/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 8 Cushing's disease is characteriz... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Cushing's disease is characterized by muscular weakness due to adrenal or pituitary dysfunction. To provide effective treatment, it is important to detect childhood Cushing's disease as early as possible. Age at onset of symptoms and age at diagnosis (months) for 15 children suffering from the disease were given in the article "Treatment of Cushing's Disease in Childhood and Adolescence by Transphenoidal Microadenomectomy" (New Engl. J. of Med., 1984:889). Here are the values of the differences between age at onset of symptoms and age at diagnosis: \(\begin{array}{llllllll}-24 & -12 & -55 & -15 & -30 & -60 & -14 & -21 \\ -48 & -12 & -25 & -53 & -61 & -69 & -80 & \end{array}\) a. Does the accompanying normal probability plot cast strong doubt on the approximate normality of the population distribution of differences? b. Calculate a lower \(95 \%\) confidence bound for the population mean difference, and interpret the resulting bound. c. Suppose the (age at diagnosis) - (age at onset) differences had been calculated. What would be a \(95 \%\) upper confidence bound for the corresponding population mean difference?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Assuming linearity of the plot implies no strong doubt about normality. b. Lower bound: -48.87 months. c. Upper bound: 48.39 months.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Sample Mean and Standard Deviation

First, we need to calculate the sample mean and sample standard deviation of the differences.Given the differences: \([-24, -12, -55, -15, -30, -60, -14, -21, -48, -12, -25, -53, -61, -69, -80]\).Calculate the sample mean (\(\bar{x}\)):\(\bar{x} = \frac{\sum x_i}{n} = \frac{-24 + (-12) + (-55) + \ldots + (-80)}{15} = -41.13\)Next, calculate the sample standard deviation (\(s\)):\(s = \sqrt{\frac{\sum (x_i - \bar{x})^2}{n-1}}\).Substituting the values, \(s \approx 20.29\).
02

Conduct Normal Probability Plot Analysis

For question (a), a normal probability plot can be visually assessed to see if the points approximate a straight line. If the plot provided seems relatively linear, we conclude there is no strong evidence against normality. Without the plot here, let's assume it's linear for theoretical analysis.
03

Calculate Lower 95% Confidence Bound

For question (b), calculate the lower 95% confidence bound for the mean.The formula for the lower bound of the confidence interval for a mean is:\[\bar{x} - t_{\alpha,n-1} \times \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}\]Use a t-table or calculator to find \(t_{0.05,14} \approx 1.761\) (1-tailed t-value).Substitute the values:Lower bound = \(-41.13 - 1.761 \times \frac{20.29}{\sqrt{15}} \approx -48.87\).Interpreting this, we are 95% confident that the population mean difference is greater than -48.87 months.
04

Calculate Upper 95% Confidence Bound for Opposite Difference

For question (c), consider swapping the age difference to (age at diagnosis) - (age at onset).This reverses the sign of each difference, so the mean becomes positive: Mean = 41.13.The upper bound for this new situation is:\[\bar{x} + t_{\alpha,n-1} \times \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}\]Substitute the values:Upper bound = \(41.13 + 1.761 \times \frac{20.29}{\sqrt{15}} \approx 48.39\).We are 95% confident that the population mean difference is less than 48.39 months.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Normal Probability Plot
A normal probability plot is a graphical tool used to assess whether a data set follows a normal distribution. The plot compares ordered data values against expected values from a normal distribution. Ideally, if the set of data is normally distributed, the points on the plot will roughly form a straight line.

This visual method is straightforward and a powerful initial check for normality. If your points stray far from the line or create a noticeable curve, this might suggest that the data does not follow a normal distribution. However, some deviation is natural, especially with small sample sizes.

In the case of Cushing's disease age differences data, the exercise asks whether the normal probability plot suggests normality. A linear pattern in such a plot would imply no strong evidence against the normality of the distribution of age differences.
Confidence Interval
The confidence interval provides a range of values that likely cover the true population parameter, such as the mean. When you create a confidence interval, you're expressing a degree of uncertainty about the parameter based on sample data.

For a 95% confidence interval, you can say that if you were to take 100 different samples and compute a confidence interval for each, about 95 of them would contain the true population parameter. This makes confidence intervals very useful in medicine and research to understand potential ranges for a mean.

In the scenario regarding the childhood onset of Cushing's disease, a 95% confidence interval was computed for the population mean difference in ages. If the exercise asks for a lower or upper confidence bound, it specifically refers to either just the lower limit or the upper limit of the interval, not both.
Sample Mean and Standard Deviation
The sample mean and standard deviation are fundamental statistics in any sort of analysis. They summarize the central tendency and dispersion of a dataset, respectively.

The sample mean, denoted as \(\bar{x}\), represents the average of all data values. It is calculated by adding up all the individual values and dividing by the number of values. In the example given, a mean difference of \(-41.13\) months was computed.

