/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 29 Consider the following three dat... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Consider the following three data sets, in which the variables of interest are \(x=\) commuting distance and \(y=\) commuting time. Based on a scatter plot and the values of \(s\) and \(r^{2}\), in which situation would simple linear regression be most (least) effective, and why? $$ \begin{array}{lllrrrrr} \text { Data Set } & & 1 & & & 2 & & 3 \\ \hline & \boldsymbol{x} & \boldsymbol{y} & \boldsymbol{x} & \boldsymbol{y} & \boldsymbol{x} & \boldsymbol{y} \\ & 15 & 42 & 5 & 16 & 5 & 8 \\ & 16 & 35 & 10 & 32 & 10 & 16 \\ & 17 & 45 & 15 & 44 & 15 & 22 \\ & 18 & 42 & 20 & 45 & 20 & 23 \\ & 19 & 49 & 25 & 63 & 25 & 31 \\ & 20 & 46 & 50 & 115 & 50 & 60 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
Simple linear regression is most effective in Data Set 2 and least effective in Data Set 1.

Step by step solution

01

Generate Scatter Plots for Each Data Set

For each data set, create a scatter plot with the commuting distance ( x") on the x-axis and commuting time ( "") on the y-axis. Analyze the visual patterns to get an initial understanding of the relationship between the variables. Look for clear linear trends.
02

Calculate the Correlation Coefficient, r

Determine the correlation coefficient ( "r"") for each data set. This value indicates the strength and direction of a linear relationship between x and y. A value of "r"") close to 1 or -1 suggests a strong linear relationship, while a value close to 0 indicates a weak linear relationship.
03

Compute the Coefficient of Determination, r²

Calculate the coefficient of determination ( r²"). This measures how well the data fit a linear regression model, with values closer to 1 indicating a better fit. r²"). It provides insight into the proportion of variance in y hat can be explained by x
04

Determine Standard Error of Estimate, s

Find the standard error of the estimate ( s"). This value helps assess the accuracy of predictions made by the linear regression model. A smaller s"). suggests that the regression line better approximates the actual data points.
05

Compare and Conclude Effectiveness

Based on r²"). and s")., compare the data sets: - The most effective use of linear regression is found in the data set with the highest r²"). and the smallest s")., indicating a good fit with low prediction error. - Conversely, the least effective use of linear regression is found in the data set with the lowest r²"). and highest s")., indicating poor fit and high prediction error.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Scatter Plot Analysis
Scatter plot analysis is a straightforward way to visually examine the relationship between two variables. In our context, the variables involved are commuting distance ( x ) and commuting time ( y ). By plotting each data point on the graph, with x on the x-axis and y on the y-axis, we can quickly assess whether a linear relationship might exist between these variables. When you look at a scatter plot:
  • If the points form a pattern that resembles a straight line, there might be a linear relationship.
  • If they are scattered without any apparent form, a linear relationship is likely weak or nonexistent.
Scatter plots are the first step in understanding potential correlations, and they guide us in further quantifying these relationships with numerical measures such as the correlation coefficient.
Correlation Coefficient (r)
The correlation coefficient, denoted as \(r\), is an essential statistic that quantifies the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables. It values range from -1 to 1:
  • \(r = 1\): perfect positive linear relationship, where both variables increase together.
  • \(r = -1\): perfect negative linear relationship, where one variable increases as the other decreases.
  • \(r = 0\): no linear relationship.
The closer the value of \(r\) is to 1 or -1, the stronger the linear relationship between the variables. In our data sets, calculating \(r\) gives us an immediate sense of how tightly the data fits a linear trend, but not the full picture, since it doesn't show all variance explained by one variable in terms of another.
Coefficient of Determination (r²)
The coefficient of determination, denoted as \(r^2\), is a key statistic that provides insight into how well a linear regression model explains the variation in the dependent variable (commuting time, \(y\)) based on the independent variable (commuting distance, \(x\)).
  • \(r^2\) values range from 0 to 1, where a value closer to 1 suggests that a large proportion of the variation in \(y\) is explained by \(x\).
  • A higher \(r^2\) value indicates a better fit of the regression model to the data.
For instance, if \(r^2 = 0.8\), this implies that 80% of the variance in commuting time is explained by the distance. It is a critical metric for determining the effectiveness of a linear regression model. When comparing data sets, the set with the highest \(r^2\) value typically indicates the most effective model for prediction.
Standard Error of Estimate (s)
The standard error of estimate, symbolized by \(s\), gauges the accuracy of the predictions made by a linear regression model. It measures the average distance that data points fall from the regression line. Here’s how it works:
  • A small \(s\) value indicates that the predicted \(y\) values are close to the actual data points, reflecting precise predictions.
  • A large \(s\) value suggests that predictions are widely spread around the actual data, thereby less reliable.
The \(s\) influences our decision about the model’s effectiveness. When assessing the datasets, the set with the smallest \(s\) typically corresponds to the most accurate predictive model. Hence, in choosing the best linear regression model, one should look for a combination of high \(r^2\) and low \(s\) for optimal results.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Toughness and fibrousness of asparagus are major determinants of quality. This was the focus of a study reported in "Post-Harvest Glyphosphate Application Reduces Toughening, Fiber Content, and Lignification of Stored Asparagus Spears" (J. of the Amer. Soc. of Hort. Science, 1988: 569–572). The article reported the accompanying data (read from a graph) on \(x=\) shear force \((\mathrm{kg})\) and \(y=\) percent fiber dry weight. $$ \begin{array}{l|ccccccccc} x & 46 & 48 & 55 & 57 & 60 & 72 & 81 & 85 & 94 \\ \hline y & 2.18 & 2.10 & 2.13 & 2.28 & 2.34 & 2.53 & 2.28 & 2.62 & 2.63 \\ x & 109 & 121 & 132 & 137 & 148 & 149 & 184 & 185 & 187 \\ \hline y & 2.50 & 2.66 & 2.79 & 2.80 & 3.01 & 2.98 & 3.34 & 3.49 & 3.26 \end{array} $$ a. Calculate the value of the sample correlation coefficient. Based on this value, how would you describe the nature of the relationship between the two variables? b. If a first specimen has a larger value of shear force than does a second specimen, what tends to be true of percent dry fiber weight for the two specimens? c. If shear force is expressed in pounds, what happens to the value of \(r\) ? Why? d. If the simple linear regression model were fit to this data, what proportion of observed variation in percent fiber dry weight could be explained by the model relationship? e. Carry out a test at significance level \(.01\) to decide whether there is a positive linear association between the two variables.

