/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 3 Suppose we wish to develop a mod... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose we wish to develop a model with three explanatory variables, \(x_{1}, x_{2},\) and \(x_{3}\) (a) Write a model that utilizes all three explanatory variables with no interaction. (b) Write a model that utilizes the explanatory variables \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) along with interaction between \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) (c) Write a model that utilizes all three explanatory variables with interaction between \(x_{2}\) and \(x_{3}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) \[ y = \beta_{0} + \beta_{1}x_{1} + \beta_{2}x_{2} + \beta_{3}x_{3} + \epsilon \]. (b) \[ y = \beta_{0} + \beta_{1}x_{1} + \beta_{2}x_{2} + \beta_{12}(x_{1} \times x_{2}) + \epsilon \]. (c) \[ y = \beta_{0} + \beta_{1}x_{1} + \beta_{2}x_{2} + \beta_{3}x_{3} + \beta_{23}(x_{2} \times x_{3}) + \epsilon \].

Step by step solution

01

Write a model with three explanatory variables and no interactions

To write a model with three explanatory variables and no interactions, introduce the variables into a linear regression equation: Let the response variable be denoted by \(y\), and the model is given by: \[ y = \beta_{0} + \beta_{1}x_{1} + \beta_{2}x_{2} + \beta_{3}x_{3} + \epsilon \] Where \( \beta_{0} \) is the intercept, \( \beta_{1}, \beta_{2}, \) and \( \beta_{3} \) are the coefficients for the explanatory variables \( x_{1}, x_{2}, \) and \( x_{3} \) respectively, and \( \epsilon \) is the error term.
02

Write a model with explanatory variables x_1 and x_2 and their interaction

To incorporate interaction between two variables, introduce a term that represents the product of these variables into the equation: The model including interaction between \( x_{1} \) and \( x_{2} \) is: \[ y = \beta_{0} + \beta_{1}x_{1} + \beta_{2}x_{2} + \beta_{12}(x_{1} \times x_{2}) + \epsilon \] Where \( \beta_{12} \) represents the coefficient for the interaction term between \( x_{1} \) and \( x_{2} \).
03

Write a model with all three explanatory variables and interaction between x_2 and x_3

To include interactions between \( x_{2} \) and \( x_{3} \) while retaining all three variables, add the interaction term to the equation: The model with interaction between \( x_{2} \) and \( x_{3} \) is: \[ y = \beta_{0} + \beta_{1}x_{1} + \beta_{2}x_{2} + \beta_{3}x_{3} + \beta_{23}(x_{2} \times x_{3}) + \epsilon \] Here, \( \beta_{23} \) represents the coefficient for the interaction term between \( x_{2} \) and \( x_{3} \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Explanatory Variables
Explanatory variables, also known as predictor variables or independent variables, are the variables in a regression analysis that are used to explain variations in the response variable. In our example, we have three explanatory variables: \( x_1 \), \( x_2 \), and \( x_3 \). These variables are used to build a linear regression model that predicts the outcome variable (denoted by \( y \)). Each explanatory variable is associated with a coefficient (e.g., \( \beta_1 \), \( \beta_2 \), \( \beta_3 \)), which quantifies the effect of the explanatory variable on the response variable. The simplest model without interaction terms would look like this:

\[ y = \beta_0 + \beta_1 x_1 + \beta_2 x_2 + \beta_3 x_3 + \epsilon \]
Here:
  • \( \beta_0 \) is the intercept, signifying the expected value of \( y \) when all explanatory variables are zero.
  • \( \epsilon \) is the error term, which accounts for variability in \( y \) that cannot be explained by the predictors.
To master the concept of explanatory variables, remember they are the inputs we use to predict the output.
Interaction Terms
Interaction terms in a regression model determine if the effect of one explanatory variable on the response variable depends on the level of another explanatory variable. These terms are added to the model as the product of two explanatory variables. For example, if we want to model the interaction between \( x_1 \) and \( x_2 \), we add the term \( \beta_{12}(x_1 \times x_2) \). The equation then looks like this:

\[ y = \beta_0 + \beta_1 x_1 + \beta_2 x_2 + \beta_{12} (x_1 \times x_2) + \epsilon \]
Here, \( \beta_{12} \) captures the effect of the interaction between \( x_1 \) and \( x_2 \) on the response variable \( y \).

