/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 80 Suppose that \(x\) and \(y\) are... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose that \(x\) and \(y\) are positive variables and that a sample of \(n\) pairs results in \(r \approx 1\). If the sample correlation coefficient is computed for the \(\left(x, y^{2}\right)\) pairs, will the resulting value also be approximately 1 ? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
No, the correlation won't be approximately 1 after the transformation.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Correlation Coefficient

The correlation coefficient \(r\) measures how closely two variables are linearly related. It ranges from -1 to 1. A value close to 1 indicates a strong positive linear relationship.
02

Correlation for Given Scenario

In this problem, we start with pairs \((x, y)\) that have a sample correlation \(r \approx 1\). This means that \(x\) and \(y\) are almost perfectly linearly related.
03

Transforming the Data

Instead of \((x, y)\), we consider \((x, y^2)\). Squaring \(y\) is a nonlinear transformation. This can affect the linear relationship between \(x\) and the new \(y^2\) values.
04

Impact of Nonlinear Transformation

When you apply a nonlinear transformation to \(y\), the linear relationship between \(x\) and \(y^2\) is typically weakened or altered. As a result, the correlation between \(x\) and \(y^2\) will unlikely be as strong as \(r \approx 1\).
05

Conclusion

Therefore, the resulting correlation coefficient for the \((x, y^2)\) pairs will likely not be approximately 1, as the relationship is no longer strictly linear.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Linear Relationship
A linear relationship refers to the connection between two variables that can be represented by a straight line when graphed. This is often described using the equation of a line, which is typically written in the form: \(y = mx + b\), where \(m\) is the slope and \(b\) is the y-intercept. When variables have a perfect linear relationship, changes in one variable correspond to constant changes in the other.
An important measure of this relationship is the correlation coefficient, denoted by \(r\), which indicates how well the data points fit on a straight line. An \(r\) value close to 1 implies a strong positive linear relationship, while an \(r\) value close to -1 indicates a strong negative linear relationship. A value around 0 suggests no linear relationship.
  • Positive Linear Relationship: As one variable increases, the other also increases.
  • Negative Linear Relationship: As one variable increases, the other decreases.
  • Perfect Linear Relationship: All data points lie exactly on a straight line.
These relationships are foundational in understanding how variables interact in statistics and their influence is most pronounced when the data exhibits simplicity without transformations.
Nonlinear Transformation
A nonlinear transformation involves altering data points using mathematical functions that are not linear, such as exponentials, logarithms, or squaring functions. In the context of the original exercise, transforming the variable \(y\) into \(y^2\) is an example of a nonlinear transformation.
When a nonlinear transformation is applied to a dataset, it changes the way the data points relate to each other. This often alters the original linear relationship. For instance, converting \((x, y)\) to \((x, y^2)\) breaks the predictable straight-line pattern, potentially creating a curve or other complex pattern.
  • Effects of Nonlinear Transformation: These transformations can simplify analysis, make relationships visible, or satisfy assumptions for statistical tests.
  • Altered Relationships: A strong linear relationship may become weaker or show a completely new pattern post-transformation, as transformations impact how data relates visually and numerically.
In statistical analysis, it is crucial to recognize when and how transformations might affect the correlation and the insights derived from a dataset.
Sample Correlation
Sample correlation measures the degree of linear relationship between two variables in a sample dataset. The correlation coefficient \(r\) is computed from sample data and serves to quantify how closely the variables adhere to a linear trend.
With a correlation of \(r \approx 1\), as described in the exercise, it suggests a nearly perfect linear relationship within the sample. However, this measurement can be sensitive to data transformations.
  • Computation of Sample Correlation: It involves a standard formula based on covariance and standard deviations of the variables. The formula is \(r = \frac{\text{Cov}(x,y)}{\sigma_x \sigma_y}\), where Cov is covariance, and \(\sigma\) denotes standard deviation.
  • Sensitivity to Nonlinear Transformations: As the exercise shows, when we modify \(y\) to \(y^2\), the correlation for \((x, y^2)\) likely decreases due to the broken linear pattern.
Understanding sample correlation allows statisticians to make predictions and inferences about the relationship between variables, but it's crucial to keep in mind potential changes when transformations are applied.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The accompanying data was read from a graph that appeared in the article "Reactions on Painted Steel Under the Influence of Sodium Chloride, and Combinations Thereof"' (Ind. Engr: Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 1985: 375-378). The independent variable is \(\mathrm{SO}_{2}\) deposition rate \(\left(\mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{m}^{2} / \mathrm{d}\right)\), and the dependent variable is steel weight loss \(\left(\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\right)\). $$ \begin{array}{r|rrrrrr} x & 14 & 18 & 40 & 43 & 45 & 112 \\ \hline y & 280 & 350 & 470 & 500 & 560 & 1200 \end{array} $$ a. Construct a scatter plot. Does the simple linear regression model appear to be reasonable in this situation? b. Calculate the equation of the estimated regression line. c. What percentage of observed variation in steel weight loss can be attributed to the model relationship in combination with variation in deposition rate? d. Because the largest \(x\) value in the sample greatly exceeds the others, this observation may have been very influential in determining the equation of the estimated line. Delete this observation and recalculate the equation. Does the new equation appear to differ substantially from the original one (you might consider predicted values)?

