/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} 53E Minority ownership of franchises... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Minority ownership of franchises. According to a 2011 report for IFA Educational Foundation, 20.5% of all franchised businesses in the United States are minority owned. (This information is based on the U.S. Census Bureau鈥檚 survey of 27 million business owners.) Suppose that you obtain a sample of 100 franchised businesses located in Mississippi and find that 15 are owned by minorities. Does this result lead you to conclude that the percentage of minority-owned franchises in Mississippi is less than the national value of 20.5%? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The confidence interval is (0.88,0.22).

No,the result do no lead us to conclude that the percentage of minority-owned franchises in Mississippi is less than the national value of 20.5%.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

According to a 2011 report for IFA Educational Foundation, a sample of 100 franchised businesses located in Mississippi and find that 15 are owned by minorities.

02

Finding the 95% confidence interval

The sample proportion is the point estimator of the population proportion p.

Computing the sample proportion is,

p^=Xn=15100=0.15

Then the level of1001-%confidence interval for p (proportion) is,

p^z2p^1-p^n

For a 95% confidence interval, the value of2is,

1001-%=95%1-=0.95

For,=0.05and2=0.025=0.05and2=0.025

The 95% confidence interval is,

p^z2p^1-p^n=0.151.9600.151-0.15100FromStandardNormalTable=0.151.9600.001275=0.150.07=0.08,0.02

Therefore, the 95% confidence interval that the true percentage of minority-owned franchises in Mississippi is between 8% and 22%.

Also 20.5% falls in this interval.

Hence, conclude that the percentage of minority-owned franchises in Mississippi is not less than the national value.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If you use the Internet, haveyou ever paid to access or download music? This was oneof the questions of interest in a recent Pew Internet and American Life Project Survey (October ). Telephoneinterviews were conducted on a representative sample of adults living in the United States. For this sample, adults admitted that they have paid to download music.

a.Use the survey information to find a point estimatefor the true proportion of U.S. adults who have paid todownload music.

b.Find an interval estimate for the proportion, part a.Useconfidence interval.

c.Give a practical interpretation of the interval,part b.Your answer should begin with 鈥淲e areconfident. . ..鈥

d.Explain the meaning of the phrase 鈥渃onfident.鈥

e.How many more adults need to be sampled to reducethe margin of error in the confidence interval by half?

Lobster trap placement. Refer to the Bulletin of MarineScience(April 2010) study of lobster trap placement,Exercise 6.29 (p. 348). Recall that you used a 95% confidenceinterval to estimate the mean trap spacing (in meters)for the population of red spiny lobster fishermen fishing inBaja California Sur, Mexico. How many teams of fishermenwould need to be sampled in order to reduce the width ofthe confidence interval to 5 meters? Use the sample standarddeviation from Exercise 6.29 in your calculation.

A sampling dispute goes to court. Sampling of Medicare and Medicaid claims by the federal and state agencies who administer those programs has become common practice to determine whether providers of those services are submitting valid claims. (See the Statistics in Action for this chapter.) The reliability of inferences based on those samples depends on the methodology used to collect the sample of claims. Consider estimating the true proportion, p, of the population of claims that are invalid. (Invalid claims should not have been reimbursed by the agency.) Of course, to estimate a binomial parameter, p, within a given level of precision we use the formula provided in Section 6.5 to determine the necessary sample size. In a recent actual case, the statistician determined a sample size large enough to ensure that the bound on the error of the estimate would not exceed 0.05, using a 95% confidence interval. He did so by assuming that the true error rate was, which, as discussed in Section 6.5, provides the maximum sample size needed to achieve the desired bound on the error.

a. Determine the sample size necessary to estimate p to within .05 of the true value using a 95% confidence interval.

b. After the sample was selected and the sampled claims were audited, it was determined that the estimated error rate was and a 95% confidence interval for p was (0.15, 0.25). Was the desired bound on the error of the estimate met?

