/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 9 The authors of the article "Dyna... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 9: Problem 9

The authors of the article "Dynamics of Canopy Structure and Light Interception in Pinus elliotti, North Florida" (Ecological Monographs, 1991: 33-51) planned an experiment to determine the effect of fertilizer on a measure of leaf area. A number of plots were available for the study, and half were selected at random to be fertilized. To ensure that the plots to receive the fertilizer and the control plots were similar, before beginning the experiment tree density (the number of trees per hectare) was recorded for eight plots to be fertilized and eight control plots, resulting in the given data. Minitab output follows. \(\begin{array}{lrrrrr}\text { Fertilizer plots } & 1024 & 1216 & 1312 & 1280 \\ & 1216 & 1312 & 992 & 1120 \\ \text { Control plots } & 1104 & 1072 & 1088 & 1328 \\ & 1376 & 1280 & 1120 & 1200 \\ & & & & & \\ \text { Two sample } T \text { for fertilizer vs control } \\ & \mathbb{N} & \text { Mean } & \text { StDev } & \text { SE Mean } \\ \text { fertilize } & 8 & 1184 & 126 & 44 \\ \text { control } & 8 & 1196 & 118 & 42 \\\ 95 \% \text { CI for mu fertilize } & -\text { mu control: } \text { (-144, } \\ 120) & & & & & \end{array}\) a. Construct a comparative boxplot and comment on any interesting features. b. Would you conclude that there is a significant difference in the mean tree density for fertilizer and control plots? Use \(\alpha=05\) c. Interpret the given confidence interval.

Short Answer

Expert verified
No significant difference in means; confidence interval includes 0.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Data

We have data on tree density for two groups: fertilizer plots and control plots. The data are given with mean, standard deviation, and standard error for each group. We have to perform statistical analysis using this information.
02

Construct Comparative Boxplot

Create boxplots for both groups using the given data. The boxplot should display the median, quartiles, and any outliers for the fertilizer and control plots. We observe the layout of the median and quartiles to indicate differences or similarities between the two groups.
03

Analyze Boxplot Features

Upon observing the boxplots, compare the central tendency and variability between the fertilizer and control plots. Look for differences in median location, interquartile ranges, and the presence of outliers, which can indicate variation between treatments.
04

Hypothesis Testing for the Means

To determine if there is a significant difference in mean tree density, perform a two-sample t-test. The hypothesis is:- Null hypothesis: There is no significant difference in means \((H_0: \mu_1 = \mu_2)\).- Alternative hypothesis: There is a significant difference in means \((H_a: \mu_1 eq \mu_2)\).
05

Evaluate Significance of the Mean Difference

Consider the given 95% confidence interval for the difference in means. Here, the interval is \((-144, 120)\). Since the interval contains 0, we cannot reject the null hypothesis, implying no significant difference at \(\alpha = 0.05\) between the mean tree densities of the two treatments.
06

Interpret the Confidence Interval

The confidence interval \((-144, 120)\) suggests we are 95% confident that the actual difference in mean tree densities between the fertilizer and control plots falls within this range. Since this interval includes zero, the data does not provide sufficient evidence to declare a meaningful difference.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Two-Sample T-Test
A two-sample t-test is a statistical method used to determine if there is a significant difference between the means of two independent groups. In our exercise, these two groups are the fertilizer plots and the control plots. This test allows us to assess whether any observed difference in tree densities (measured in trees per hectare) is due to the fertilizer treatment or merely due to random variation in the sample.
The main steps in conducting a two-sample t-test are:
  • Formulate hypotheses: The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) assumes no difference in means between the groups. In this context, both the fertilized and control plots have equal means. The alternative hypothesis (\(H_a\)) suggests a difference in means.
  • Calculate the t-statistic: This involves using the group means, standard deviations, and sample sizes.
  • Determine the p-value: This value indicates the probability of observing the data if the null hypothesis is true. A lower p-value suggests stronger evidence against \(H_0\).
A confidence interval is also computed alongside the test to provide additional insight about where the true difference between group means lies.
Confidence Interval Interpretation
Confidence intervals give us a range in which we can be certain, to a specified degree, that the true parameter (e.g., difference in means) lies. The confidence level, often set at 95%, indicates how often we'd expect the true parameter to be captured by the interval in repeated sampling.
In the context of our exercise, the 95% confidence interval for the difference in mean tree densities between the fertilized and control plots was (-144, 120). This interval means:
  • We are 95% confident that the true difference in mean densities lies within this range.
  • Since 0 is within the interval, we cannot rule out the possibility that there is no difference.
  • This suggests that, at the 95% level, our data does not provide sufficient evidence for a significant difference in the treatment means.
Understanding confidence intervals helps clarify the uncertainty and reliability of the estimate, adding depth to simple hypothesis testing outcomes.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a structured methodology used to assess the evidence in data regarding a particular claim or hypothesis. In statistics, it's commonly used to validate or refute assumptions about population parameters based on sample data.
In this exercise, our hypothesis testing is focused on determining whether the fertilizer affects tree density:
  • **Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)):** Suggests no effect or difference; here, it implies the fertilizers do not change tree density compared to control plots.
  • **Alternative Hypothesis (\(H_a\)):** Indicates a significant effect or difference; here, it means fertilizers are affecting tree density.
  • The decision to accept or reject \(H_0\) is based on the p-value, which shows the probability of the observed data occurring under \(H_0\). If the p-value is less than the significance level (\(\alpha\), such as 0.05), \(H_0\) gets rejected in favor of \(H_a\).
The exercise results showed that the confidence interval included zero, reinforcing the null hypothesis that there is no significant effect of the fertilizer on tree density under the conditions tested. Hypothesis testing helps in making informed decisions based on statistical evidence.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Teen Court is a juvenile diversion program designed to circumvent the formal processing of first-time juvenile offenders within the juvenile justice system. The article "An Experimental Evaluation of Teen Courts" ( \(J\). of Experimental Criminology, 2008: 137-163) reported on a study in which offenders were randomly assigned either to Teen Court or to the traditional Department of Juvenile Services method of processing. Of the 56 TC individuals, 18 subsequently recidivated (look it up!) during the 18-month follow-up period, whereas 12 of the 51 DJS individuals did so. Does the data suggest that the true proportion of TC individuals who recidivate during the specified follow-up period differs from the proportion of DJS individuals who do so? State and test the relevant hypotheses by obtaining a \(P\)-value and then using a significance level of 10 .