The accompanying data on \(x=\) diesel oil consumption rate measured by the drain-weigh method and \(y=\) rate measured by the CI-trace method, both in \(\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{hr}\), was read from a graph in the article "A New Measurement Method of Diesel Engine Oil Consumption Rate" (J. of Soc. of Auto Engr., 1985: 28-33). $$ \begin{array}{l|ccccccccccccc} x & 4 & 5 & 8 & 11 & 12 & 16 & 17 & 20 & 22 & 28 & 30 & 31 & 39 \\ \hline y & 5 & 7 & 10 & 10 & 14 & 15 & 13 & 25 & 20 & 24 & 31 & 28 & 39 \end{array} $$ a. Assuming that \(x\) and \(y\) are related by the simple linear regression model, carry out a test to decide whether it is plausible that on average the change in the rate measured by the CI-trace method is identical to the change in the rate measured by the drain-weigh method. b. Calculate and interpret the value of the sample correlation coefficient

Calcium phosphate cement is gaining increasing attention for use in bone repair applications. The article "Short-Fibre Reinforcement of Calcium Phosphate Bone Cement" (J. of Engr: in Med., 2007: 203-211) reported on a study in which polypropylene fibers were used in an attempt to improve fracture behavior. The following data on \(x=\) fiber weight (\%) and \(y=\) compressive strength (MPa) was provided by the article's authors. $$ \begin{array}{l|ccccccccc} x & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 1.25 & 1.25 & 1.25 & 1.25 \\ \hline y & 9.94 & 11.67 & 11.00 & 13.44 & 9.20 & 9.92 & 9.79 & 10.99 & 11.32 \\\ x & 2.50 & 2.50 & 2.50 & 2.50 & 2.50 & 5.00 & 5.00 & 5.00 & 5.00 \\ \hline y & 12.29 & 8.69 & 9.91 & 10.45 & 10.25 & 7.89 & 7.61 & 8.07 & 9.04 \\ x & 7.50 & 7.50 & 7.50 & 7.50 & 10.00 & 10.00 & 10.00 & 10.00 & \\ \hline y & 6.63 & 6.43 & 7.03 & 7.63 & 7.35 & 6.94 & 7.02 & 7.67 \end{array} $$ a. Fit the simple linear regression model to this data. Then determine the proportion of observed variation in strength that can be attributed to the model relationship between strength and fiber weight. Finally, obtain a point estimate of the standard deviation of \(\epsilon\), the random deviation in the model equation. b. The average strength values for the six different levels of fiber weight are \(11.05,10.51,10.32,8.15,6.93\), and \(7.24\), respectively. The cited paper included a figure in which the average strength was regressed against fiber weight. Obtain the equation of this regression line and calculate the corresponding coefficient of determination. Explain the difference between the \(r^{2}\) value for this regression and the \(r^{2}\) value obtained in (a).

The Turbine Oil Oxidation Test (TOST) and the Rotating Bomb Oxidation Test (RBOT) are two different procedures for evaluating the oxidation stability of steam turbine oils. The article "Dependence of Oxidation Stability of Steam Turbine Oil on Base Oil Composition" (J. of the Society of Tribologists and Lubrication Engrs., Oct. 1997: 19-24) reported the accompanying observations on \(x=\) TOST time (hr) and \(y=\) RBOT time (min) for 12 oil specimens. $$ \begin{array}{lrrrrrr} \text { TOST } & 4200 & 3600 & 3750 & 3675 & 4050 & 2770 \\ \text { RBOT } & 370 & 340 & 375 & 310 & 350 & 200 \\ \text { TOST } & 4870 & 4500 & 3450 & 2700 & 3750 & 3300 \\ \text { RBOT } & 400 & 375 & 285 & 225 & 345 & 285 \end{array} $$ a. Calculate and interpret the value of the sample correla tion coefficient (as do the article's authors). b. How would the value of \(r\) be affected if we had le \(x=\) RBOT time and \(y=\) TOST time? c. How would the value of \(r\) be affected if RBOT time were expressed in hours? d. Construct normal probability plots and comment. e. Carry out a test of hypotheses to decide whether RBOT time and TOST time are linearly related.

How does lateral acceleration-side forces experienced in turns that are largely under driver control-affect nausea as perceived by bus passengers? The article "Motion Sickness in Public Road Transport: The Effect of Driver, Route, and Vehicle" (Ergonomics, 1999: 1646-1664) reported data on \(x=\) motion sickness dose (calculated in accordance with a British standard for evaluating similar motion at sea) and \(y=\) reported nausea (\%). Relevant summary quantities are \(n=17, \sum x_{i}=222.1, \sum y_{i}=193, \sum x_{i}^{2}=3056.69\), \(\sum x_{i} y_{i}=2759.6, \sum y_{i}^{2}=2975\) Values of dose in the sample ranged from \(6.0\) to 17.6. a. Assuming that the simple linear regression model is valid for relating these two variables (this is supported by the raw data), calculate and interpret an estimate of the slope parameter that conveys information about the precision and reliability of estimation. b. Does it appear that there is a useful linear relationship between these two variables? Answer the question by employing the \(P\)-value approach. c. Would it be sensible to use the simple linear regression model as a basis for predicting \(\%\) nausea when dose \(=5.0 ?\) Explain your reasoning. d. When Minitab was used to fit the simple linear regression model to the raw data, the observation \((6.0,2.50)\) was flagged as possibly having a substantial impact on the fit. Eliminate this observation from the sample and recalculate the estimate of part (a). Based on this, does the observation appear to be exerting an undue influence?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.