Interaction terms are crucial when the impact of one predictor on the dependent variable is modified by another variable. For example, the combined effect of study time (\( x_1 \)) and tutoring hours (\( x_2 \)) on a student's grades (\( y \)) can be different from their individual effects. To include such interactions, we can extend models with more than one interaction term as needed, like:
  • \( \beta_{23}(x_2 \times x_3) \) for interaction between \( x_2 \) and \( x_3 \).
Regression Coefficients
Regression coefficients are the values that multiply the explanatory variables in a regression equation. They represent the strength and direction of the relationship between each explanatory variable and the response variable. In our models, \( \beta_1 \), \( \beta_2 \), and \( \beta_3 \) are the coefficients for \( x_1 \), \( x_2 \), and \( x_3 \) respectively.

For instance, in the equation:

\[ y = \beta_0 + \beta_1 x_1 + \beta_2 x_2 + \beta_3 x_3 + \epsilon \]
If \( \beta_1 \) is 2, for every one unit increase in \( x_1 \), \( y \) increases by 2 units, assuming other variables stay the same.

Regression coefficients for interaction terms tell us how the interaction between variables affects the response variable. In the equation,

\[ y = \beta_0 + \beta_1 x_1 + \beta_2 x_2 + \beta_{12}(x_1 \times x_2) + \epsilon \]
\( \beta_{12} \) shows how the combined effect of \( x_1 \) and \( x_2 \) influences \( y \).

Understanding regression coefficients:
  • Positive coefficients indicate a direct relationship between the predictor and response.
  • Negative coefficients indicate an inverse relationship.
  • The magnitude of the coefficient shows the strength of the relationship.
  • Customized coefficients for interaction terms highlight the complexity of these combined relationships.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Why is it desirable to have the explanatory variables spread out to test a hypothesis regarding \(\beta_{1}\) or to construct confidence intervals about \(\beta_{1} ?\)

Putting It Together: Purchasing Diamonds The value of a diamond is determined by the four C's: carat weight, color, clarity, and cut. Carat weight is the standard measure for the size of a diamond. Generally, the more a diamond weighs, the more valuable it will be. The Gemological Institute of America (GIA) determines the color of diamonds using a 22 -grade scale from D (almost clear white) to \(Z\) (light yellow). Colorless diamonds are generally considered the most desirable. The clarity of a diamond refers to how "free" the diamond is of imperfections and is determined using an 11 -grade scale: flawless (FL), internally flawless (IF), very, very slightly imperfect (VVS1, VVS2), very slightly imperfect (VS1, VS2), slightly imperfect (SI1,SI2), and imperfect (I1, I2, I3). The cut of a diamond refers to the diamond's proportions and finish. Put simply, the better the diamond's cut is, the better it reflects and refracts light, which makes it more beautiful and thus more valuable. The cut of a diamond is rated using a five-grade scale: Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair, and Poor. Finally, the shape of a diamond (which is not one of the four C's) refers to its basic form: round, oval, pear-shaped, marquis, and so on. A novice might confuse shape with cut, so be careful not to confuse the two. Go to www.pearsonhighered.com/sullivanstats to obtain the data file \(14_{-} 6_{-} 8\) using the file format of your choice for the version of the text you are using. The data represent a random sample of 40 unmounted, round-shaped diamonds. Use the data to answer the questions that follow: (a) Determine the level of measurement for each variable. (i) Carat weight (iv) Cut (ii) Color (v) Price (iii) Clarity (vi) Shape (b) Construct a correlation matrix. To do so, first convert the variables color, clarity, and cut to numeric values as follows: Color: \(\mathrm{D}=1, \mathrm{E}=2, \mathrm{~F}=3, \mathrm{G}=4, \mathrm{H}=5, \mathrm{I}=6, \mathrm{~J}=7\) Clarity: \(\mathrm{FL}=1, \mathrm{IF}=2, \mathrm{VVS} 1=3, \mathrm{VVS} 2=4, \mathrm{VS} 1=5\) \(\mathrm{VS} 2=6, \mathrm{SI} 1=7, \mathrm{SI} 2=8\) Cut: Excellent \(=1,\) Very Good \(=2,\) Good \(=3\) If price is to be the response variable in our model, is there reason to be concerned about multicollinearity? Explain. (c) Find the "best" model for predicting the price of a diamond. (d) Draw residual plots, a boxplot of the residuals, and a normal probability plot of the residuals to assess the adequacy of the "best" model. (e) For the "best" model, interpret each regression coefficient. (f) Determine and interpret \(R^{2}\) and the adjusted \(R^{2}\). (g) Predict the mean price of a round-shaped diamond with the following characteristics: 0.85 carat, E, VVS1, Excellent. (h) Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean price found in part (g). (i) Predict the price of an individual round-shaped diamond with the following characteristics: 0.85 carat, E, VVS1 Excellent. (j) Construct a \(95 \%\) prediction interval for the price found in \(\operatorname{part}(\mathrm{i})\) (k) Explain why the predictions in parts \((\mathrm{g})\) and (i) are the same, yet the intervals in parts \((\mathrm{h})\) and \((\mathrm{j})\) are different.

