/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 5 The article "Objective Measureme... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The article "Objective Measurement of the Stretchability of Mozzarella Cheese" (J. of Texture Studies, 1992: 185–194) reported on an experiment to investigate how the behavior of mozzarella cheese varied with temperature. Consider the accompanying data on \(x=\) temperature and \(y=\) elongatior (\%) at failure of the cheese. $$ \begin{array}{l|rrrrrrr} x & 59 & 63 & 68 & 72 & 74 & 78 & 83 \\ \hline y & 118 & 182 & 247 & 208 & 197 & 135 & 132 \end{array} $$ a. Construct a scatter plot in which the axes intersect at \((0,0)\). Mark \(0,20,40,60,80\), and 100 on the horizontal axis and \(0,50,100,150,200\), and 250 on the vertical axis. b. Construct a scatter plot in which the axes intersect at \((55,100)\), as was done in the cited article. Does this plot seem preferable to the one in part (a)? Explain your reasoning. c. What do the plots of parts (a) and (b) suggest about the nature of the relationship between the two variables?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The scatter plot at (55,100) is preferable and suggests a quadratic relationship between temperature and elongation.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Data

We have paired data representing temperature in degrees Fahrenheit (\(x\)) and elongation at failure in percentage (\(y\)). The temperatures are \(59, 63, 68, 72, 74, 78, 83\) and the corresponding elongations are \(118, 182, 247, 208, 197, 135, 132\). We will plot these data pairs in two different scatter plots to analyze their relationship.
02

Constructing Scatter Plot (0,0)

For the first scatter plot, plot each \((x, y)\) pair on a graph where the horizontal axis represents temperature and the vertical axis represents elongation. The axes intersect at \((0,0)\), and the scales should include specific marks: \(0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100\) on the x-axis and \(0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250\) on the y-axis. Plot the points \((59, 118), (63, 182), (68, 247), (72, 208), (74, 197), (78, 135), (83, 132)\).
03

Constructing Scatter Plot (55,100)

In the second scatter plot, re-plot the same data with axes intersecting at \((55, 100)\). Adjust the origin of the graph so it effectively shifts the entire plot up and to the right. This helps in visualizing data that focuses more on the variability rather than the absolute position of the points.
04

Analyzing the Preference of Plots

Compare the two scatter plots. The plot intersecting at \((55,100)\) can provide a more focused view by aligning the axes closer to the range of data values, thereby magnifying any variations or patterns present in the data. This makes it preferable, as detecting trends or relationships may be clearer.
05