The sample standard deviation \(s\), measures how much each data point deviates from the mean on average. A smaller standard deviation means the data points are close to the mean, whereas a larger one indicates more spread out data. In the context of childhood Cushing's disease, the standard deviation of about \(20.29\) indicates varied lengths in diagnosis gap times.

These calculations are pivotal for further statistical analyses such as making confidence intervals or conducting hypothesis tests.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Fatigue Testing of Condoms" cited in Exercise \(7.32\) reported that for a sample of 20 natural latex condoms of a certain type, the sample mean and sample standard deviation of the number of cycles to break were 4358 and 2218 , respectively, whereas a sample of 20 polyisoprene condoms gave a sample mean and sample standard deviation of 5805 and 3990 , respectively. Is there strong evidence for concluding that true average number of cycles to break for the polyisoprene condom exceeds that for the natural latex condom by more than 1000 cycles? Carry out a test using a significance level of .01. [Note: The cited paper reported \(P\)-values of \(t\) tests for comparing means of the various types considered.]

In a study of copper deficiency in cattle, the copper values ( \(\mu \mathrm{g} \mathrm{Cu} / 100 \mathrm{~mL}\) blood) were determined both for cattle grazing in an area known to have well-defined molybdenum anomalies (metal values in excess of the normal range of regional variation) and for cattle grazing in a nonanomalous area ("An Investigation into Copper Deficiency in Cattle in the Southern Pennines," J. Agricultural Soc. Cambridge, 1972: \(157-163)\), resulting in \(s_{1}=21.5(\mathrm{~m}=48)\) for the anomalous condition and \(s_{2}=19.45(n=45)\) for the nonanomalous condition. Test for the equality versus inequality of population variances at significance level .10 by using the \(P\)-value approach.

The article "Pine Needles as Sensors of Atmospheric Pollution" (Environ. Monitoring, 1982: 273-286) reported on the use of neutron-activity analysis to determine pollutant concentration in pine needles. According to the article's authors, "These observations strongly indicated that for those elements which are determined well by the analytical procedures, the distribution of concentration is lognormal. Accordingly, in tests of significance the logarithms of concentrations will be used." The given data refers to bromine concentration in needles taken from a site near an oil-fired steam plant and from a relatively clean site. The summary values are means and standard deviations of the log-transformed observations. \begin{tabular}{lccc} Site & Sample Size & Mean Log Concentration & SD of Log Concentration \\ \hline Steam plant & 8 & \(18.0\) & \(4.9\) \\ Clean & 9 & \(11.0\) & \(4.6\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} Let \(\mu_{1}^{*}\) be the true average log concentration at the first site, and define \(\mu_{2}^{*}\) analogously for the second site. a. Use the pooled \(t\) test (based on assuming normality and equal standard deviations) to decide at significance level .05 whether the two concentration distribution means are equal. b. If \(\sigma_{1}^{*}\) and \(\sigma_{2}^{*}\) (the standard deviations of the two log concentration distributions) are not equal, would \(\mu_{1}\) and \(\mu_{2}\) (the means of the concentration distributions) be the same if \(\mu_{1}^{*}=\mu_{2}^{*}\) ? Explain your reasoning.

The National Health Statistics Reports dated Oct. 22, 2008 , included the following information on the heights (in.) for non-Hispanic white females: \begin{tabular}{lccc} Age & Sample Size & Sample Mean & Std. Error Mean \\ \hline \(20-39\) & 866 & \(64.9\) & \(.09\) \\ 60 and older & 934 & \(63.1\) & \(.11\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} a. Calculate and interpret a confidence interval at confidence level approximately \(95 \%\) for the difference between population mean height for the younger women and that for the older women. b. Let \(\mu_{1}\) denote the population mean height for those aged \(20-39\) and \(\mu_{2}\) denote the population mean height for those aged 60 and older. Interpret the hypotheses \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}-\) \(\mu_{2}=1\) and \(H_{a}: \mu_{1}-\mu_{2}>1\), and then carry out a test of these hypotheses at significance level .001 using the rejection region approach. c. What is the \(P\)-value for the test you carried out in (b)? Based on this \(P\)-value, would you reject the null hypothesis at any reasonable significance level? Explain. d. What hypotheses would be appropriate if \(\mu_{1}\) referred to the older age group, \(\mu_{2}\) to the younger age group, and you wanted to see if there was compelling evidence for concluding that the population mean height for younger women exceeded that for older women by more than 1 in.?

Is there any systematic tendency for part-time college faculty to hold their students to different standards than do full-time faculty? The article "Are There Instructional Differences Between Full-Time and Part-Time Faculty?" (College Teaching, 2009: 23-26) reported that for a sample of 125 courses taught by full-time faculty, the mean course GPA was \(2.7186\) and the standard deviation was \(.63342\), whereas for a sample of 88 courses taught by part- timers, the mean and standard deviation were \(2.8639\) and \(.49241\), respectively. Does it appear that true average course GPA for part-time faculty differs from that for faculty teaching full-time? Test the appropriate hypotheses at significance level 01 by first obtaining a \(P\)-value.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.