For the data set $$ \begin{array}{lllll} x_{1} & x_{2} & x_{3} & x_{4} & y \\ \hline 43 & 19.6 & 7.1 & 32 & 200 \\ \hline 44 & 13.1 & 58.5 & 37 & 204 \\ \hline 40 & 24.7 & 2.1 & 32 & 215 \\ \hline 35 & 30.4 & 41.4 & 39 & 229 \\ \hline 38 & 28.2 & 7.7 & 30 & 231 \\ \hline 39 & 24.9 & 25.0 & 26 & 243 \\ \hline 39 & 45.7 & 28.5 & 25 & 266 \\ \hline 40 & 38.4 & 27.7 & 24 & 278 \\ \hline 47 & 36.9 & 26.2 & 17 & 287 \\ \hline 35 & 66.3 & 4.2 & 23 & 298 \\ \hline 36 & 112.8 & 26.2 & 21 & 339 \\ \hline 44 & 108.4 & 22.3 & 24 & 359 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Construct a correlation matrix between \(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}, x_{4},\) and \(y .\) Is there any evidence that multicollinearity may be a problem? (b) Determine the multiple regression line using all the explanatory variables listed. Does the F-test indicate that we should reject \(H_{0} \cdot \beta_{1}=\beta_{2}=\beta_{3}=\beta_{4}=0 ?\) Which explanatory variables have slope coefficients that are not significantly different from zero? (c) Remove the explanatory variable with the highest \(P\) -value from the model and recompute the regression model. Does the \(F\) -test still indicate that the model is significant? Remove any additional explanatory variables on the basis of the\(P\) -value of the slope coefficient. Then compute the model with the variable removed. (d) Draw residual plots and a box plot of the residuals to assess the adequacy of the model. (e) Use the model constructed in part (c) to predict the value of \(y\) if \(x_{1}=34, x_{2}=35.6, x_{3}=12.4,\) and \(x_{4}=29 .\) (f) Draw a normal probability plot of the residuals. Is it reasonable to construct confidence and prediction intervals? (g) Construct \(95 \%\) confidence and prediction intervals if \(x_{1}=34, x_{2}=35.6, x_{3}=12.4,\) and \(x_{4}=29\)

