/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q171SE Question: State casket sales res... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视


Question: State casket sales restrictions. Refer to the Journal of Law and Economics (February 2008) study of the impact of lifting casket sales restrictions on the cost of a funeral, Exercise 12.123 (p. 803). Recall that data collected for a sample of 1,437 funerals were used to fit the model, E(y)=0+1x1+2x2+3x1x2, where y is the price (in dollars) of a direct burial,{1 if funeral home is in a restricted state, 0 if not}, and{1 if price includes a basic wooden casket, 0 if no casket}.The estimated equation (with standard errors in parentheses) is:

y^=1432+793x1-252x2+261x1x2,R2=.78

(70) (134) (109)

  1. Interpret the reported value of R2.
  2. Use the value of R2to compute the F-statistic for testing the overall adequacy of the model. Test atrole="math" localid="1660811116911" =.05.
  3. Compute the predicted price of a direct burial with a basic wooden casket for a funeral home in a restrictive state.
  4. Estimate the difference between the mean price of a direct burial with a basic wooden casket and the mean price of a burial with no casket for a funeral home in a restrictive state.
  5. Estimate the difference between the mean price of a direct burial with a basic wooden casket and the mean price of a burial with no casket for a funeral home in a non-restrictive state.
  6. Is there sufficient evidence to indicate that the difference between the mean price of a direct burial with a basic wooden casket and the mean price of a burial with no casket depends on whether the funeral home is in a restrictive state? Test using=.05.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Answers

  1. The value R2 of is 0.78 indicating that almost 78% of the variation in the data is explained by the model. The higher the value of the better the model is fit for the data. 78% is very high value indicating that the model is a good fit for the data.
  2. At 95% significance level, at least one of the parameters1,2,3 is non zero.
  3. The prediction price of a direct burial with a basic wooden casket for a funeral home in a restrictive state is 2234.
  4. The difference in mean prices of direct burial in a restrictive state is2234-2225=9 .
  5. The difference in mean prices of direct burial in a non-restrictive state is1180-1432=-252 .
  6. At 95% significance level,30 indicating that the difference between the mean price of a direct burial with a basic wooden casket and the mean price of a burial with no casket does not depends on whether the funeral home is in a restrictive state.

Step by step solution

01

Stating the given information  

The total number of samples are 1437 and the model is given as,Ey=0+1x1+2x2+3x1x2 where y is the price (in dollars) of a direct burial, x1 ={1 if funeral home is in a restricted state, 0 if not}, and x2 = {1 if price includes a basic wooden casket, 0 if no casket}. The estimated model is R-Squared and the standard errors are given as y^=1432+793x1-252x2+261x1x2,R2=.78, 70,134,109 for x1x2andx1x2respectively.

02

Interpretation of 

a. A study was conducted to find the impact of casket sales restriction on the cost of funerals. A first order equation with interaction was fitted to the data collected from 1437 observations.

The regression equation with the standard errors of the coefficients and the R2 value is mentioned below.

,y^=1432+793x1-252x2+261x1x2

(70) (134) (109)

The value of R2 is 0.78 indicating that almost 78% of the variation in the data is explained by the model. The higher the value of R2 the better the model is fit for the data. 78% is very high value indicating that the model is a good fit for the data.

03

Overall adequacy of the model

b.

H0:1=2=3=0

Ha :At least one of the parameters1,2,3 is non zero.

Here

F-teststatistic=R2k1-R2n-k+1=0.7830.221437-3+1=1269.2727

Value of F0.05,1436,1436is 1.517.

H0 is rejected if F-statistic>F0.05,28,28. For=0.05 , since F>F0.05,1436,1436there is a sufficient evidence to reject H0 at 95% confidence interval.

Therefore, at least one of the parameters1,2,3 is non zero.

04

Prediction value

c. The regression equation is y^=1432+793x1-252x2+261x1x2.

The prediction price of a direct burial with a basic wooden casket for a funeral home in a restrictive state can be calculated whenx1=1,x2=1

y^=1432+7931-2521+26111y^=2234

The prediction price of a direct burial with a basic wooden casket for a funeral home in a restrictive state is 2234.

05

Difference in mean prices 

d. The mean price of a direct burial with a basic wooden casket and the mean price of a burial with no casket for a funeral home in a restrictive state can be calculated when x1=1andx2=1or 0.

Mean price of a direct burial with a basic wooden casket in a restrictive state is

y^=1432+7931-2521+26111y^=2234

Mean price of a burial with no casket for a funeral home in a restrictive state is

y^=1432+7931-2520+26110y^=2225

The difference in mean prices is (2234-2225) = 9.

06

Difference in mean prices

e. The mean price of a direct burial with a basic wooden casket and the mean price of a burial with no casket for a funeral home in a non-restrictive state can be calculated when x1=1andx2=1or 0.

