/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 22 Suppose you wish to determine if... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose you wish to determine if the mean IQ of students on your campus is different from the mean IQ in the general population, \(100 .\) To conduct this study, you obtain a simple random sample of 50 students on your campus, administer an IQ test, and record the results. The mean IQ of the sample of 50 students is found to be 107.3 with a standard deviation of \(13.6 .\) (a) Conduct a hypothesis test (preferably using technology) \(H_{0}: \mu=\mu_{0}\) versus \(H_{1}: \mu \neq \mu_{0}\) for \(\mu_{0}=103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112\) at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance. For which values of \(\mu_{0}\) do you not reject the null hypothesis? (b) Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean IQ of students on your campus. What might you conclude about how the lower and upper bounds of a confidence interval relate to the values for which the null hypothesis is rejected? (c) Suppose you changed the level of significance in conducting the hypothesis test to \(\alpha=0.01\). What would happen to the range of values of \(\mu_{0}\) for which the null hypothesis is not rejected? Why does this make sense?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Reject null hypothesis for \( \mu_0 = 108, 109, 110, 111, 112 \) at \( \alpha = 0.05 \). For a 95% confidence interval: \[ 103.44, 111.16 \]. Changing \( \alpha \ to 0.01 narrows the accepted \( \mu_0 \) range.

Step by step solution

01

Define the Hypotheses

The null hypothesis is defined as: H_0: \( \mu = \mu_0 \) The alternative hypothesis is defined as: H_1: \( \mu eq \mu_0 \)
02

Set the Level of Significance

For this exercise, we use \( \alpha = 0.05 \). This means there is a 5% risk of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true.
03

Calculate the Test Statistic

The test statistic for a sample mean is calculated using the formula: \[ t = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu_0}{s / \sqrt{n}} \] where \( \bar{x} \) is the sample mean, \( \mu_0 \) is the population mean, \( s \) is the sample standard deviation, and \( n \) is the sample size. Plugging in the values: \[ t = \frac{107.3 - \mu_0}{13.6 / \sqrt{50}} \]
04

Determine the Critical Value

Using a t-distribution table and \( \alpha / 2 = 0.025 \) for a two-tailed test with \( df = 49 \) degrees of freedom, the critical t-value is approximately \( \pm 2.009 \).
05

Compare the Test Statistic to the Critical Value

Calculate the test statistic for each \( \mu_0 = 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112 \) and determine whether it falls within the range \( -2.009 \) to \( 2.009 \).
06

Identify Values of \( \mu_0 \) for Which \( H_0 \) is Not Rejected

For \( \mu_0 \) values that make the test statistic fall within \( -2.009 \) to \( 2.009 \), the null hypothesis is not rejected.
07

Construct a 95% Confidence Interval

The confidence interval for the mean is calculated using the formula: \[ \bar{x} \pm t_{\alpha/2} \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}} \] where \( \bar{x} \) is the sample mean, \( t_{\alpha/2} \) is the critical value from the t-distribution, \( s \) is the sample standard deviation, and \( n \) is the sample size. Plugging in the values: \[ 107.3 \pm 2.009 \frac{13.6}{\sqrt{50}} \] This results in the interval: \[ 107.3 \pm 3.86 \] or \[ [103.44, 111.16] \]
08

Relate Confidence Interval to Hypothesis Test

The confidence interval \[ [103.44, 111.16] \] indicates that values of \( \mu_0 \) within this range are not rejected at the \( \alpha = 0.05 \) significance level.
09

Analyze Impact of Changing \( \alpha \) to 0.01

A lower significance level \( \alpha = 0.01 \) results in a wider critical value range, from \( -2.677 \) to \( 2.677 \). This would likely narrow down the range of \( \mu_0 \) values for which \( H_0 \) is not rejected.
10

Conclusion

A lower significance level tightens the criteria for rejection, ensuring higher confidence in decisions but reducing the range of accepted \( \mu_0 \) values.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

