/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 24 The accompanying data was read f... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The accompanying data was read from a graph that appeared in the article "Reactions on Painted Steel Under the Influence of Sodium Chloride, and Combinations Thereof"' (Ind. Engr: Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 1985: 375-378). The independent variable is \(\mathrm{SO}_{2}\) deposition rate \(\left(\mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{m}^{2} / \mathrm{d}\right)\), and the dependent variable is steel weight loss \(\left(\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\right)\). $$ \begin{array}{r|rrrrrr} x & 14 & 18 & 40 & 43 & 45 & 112 \\ \hline y & 280 & 350 & 470 & 500 & 560 & 1200 \end{array} $$ a. Construct a scatter plot. Does the simple linear regression model appear to be reasonable in this situation? b. Calculate the equation of the estimated regression line. c. What percentage of observed variation in steel weight loss can be attributed to the model relationship in combination with variation in deposition rate? d. Because the largest \(x\) value in the sample greatly exceeds the others, this observation may have been very influential in determining the equation of the estimated line. Delete this observation and recalculate the equation. Does the new equation appear to differ substantially from the original one (you might consider predicted values)?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The linear model is reasonable; original and recalculated equations are similar but influenced by the outlier.

Step by step solution

01

Plot the Data

To understand if a simple linear regression model is appropriate, we first visualize the data with a scatter plot. We plot \( x \) (SO2 deposition rate) on the x-axis and \( y \) (steel weight loss) on the y-axis. Each point on the plot corresponds to one pair of \( x \) and \( y \) values.
02

Assess Linearity

After creating the scatter plot, we assess whether a straight line could reasonably describe the relationship between \( x \) and \( y \). If the data points generally form a straight-line pattern, the assumption of a linear relationship is reasonable.
03

Calculate Slope and Intercept for Regression Line

Using the formulas for the slope \( b = \frac{n(\sum xy) - (\sum x)(\sum y)}{n(\sum x^2) - (\sum x)^2} \) and the intercept \( a = \frac{\sum y - b \sum x}{n} \), we calculate the slope \( b \) and intercept \( a \). This will allow us to express the regression line equation as \( y = a + bx \).
04

Compute Regression Equation

Substitute the calculated values of the slope \( b \) and intercept \( a \) into the regression equation. This provides the estimated line equation \( \hat{y} = a + bx \), which describes the linear relationship.
05

Calculate R-squared Value

Calculate the coefficient of determination \( R^2 \) as \( R^2 = 1 - \frac{SS_{res}}{SS_{tot}} \), where \( SS_{res} \) is the sum of squares of residuals and \( SS_{tot} \) is the total sum of squares. \( R^2 \) represents the proportion of the variance in the dependent variable that is predictable from the independent variable.
06

Assess Influence of the Outlier

To determine the influence of the large \( x \) value (112), we remove this point and recalculate the regression equation. We repeat steps 3 and 4 using only the first five \( x, y \) pairs.
07

Compare Regression Equations

Compare the original and recalculated regression equations and their predicted values to evaluate substantial differences and interpret the significance of any change.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Scatter Plot
To begin with, a scatter plot is an essential tool to visualize the relationship between two variables. Here, we plot the independent variable, which is the \(\text{SO}_2\) deposition rate (in \(\text{mg/m}^2/ ext{d}\)), on the x-axis. Meanwhile, the dependent variable, steel weight loss (in \(\text{g/m}^2\)), sits on the y-axis. Each set of \(x, y\) values makes up a point on the graph.

The scatter plot helps to determine if a simple linear regression model is suitable. By looking at the plot's overall pattern, if the points generally form a straight-line alignment, it indicates linearity. This supports the idea that the variables possess a linear relationship, and thus, a simple linear regression model may be reasonable.

Using scatter plots, we visually assess where most of the data points concentrate. If a clear trend appears, it assists us in predicting whether a linear regression line could effectively describe their relationship.
Regression Equation
Once we identify a potential linear relationship from a scatter plot, the next step involves determining the regression equation. This equation provides a mathematical representation of the relationship between our variables.

The regression equation takes the form \(\hat{y} = a + bx\), where \(a\) is the intercept, and \(b\) is the slope of the line. The slope \(b\) represents the change in the dependent variable for every one-unit change in the independent variable.

