/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 2 Let \(\mu_{1}\) and \(\mu_{2}\) ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Let \(\mu_{1}\) and \(\mu_{2}\) denote true average densities for two different types of brick. Assuming normality of the two density distributions, test \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}-\mu_{2}=0\) versus \(H_{\mathrm{a}}: \mu_{1}-\mu_{2} \neq 0\) using the following data: \(m=6, \bar{x}=22.73, s_{1}=.164\), \(n=5, \bar{y}=21.95\), and \(s_{2}=.240\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
Reject \(H_0\); there is evidence \(\mu_1 \neq \mu_2\).

Step by step solution

01

Formulate the Hypotheses

We are tasked with testing the null hypothesis which states there is no difference between the true average densities of the two types of bricks. Mathematically, this is represented as \[ H_0: \mu_1 - \mu_2 = 0 \]The alternative hypothesis suggests that there is a difference:\[ H_a: \mu_1 - \mu_2 eq 0 \]
02

Compute the Test Statistic

First, compute the difference in sample means:\[ \bar{x} - \bar{y} = 22.73 - 21.95 = 0.78 \]Next, calculate the standard error of the difference. The formula for the standard error (SE) for independent samples is:\[ SE = \sqrt{\left( \frac{s_1^2}{m} + \frac{s_2^2}{n} \right)} = \sqrt{\left( \frac{0.164^2}{6} + \frac{0.240^2}{5} \right)} \]Compute the value:\[ SE = \sqrt{\left( \frac{0.026896}{6} + \frac{0.0576}{5} \right)} = \sqrt{0.0044827 + 0.01152} = \sqrt{0.0160027} \approx 0.1265 \]Then, compute the test statistic using:\[ t = \frac{(\bar{x} - \bar{y}) - 0}{SE} = \frac{0.78}{0.1265} \approx 6.17 \]
03

Determine the Degrees of Freedom

For independent samples, calculate the degrees of freedom (df) using the formula:\[ df = \frac{\left(\frac{s_1^2}{m} + \frac{s_2^2}{n}\right)^2}{\frac{\left(\frac{s_1^2}{m}\right)^2}{m-1} + \frac{\left(\frac{s_2^2}{n}\right)^2}{n-1}} \]Calculate each term:- Numerator: \((\frac{0.026896}{6} + \frac{0.0576}{5})^2 = 0.0160027^2 = 0.0002561\)- Denominator Part 1: \(\frac{(\frac{0.026896}{6})^2}{5} = \frac{0.0000207}{5} = 0.00000414\)- Denominator Part 2: \(\frac{(\frac{0.0576}{5})^2}{4} = \frac{0.00013256}{4} = 0.00003314\)Now, combine to find df:\[ df = \frac{0.0002561}{0.00000414 + 0.00003314} \approx \frac{0.0002561}{0.00003728} \approx 6.87 \]This rounds to 6 when using statistical tables.
04

Find the Critical Value and Make a Decision

Using a t-table or calculator, find the critical t-value for a two-tailed test with df = 6 and a typical level of significance (e.g., \(\alpha = 0.05\)). The critical t-value for \(df = 6\) at \(\alpha = 0.05\) is approximately \( \pm 2.447 \).Compare the calculated test statistic \( t \approx 6.17 \) to the critical values:Since \( 6.17 > 2.447 \), we reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Independent Samples t-Test
The Independent Samples t-Test is a popular statistical method used to determine if there is a significant difference between the means of two independent groups. Imagine you want to compare the average densities of two different types of bricks, as in the exercise. By using the Independent Samples t-Test, you can test whether these averages are statistically different from each other.

To conduct this test, you will typically go through a few steps:
  • Formulate your null hypothesis (\(H_0\): The means are equal) and alternative hypothesis (\(H_a\): The means are not equal).
  • Calculate the difference between the sample means.
  • Compute the standard error, which estimates the variability of the sample means.
  • Divide the difference by the standard error to get the t-statistic, which tells you how many standard errors the means are away from each other.
A large t-statistic indicates a significant difference, leading you to potentially reject the null hypothesis. This test is particularly useful when you want to compare two independent groups on a continuous outcome, like density.
Degrees of Freedom
In hypothesis testing, understanding the concept of Degrees of Freedom (df) is crucial. It essentially refers to the number of values in a calculation that are free to vary. These are important because they impact the shape of the t-distribution, which in turn affects the critical values and ultimately your conclusions in hypothesis testing.

For an Independent Samples t-Test, the formula to calculate degrees of freedom is a bit complex:\[ df = \frac{(\frac{s_1^2}{m} + \frac{s_2^2}{n})^2}{\frac{(\frac{s_1^2}{m})^2}{m-1} + \frac{(\frac{s_2^2}{n})^2}{n-1}} \]
Where:
  • \(s_1^2\) and \(s_2^2\) are the variances of the two samples
  • \(m\) and \(n\) are the sample sizes
In practice, this calculated value often has to be rounded. Tables or calculators are then used to find critical values based on this, helping you decide whether to reject the null hypothesis.
With our given example, the degrees of freedom came out to about 6.87, but it's rounded to 6 for practical use in statistical tables. This is crucial because the degrees of freedom directly influence the precision of our hypothesis test.
Critical Value
The Critical Value is an essential component in hypothesis testing. It acts as a threshold that determines the boundary for deciding whether to reject the null hypothesis. If the calculated test statistic exceeds this critical value, it means that the observed effect is statistically significant.

