea of change or difference from the baseline assumption.
### Understanding the Alternative HypothesisThe alternative hypothesis serves as a counter to the null hypothesis, suggesting that observations are influenced by some real effect and are not due to random chance:
- **Formulation:** It usually represents inequality, such as \( H_a: p > 0.03 \), signifying that the true proportion is greater than 3%.- **Goal:** Researchers aim to provide enough evidence through data to support \( H_a \), indicating there is a statistically significant difference or effect compared to \( H_0 \).- **Decision Making:** If the statistical test results in a significant finding, with the calculated p-value less than the significance level \( \alpha \), \( H_a \) is accepted, and \( H_0 \) is rejected.
The choice and formulation of \( H_a \) are dictated by the research question and what is of primary interest in the study, guiding the direction of the hypothesis test.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

According to a Washington Post-ABC News poll, 331 of 502 randomly selected American adults said they would not be bothered if the National Security Agency collected records of personal telephone calls. The data were used to test \(H_{0}: p=0.5\) versus \(H_{a}: p>0.5,\) and the null hypothesis was rejected. a. Based on the hypothesis test, what can you conclude about the proportion of American adults who would not be bothered if the National Security Agency collected records of personal telephone calls? b. Is it reasonable to say that the data provide strong support for the alternative hypothesis? c. Is it reasonable to say that the data provide strong evidence against the null hypothesis?

The paper referenced in the previous exercise also reported that when each of the 1,178 students who participated in the study was asked if he or she played video games at least once a day, 271 responded yes. The researchers were interested in using this information to decide if there is convincing evidence that more than \(20 \%\) of students ages 8 to 18 play video games at least once a day.

The article "The Benefits of Facebook Friends: Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites" (Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication [2007]: \(1143-1168\) ) describes a study of \(n=286\) undergraduate students at Michigan State University. Suppose that it is reasonable to regard this sample as a random sample of undergraduates at Michigan State. You want to use the survey data to decide if there is evidence that more than \(75 \%\) of the students at this university have a Facebook page that includes a photo of themselves. Let \(p\) denote the proportion of all Michigan State undergraduates who have such a page. (Hint: See Example 10.10\()\) a. Describe the shape, center, and spread of the sampling distribution of \(\hat{p}\) for random samples of size 286 if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.75\) is true. b. Would you be surprised to observe a sample proportion as large as \(\hat{p}=0.83\) for a sample of size 286 if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.75\) were true? Explain why or why not. c. Would you be surprised to observe a sample proportion as large as \(\hat{p}=0.79\) for a sample of size 286 if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.75\) were true? Explain why or why not. d. The actual sample proportion observed in the study was \(\hat{p}=0.80 .\) Based on this sample proportion, is there convincing evidence that the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=\) 0.75 is not true, or is \(\hat{p}\) consistent with what you would expect to see when the null hypothesis is true? Support your answer with a probability calculation.

Consider the following quote from the article "Review Finds No Link Between Vaccine and Autism" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, October 19,2005 ): "We found no evidence that giving MMR causes Crohn's disease and/or autism in the children that get the MMR,' said Tom Jefferson, one of the authors of The Cochrane Review. 'That does not mean it doesn't cause it. It means we could find no evidence of it." (MMR is a measles-mumps-rubella vaccine.) In the context of a hypothesis test with the null hypothesis being that MMR does not cause autism, explain why the author could not conclude that the MMR vaccine does not cause autism.

Assuming a random sample from a large population, for which of the following null hypotheses and sample sizes is the large-sample \(z\) test appropriate? a. \(H_{0}: p=0.8, n=40\) b. \(H_{0}: p=0.4, n=100\) c. \(H_{0}: p=0.1, n=50\) d. \(H_{0}: p=0.05, n=750\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.