To calculate these, we use specific formulas:
  • Slope \(b\) is calculated as \(b = \frac{n(\sum xy) - (\sum x)(\sum y)}{n(\sum x^2) - (\sum x)^2}\)
  • Intercept \(a\) is found using \(a = \frac{\sum y - b \sum x}{n}\)
By inserting the computed \(a\) and \(b\) into the regression equation, we obtain an estimate that provides insightful predictions. This formula acts as the best-fit line, capturing the central linear trend among the varied data points.
R-squared Value
The \(R^2\) value, known as the coefficient of determination, plays a significant role in evaluating a regression model's strength. This metric quantifies how much of the variance in the dependent variable can be explained by the independent variable in our model.

Mathematically, \(R^2\) is calculated through the formula \(R^2 = 1 - \frac{SS_{res}}{SS_{tot}}\). Here, \(SS_{res}\) is the sum of squared residuals, which represents the discrepancies between the actual and estimated values. Meanwhile, \(SS_{tot}\) indicates the total sum of squares from the mean.

An \(R^2\) value close to 1 suggests a strong correlation, meaning most of the variation in steel weight loss is attributed to variations in \(\text{SO}_2\) deposition rate. Conversely, a value near 0 would indicate a weak model, where little of the variation is explainable by our independent variable. Thus, understanding \(R^2\) helps in interpreting the model's reliability.

Effective in determining the goodness of the fit, \(R^2\) assists in model comparison, providing a clear numeric representation of variance explained by the regression line.
Outliers in Regression
Outliers can significantly influence the outcome of a regression analysis. These are data points that differ dramatically from others in the dataset, which could potentially skew results and affect the regression line's direction.

In this exercise, an outlier is identified with the largest \(x\) value (112), which indeed could disproportionately affect the regression equation. By excluding this outlier, we can recalibrate our regression line using the remaining data points. This involves recalculating the slopes and intercept values.

After removing the outlier and re-evaluating the regression equation, we can compare it to the original. Significant changes in the equation or predicted values demonstrate the outlier's impact. This step is essential as it helps us determine whether the initial model remains robust or if it's overly sensitive to extreme values.

Examining outliers is important in regression analysis as it ensures the accuracy and reliability of the model’s predictions, minimizing the risks posed by misrepresentative data points.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

No-fines concrete, made from a uniformly graded coarse aggregate and a cement- water paste, is beneficial in areas prone to excessive rainfall because of its excellent drainage properties. The article "Pavement Thickness Design for NoFines Concrete Parking Lots," J. of Trans. Engr:, 1995: 476-484) employed a least squares analysis in studying how \(y=\) porosity (\%) is related to \(x=\) unit weight (pcf) in concrete specimens. Consider the following representative data: $$ \begin{array}{r|rrrrrrrr} x & 99.0 & 101.1 & 102.7 & 103.0 & 105.4 & 107.0 & 108.7 & 110.8 \\ \hline y & 28.8 & 27.9 & 27.0 & 25.2 & 22.8 & 21.5 & 20.9 & 19.6 \\ x & 112.1 & 112.4 & 113.6 & 113.8 & 115.1 & 115.4 & 120.0 \\ \hline y & 17.1 & 18.9 & 16.0 & 16.7 & 13.0 & 13.6 & 10.8 \end{array} $$ Relevant summary quantities are \(\sum x_{i}=1640.1\), \(\sum y_{i}=299.8, \quad \sum x_{i}^{2}=179,849.73, \quad \sum x_{i} y_{i}=32,308.59\) \(\sum y_{i}^{2}=6430.06\) a. Obtain the equation of the estimated regression line. Then create a scatter plot of the data and graph the estimated line. Does it appear that the model relationship will explain a great deal of the observed variation in \(y\) ? b. Interpret the slope of the least squares line. c. What happens if the estimated line is used to predict porosity when unit weight is 135 ? Why is this not a good idea? d. Calculate the residuals corresponding to the first two observations. e. Calculate and interpret a point estimate of \(\sigma\). f. What proportion of observed variation in porosity can be attributed to the approximate linear relationship between unit weight and porosity?