Fusible interlinings are being used with increasing frequency to support outer fabrics and improve the shape and drape of various pieces of clothing. The article "Compatibility of Outer and Fusible Interlining Fabrics in Tailored Garments" (Textile Res. \(J_{.}, 1997: 137-142\) ) gave the accompanying data on extensibility (\%) at \(100 \mathrm{gm} / \mathrm{cm}\) for both high-quality (H) fabric and poor-quality (P) fabric specimens. \(\begin{array}{rrrrrrrrrr}\mathrm{H} & 1.2 & .9 & .7 & 1.0 & 1.7 & 1.7 & 1.1 & .9 & 1.7 \\ & 1.9 & 1.3 & 2.1 & 1.6 & 1.8 & 1.4 & 1.3 & 1.9 & 1.6 \\ & 8 & 2.0 & 1.7 & 1.6 & 2.3 & 2.0 & & & \\ \mathrm{P} & 1.6 & 1.5 & 1.1 & 2.1 & 1.5 & 1.3 & 1.0 & 2.6 & \end{array}\) a. Construct normal probability plots to verify the plausibility of both samples having been selected from normal population distributions. b. Construct a comparative boxplot. Does it suggest that there is a difference between true average extensibility for high-quality fabric specimens and that for poorquality specimens? c. The sample mean and standard deviation for the highquality sample are \(1.508\) and \(.444\), respectively, and those for the poor-quality sample are \(1.588\) and 530 . Use the two-sample \(t\) test to decide whether true average extensibility differs for the two types of fabric.

Researchers sent 5000 resumes in response to job ads that appeared in the Boston Globe and Chicago Tribune. The resumes were identical except that 2500 of them had "white sounding" first names, such as Brett and Emily, whereas the other 2500 had "black sounding" names such as Tamika and Rasheed. The resumes of the first type elicited 250 responses and the resumes of the second type only 167 responses (these numbers are very consistent with information that appeared in a Jan. 15, 2003, report by the Associated Press). Does this data strongly suggest that a resume with a "black" name is less likely to result in a response than is a resume with a "white" name?

The level of lead in the blood was determined for a sample of 152 male hazardous-waste workers ages \(20-30\) and also for a sample of 86 female workers, resulting in a mean \(\pm\) standard error of \(5.5 \pm 0.3\) for the men and \(3.8 \pm 0.2\) for the women ("Temporal Changes in Blood Lead Levels of Hazardous Waste Workers in New Jersey, 19841987, Environ. Monitoring and Assessment, 1993: 99-107). Calculate an estimate of the difference between true average blood lead levels for male and female workers in a way that provides information about reliability and precision.

Persons having Reynaud's syndrome are apt to suffer a sudden impairment of blood circulation in fingers and toes. In an experiment to study the extent of this impairment, each subject immersed a forefinger in water and the resulting heat output \(\left(\mathrm{cal} / \mathrm{cm}^{2} / \mathrm{min}\right)\) was measured. For \(m=10\) subjects with the syndrome, the average heat output was \(\bar{x}=.64\), and for \(n=10\) nonsufferers, the average output was \(2.05\). Let \(\mu_{1}\) and \(\mu_{2}\) denote the true average heat outputs for the two types of subjects. Assume that the two distributions of heat output are normal with \(\sigma_{1}=2\) and \(\sigma_{2}=.4\). a. Consider testing \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}-\mu_{2}=-1.0\) versus \(H_{a}: \mu_{1}-\) \(\mu_{2}<-1.0\) at level .01. Describe in words what \(H_{\mathrm{a}}\) says, and then carry out the test. b. Compute the \(P\)-value for the value of \(Z\) obtained in part (a). c. What is the probability of a type II error when the actual difference between \(\mu_{1}\) and \(\mu_{2}\) is \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}=-1.2\) ? d. Assuming that \(m=n\), what sample sizes are required to ensure that \(\beta=\), l when \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}=-1,2\) ?
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Statistics

Read Explanation

Calculus

Read Explanation

Logic and Functions

Read Explanation

Discrete Mathematics

Read Explanation

Applied Mathematics

Read Explanation

Pure Maths

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.