Mean price of a direct burial with a basic wooden casket in a restrictive state is

y^=1432+7930-2521+26101y^=1180

Mean price of a burial with no casket for a funeral home in a restrictive state is

y^=1432+7930-2520+26100y^=1432

The difference in mean prices is (1180-1432) = -252.

07

Significance of  β3

f.

H0:3=0Ha:30

Here,t-teststatistic=^3s^3=261109=2.39

Value of t0.025,1436is 1.96.

H0is rejected if t-statistic>t0.05,1436.

For=0.05 , sincet>t0.05,31 sufficient evidence to reject H0 at 95% confidence interval.

Therefore ,indicating that the difference between the mean price of a direct burial with a basic wooden casket and the mean price of a burial with no casket does not depends on whether the funeral home is in a restrictive state.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider a multiple regression model for a response y, with one quantitative independent variable x1 and one qualitative variable at three levels.

a. Write a first-order model that relates the mean response E(y) to the quantitative independent variable.

b. Add the main effect terms for the qualitative independent variable to the model of part a. Specify the coding scheme you use.

c. Add terms to the model of part b to allow for interaction between the quantitative and qualitative independent variables.

d. Under what circumstances will the response lines of the model in part c be parallel?

e. Under what circumstances will the model in part c have only one response line?

Question: Suppose you fit the regression modelE(y)=0+1x1+2x2+3x1+4x12+5x22to n = 30 data points and wish to test H0: 尾3 = 尾4 = 尾5 = 0

a. State the alternative hypothesis Ha.

b. Give the reduced model appropriate for conducting the test.

c. What are the numerator and denominator degrees of freedom associated with the F-statistic?

d. Suppose the SSE鈥檚 for the reduced and complete models are SSER = 1,250.2 and SSEC = 1,125.2. Conduct the hypothesis test and interpret the results of your test. Test using 伪 = .05.

Question: Manipulating rates of return with stock splits. Some firms have been accused of using stock splits to manipulate their stock prices before being acquired by another firm. An article in Financial Management (Winter 2008) investigated the impact of stock splits on long-run stock performance for acquiring firms. A simplified version of the model fit by the researchers follows:

E(y)=0+1x1+2x2+3x1x2

where

y = Firm鈥檚 3-year buy-and-hold return rate (%)

x1 = {1 if stock split prior to acquisition, 0 if not}

x2 = {1 if firm鈥檚 discretionary accrual is high, 0 if discretionary accrual is low}

a. In terms of the 尾鈥檚 in the model, what is the mean buy and- hold return rate (BAR) for a firm with no stock split and a high discretionary accrual (DA)?

b. In terms of the 尾鈥檚 in the model, what is the mean BAR for a firm with no stock split and a low DA?

c. For firms with no stock split, find the difference between the mean BAR for firms with high and low DA. (Hint: Use your answers to parts a and b.)

d. Repeat part c for firms with a stock split.

e. Note that the differences, parts c and d, are not the same. Explain why this illustrates the notion of interaction between x1 and x2.

f. A test for H0: 尾3 = 0 yielded a p-value of 0.027. Using 伪 = .05, interpret this result.

g. The researchers reported that the estimated values of both 尾2 and 尾3 are negative. Consequently, they conclude that 鈥渉igh-DA acquirers perform worse compared with low-DA acquirers. Moreover, the underperformance is even greater if high-DA acquirers have a stock split before acquisition.鈥 Do you agree?

Question: Study of supervisor-targeted aggression. 鈥淢oonlighters鈥 are workers who hold two jobs at the same time. What are the factors that impact the likelihood of a moonlighting worker becoming aggressive toward his/her supervisor? This was the research question of interest in the Journal of Applied Psychology (July 2005). Completed questionnaires were obtained from n = 105 moonlighters, and the data were used to fit several multiple regression models for supervisor-directed aggression score 1y2. Two of the models (with R2-values in parentheses) are given below:

a. Interpret the R2-values for the models.

b. Give the null and alternative hypotheses for comparing the fits of models 1 and 2.

c. Are the two models nested? Explain.

d. The nested F-test for comparing the two models resulted in F = 42.13 and p-value < .001. What can you conclude from these results?

e. A third model was fit, one that hypothesizes all possible pairs of interactions between self-esteem, history of aggression, interactional injustice at primary job, and abusive supervisor at primary job. Give the equation of this model (model 3).

f. A nested F-test to compare models 2 and 3 resulted in a p-value > .10. What can you conclude from this result?

Question: Refer to Exercise 12.82.

a. Write a complete second-order model that relates E(y) to the quantitative variable.

b. Add the main effect terms for the qualitative variable (at three levels) to the model of part a.

c. Add terms to the model of part b to allow for interaction between the quantitative and qualitative independent variables.

d. Under what circumstances will the response curves of the model have the same shape but different y-intercepts?

e. Under what circumstances will the response curves of the model be parallel lines?

f. Under what circumstances will the response curves of the model be identical?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.