/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 59 Toughness and fibrousness of asp... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Toughness and fibrousness of asparagus are major determinants of quality. This was the focus of a study reported in "Post-Harvest Glyphosphate Application Reduces Toughening, Fiber Content, and Lignification of Stored Asparagus Spears" (J. of the Amer. Soc. of Horticultural Science, 1988: 569-572). The article reported the accompanying data (read from a graph) on \(x=\) shear force \((\mathrm{kg})\) and \(y=\) percent fiber dry weight. $$ \begin{array}{l|ccccccccc} x & 46 & 48 & 55 & 57 & 60 & 72 & 81 & 85 & 94 \\ \hline y & 2.18 & 2.10 & 2.13 & 2.28 & 2.34 & 2.53 & 2.28 & 2.62 & 2.63 \\ x & 109 & 121 & 132 & 137 & 148 & 149 & 184 & 185 & 187 \\ \hline y & 2.50 & 2.66 & 2.79 & 2.80 & 3.01 & 2.98 & 3.34 & 3.49 & 3.26 \end{array} $$ \(n=18, \quad \sum x_{i}=1950, \quad \sum x_{i}^{2}=251,970\) \(\sum y_{i}=47.92, \quad \sum y_{i}^{2}=130.6074, \quad \sum x_{i} y_{i}=5530.92\) a. Calculate the value of the sample correlation coefficient. Based on this value, how would you describe the nature of the relationship between the two variables? b. If a first specimen has a larger value of shear force than does a second specimen, what tends to be true of percent dry fiber weight for the two specimens? c. If shear force is expressed in pounds, what happens to the value of \(r\) ? Why? d. If the simple linear regression model were fit to this data, what proportion of observed variation in percent fiber dry weight could be explained by the model relationship? e. Carry out a test at significance level .01 to decide whether there is a positive linear association between the two variables.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The sample correlation is 0.999, indicating a very strong positive relationship between shear force and fiber weight. Changing the units will not affect the correlation. 99.8% of variation is explained by the model relationship.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Mean Values

First, calculate the mean values of shear force \(x\) and percent fiber dry weight \(y\) using the formulas \(\bar{x} = \frac{\sum x_i}{n}\) and \(\bar{y} = \frac{\sum y_i}{n}\). For \(x\), \(\bar{x} = \frac{1950}{18} = 108.33\), and for \(y\), \(\bar{y} = \frac{47.92}{18} = 2.662\).
02

Calculate the Sample Covariance

Using the provided sums, calculate the covariance \( S_{xy} \) with the formula: \[ S_{xy} = \frac{\sum (x_iy_i) - n\bar{x}\bar{y}}{n-1} \] \Substituting the values, \( S_{xy} = \frac{5530.92 - 18(108.33)(2.662)}{17} = 48.43\).
03

Calculate the Sample Variances

Calculate the variances \( S_{xx} \) and \( S_{yy} \) with \( S_{xx} = \frac{\sum x_i^2 - n\bar{x}^2}{n-1} \) and \( S_{yy} = \frac{\sum y_i^2 - n\bar{y}^2}{n-1} \). \[ S_{xx} = \frac{251970 - 18(108.33)^2}{17} = 1885.27 \] \[ S_{yy} = \frac{130.6074 - 18(2.662)^2}{17} = 0.18 \]
04

Calculate the Sample Correlation Coefficient

The sample correlation coefficient \( r \) is given by \( r = \frac{S_{xy}}{\sqrt{S_{xx}S_{yy}}} \). Substituting calculated values: \[ r = \frac{48.43}{\sqrt{1885.27 \times 0.18}} = 0.999\]. This implies a very strong positive linear relationship between shear force and percent fiber dry weight.
05

Analyze the Nature of Relationship

Since \( r = 0.999 \), the relationship between shear force and percent fiber dry weight is a very strong positive linear association.
06

Understand the Influence of Shear Force

If a first specimen has a larger shear force than a second specimen, the first specimen tends to have a higher percent dry fiber weight, due to the positive correlation.
07

Effect of Unit Change on Correlation

Changing the units of shear force from kg to pounds will not affect the calculated correlation coefficient \( r \) because correlation is a dimensionless quantity.
08

Calculate Proportion of Variation Explained

The proportion of variation in \( y \) that is explained by \( x \) is \( r^2 = (0.999)^2 = 0.998 \). This indicates that 99.8% of the variation is explained by the linear model.
09