How does lateral acceleration-side forces experienced in turns that are largely under driver control-affect nausea as perceived by bus passengers? The article "Motion Sickness in Public Road Transport: The Effect of Driver, Route, and Vehicle" (Ergonomics, 1999: 1646-1664) reported data on \(x=\) motion sickness dose (calculated in accordance with a British standard for evaluating similar motion at sea) and \(y=\) reported nausea (\%). Relevant summary quantities are \(n=17, \sum x_{i}=222.1, \sum y_{i}=193, \sum x_{i}^{2}=3056.69\), \(\sum x_{i} y_{i}=2759.6, \sum y_{i}^{2}=2975\) Values of dose in the sample ranged from \(6.0\) to 17.6. a. Assuming that the simple linear regression model is valid for relating these two variables (this is supported by the raw data), calculate and interpret an estimate of the slope parameter that conveys information about the precision and reliability of estimation. b. Does it appear that there is a useful linear relationship between these two variables? Answer the question by employing the \(P\)-value approach. c. Would it be sensible to use the simple linear regression model as a basis for predicting \(\%\) nausea when dose \(=5.0 ?\) Explain your reasoning. d. When Minitab was used to fit the simple linear regression model to the raw data, the observation \((6.0,2.50)\) was flagged as possibly having a substantial impact on the fit. Eliminate this observation from the sample and recalculate the estimate of part (a). Based on this, does the observation appear to be exerting an undue influence?

Calcium phosphate cement is gaining increasing attention for use in bone repair applications. The article "Short-Fibre Reinforcement of Calcium Phosphate Bone Cement" (J. of Engr: in Med., 2007: 203-211) reported on a study in which polypropylene fibers were used in an attempt to improve fracture behavior. The following data on \(x=\) fiber weight (\%) and \(y=\) compressive strength (MPa) was provided by the article's authors. $$ \begin{array}{l|ccccccccc} x & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 1.25 & 1.25 & 1.25 & 1.25 \\ \hline y & 9.94 & 11.67 & 11.00 & 13.44 & 9.20 & 9.92 & 9.79 & 10.99 & 11.32 \\\ x & 2.50 & 2.50 & 2.50 & 2.50 & 2.50 & 5.00 & 5.00 & 5.00 & 5.00 \\ \hline y & 12.29 & 8.69 & 9.91 & 10.45 & 10.25 & 7.89 & 7.61 & 8.07 & 9.04 \\ x & 7.50 & 7.50 & 7.50 & 7.50 & 10.00 & 10.00 & 10.00 & 10.00 & \\ \hline y & 6.63 & 6.43 & 7.03 & 7.63 & 7.35 & 6.94 & 7.02 & 7.67 \end{array} $$ a. Fit the simple linear regression model to this data. Then determine the proportion of observed variation in strength that can be attributed to the model relationship between strength and fiber weight. Finally, obtain a point estimate of the standard deviation of \(\epsilon\), the random deviation in the model equation. b. The average strength values for the six different levels of fiber weight are \(11.05,10.51,10.32,8.15,6.93\), and \(7.24\), respectively. The cited paper included a figure in which the average strength was regressed against fiber weight. Obtain the equation of this regression line and calculate the corresponding coefficient of determination. Explain the difference between the \(r^{2}\) value for this regression and the \(r^{2}\) value obtained in (a).

For the past decade, rubber powder has been used in asphalt cement to improve performance. The article "Experimental Study of Recycled Rubber-Filled High- Strength Concrete" (Magazine of Concrete Res., 2009: 549-556) includes a regression of \(y=\) axial strength (MPa) on \(x=c u b e\) strength (MPa) based on the following sample data: $$ \begin{array}{c|cccccccccc} x & 112.3 & 97.0 & 92.7 & 86.0 & 102.0 & 99.2 & 95.8 & 103.5 & 89.0 & 86.7 \\ \hline y & 75.0 & 71.0 & 57.7 & 48.7 & 74.3 & 73.3 & 68.0 & 59.3 & 57.8 & 48.5 \end{array} $$ a. Obtain the equation of the least squares line, and interpret its slope. b. Calculate and interpret the coefficient of determination. c. Calculate and interpret an estimate of the error standard deviation \(\sigma\) in the simple linear regression model.

The article "Objective Measurement of the Stretchability of Mozzarella Cheese" (J. of Texture Studies, 1992: 185–194) reported on an experiment to investigate how the behavior of mozzarella cheese varied with temperature. Consider the accompanying data on \(x=\) temperature and \(y=\) elongatior (\%) at failure of the cheese. $$ \begin{array}{l|rrrrrrr} x & 59 & 63 & 68 & 72 & 74 & 78 & 83 \\ \hline y & 118 & 182 & 247 & 208 & 197 & 135 & 132 \end{array} $$ a. Construct a scatter plot in which the axes intersect at \((0,0)\). Mark \(0,20,40,60,80\), and 100 on the horizontal axis and \(0,50,100,150,200\), and 250 on the vertical axis. b. Construct a scatter plot in which the axes intersect at \((55,100)\), as was done in the cited article. Does this plot seem preferable to the one in part (a)? Explain your reasoning. c. What do the plots of parts (a) and (b) suggest about the nature of the relationship between the two variables?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.