mean IQ
In this problem, we want to compare the mean IQ of students on a campus to the general population mean IQ, which is 100. The mean (or average) IQ score is a central point around which the IQ scores of individuals within a group vary. We calculated the sample mean IQ from our simple random sample of 50 students, which is found to be 107.3. The sample mean gives us a point estimate of the population mean but it is not enough on its own to determine if there is a significant difference from the known population mean.
t-distribution
The t-distribution plays a crucial role in hypothesis testing, especially when the sample size is small. This distribution is similar to the normal distribution but has thicker tails, which is appropriate when dealing with small sample sizes and unknown population standard deviations. Here, we use the t-distribution because our sample size is 50, and we need to estimate the population standard deviation from the sample. We use the t-distribution to find the critical values for our test statistic, which is calculated using the formula: \[ t = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu_0}{s / \sqrt{n}} \] where \( \bar{x} \) is the sample mean, \( \mu_0 \) is the hypothesized population mean, \( s \) is the sample standard deviation, and \( n \) is the sample size.
confidence interval
A confidence interval provides a range of values within which the true population mean is expected to lie with a certain level of confidence. In this problem, we constructed a 95% confidence interval for the mean IQ of students on campus. The confidence interval is calculated using the formula: \[ \bar{x} \pm t_{\alpha/2} \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}} \] where \( \bar{x} \) is the sample mean, \( t_{\alpha/2} \) is the critical value from the t-distribution, \( s \) is the sample standard deviation, and \( n \) is the sample size. By plugging in the values, we get: \[ 107.3 \pm 2.009 \frac{13.6}{\sqrt{50}} \] which results in the confidence interval: \[ 107.3 \pm 3.86 \] or \[ [103.44, 111.16] \]. This means we are 95% confident that the true mean IQ of students on campus lies between 103.44 and 111.16.
level of significance
The level of significance, denoted as \( \alpha \), is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. In other words, it represents the risk of making a Type I error. For this problem, we used a significance level of \( \alpha = 0.05 \). This means we accept a 5% chance of mistakenly rejecting the null hypothesis. If we change the significance level to \( \alpha = 0.01 \), the criteria to reject the null hypothesis becomes stricter, reducing the risk of Type I error but potentially increasing the range of values for which \( \mu_0 \) is not rejected. This makes our test more conservative.
critical value
The critical value is a threshold that the test statistic must exceed in order for us to reject the null hypothesis. In a two-tailed test, which is used here, there are two critical values: negative and positive. We use a t-distribution table to find these critical values based on our chosen level of significance \( \alpha \) and degrees of freedom \( df \), which is calculated as \( df = n - 1 \). For an \( \alpha = 0.05 \) level of significance and \( df = 49 \), the critical t-value is approximately \( \pm 2.009 \). We then compare our calculated test statistic to these critical values to determine if it falls within the acceptance range, which makes all the values of \( \mu_0 \) where the test statistic falls between -2.009 to 2.009 the values for which the null hypothesis is not rejected.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Simulation Simulate drawing 100 simple random samples of size \(n=15\) from a population that is normally distributed with mean 100 and standard deviation 15 . (a) Test the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: \mu=100\) versus \(H_{1}: \mu \neq 100\) for each of the 100 simple random samples. (b) If we test this hypothesis at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance, how many of the 100 samples would you expect to result in a Type I error? (c) Count the number of samples that lead to a rejection of the null hypothesis. Is it close to the expected value determined in part (b)? (d) Describe how we know that a rejection of the null hypothesis results in making a Type I error in this situation.

To test \(H_{0}: \sigma=1.2\) versus \(H_{1}: \sigma \neq 1.2,\) a random sample of size \(n=22\) is obtained from a population that is known to be normally distributed. (a) If the sample standard deviation is determined to be \(s=0.8\), compute the test statistic. (b) If the researcher decides to test this hypothesis at the \(\alpha=0.10\) level of significance, determine the critical values. (c) Draw a chi-square distribution and depict the critical regions. (d) Will the researcher reject the null hypothesis? Why?

A can of soda is labeled as containing 12 fluid ounces. The quality control manager wants to verify that the filling machine is neither over-filling nor under-filling the cans. (a) Determine the null and alternative hypotheses that would be used to determine if the filling machine is calibrated correctly. (b) The quality control manager obtains a sample of 75 cans and measures the contents. The sample evidence leads the manager to reject the null hypothesis. Write a conclusion for this hypothesis test. (c) Suppose, in fact, the machine is not out of calibration. Has a Type I or Type II error been made? (d) Management has informed the quality control department that it does not want to shut down the filling machine unless the evidence is overwhelming that the machine is out of calibration. What level of significance would you recommend the quality control manager use? Explain.

True or False: Sample evidence can prove a null hypothesis is true.

(a) Determine the critical value for a right-tailed test of a population standard deviation with 18 degrees of freedom at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance. (b) Determine the critical value for a left-tailed test of a population standard deviation for a sample of size \(n=23\) at the \(\alpha=0.1\) level of significance. (c) Determine the critical values for a two-tailed test of a population standard deviation for a sample of size \(n=30\) at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.