In the context of a two-tailed Independent Samples t-Test, like the exercise, you look for both upper and lower critical values. These values are determined by your chosen level of significance (\( \alpha \)), often set at 0.05 for a 95% confidence level. Using statistical tables or software, you'd find critical values that correspond to the specific degrees of freedom you've calculated.

For example, in our scenario with 6 degrees of freedom and \( \alpha = 0.05\), the t-table gives a critical value of approximately \( \pm 2.447 \). With a calculated test statistic of \( 6.17 \), which is much larger than \( 2.447 \), we reject the null hypothesis. This means the difference in brick densities is statistically significant at the 5% level.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Fatigue Testing of Condoms" cited in Exercise \(7.32\) reported that for a sample of 20 natural latex condoms of a certain type, the sample mean and sample standard deviation of the number of cycles to break were 4358 and 2218 , respectively, whereas a sample of 20 polyisoprene condoms gave a sample mean and sample standard deviation of 5805 and 3990 , respectively. Is there strong evidence for concluding that true average number of cycles to break for the polyisoprene condom exceeds that for the natural latex condom by more than 1000 cycles? Carry out a test using a significance level of .01. [Note: The cited paper reported \(P\)-values of \(t\) tests for comparing means of the various types considered.]

Recent incidents of food contamination have caused great concern among consumers. The article "How Safe Is That Chicken?" (Consumer Reports, Jan. 2010: 19-23) reported that 35 of 80 randomly selected Perdue brand broilers tested positively for either campylobacter or salmonella (or both), the leading bacterial causes of food-borne disease, whereas 66 of 80 Tyson brand broilers tested positive. a. Does it appear that the true proportion of non- contaminated Perdue broilers differs from that for the Tyson brand? Carry out a test of hypotheses using a significance level.01 by obtaining a \(P\)-value. b. If the true proportions of non-contaminated chickens for the Perdue and Tyson brands are . 50 and \(.25\), respectively, how likely is it that the null hypothesis of equal proportions will be rejected when a, 01 significance level is used and the sample sizes are both 80 ?

a. Show for the upper-tailed test with \(\sigma_{1}\) and \(\sigma_{2}\) known that as either \(m\) or \(n\) increases, \(\beta\) decreases when \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}>\Delta_{0}\) b. For the case of equal sample sizes \((m=n)\) and fixed \(\alpha\), what happens to the necessary sample size \(n\) as \(\beta\) is decreased, where \(\beta\) is the desired type II error probability at a fixed alternative?

Determine the number of degrees of freedom for the twosample \(t\) test or \(\mathrm{CI}\) in each of the following situations: a. \(m=10, n=10, s_{1}=5.0, s_{2}=6.0\) b. \(m=10, n=15, s_{1}=5.0, s_{2}=6.0\) c. \(m=10, n=15, s_{1}=2.0, s_{2}=6.0\) d. \(m=12, n=24, s_{1}=5.0, s_{2}=6.0\)

The paper "Quantitative Assessment of Glenohumeral Translation in Baseball Players" (The Amer. J. of Sports Med. 2004: 1711-1715) considered various aspects of shoulder motion for a sample of pitchers and another sample of position players [glenohumeral refers to the articulation between the humerus (ball) and the glenoid (socket)]. The authors kindly supplied the following data on anteroposterior translation (mm), a measure of the extent of anterior and posterior motion, both for the dominant arm and the nondominant arm. \(\begin{array}{lcccc} & \text { Pos Dom Tr Pos ND } & \text { Tr Pit Dom Tr } & \text { Pit ND } & \text { Tr } \\ 1 & 30.31 & 32.54 & 27.63 & 24.33 \\ 2 & 44.86 & 40.95 & 30.57 & 26.36 \\ 3 & 22.09 & 23.48 & 32.62 & 30.62 \\ 4 & 31.26 & 31.11 & 39.79 & 33.74 \\ 5 & 28.07 & 28.75 & 28.50 & 29.84 \\ 6 & 31.93 & 29.32 & 26.70 & 26.71 \\ 7 & 34.68 & 34.79 & 30.34 & 26.45 \\ 8 & 29.10 & 28.87 & 28.69 & 21.49 \\ 9 & 25.51 & 27.59 & 31.19 & 20.82 \\ 10 & 22.49 & 21.01 & 36.00 & 21.75 \\ 11 & 28.74 & 30.31 & 31.58 & 28.32 \\ 12 & 27.89 & 27.92 & 32.55 & 27.22 \\ 13 & 28.48 & 27.85 & 29.56 & 28.86 \\ 14 & 25.60 & 24.95 & 28.64 & 28.58 \\ 15 & 20.21 & 21.59 & 28.58 & 27.15 \\ 16 & 33.77 & 32.48 & 31.99 & 29.46 \\ 17 & 32.59 & 32.48 & 27.16 & 21.26 \\ 18 & 32.60 & 31.61 & & \\ 19 & 29.30 & 27.46 & & \\ \text { mean } & 29.4463 & 29.2137 & 30.7112 & 26.6447 \\ \text { sd } & 5.4655 & 4.7013 & 3.3310 & 3.6679\end{array}\) a. Estimate the true average difference in translation between dominant and nondominant arms for pitchers in a way that conveys information about reliability and precision, and interpret the resulting estimate. b. Repeat (a) for position players. c. The authors asserted that "pitchers have greater difference in side-to-side anteroposterior translation of their shoulders compared with position players." Do you agree? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.