The following data is representative of that reported in the article "An Experimental Correlation of Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions from Power Boilers Based on Field Data" (J. of Engr: for Power; July 1973: 165-170), with \(x=\) burner-area liberation rate \(\left(\mathrm{MBtu} / \mathrm{hr}^{-\mathrm{ft}^{2}}\right)\) and \(y=\mathrm{NO}_{x}\) emission rate (ppm): $$ \begin{array}{l|rrrrrrr} x & 100 & 125 & 125 & 150 & 150 & 200 & 200 \\ \hline y & 150 & 140 & 180 & 210 & 190 & 320 & 280 \\ x & 250 & 250 & 300 & 300 & 350 & 400 & 400 \\ \hline y & 400 & 430 & 440 & 390 & 600 & 610 & 670 \end{array} $$ a. Assuming that the simple linear regression model is valid, obtain the least squares estimate of the true regression line. b. What is the estimate of expected \(\mathrm{NO}_{x}\) emission rate when burner area liberation rate equals 225 ? c. Estimate the amount by which you expect \(\mathrm{NO}_{x}\) emission rate to change when burner area liberation rate is decreased by 50 . d. Would you use the estimated regression line to predict emission rate for a liberation rate of 500 ? Why or why not?

Verify that if each \(x_{i}\) is multiplied by a positive constant \(c\) and each \(y_{i}\) is multiplied by another positive constant \(d\), the \(t\) statistic for testing \(H_{0}: \beta_{1}=0\) versus \(H_{\mathrm{a}}: \beta_{1} \neq 0\) is unchanged in value (the value of \(\hat{\beta}_{1}\) will change, which shows that the magnitude of \(\hat{\beta}_{1}\) is not by itself indicative of model utility).

The article "Objective Measurement of the Stretchability of Mozzarella Cheese" (J. of Texture Studies, 1992: 185–194) reported on an experiment to investigate how the behavior of mozzarella cheese varied with temperature. Consider the accompanying data on \(x=\) temperature and \(y=\) elongatior (\%) at failure of the cheese. $$ \begin{array}{l|rrrrrrr} x & 59 & 63 & 68 & 72 & 74 & 78 & 83 \\ \hline y & 118 & 182 & 247 & 208 & 197 & 135 & 132 \end{array} $$ a. Construct a scatter plot in which the axes intersect at \((0,0)\). Mark \(0,20,40,60,80\), and 100 on the horizontal axis and \(0,50,100,150,200\), and 250 on the vertical axis. b. Construct a scatter plot in which the axes intersect at \((55,100)\), as was done in the cited article. Does this plot seem preferable to the one in part (a)? Explain your reasoning. c. What do the plots of parts (a) and (b) suggest about the nature of the relationship between the two variables?

Suppose that \(x\) and \(y\) are positive variables and that a sample of \(n\) pairs results in \(r \approx 1\). If the sample correlation coefficient is computed for the \(\left(x, y^{2}\right)\) pairs, will the resulting value also be approximately 1 ? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.