/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} 138SE A sampling dispute goes to court... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

A sampling dispute goes to court. Sampling of Medicare and Medicaid claims by the federal and state agencies who administer those programs has become common practice to determine whether providers of those services are submitting valid claims. (See the Statistics in Action for this chapter.) The reliability of inferences based on those samples depends on the methodology used to collect the sample of claims. Consider estimating the true proportion, p, of the population of claims that are invalid. (Invalid claims should not have been reimbursed by the agency.) Of course, to estimate a binomial parameter, p, within a given level of precision we use the formula provided in Section 6.5 to determine the necessary sample size. In a recent actual case, the statistician determined a sample size large enough to ensure that the bound on the error of the estimate would not exceed 0.05, using a 95% confidence interval. He did so by assuming that the true error rate was, which, as discussed in Section 6.5, provides the maximum sample size needed to achieve the desired bound on the error.

a. Determine the sample size necessary to estimate p to within .05 of the true value using a 95% confidence interval.

b. After the sample was selected and the sampled claims were audited, it was determined that the estimated error rate was and a 95% confidence interval for p was (0.15, 0.25). Was the desired bound on the error of the estimate met?

c. An economist hired by the Medicare provider noted that, since the desired bound on the error of .05 is equal to 25% of the estimated invalid claim rate, the 鈥渢rue鈥 bound on the error was .25, not .05. He argued that a significantly larger sample would be necessary to meet the 鈥渞elative error鈥 (the bound on the error divided by the error rate) goal of .05, and that the statistician鈥檚 use of the 鈥渁bsolute error鈥 of .05 was inappropriate, and more sampling was required. The statistician argued that the relative error was a moving target, since it depends on the sample estimate of the invalid claim rate, which cannot be known prior to selecting the sample. He noted that if the estimated invalid claim rate turned out to be larger than .5, the relative error would then be lower than the absolute error bound. As a consequence, the case went to trial over the relative vs. absolute error dispute. Give your opinion on the matter. [Note: The Court concluded that 鈥渁bsolute error was the fair and accurate measure of the margin of error.鈥 As a result, a specified absolute bound on the error continues to be the accepted method for determining the sample size necessary to provide a reliable estimate of Medicare and Medicaid providers鈥 claim submission error rates.]

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. The sample size need to be analyzed to estimate the true proportion to within 0.05 with 95% confidence interval is 385.
  2. The desired bound on the error of the estimate met the sampled claims were audited.
  3. From the information, it is clear that the absolute error is better to determine the sample size when compared to the relative error, because the absolute error provides the fair and accurate measures of the margin of error when compared to the relative error.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The statistician determined a sample size large enough to ensure that the bound on the error of the estimate would not exceed 0.05, using a 95% confidence interval. He did so by assuming that the true error rate was.

02

Computing the sample size

Consider,p=0.5

The general formula for the sample size is given below:

n=(Z2)2(pq)(SE)2

Here, the confidence level is 0.95.

For

1-=0.95=0.052=0.025

From table, the value ofz2 is given below:

z2=z0.025=1.96

The sample size is obtained below:

n=1.9620.50.50.052n=0.96040.0025n=384.16n385

Thus, the sample size need to be analyzed to estimate the true proportion to within 0.05 with 95% confidence interval is 385.

03

Interpretation

b.

Yes, the desired bound on the error of the estimate met the samples claims were audited. From part a., the desired bound on the error is 0.05.

The actual bound on the error is

0.25-0.152=0.05

Hence, the desired bound on the error and the actual bound on the error are equal. Thus, the desired bound on the error of the estimate met the sampled claims were audited.

04

Opinion

c.

From the information, it is clear that the absolute error is better to determine the sample size when compared to the relative error, because the absolute error provides the fair and accurate measures of the margin of error when compared to the relative error.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question: Is Starbucks coffee overpriced? The Minneapolis Star Tribune (August 12, 2008) reported that 73% of Americans say that Starbucks coffee is overpriced. The source of this information was a national telephone survey of 1,000 American adults conducted by Rasmussen Reports.

a. Identify the population of interest in this study.

b. Identify the sample for the study.

c. Identify the parameter of interest in the study.

d. Find and interpret a 95% confidence interval for the parameter of interest.

A random sample of size n = 225 yielded p^= .46

a. Is the sample size large enough to use the methods of this section to construct a confidence interval for p? Explain.

b. Construct a 95% confidence interval for p.

c. Interpret the 95% confidence interval.

d. Explain what is meant by the phrase 鈥95% confidence interval.鈥

Suppose you have selected a random sample of n = 5 measurements from a normal distribution. Compare the standard normal z-values with the corresponding t-values if you were forming the following confidence intervals.

a. 80% confidence interval

b. 90% confidence interval

c. 95% confidence interval

d. 98% confidence interval

e. 99% confidence interval

f. Use the table values you obtained in parts a鈥揺 to sketch the z- and t-distributions. What are the similarities and differences?

A random sample of 70 observations from a normally distributed population possesses a sample mean equal to 26.2 and a sample standard deviation equal to 4.1.

a. Find an approximate 95% confidence interval for

b. What do you mean when you say that a confidence coefficient is .95?

c. Find an approximate 99% confidence interval for

d. What happens to the width of a confidence interval as the value of the confidence coefficient is increased while the sample size is held fixed?

e. Would your confidence intervals of parts a and c be valid if the distribution of the original population was not normal? Explain

Who prepares your tax return? Refer to the Behavioral Research and Accounting (January 2015) study on income tax compliance, Exercise 5.50 (p. 321). Recall that in a sample of 270 U.S. adult workers, the researchers found that 37% prepare their own tax return.

a. Construct a 99% confidence interval for the true proportion of all U.S. adult workers who prepare their own tax return.

b. Suppose an IRS tax consultant claims that 50% of all U.S. adult workers prepare their own tax return. Make an inference about this claim.

c. According to the researchers, about 70% of the sampled workers were recruited from a shopping mall (where they were reimbursed $5 for their time) and about 30% were full-time workers enrolled in a professional graduate degree program. How might this information impact the inference you made in part b?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.