Conduct the Hypothesis Test

To test for a positive linear association, use the formula for the t-statistic: \[ t = \frac{r\sqrt{n-2}}{\sqrt{1-r^2}} \] With \( r = 0.999 \), \( n = 18 \), \[ t = \frac{0.999\sqrt{16}}{\sqrt{1 - (0.999)^2}} = 158.56 \] Compare with \( t_{0.01,16} \), showing strong evidence of a positive correlation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Linear Regression
Linear regression is a fundamental statistical method used to model the relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables. In the context of the given exercise, linear regression would help to identify how the shear force ( x ) affects the fiber dry weight ( y ) of asparagus. By fitting a line to the data points, one can predict the outcome for a given input of shear force.
This method assumes that the relationship between the variables is linear, meaning as one variable increases, the other also tends to increase or decrease in a consistent manner. Linear regression provides the equation of a line, y = mx + c , where m is the slope indicating the direction and steepness of the line, and c is the intercept.
  • The goal is to minimize the difference between the observed and predicted values. This difference is known as the residual.
  • Linear regression can determine how changes in the independent variable impact the dependent variable.
  • The strength of this impact is quantified through the correlation coefficient and the proportion of variance explained by the model (r-squared), as shown in the exercise with the value of 0.998, indicating a strong relationship.
Covariance
Covariance is a measure of how much two random variables change together. In the exercise, covariance was calculated to assess how shear force and fiber dry weight move in relation to each other. A positive covariance, as indicated by the calculation, signifies that as the shear force increases, the percent of fiber dry weight also tends to increase.
Covariance between two variables x and y is calculated as \[ S_{xy} = \frac{\sum (x_i y_i) - n\bar{x}\bar{y}}{n-1}\] where x_i and y_i are individual sample points, n is the number of sample points, and \( \bar{x} \), \( \bar{y} \) are means of x and y respectively.
  • Covariance is susceptible to the scale of the variables. Larger numerical values can lead to larger covariance values.
  • Unlike correlation, covariance does not provide limits or a standardized measure of strength.
  • The units of covariance are the product of the units of the two variables measured, making it less intuitive than correlation.
Shear Force
Shear force describes the force required to cut through asparagus fibers. In horticultural studies, like the one mentioned, it helps evaluate the texture and edibility of the asparagus spears. It's an important determinant of what makes the vegetable more appealing to consumers.
Understanding shear force is crucial as it directly impacts the perception of "toughness" in asparagus. Typically, a higher shear force implies tougher and potentially less desirable vegetable quality. This metric is not just significant for consumer satisfaction but also for agricultural practices that aim to optimize crop quality.
The data given shows various measurements of shear force in kilograms. These figures are tested for their effects on fiber dry weight, establishing a scientific basis for quality control.
Fiber Dry Weight
Fiber dry weight represents the percentage of fiber content in asparagus after drying. It is used as a measure of fibrousness, which is an integral aspect of asparagus quality.
  • A higher fiber content means the asparagus has a harder texture, which can be less desirable.
  • In the study, fiber dry weight as a percentage shows the extent of fibrousness in relation to the overall weight, once water content is removed.
  • This measurement is vital for understanding how different growing and post-harvest management can affect asparagus quality.
By correlating fiber dry weight with shear force, researchers can deduce patterns and relationships in how the asparagus toughens over time or post-harvest treatments.
Hypothesis Testing
In the context of the study, hypothesis testing is used to determine if there is a statistically significant correlation between shear force and fiber dry weight in asparagus. The hypothesis typically starts with a null hypothesis stating that there is no correlation, against an alternative hypothesis suggesting a correlation exists.
At a significance level of 0.01, the t-statistic is calculated to determine the p-value, which helps in deciding whether to reject the null hypothesis. The exercise uses the formula \[ t = \frac{r\sqrt{n-2}}{\sqrt{1-r^2}} \] with calculated sample correlation coefficient r and sample size n .
  • A t-value that exceeds the critical value suggests rejecting the null hypothesis, confirming the presence of a positive relationship.
  • In this exercise, the t-statistic was extremely high (158.56), strongly indicating a significant positive association.
  • Hypothesis testing provides a framework for making informed decisions based on statistical evidence.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose the expected cost of a production run is related to the size of the run by the equation \(y=4000+10 x\). Let \(Y\) denote an observation on the cost of a run. If the variables size and cost are related according to the simple linear regression model, could it be the case that \(P(Y>5500\) when \(x=\) \(100)=.05\) and \(P(Y>6500\) when \(x=200)=.10\) ? Explain.

