/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q19E Comparing taste-test rating prot... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Comparing taste-test rating protocols. Taste-testers of new food products are presented with several competing food samples and asked to rate the taste of each on a 9-point scale (where1="dislike extremely" and9="like extremely"). In the Journal of Sensory Studies (June 2014), food scientists compared two different taste-testing protocols. The sequential monadic (SM) method presented the samples one-at-a-time to the taster in a random order, while the rank rating (RR) method presented the samples to the taster all at once, side-by-side. Consider the following experiment (similar to the one conducted in the journal): 50 consumers of apricot jelly were asked to taste test five different varieties. Half the testers used the SM protocol and half used the RR protocol during testing. In a second experiment, 50 consumers of cheese were asked to taste-test four different varieties. Again, half the testers used the SM protocol and half used the RR protocol during testing. For each product (apricot jelly and cheese), the mean taste scores of the two protocols (SM and RR) were compared. The results are shown in the accompanying tables.

a. Consider the five varieties of apricot jelly. Identify the varieties for which you can conclude that "the mean taste scores of the two protocols (SM and RR) differ significantly at=.05."

b. Consider the four varieties of cheese. Identify the varieties for which you can conclude that "the mean taste scores of the two protocols (SM and RR) differ significantly at=.05."

c. Explain why the taste-test scores do not need to be normally distributed for the inferences, parts a and b, to be valid.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a)In the first experiment, allp-values are greater than=0.05.

It is known that if p-value is less than the level of significance value, then it can be said that the varieties are significantly different.

(b) For A, Cand D, the mean taste scores of the two protocols differ significantly.

(c) This is because the sample size is already large enough to be normally distributed as per the Central Limit Theorem, by which is stated that as the sample size becomes large, the sampling distribution becomes approximately normal.

Step by step solution

01

Step-by-Step SolutionStep 1: Given information

One survey was done on taste-teasers of a new food. The foods are rated on a 9 point scale. 50 consumers are divided in two groups. Half of the testers used the SM protocol and half used RR protocol. In another experiment, 50 consumers are asked in the same way but with four varieties of foods.

02

(a) The varieties of apricot jelly differ significantly

In the first experiment, allp-values are greater than=0.05.

It is known that ifp-value is less than the level of significance value, then it can be said that the varieties are significantly different.

Here, it cannot be concluded that the mean taste scores of the two protocols differ for any of the varieties.

03

(b) The varieties of cheese differ significantly

In the second experiment, the p-values for variety A,Cand Dare 0.013,0.002, and 0.034respectively, which are less than =0.05.

It is known that, ifp-value is less than the level of significance value, then it can be said that the varieties are significantly different.

Therefore, the mean taste scores of the two protocols differ significantly for variety A, C, and D.

04

(c) The taste-test scores do not need to be normally distributed for the inferences to be valid

Here, in two experiments the sample size is greater than 30.

If the samples are larger, then all samples follow approximately normal based on the central limit theorem. Therefore, the population of taste test scores that are normal is not needed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A paired difference experiment produced the following results:

nd=38,x1=92,x2=95.5,d=-3.5,sd2=21

a. Determine the values zfor which the null hypothesis 12=0would be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis 12<0 Use .role="math" localid="1652704322912" 伪=.10

b. Conduct the paired difference test described in part a. Draw the appropriate conclusions.

c. What assumptions are necessary so that the paired difference test will be valid?

d. Find a90% confidence interval for the mean difference d.

e. Which of the two inferential procedures, the confidence interval of part d or the test of the hypothesis of part b, provides more information about the differences between the population means?

Two populations are described in each of the following cases. In which cases would it be appropriate to apply the small-sample t-test to investigate the difference between the population means?

a.Population 1: Normal distribution with variance 12. Population 2: Skewed to the right with variance22=12.

b. Population 1: Normal distribution with variance 12. Population 2: Normal distribution with variance 2212.

c. Population 1: Skewed to the left with variance 12. Population 2: Skewed to the left with variance22=12.

d. Population 1: Normal distribution with variance12 . Population 2: Normal distribution with variance22=12 .

e. Population 1: Uniform distribution with variance12 . Population 2: Uniform distribution with variance 22=12.

Whistle-blowing among federal employees. Whistle blowing refers to an employee鈥檚 reporting of wrongdoing by co-workers. A survey found that about 5% of employees contacted had reported wrongdoing during the past 12 months. Assume that a sample of 25 employees in one agency are contacted and let x be the number who have observed and reported wrongdoing in the past 12 months. Assume that the probability of whistle-blowing is .05 for any federal employee over the past 12 months.

a. Find the mean and standard deviation of x. Can x be equal to its expected value? Explain.

b. Write the event that at least 5 of the employees are whistle-blowers in terms of x. Find the probability of the event.

c. If 5 of the 25 contacted have been whistle-blowers over the past 12 months, what would you conclude about the applicability of the 5% assumption to this

agency? Use your answer to part b to justify your conclusion.

Bankruptcy effect on U.S. airfares. Both Delta Airlines and USAir filed for bankruptcy. A study of the impact of bankruptcy on the fares charged by U.S. airlines was published in Research in Applied Economics (Vol. 2, 2010). The researchers collected data on Orlando-bound airfares for three airlines鈥擲outhwest (a stable airline), Delta (just entering bankruptcy at the time), and USAir (emerging from bankruptcy). A large sample of nonrefundable ticket prices was obtained for each airline following USAir鈥檚 emergence from bankruptcy, and then a 95% confidence interval for the true mean airfare was obtained for each. The results for 7-day advance bookings are shown in the accompanying table.

a. What confidence coefficient was used to generate the confidence intervals?

b. Give a practical interpretation of each of the 95% confidence intervals. Use the phrase 鈥95% confident鈥 in your answer.

c. When you say you are 鈥95% confident,鈥 what do you mean?

d. If you want to reduce the width of each confidence interval, should you use a smaller or larger confidence coefficient?

Buy-side vs. sell-side analysts' earnings forecasts. Refer to the Financial Analysts Journal (Jul. /Aug. 2008) study of financial analysts' forecast earnings, Exercise 2.86 (p. 112). Recall that data were collected from 3,526 buy-side analysts and 58,562forecasts made by sell-side analysts, and the relative absolute forecast error was determined for each. The mean and standard deviation of forecast errors for both types of analysts are given in the table.

a. Construct a 95% confidence interval for the difference between the mean forecast error of buy-side analysts and the mean forecast error of sell-side analysts.

b. Based on the interval, part a, which type of analysis has the greater mean forecast error? Explain.

c. What assumptions about the underlying populations of forecast errors (if any) are necessary for the validity of the inference, part b?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.