/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 8 True or False: Sample evidence c... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

True or False: Sample evidence can prove a null hypothesis is true.

Short Answer

Expert verified
False. Sample evidence cannot prove a null hypothesis is true; it can only fail to reject it.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Null Hypothesis

The null hypothesis (ull H_0ull) is a statement that there is no effect or no difference. It serves as a starting point for statistical testing.
02

Role of Sample Evidence

Sample evidence is gathered through experiments or observations to draw conclusions about the population from which the sample is drawn.
03

Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing involves determining whether to reject the null hypothesis based on sample evidence. The goal is usually to see if there is enough evidence to support an alternative hypothesis (ull H_aull).
04

Proving the Null Hypothesis

Sample evidence can never prove the null hypothesis to be true. It can only fail to provide sufficient evidence to reject it. This means that while sample evidence might support lack of evidence against the null hypothesis, it does not confirm the null hypothesis is true.
05

Conclusion

Based on the logic of hypothesis testing, it's clear that sample evidence does not prove the null hypothesis true; it only fails to reject it.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

null hypothesis
A null hypothesis, denoted as \(H_0\), is a statement asserting that there is no significant effect or difference in a particular situation. It's a default position that indicates no relationship between variables in an experiment.
For instance, if you're testing a new drug, the null hypothesis might state that the drug has no effect on patients.
The null hypothesis serves as a starting point for the process of statistical testing. It is the hypothesis that researchers seek evidence against. However, keep in mind that failing to reject the null hypothesis does not mean it is true; it only means there is not enough evidence to support an alternative hypothesis.
sample evidence
Sample evidence refers to the data collected from a subset of a population through experiments or observations. This data is used to make inferences about the entire population.

Here's why sample evidence is crucial:
  • It's often impractical to examine an entire population due to cost or time constraints.
  • The sample should be representative to ensure the conclusions drawn are valid.

In the context of hypothesis testing, sample evidence helps determine if there's enough reason to reject the null hypothesis. For example, if surveys conducted on a sample of voters indicate a preference for a particular candidate, this sample evidence is used to predict the likely outcome for the entire population of voters.
alternative hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis, denoted as \(H_a\) or \(H_1\), is a statement that contradicts the null hypothesis. It suggests that there is a significant effect or a difference.

When performing hypothesis testing, researchers aim to collect enough sample evidence to support the alternative hypothesis.
For example, if the null hypothesis claims that a new teaching method has no impact on student performance, the alternative hypothesis might propose that the new method significantly improves performance.
The key here is that while we use sample evidence to determine if the alternative hypothesis is likely, we can never absolutely prove it. The evidence should be compelling enough to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative.
statistical testing
Statistical testing is the process of using sample evidence to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis. This involves several steps:
  • Define the null and alternative hypotheses.
  • Collect sample data through observation or experimentation.
  • Calculate a test statistic, which provides insight into the differences between the sample data and what is expected under the null hypothesis.
  • Determine a p-value, which indicates the probability of observing the sample data if the null hypothesis is true.
  • Compare the p-value to a predetermined significance level (commonly 0.05).

If the p-value is less than the significance level, the null hypothesis is rejected, suggesting there is enough evidence to support the alternative hypothesis. Conversely, if the p-value is larger, there isn't sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
Importantly, statistical testing doesn't prove anything definitively; it only helps researchers make informed decisions based on the available data.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

To test \(H_{0}: \sigma=4.3\) versus \(H_{1}: \sigma \neq 4.3,\) a random sample of size \(n=12\) is obtained from a population that is known to be normally distributed. (a) If the sample standard deviation is determined to be \(s=4.8\), compute the test statistic. (b) If the researcher decides to test this hypothesis at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance, determine the critical values. (c) Draw a chi-square distribution and depict the critical regions. (d) Will the researcher reject the null hypothesis? Why?

A manufacturer of high-strength, lowalloy steel beams requires that the standard deviation of yield strength not exceed 7000 pounds per square inch (psi). The quality-control manager selected a sample of 20 steel beams and measured their yield strength. The standard deviation of the sample was 7500 psi. Assume that yield strengths are normally distributed. Does the evidence suggest that the standard deviation of yield strength exceeds 7000 psi at the \(\alpha=0.01\) level of significance?

Suppose you wish to determine if the mean IQ of students on your campus is different from the mean IQ in the general population, \(100 .\) To conduct this study, you obtain a simple random sample of 50 students on your campus, administer an IQ test, and record the results. The mean IQ of the sample of 50 students is found to be 107.3 with a standard deviation of \(13.6 .\) (a) Conduct a hypothesis test (preferably using technology) \(H_{0}: \mu=\mu_{0}\) versus \(H_{1}: \mu \neq \mu_{0}\) for \(\mu_{0}=103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112\) at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance. For which values of \(\mu_{0}\) do you not reject the null hypothesis? (b) Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean IQ of students on your campus. What might you conclude about how the lower and upper bounds of a confidence interval relate to the values for which the null hypothesis is rejected? (c) Suppose you changed the level of significance in conducting the hypothesis test to \(\alpha=0.01\). What would happen to the range of values of \(\mu_{0}\) for which the null hypothesis is not rejected? Why does this make sense?

The drug Lipitor is meant to reduce cholesterol and LDL cholesterol. In clinical trials, 19 out of 863 patients taking \(10 \mathrm{mg}\) of Lipitor daily complained of flulike symptoms. Suppose that it is known that \(1.9 \%\) of patients taking competing drugs complain of flulike symptoms. Is there evidence to conclude that more than \(1.9 \%\) of Lipitor users experience flulike symptoms as a side effect at the \(\alpha=0.01\) level of significance?

In \(1994,52 \%\) of parents with children in high school felt it was a serious problem that high school students were not being taught enough math and science. A recent survey found that 256 of 800 parents with children in high school felt it was a serious problem that high school students were not being taught enough math and science. Do parents feel differently today than they did in 1994 ? Use the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance? Source: Based on "Reality Check: Are Parents and Students Ready for More Math and Science?" Public Agenda, \(2006 .\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.