/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 17 Is there an association between ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Is there an association between level of happiness and the risk of heart disease? Researchers studied 1739 people over a 10 year period and asked questions about their daily lives and the hassles they face. The researchers also determined which individuals in the study experienced any type of heart disease. After their analysis, they concluded that happy individuals are less likely to experience heart disease. Source: European Heart Journal \(31(9): 1065-1070,\) February \(2010 .\) (a) What type of observational study is this? Explain. (b) What is the response variable? What is the explanatory variable? (c) In the report, the researchers stated that "the research team also hasn't ruled out that a common factor like genetics could be causing both the emotions and the heart disease." Use the language introduced in this section to explain what this sentence means.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) This is a cohort observational study. b) Response variable: occurrence of heart disease; explanatory variable: level of happiness. c) Genetics could be a confounding variable affecting both emotions and heart disease.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the type of observational study

Determine whether the study observes indirect associations, uses past data, or collects data over a period to monitor outcomes over time. From the description, the researchers followed 1739 people for 10 years and observed the outcomes.
02

Define the response variable and explanatory variable

Identify the response variable and explanatory variable by understanding what is being measured and what factors are being suggested to influence the measured variable. Here, the rate of experiencing heart disease is measured in relation to the level of happiness.
03

Interpret the researchers' statement regarding genetics

Understand the statement by recognizing the possibility of confounding variables in the study. Explain how genetics might be a lurking variable that could influence both happiness and the risk of heart disease.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

explanatory variable
In an observational study, an explanatory variable is a variable that explains or influences changes in another variable. It's sometimes called an independent variable. In our exercise, researchers wanted to see how the level of happiness influences the risk of heart disease.

Happiness is the explanatory variable here because the study investigates if it has an effect on the occurrence of heart disease. Researchers collected data about the participants' happiness levels over 10 years to evaluate this relationship.

By observing happiness levels, researchers attempted to assess their impact on the subsequent health outcomes.
response variable
A response variable, or dependent variable, is the variable researchers are trying to predict or explain. It changes in response to changes in the explanatory variable.

In this observational study, the response variable is the incidence of heart disease. Researchers monitored 1739 individuals over a 10-year period to see how many developed heart disease and compared this data to their levels of daily happiness.

The rate at which participants experienced heart disease is considered the outcome influenced by the levels of happiness observed in the study.
confounding variable
A confounding variable is an outside influence that can skew the results of a study. It is something not accounted for that could affect both the explanatory and response variables, making it difficult to determine a clear relationship between the two.

In the context of our exercise, scientists mentioned genetics as a potential confounding variable. If genetics influences both an individual's happiness and their risk of heart disease, it could confuse the direct impact happiness has on heart disease incidence.

This means that without controlling for genetics, we can't be sure whether happiness or an individual's genetic makeup is more responsible for the lower rates of heart disease.
association
Association in statistical terms refers to a relationship between two variables such that changes in one variable relate to changes in the other. However, association does not equal causation which means we cannot conclude that changes in one cause changes in the other.

In the described study, the researchers concluded that there is an association between being happier and having a lower risk of heart disease.

This means that based on their observations, happier people are less likely to develop heart disease, but this study does not prove that happiness directly prevents heart disease.

Other factors, such as genetics, cannot be ruled out and may contribute to the observed relationship.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Are young couples who marry or cohabitate more likely to gain weight than those who stay single? Researchers followed 8000 men and women for 7 years. At the start of the study, none of the participants were married or living with a romantic partner. The researchers found that women who married or cohabitated during the study gained 9 pounds more than single women, and married or cohabitating men gained, on average, 6 pounds more than single men. (a) Why is this an observational study? What type of observational study is this? (b) What is the response variable in the study? What is the explanatory variable? (c) Identify some potential lurking variables in this study. (d) Can we conclude that getting married or cohabiting causes one to gain weight? Explain.

Researchers want to know if there is a link between hypertension (high blood pressure) and consumption of salt. Past studies have indicated that the consumption of fruits and vegetables offsets the negative impact of salt consumption. It is also known that there is quite a bit of person-to-person variability in the ability of the body to process and eliminate salt. However, no method exists for identifying individuals who have a higher ability to process salt. The U.S. Department of Agriculture recommends that daily intake of salt should not exceed 2400 milligrams (mg). The researchers want to keep the design simple, so they choose to conduct their study using a completely randomized design. (a) What is the response variable in the study? (b) Name three factors that have been identified. (c) For each factor identified, determine whether the variable can be controlled or cannot be controlled. If a factor cannot be controlled, what should be done to reduce variability in the response variable? (d) How many treatments would you recommend? Why?

The survey has bias. (a) Determine the type of bias. (b) Suggest a remedy. To determine the public's opinion of the police department, the police chief obtains a cluster sample of 15 census tracts within his jurisdiction and samples all households in the randomly selected tracts. Uniformed police officers go door to door to conduct the survey.

Magnum, LLC, is a web page design firm that has two designs for an online hardware store. To determine which is the more effective design, Magnum uses one page in the Denver area and a second page in the Miami area. For each visit, Magnum records the amount of time visiting the site and the amount spent by the visitor. (a) What is the explanatory variable in this study? Is it qualitative or quantitative? (b) What are the two response variables? For each response variable, state whether it is qualitative or quantitative. (c) Explain how confounding might be an issue with this study.

Determine whether the study depicts an observational study or an experiment. Sixty patients with carpal tunnel syndrome are randomly divided into two groups. One group is treated weekly with both acupuncture and an exercise regimen. The other is treated weekly with the exact same exercise regimen, but no acupuncture. After 1 year, both groups are questioned about their level of pain due to carpal tunnel syndrome.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.