Interpreting the Relationship

Examine both scatter plots to determine the relationship between temperature and elongation. A parabolic shape might suggest a quadratic relationship, where elongation initially increases with temperature but decreases after reaching a peak. This could imply optimal temperature conditions for maximum elongation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Temperature and Elongation Relationship
When observing the connection between temperature and elongation in mozzarella cheese, we are essentially looking at how heat affects stretchability. The elongation at failure is measured as a percentage, representing how much the cheese can stretch before it breaks. It is important to note that different temperatures can impact elongation, which is why the study aimed to explore this variability. The cheese's elasticity might change due to the heat, affecting its stretchable length before it tears. Understanding this relationship is crucial for industries that rely on cheese flow or melt behavior, like pizza-making or other culinary arts where cheese performance at various temperatures is vital.
Constructing Scatter Plots
Creating a scatter plot is a vital step in visually analyzing data. It allows us to plot the variables against each other to look for trends. For our dataset, we have temperature on the horizontal axis and elongation on the vertical axis. By plotting points like (59, 118) and (63, 182), where the first value represents temperature and the second represents elongation, we can see how these two variables interact. In different plots, adjusting the axis intersection from (0,0) to (55,100) helps change the focus of our analysis. These adjustments can highlight variations more clearly by placing the data within a relevant part of the graph, offering insights that might be missed with a simple (0,0) intersection. This choice depends on what aspect of the data we want to emphasize.
Data Visualization
Data visualization is a powerful tool for summarizing complex datasets and uncovering hidden patterns. Scatter plots, like the ones discussed, are one form of data visualization that allows us to see direct relationships between two variables. Visualizing the temperature versus elongation data can uncover trends that are not immediately obvious in raw numbers. For instance, higher elongation values at certain temperatures can be quickly identified visually. By using visual tools, we enhance our ability to interpret the data. This visualization can suggest possible maximums, minimums, or changes in the rate of elongation, helping to form hypotheses on cheese behavior with temperature changes. Bullet points can help summarize key observations:
  • Identify peaks and troughs in data visually.
  • Distinguish between linear and non-linear relationships.
  • Spot outliers or unexpected patterns easily.
Quadratic Relationship
From the analysis of scatter plots, if the plotted data suggests a curve rather than a straight line, it often indicates a quadratic relationship. This means the relationship between temperature and elongation may not be linear, but rather form a parabolic curve. A quadratic relationship may show that as temperature increases initially, elongation also increases until it reaches a peak. Beyond this peak temperature, further increases might lead to reduced elongation, suggesting there is an optimal temperature for maximum stretchability. Understanding this quadratic relationship is essential. It provides insights into ideal conditions for cheese processing or consumption, contributing to product quality optimization. In summary, evaluating a quadratic pattern helps in recognizing optimal parameters and improving processes accordingly.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Exhaust Emissions from Four-Stroke Lawn Mower Engines" (J. of the Air and Water Mgmnt. Assoc., 1997: 945-952) reported data from a study in which both a baseline gasoline mixture and a reformulated gasoline were used. Consider the following observations on age (yr) and \(\mathrm{NO}_{x}\) emissions \((\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{kWh})\) : $$ \begin{array}{lccccc} \text { Engine } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 \\ \text { Age } & 0 & 0 & 2 & 11 & 7 \\ \text { Baseline } & 1.72 & 4.38 & 4.06 & 1.26 & 5.31 \\ \text { Reformulated } & 1.88 & 5.93 & 5.54 & 2.67 & 6.53 \\ \text { Engine } & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 \\ \text { Age } & 16 & 9 & 0 & 12 & 4 \\ \text { Baseline } & .57 & 3.37 & 3.44 & .74 & 1.24 \\ \text { Reformulated } & .74 & 4.94 & 4.89 & .69 & 1.42 \end{array} $$ Construct scatter plots of \(\mathrm{NO}_{x}\) emissions versus age. What appears to be the nature of the relationship between these two variables?

The efficiency ratio for a steel specimen immersed in a phosphating tank is the weight of the phosphate coating divided by the metal loss (both in \(\mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{ft}^{2}\) ). The article "Statistical Process Control of a Phosphate Coating Line" (Wire J. Intl., May 1997: 78-81) gave the accompanying data on tank temperature \((x)\) and efficiency ratio \((y)\). $$ \begin{array}{lrrrrrrr} \text { Temp. } & 170 & 172 & 173 & 174 & 174 & 175 & 176 \\ \text { Ratio } & .84 & 1.31 & 1.42 & 1.03 & 1.07 & 1.08 & 1.04 \\ \text { Temp. } & 177 & 180 & 180 & 180 & 180 & 180 & 181 \\ \text { Ratio } & 1.80 & 1.45 & 1.60 & 1.61 & 2.13 & 2.15 & .84 \\ \text { Temp. } & 181 & 182 & 182 & 182 & 182 & 184 & 184 \\ \text { Ratio } & 1.43 & .90 & 1.81 & 1.94 & 2.68 & 1.49 & 2.52 \\ \text { Temp. } & 185 & 186 & 188 & & & & \\ \text { Ratio } & 3.00 & 1.87 & 3.08 & & & & \end{array} $$ a. Construct stem-and-leaf displays of both temperature and efficiency ratio, and comment on interesting features. b. Is the value of efficiency ratio completely and uniquely determined by tank temperature? Explain your reasoning. c. Construct a scatter plot of the data. Does it appear that efficiency ratio could be very well predicted by the value of temperature? Explain your reasoning.