The following data is representative of that reported in the article "An Experimental Correlation of Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions from Power Boilers Based on Field Data" (J. Eng. for Power, July 1973: 165-170), with \(x=\) burner area liberation rate \(\left(\mathrm{MBtu} / \mathrm{hr}-\mathrm{ft}^{2}\right)\) and \(y=\mathrm{NO}_{X}\) emission rate (ppm): $$ \begin{array}{l|ccccccc} x & 100 & 125 & 125 & 150 & 150 & 200 & 200 \\ \hline y & 150 & 140 & 180 & 210 & 190 & 320 & 280 \\ x & 250 & 250 & 300 & 300 & 350 & 400 & 400 \\ \hline y & 400 & 430 & 440 & 390 & 600 & 610 & 670 \end{array} $$ a. Assuming that the simple linear regression model is valid, obtain the least squares estimate of the true regression line. b. What is the estimate of expected \(\mathrm{NO}_{\mathrm{X}}\) emission rate when burner area liberation rate equals 225 ? c. Estimate the amount by which you expect \(\mathrm{NO}_{\mathrm{X}}\) emission rate to change when burner area liberation rate is decreased by 50 . d. Would you use the estimated regression line to predict emission rate for a liberation rate of 500 ? Why or why not?

The accompanying data on \(x=\) diesel oil consumption rate measured by the drain-weigh method and \(y=\) rate measured by the CI-trace method, both in \(\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{hr}\), was read from a graph in the article "A New Measurement Method of Diesel Engine Oil Consumption Rate" (J. Society Auto Engr., 1985: 28-33). $$ \begin{array}{l|ccccccccccccc} x & 4 & 5 & 8 & 11 & 12 & 16 & 17 & 20 & 22 & 28 & 30 & 31 & 39 \\ \hline y & 5 & 7 & 10 & 10 & 14 & 15 & 13 & 25 & 20 & 24 & 31 & 28 & 39 \end{array} $$ a. Assuming that \(x\) and \(y\) are related by the simple linear regression model, carry out a test to decide whether it is plausible that on average the change in the rate measured by the CI-trace method is identical to the change in the rate measured by the drain-weigh method. b. Calculate and interpret the value of the sample correlation coefficient.

The article "The Incorporation of Uranium and Silver by Hydrothermally Synthesized Galena" (Econ. Geology, 1964: 1003-1024) reports on the determination of silver content of galena crystals grown in a closed hydrothermal system over a range of temperature. With \(x=\) crystallization temperature in \({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and \(y=\mathrm{Ag}_{2} \mathrm{~S}\) in mol\%, the data follows: $$ \begin{array}{l|ccccccccccccc} x & 398 & 292 & 352 & 575 & 568 & 450 & 550 & 408 & 484 & 350 & 503 & 600 & 600 \\ \hline y & .15 & .05 & .23 & .43 & .23 & .40 & .44 & .44 & .45 & .09 & .59 & .63 & .60 \end{array} $$ from which \(\sum x_{i}=6130, \sum x_{i}^{2}=3,022,050, \sum y_{i}=4.73\), \(\sum y_{i}^{2}=2.1785, \sum x_{i} y_{i}=2418.74, \hat{\beta}_{1}=.00143, \hat{\beta}_{0}=-.311\), and \(s=.131\). a. Estimate true average silver content when temperature is \(500^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) using a \(95 \%\) confidence interval. b. How would the width of a \(95 \%\) CI for true average silver content when temperature is \(400^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) compare to the width of the interval in part (a)? Answer without computing this new interval. c. Calculate a \(95 \%\) CI for the true average change in silver content associated with a \(1^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) increase in temperature. d. Suppose it had previously been believed that when crystallization temperature was \(400^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), true average silver content would be .25. Carry out a test at significance level .05 to decide whether the sample data contradicts this prior belief.

The article "Exhaust Emissions from Four-Stroke Lawn Mower Engines" (J. of the Air and Water Mgmnt. Assoc., 1997: 945-952) reported data from a study in which both a baseline gasoline mixture and a reformulated gasoline were used. Consider the following observations on age (yr) and \(\mathrm{NO}_{X}\) emissions \((\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{kWh})\) : $$ \begin{array}{lccccc} \text { Engine } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 \\ \text { Age } & 0 & 0 & 2 & 11 & 7 \\ \text { Baseline } & 1.72 & 4.38 & 4.06 & 1.26 & 5.31 \\ \text { Reformulated } & 1.88 & 5.93 & 5.54 & 2.67 & 6.53 \\ \text { Engine } & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 \\ \text { Age } & 16 & 9 & 0 & 12 & 4 \\ \text { Baseline } & .57 & 3.37 & 3.44 & .74 & 1.24 \\ \text { Reformulated } & .74 & 4.94 & 4.89 & .69 & 1.42 \end{array} $$ Construct scatter plots of \(\mathrm{NO}_{\mathrm{x}}\) emissions versus age. What appears to be the nature of the relationship between these two variables? [Note: The authors of the cited article commented on the relationship.]

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.