For the data set $$\begin{array}{cccc}x_{1} & x_{2} & x_{3} & y \\\\\hline 24.9 & 13.5 & 3.7 & 59.8 \\\\\hline 26.7 & 15.7 & 11.4 & 66.3 \\\\\hline 30.6 & 13.8 & 15.7 & 76.5 \\\\\hline 39.6 & 8.8 & 8.8 & 77.1 \\\\\hline 33.1 & 10.6 & 18.3 & 81.9 \\\\\hline 41.1 & 9.7 & 21.8 & 84.6 \\ \hline 25.4 & 9.8 & 16.4 & 87.3 \\\\\hline 33.8 & 6.8 & 25.9 & 88.5 \\\\\hline 23.5 & 7.5 & 15.5 & 90.7 \\\\\hline 39.8 & 6.8 & 30.8 & 93.4\end{array}$$.(a) Construct a correlation matrix between \(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3},\) and \(y .\) Is there any evidence that multicollinearity exists? Why? (b) Determine the multiple regression line with \(x_{1}, x_{2},\) and \(x_{3}\) as the explanatory variables. (c) Assuming that the requirements of the model are satisfied, test \(H_{0}: \beta_{1}=\beta_{2}=\beta_{3}=0\) versus \(H_{1}:\) at least one of the \(\beta_{i}\) is different from zero at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance. (d) Assuming that the requirements of the model are satisfied, test \(H_{0}: \beta_{i}=0\) versus \(H_{1}: \beta_{i} \neq 0\) for \(i=1,2,3\) at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance. Should a variable be removed from the model? Why? (e) Remove the variable identified in part (d) and recompute the regression model. Test whether at least one regression coefficient is different from zero. Then test whether each individual regression coefficient is significantly different from zero.

A researcher wants to determine a model that can be used to predict the 28 -day strength of a concrete mixture. The following data represent the 28 -day and 7 -day strength (in pounds per square inch) of a certain type of concrete along with the concrete's slump. Slump is a measure of the uniformity of the concrete, with a higher slump indicating a less uniform mixture. $$ \begin{array}{ccc} \text { Slump (inches) } & \text { 7-Day psi } & \text { 28-Day psi } \\ \hline 4.5 & 2330 & 4025 \\ \hline 4.25 & 2640 & 4535 \\\ \hline 3 & 3360 & 4985 \\ \hline 4 & 1770 & 3890 \\ \hline 3.75 & 2590 & 3810 \\ \hline 2.5 & 3080 & 4685 \\ \hline 4 & 2050 & 3765 \\ \hline 5 & 2220 & 3350 \\ \hline 4.5 & 2240 & 3610 \\ \hline 5 & 2510 & 3875 \\ \hline 2.5 & 2250 & 4475 \end{array} $$ (a) Construct a correlation matrix between slump, 7 -day psi, and 28 -day psi. Is there any reason to be concerned with multicollinearity based on the correlation matrix? (b) Find the least-squares regression equation \(\hat{y}=b_{0}+b_{1} x_{1}+b_{2} x_{2},\) where \(x_{1}\) is slump, \(x_{2}\) is 7 -day strength, and \(y\) is the response variable, 28 -day strength. (c) Draw residual plots and a boxplot of the residuals to assess the adequacy of the model. (d) Interpret the regression coefficients for the least-squares regression equation. (e) Determine and interpret \(R^{2}\) and the adjusted \(R^{2}\). (f) Test \(H_{0}: \beta_{1}=\beta_{2}=0\) versus \(H_{1}:\) at least one of the \(\beta_{1} \neq 0\) at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance. (g) Test the hypotheses \(H_{0}: \beta_{1}=0\) versus \(H_{1}: \beta_{1} \neq 0\) and \(H_{0}: \beta_{2}=0\) versus \(H_{1}: \beta_{2} \neq 0\) at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance. (h) Predict the mean 28 -day strength of all concrete for which slump is 3.5 inches and 7 -day strength is 2450 psi. (i) Predict the 28 -day strength of a specific sample of concrete for which slump is 3.5 inches and 7 -day strength is 2450 psi. (j) Construct \(95 \%\) confidence and prediction intervals for concrete for which slump is 3.5 inches and 7 -day strength is 2450 psi. Interpret the results.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.