Astringency is the quality in a wine that makes the wine drinker's mouth feel slightly rough, dry, and puckery. The paper "Analysis of Tannins in Red Wine Using Multiple Methods: Correlation with Perceived Astringency" (Amer. \(J\). of Enol. and Vitic., 2006: 481-485) reported on an investigation to assess the relationship between perceived astringency and tannin concentration using various analytic methods. Here is data provided by the authors on \(x=\tan -\) nin concentration by protein precipitation and \(y=\) perceived astringency as determined by a panel of tasters. $$ \begin{array}{r|rrrrrrrr} x & .718 & .808 & .924 & 1.000 & .667 & .529 & .514 & .559 \\ \hline y & .428 & .480 & .493 & .978 & .318 & .298 & -.224 & .198 \\ x & .766 & .470 & .726 & .762 & .666 & .562 & .378 & .779 \\ \hline y & .326 & -.336 & .765 & .190 & .066 & -.221 & -.898 & .836 \\ x & .674 & .858 & .406 & .927 & .311 & .319 & .518 & .687 \\ \hline y & .126 & .305 & -.577 & .779 & -.707 & -.610 & -.648 & -.145 \\ x & .907 & .638 & .234 & .781 & .326 & .433 & .319 & .238 \\ \hline y & 1.007 & -.090-1.132 & .538 & -1.098 & -.581 & -.862 & -.551 \end{array} $$ Relevant summary quantities are as follows: $$ \begin{aligned} &\sum x_{i}=19.404, \sum y_{i}=-.549, \sum x_{i}^{2}=13.248032 \\ &\sum y_{i}^{2}=11.835795, \sum x_{i} y_{i}=3.497811 \\ &S_{x x}=13.248032-(19.404)^{2} / 32=1.48193150, \\ &S_{y y}=11.82637622 \\ &S_{x y}=3.497811-(19.404)(-.549) / 32 \\ &=3.83071088 \end{aligned} $$ a. Fit the simple linear regression model to this data. Then determine the proportion of observed variation in astringency that can be attributed to the model relationship between astringency and tannin concentration. b. Calculate and interpret a confidence interval for the slope of the true regression line. c. Estimate true average astringency when tannin concentration is \(.6\), and do so in a way that conveys information about reliability and precision. d. Predict astringency for a single wine sample whose tannin concentration is .6, and do so in a way that conveys information about reliability and precision. e. Does it appear that true average astringency for a tannin concentration of 7 is something other than 0 ? State and test the appropriate hypotheses.

The following data is representative of that reported in the article "An Experimental Correlation of Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions from Power Boilers Based on Field Data" (J. of Engr: for Power; July 1973: 165-170), with \(x=\) burner-area liberation rate \(\left(\mathrm{MBtu} / \mathrm{hr}^{-\mathrm{ft}^{2}}\right)\) and \(y=\mathrm{NO}_{x}\) emission rate (ppm): $$ \begin{array}{l|rrrrrrr} x & 100 & 125 & 125 & 150 & 150 & 200 & 200 \\ \hline y & 150 & 140 & 180 & 210 & 190 & 320 & 280 \\ x & 250 & 250 & 300 & 300 & 350 & 400 & 400 \\ \hline y & 400 & 430 & 440 & 390 & 600 & 610 & 670 \end{array} $$ a. Assuming that the simple linear regression model is valid, obtain the least squares estimate of the true regression line. b. What is the estimate of expected \(\mathrm{NO}_{x}\) emission rate when burner area liberation rate equals 225 ? c. Estimate the amount by which you expect \(\mathrm{NO}_{x}\) emission rate to change when burner area liberation rate is decreased by 50 . d. Would you use the estimated regression line to predict emission rate for a liberation rate of 500 ? Why or why not?

A study to assess the capability of subsurface flow wetland systems to remove biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and various other chemical constituents resulted in the accompanying data on \(x=\) BOD mass loading \((\mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{ha} / \mathrm{d})\) and \(y=\) BOD mass removal \((\mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{ha} / \mathrm{d})\) ("Subsurface Flow Wetlands-A Performance Evaluation," Water Envir: Res., 1995: 244–247). $$ \begin{array}{c|cccccccccccccc} x & 3 & 8 & 10 & 11 & 13 & 16 & 27 & 30 & 35 & 37 & 38 & 44 & 103 & 142 \\ \hline y & 4 & 7 & 8 & 8 & 10 & 11 & 16 & 26 & 21 & 9 & 31 & 30 & 75 & 90 \end{array} $$ a. Construct boxplots of both mass loading and mass removal, and comment on any interesting features. b. Construct a scatter plot of the data, and comment on any interesting features.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.