/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 2 Give as much information as you ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Give as much information as you can about the \(P\)-value of the \(F\) test in each of the following situations: a. \(v_{1}=5, v_{2}=10\), upper-tailed test, \(f=4.75\) b. \(v_{1}=5, v_{2}=10\), upper-tailed test, \(f=2.00\) c. \(v_{1}=5, v_{2}=10\), two-tailed test, \(f=5.64\) d. \(v_{1}=5, v_{2}=10\), lower-tailed test, \(f=.200\) e. \(v_{1}=35, v_{2}=20\), upper-tailed test, \(f=3.24\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Situations a, d, and e show significant results (\(P\)-value < 0.05), indicating tendencies to reject null hypotheses, while b shows less significance (\(P\)-value > 0.05). Situation c is highly significant (\(P\)-value < 0.01).

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the F-Test Components

In an F-test, the degrees of freedom for the numerator and the denominator are denoted as \(v_1\) and \(v_2\), respectively. The F-test can be either an upper-tailed, lower-tailed, or two-tailed test. Given the statistics of the test, we seek to determine the significance through the \(P\)-value, which varies based on these inputs.
02

Situation A Analysis

For situation (a) with \(v_1 = 5\), \(v_2 = 10\), \(f = 4.75\), and an upper-tailed test, we look at the upper tail of the F-distribution. By comparing \(f = 4.75\) with critical values for \((5, 10)\) degrees of freedom, we find that the \(P\)-value is typically in the range below 0.05, suggesting significant results with high likelihood of rejecting the null hypothesis.
03

Situation B Analysis

In situation (b), we maintain \(v_1 = 5\), \(v_2 = 10\), but here \(f = 2.00\) for an upper-tailed test. When \(f = 2.00\) is compared to critical values, this \(P\)-value is higher, typically above 0.05, likely between 0.10 and 0.05, indicating that it is less significant compared to situation (a), suggesting less confidence in rejecting the null hypothesis.
04

Situation C Analysis

In situation (c) with \(v_1 = 5\), \(v_2 = 10\), \(f = 5.64\), and a two-tailed test, the critical point considers both tails of the distribution. Comparing \(f = 5.64\) with critical values yields a smaller \(P\)-value, often below 0.01. This highly significant result suggests a strong basis for rejecting the null hypothesis if it exists.
05

Situation D Analysis

For situation (d), where \(v_1 = 5\), \(v_2 = 10\), \(f = 0.200\), and a lower-tailed test, \(P\)-values are calculated using the lower extreme. The \(P\)-value for \(f = 0.200\) is significant, lower than 0.05, indicating a strong likelihood of differences being significant, again suggesting rejection of the null hypothesis.
06

Situation E Analysis

In situation (e), with \(v_1 = 35\), \(v_2 = 20\), and an upper-tailed \(f = 3.24\), checking against critical values shows that the \(P\)-value is likely between 0.01 and 0.05. Thus, it indicates significant evidence against the null hypothesis, suggesting a significant difference exists between the groups.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Degrees of Freedom
In statistical tests, degrees of freedom (often abbreviated as df) are critical in determining the shape of the distribution used for tests. For an F-test, which is a tool used to compare variances between two samples, the degrees of freedom are defined for both the numerator and the denominator. These are denoted as \(v_1\) and \(v_2\), respectively.

The degree of freedom \(v_1\) is typically associated with the variance from the sample data in the numerator, while \(v_2\) is linked to the variance from the denominator. The choice and calculation of these values influence the critical values of the F-distribution. Correctly assigning degrees of freedom is crucial for interpreting test results, as they guide the sensitivity of the test to find significant differences.
F-distribution
The F-distribution is a skewed distribution that is used in analysis of variance tests, like the F-test, and is crucial for determining whether variances across groups are significantly different. It is defined by two sets of degrees of freedom, \(v_1\) and \(v_2\), which define the specific form of the F-curve.

This curve is always right-skewed, meaning it has a tail that extends to the right. The longer tail implies that larger values become less probable. Studying where a test statistic lands on the F-distribution helps determine the statistical significance of test results. This, in turn, relates to the likelihood of rejecting the null hypothesis when there is no true difference.
Critical Values
Critical values are essential in hypothesis testing, defining the threshold at which we decide whether to reject the null hypothesis. In the context of the F-test, the critical value marks the boundary between accepting or rejecting the null.

This value is obtained from the F-distribution tables, with the appropriate degrees of freedom for the numerator (\(v_1\)) and the denominator (\(v_2\)), and the chosen level of significance, typically 0.05. If the calculated F-statistic is greater than the critical value in an upper-tailed test, there's sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

Understanding critical values is key as it provides the cutoff point in determining the significance of the observed data in relation to random chance.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis is the default position that there is no effect or no difference between groups being studied. In F-tests, the null hypothesis posits that the variances between the two groups being tested are equal.

The goal of hypothesis testing is to challenge this presumption by analyzing data and determining if there's statistically significant evidence to reject the null. If the looked-for effect is strong enough and the \(P\)-value is sufficiently small, the null hypothesis can be rejected.

