/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q-59E Vulnerability of counting party ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Vulnerability of counting party Web spots. When you subscribe to your Facebook account, you're granted access to further. Then 1 million counting parties (RP) Web spots. Vulnerabilities in this sign-on system may permit a bushwhacker to gain unauthorized access to your profile, allowing the bushwhacker to impersonate you on the RP Web point. Computer and systems Masterminds delved into the vulnerability of counting party Web spots and presented their results at the Proceedings of the 5th AMC Factory on Computers & Communication Security (October 2012). RP Web spots were distributed as Gar莽on- inflow or customer- inflow Web spots. Of the 40 gar莽on- inflow spots studied, 20 were planted to be vulnerable to impersonation attacks. Of the 54 customer-inflow spots examined, 41 were. Plant to be vulnerable to impersonation attacks. Give your opinion on whether a customer- inflow Web point is more likely to be vulnerable to an impersonation attack than a gar莽on- inflow Website. However, how much more likely? If so.

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is 95% confidence that a client-flow website is more likely to be vulnerable to a special attack than a server-flow website is, from 0.067 to 0.451.

Step by step solution

01

Check whether a client-flow website is more likely to an impressive attack than a server-flow site

The sample proportion for the client-flow website is obtained below.

P-c=xcnc=2040=0.5

The sample proportion for the serve-flow website is obtained below.

P-s=xsns=4154=0.759

The weighted average role="math" localid="1668666697803" P-of Pc and Ps is,

P-=xc+xsnc+ns=20+4140+51=0.649

02

State the test hypotheses

Null hypothesis:

H0: PS鈥 Pc= 0

The client-flow website is not more likely to be vulnerable to a special attack than a serve-flow website.

Alternative hypothesis:

Ha= Ps- Pc< 0

The client-flow website is more likely to be vulnerable to a special attack than a serve-flow website.

03

Test statistics

z=p-q-p-q-1n1+1n2=0.5-0.7590.6491-0.649140+154=0.250.0996=-2.60

Thus, the test statistic is -2.60.

04

Critical values

The critical value is obtained below.

Here, the test is two-tailed, and the significance level is 伪 = 0.05.

The confidence coefficient is 0.95.

So,

(1-伪)=0.95

螒=0.05

= 0.025

From appendix D, table 2, the critical value for the two-tailed test with 伪 = 0.05 isZa2(-0.025)= 1.96.

05

Conclusion

Here, the test statistic falls in the rejection region.

So, the null hypothesis was rejected.

06

Get a 95% confidence interval

Determine how much a client-flow website is more likely to be vulnerable to a special attack than a server-flow website.

P-s-P-cZa5P-s1-P-sns+P-c1-P-cnc=0.759-0.51.930.7591-0.75954+0.51-0.0540

= (0.759 - .05) 卤 1.96

= 0.259卤 1.96 (0.09817)

=0.259卤0.1924

= (0.067,0.451)

So, 95% confidence interval is (0.067,0.451).

07

Final answer

There is 95% confidence that a client-flow website is more likely to be vulnerable to a special attack than a server-flow website is, from 0.067 to 0.451.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

4.132 Suppose xis a random variable best described by a uniform

probability distribution with c= 3 and d= 7.

a. Find f(x)

b. Find the mean and standard deviation of x.

c. FindP(-x+)

Predicting software blights. Relate to the Pledge Software Engineering Repository data on 498 modules of software law written in 鈥淐鈥 language for a NASA spacecraft instrument, saved in the train. (See Exercise 3.132, p. 209). Recall that the software law in each module was estimated for blights; 49 were classified as 鈥渢rue鈥 (i.e., the module has imperfect law), and 449 were classified as 鈥渇alse鈥 (i.e., the module has corrected law). Consider these to be Arbitrary independent samples of software law modules. Experimenters prognosticated the disfigurement status of each module using the simple algorithm, 鈥淚f the number of lines of law in the module exceeds 50, prognosticate the module to have a disfigurement.鈥 The accompanying SPSS printout shows the number of modules in each of the two samples that were prognosticated to have blights (PRED_LOC = 鈥測es鈥) and prognosticated to have no blights (PRED_LOC = 鈥渘o鈥). Now, define the delicacy rate of the algorithm as the proportion of modules. That was rightly prognosticated. Compare the delicacy rate of the algorithm when applied to modules with imperfect law with the delicacy rate of the algorithm when applied to modules with correct law. Use a 99-confidence interval.

DEFECT*PRED_LOC crosstabulation


PRED_LOC
total
noyes

DEFECT False

True

total

440

29

429

49

20

69

449

49

498

Intrusion detection systems. The Journal of Researchof the National Institute of Standards and Technology (November鈥揇ecember 2003) published a study of a doubleintrusion detection system with independent systems. Ifthere is an intruder, system A sounds an alarm with probability.9, and system B sounds an alarm with probability.95. If there is no intruder, system A sounds an alarm withprobability .2, and system B sounds an alarm with probability.1. Now assume that the probability of an intruderis .4. Also assume that under a given condition (intruderor not), systems A and B operate independently. If bothsystems sound an alarm, what is the probability that anintruder is detected?

Drug content assessment. Scientists at GlaxoSmithKlineMedicines Research Center used high-performance liquidchromatography (HPLC) to determine the amountof drug in a tablet produced by the company (Analytical

Chemistry, Dec. 15, 2009). Drug concentrations (measuredas a percentage) for 50 randomly selected tablets are listedin the table below and saved in the accompanying file.

a. Descriptive statistics for the drug concentrations areshown at the top of the XLSTAT printout on the nextpage. Use this information to assess whether the dataare approximately normal.

b. An XLSTAT normal probability plot follows. Use thisinformation to assess whether the data are approximatelynormal.

91.28 92.83 89.35 91.90 82.85 94.83 89.83 89.00 84.62

86.96 88.32 91.17 83.86 89.74 92.24 92.59 84.21 89.36

90.96 92.85 89.39 89.82 89.91 92.16 88.67 89.35 86.51

89.04 91.82 93.02 88.32 88.76 89.26 90.36 87.16 91.74

86.12 92.10 83.33 87.61 88.20 92.78 86.35 93.84 91.20

93.44 86.77 83.77 93.19 81.79

Descriptive statistics(Quantitative data)

Statistic

Content

Nbr.of Observation

50

Minimum

81.79

Maximum

94.83

1st Quartile

87.2725

Median

89.375

3rd Quartile

91.88

Mean

89.2906

Variance(n-1)

10.1343

Standard deviation(n-1)

3.1834

Last name and acquisition timing. Refer to the Journal of Consumer Research (August 2011) study of the last name effect in acquisition timing, Exercise 8.13 (p. 466). Recall that the mean response times (in minutes) to acquire free tickets were compared for two groups of MBA students鈥 those students with last names beginning with one of the first nine letters of the alphabet and those with last names beginning with one of the last nine letters of the alphabet. How many MBA students from each group would need to be selected to estimate the difference in mean times to within 2 minutes of its true value with 95% confidence? (Assume equal sample sizes were selected for each group and that the response time standard deviation for both groups is 鈮 9 minutes.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.