c. An economist hired by the Medicare provider noted that, since the desired bound on the error of .05 is equal to 25% of the estimated invalid claim rate, the 鈥渢rue鈥 bound on the error was .25, not .05. He argued that a significantly larger sample would be necessary to meet the 鈥渞elative error鈥 (the bound on the error divided by the error rate) goal of .05, and that the statistician鈥檚 use of the 鈥渁bsolute error鈥 of .05 was inappropriate, and more sampling was required. The statistician argued that the relative error was a moving target, since it depends on the sample estimate of the invalid claim rate, which cannot be known prior to selecting the sample. He noted that if the estimated invalid claim rate turned out to be larger than .5, the relative error would then be lower than the absolute error bound. As a consequence, the case went to trial over the relative vs. absolute error dispute. Give your opinion on the matter. [Note: The Court concluded that 鈥渁bsolute error was the fair and accurate measure of the margin of error.鈥 As a result, a specified absolute bound on the error continues to be the accepted method for determining the sample size necessary to provide a reliable estimate of Medicare and Medicaid providers鈥 claim submission error rates.]

Material safety data sheets. The Occupational Safety &Health Administration has required companies that handle hazardous chemicals to complete material safety datasheets (MSDSs). These MSDSs have been criticized for being too hard to understand and complete by workers. A

study of 150 MSDSs revealed that only 11% were satisfactorily completed (Chemical & Engineering News, February7, 2005).

a. Give a point estimate of p, the true proportion of MSDSs that are satisfactorily completed.

b. Find a 95% confidence interval for p.

c. Give a practical interpretation of the interval, part b.

Scallops, sampling, and the law. Interfaces (March鈥揂pril 1995) presented the case of a ship that fishes for scallops off the coast of New England. In order to protect baby scallops from being harvested, the U.S. Fisheries and Wildlife Service requires that 鈥渢he average meat per scallop weigh at least 136 of a pound.鈥 The ship was accused of violating this weight standard. Author Arnold Barnett lays out the scenario:

The vessel arrived at a Massachusetts port with 11,000 bags of scallops, from which the harbormaster randomly selected 18 bags for weighing. From each such bag, his agents took a large scoopful of scallops; then, to estimate the bag鈥檚 average meat per scallop, they divided the total weight of meat in the scoopful by the number of scallops it contained. Based on the 18 [numbers] thus generated, the harbormaster estimated that each of the ship鈥檚 scallops possessed an average of 139 of a pound of meat (that is, they were about seven percent lighter than the minimum requirement). Viewing this outcome as conclusive evidence that the weight standard had been violated, federal authorities at once confiscated 95 percent of the catch (which they then sold at auction). The fishing voyage was thus transformed into a financial catastrophe for its participants. The actual scallop weight measurements for each of the 18 sampled bags are listed in the table below. For ease of exposition, Barnett expressed each number as a multiple of of a pound, the minimum permissible average weight per scallop. Consequently, numbers below 1 indicate individual bags that do not meet the standard. The ship鈥檚 owner filed a lawsuit against the federal government, declaring that his vessel had fully complied with the weight standard. A Boston law firm was hired to represent the owner in legal proceedings, and Barnett was retained by the firm to provide statistical litigation support and, if necessary, expert witness testimony.

0.93

0.88

0.85

0.91

0.91

0.84

0.90

0.98

0.88

0.89

0.98

0.87

0.91

0.92

0.99

1.14

1.06

0.93

  1. Recall that the harbormaster sampled only 18 of the ship鈥檚 11,000 bags of scallops. One of the questions the lawyers asked Barnett was, 鈥淐an a reliable estimate of the mean weight of all the scallops be obtained from a sample of size 18?鈥 Give your opinion on this issue.
  2. As stated in the article, the government鈥檚 decision rule is to confiscate a catch if the sample mean weight of the scallops is less than 136 of a pound. Do you see any flaws in this rule?
  3. Develop your own procedure for determining whether a ship is in violation of the minimum-weight restriction. Apply your rule to the data. Draw a conclusion about the ship in question.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.