This rejection suggests that there is support for the alternative hypothesis, which is the statement that there is a difference or effect. The null hypothesis is a cornerstone of statistical testing, as it provides a basis for statistical comparison.
Tail Tests
In hypothesis testing, tail tests refer to the direction of the test's evaluation for significance and can be classified as upper-tailed, lower-tailed, or two-tailed.

Upper-tailed tests are employed when the research hypothesis suggests that one variance is greater than the other and focuses on the right tail of the distribution. Meanwhile, lower-tailed tests check if one variance is less, focusing on the left tail.

Two-tailed tests examine for difference in either direction, meaning both extremes of the F-distribution are considered. Choosing the correct tail test is important since it affects the interpretation of results and determines how critical values are used.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

It is thought that the front cover and the nature of the first question on mail surveys influence the response rate. The article "The Impact of Cover Design and First Questions on Response Rates for a Mail Survey of Skydivers" (Leisure Sciences, 1991: 67-76) tested this theory by experimenting with different cover designs. One cover was plain; the other used a picture of a skydiver. The researchers speculated that the return rate would be lower for the plain cover. \begin{tabular}{lcc} Cover & Number Sent & Number Returned \\ \hline Plain & 207 & 104 \\ Skydiver & 213 & 109 \\ \hline \end{tabular} Does this data support the researchers' hypothesis? Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=.10\) by first calculating a \(P\)-value.

Arsenic is a known carcinogen and poison. The standard laboratory procedures for measuring arsenic concentration \((\mu \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{L})\) in water are expensive. Consider the accompanying summary data and Minitab output for comparing a laboratory method to a new relatively quick and inexpensive field method (from the article "Evaluation of a New Field Measurement Method for Arsenic in Drinking Water Samples," J. of Envir. Engr, 2008: 382-388). Two-Sample T-Test and CI \(\begin{array}{lcccr}\text { Sample } & \text { N } & \text { Mean } & \text { StDev } & \text { SE Mean } \\ 1 & 3 & 19.70 & 1.10 & 0.64 \\ 2 & 3 & 10.90 & 0.60 & 0.35 \\ \text { Estimate for difference: } 8.800 & \end{array}\) 95? CI for difference: \((6.498,11.102)\) T-Test of difference \(=0\) (vs not \(=\) ): \(\mathrm{T}\)-Value \(=12.16 \mathrm{P}\)-Value \(=0.001 \mathrm{DF}=3\) What conclusion do you draw about the two methods, and why? Interpret the given confidence interval. [Note: One of the article's authors indicated in private communication that they were unsure why the two methods disagreed.]

Fusible interlinings are being used with increasing frequency to support outer fabrics and improve the shape and drape of various pieces of clothing. The article "Compatibility of Outer and Fusible Interlining Fabrics in Tailored Garments" (Textile Res. \(J_{.}, 1997: 137-142\) ) gave the accompanying data on extensibility (\%) at \(100 \mathrm{gm} / \mathrm{cm}\) for both high-quality (H) fabric and poor-quality (P) fabric specimens. \(\begin{array}{rrrrrrrrrr}\mathrm{H} & 1.2 & .9 & .7 & 1.0 & 1.7 & 1.7 & 1.1 & .9 & 1.7 \\ & 1.9 & 1.3 & 2.1 & 1.6 & 1.8 & 1.4 & 1.3 & 1.9 & 1.6 \\ & 8 & 2.0 & 1.7 & 1.6 & 2.3 & 2.0 & & & \\ \mathrm{P} & 1.6 & 1.5 & 1.1 & 2.1 & 1.5 & 1.3 & 1.0 & 2.6 & \end{array}\) a. Construct normal probability plots to verify the plausibility of both samples having been selected from normal population distributions. b. Construct a comparative boxplot. Does it suggest that there is a difference between true average extensibility for high-quality fabric specimens and that for poorquality specimens? c. The sample mean and standard deviation for the highquality sample are \(1.508\) and \(.444\), respectively, and those for the poor-quality sample are \(1.588\) and 530 . Use the two-sample \(t\) test to decide whether true average extensibility differs for the two types of fabric.

It has been estimated that between 1945 and 1971 , as many as 2 million children were born to mothers treated with diethylstilbestrol \((\mathrm{DES})\), a nonsteroidal estrogen recommended for pregnancy maintenance. The FDA banned this drug in 1971 because research indicated a link with the incidence of cervical cancer. The article "Effects of Prenatal Exposure to Diethylstilbestrol (DES) on Hemispheric Laterality and Spatial Ability in Human Males" (Hormones and Behavior, 1992: 62-75) discussed a study in which 10 males exposed to \(\mathrm{DES}\), and their unexposed brothers, underwent various tests. This is the summary data on the results of a spatial ability test: \(\bar{x}=12.6\) (exposed), \(\bar{y}=13.7\), and standard error of mean difference \(=.5\). Test at level .05 to see whether exposure is associated with reduced spatial ability by obtaining the P-value.

Let \(\mu_{1}\) and \(\mu_{2}\) denote true average densities for two different types of brick. Assuming normality of the two density distributions, test \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}-\mu_{2}=0\) versus \(H_{\mathrm{a}}: \mu_{1}-\mu_{2} \neq 0\) using the following data: \(m=6, \bar{x}=22.73, s_{1}=.164\), \(n=5, \bar{y}=21.95\), and \(s_{2}=.240\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.