/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q104SE Is steak your favorite barbeque ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Is steak your favorite barbeque food? July is National Grilling Month in the United States. On July 1, 2008, The Harris Poll #70 reported on a survey of Americans’ grilling preferences. When asked about their favorite food prepared on a barbeque, 662 of 1,250 randomly sampled Democrats preferred steak, as compared to 586 of 930 randomly sampled Republicans.

a. Give a point estimate for the proportion of all Democrats who prefer steak as their favorite barbeque food.

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. The point estimate for the proportion of all democrats is 0.5296.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

The sample size of democrats is 1250.

The sample size of republicans is 930.

And \({x_1} = 662\;and\;{x_2} = 586\)

02

Point Estimate

The value of a sample statistic that is used to estimate the population parameter is called a point estimate. It is a single number. The selected statistic is called a point estimator.

03

Compute Point Estimate

The point estimate for the proportion of all democrats is computed as

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{{\hat p}_1} &= \frac{{{x_1}}}{{{n_1}}}\\ &= \frac{{662}}{{1250}}\\ = 0.5296\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the point estimate for the proportion of all democrats is 0.5296.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Comparing taste-test rating protocols. Taste-testers of new food products are presented with several competing food samples and asked to rate the taste of each on a 9-point scale (where1="dislike extremely" and9="like extremely"). In the Journal of Sensory Studies (June 2014), food scientists compared two different taste-testing protocols. The sequential monadic (SM) method presented the samples one-at-a-time to the taster in a random order, while the rank rating (RR) method presented the samples to the taster all at once, side-by-side. Consider the following experiment (similar to the one conducted in the journal): 50 consumers of apricot jelly were asked to taste test five different varieties. Half the testers used the SM protocol and half used the RR protocol during testing. In a second experiment, 50 consumers of cheese were asked to taste-test four different varieties. Again, half the testers used the SM protocol and half used the RR protocol during testing. For each product (apricot jelly and cheese), the mean taste scores of the two protocols (SM and RR) were compared. The results are shown in the accompanying tables.

a. Consider the five varieties of apricot jelly. Identify the varieties for which you can conclude that "the mean taste scores of the two protocols (SM and RR) differ significantly atα=.05."

b. Consider the four varieties of cheese. Identify the varieties for which you can conclude that "the mean taste scores of the two protocols (SM and RR) differ significantly atα=.05."

c. Explain why the taste-test scores do not need to be normally distributed for the inferences, parts a and b, to be valid.

Given that x is a random variable for which a Poisson probability distribution provides a good approximation, use statistical software to find the following:

a.P(x⩽2) when λ=1

b.P(x⩽2) when λ=2

c.P(x⩽2) when λ=3

d. What happens to the probability of the event {x⩽2} as λ it increases from 1 to 3? Is this intuitively reasonable?

Identify the rejection region for each of the following cases. Assume

v1=7andv2=9

a. Ha:σ12&±ô³Ù;σ22,α=.05

b. Ha:σ12&²µ³Ù;σ22,α=.01

c. Ha:σ12≠σ22,α=.1withs12>s22

d. Ha:σ12&±ô³Ù;σ22,α=.025

Homework assistance for accounting students. How much assistance should accounting professors provide students for completing homework? Is too much assistance counterproductive? These were some of the questions of interest in a Journal of Accounting Education (Vol. 25, 2007) article. A total of 75 junior-level accounting majors who were enrolled in Intermediate Financial Accounting participated in an experiment. All students took a pretest on a topic not covered in class; then, each was given a homework problem to solve on the same topic. However, the students were randomly assigned different levels of assistance on the homework. Some (20 students) were given the completed solution, some (25 students) were given check figures at various steps of the solution, and the rest (30 students) were given no help. After finishing the homework, each student was given a posttest on the subject. One of the variables of interest to the researchers was the knowledge gain (or test score improvement), measured as the difference between the posttest and pretest scores. The sample means knowledge gains for the three groups of students are provided in the table.

a. The researchers theorized that as the level of homework assistance increased, the test score improvement from pretest to post test would decrease. Do the sample means reported in the table support this theory?

b. What is the problem with using only the sample means to make inferences about the population mean knowledge gains for the three groups of students?

c. The researchers conducted a statistical test of the Hypothesis to compare the mean knowledge gain of students in the "no solutions" group with the mean knowledge gain of students in the "check figures" group. Based on the theory, part a sets up the null and alternative hypotheses for the test.

d. The observed significance level of the t-test of the partc was reported as8248 Using α=.05, interpret this result.

e. The researchers conducted a statistical test of the hypothesis to compare the mean knowledge gain of students in the "completed solutions" group with the mean knowledge gain of students in the "check figures" group. Based on the theory, part a sets up the null and alternative hypotheses for the test.

f. The observed significance level of the role="math" localid="1652694732458" t-test of part e was reported as 1849. Using α=.05, interpret this result.

g. The researchers conducted a statistical test of the Hypothesis to compare the mean knowledge gain of students in the "no solutions" group with the mean knowledge gain of students in the "completed solutions" group. Based on the theory, part a sets up the null and alternative hypotheses for the test.

h. The observed significance level of the t-test of the part wasg reported as2726. Using role="math" localid="1652694677616" α=.05, interpret this result.

Patron amenability to supply biomass. Relate to the Biomass and Energy (Vol. 36, 2012) study of the amenability of directors to supply biomass products similar to fat hay, Exercise8.20 (p. 469). Recall that independent samples of Missouri directors and Illinois directors were surveyed. Another aspect of the study concentrated on the service directors who were willing to supply. One essential service involves windrowing (mowing and piling) hay. Of the 558 Missouri directors surveyed, 187 were willing to offer windrowing. Of the 940 Illinois directors surveyed, 380 were willing to offer windrowing services. The experimenters want to know if the proportion of directors willing to offer windrowing services to the biomass request differs for the two areas, Missouri and Illinois.

a. Specify the parameter of interest to the experimenters.

b. Set up the null and indispensable suppositions for testing whether the proportion of directors willing to offer windrowing services differs in Missouri and Illinois.

c. A Minitab analysis of the data is given below. Detect the test statistic on the printout.

d. provide the rejection region for the test using a = .01.

e. Detect the p- the value of the test on the printout.

f. Make the applicable conclusion using both the p-value and rejection region approach. Your conclusions should agree.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.