/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q15E Exercise \(10.7\) described an e... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Exercise \(10.7\) described an experiment in which \(26\)resistivity observations were made on each of six different concrete mitures. The article cited there gave the following sample means: \(14.18\,,17.94,\,18.00,\,\,25.74,\,\,27.67\) Apply Tukey鈥檚 method with a simultaneous confidence level of \(95\% \)to identify significant differences, and describe your findings \((use\,\,MSE = 13.929)\)

Short Answer

Expert verified

The T Method for Identifying Significantly Different 渭i 鈥檚

Find value \({Q_{\alpha ,}}I,{I_{\left( {j - 1} \right)}}\)at the Table A.10. in the appendix of the book for given \(\alpha \).

\(\begin{aligned}{l}\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{1.}}\\\underline {14.18} \end{aligned}\)\(\begin{aligned}{l}\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{2.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{3.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{4.}}\\\underline {\,\,17.94\,\,\,\,\,18\,\,\,\,\,\,18\,\,} \,\,\end{aligned}\)\(\begin{aligned}{l}\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{5.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{6.}}\,\,\,\,\,\\\underline {\,\,25.74\,\,\,\,\,26.67\,\,\,} \end{aligned}\)

Step by step solution

01

definition of mean

Two are more numbers of mathematical average called mean.

The T Method for Identifying Significantly Different 渭i 鈥檚

Find value \({Q_{\alpha ,}}I,{I_{\left( {j - 1} \right)}}\)at the Table A.10. in the appendix of the book for given \(\alpha \).

Compute and list the sample means in increasing order. Calculate

\(w = {Q_{\alpha ,}}I,{I_{\left( {j - 1} \right)}}.\sqrt {\frac{{MSE}}{J}} \)

underline pairs of the sample means that differ by less than W . The pair of sample which are not underscored by the same line corresponding of population or treatment means that they are significantly different.

From the mentioned table, and\(\alpha = 0.05\)\(I = 6,J = 26\)

\({Q_{\alpha ,}}I,{I_{\left( {J - 1} \right)}} = {Q_{0.05,6,150}} \approx {Q_{0.05,6,120 = 4.1}}\)

\( = 4.02\)

The value of of estimate using the table.

\(MSE = 13.929\)

Compute the w value as

\(w = {Q_{\alpha ,}}I,{I_{\left( {j - 1} \right)}}.\sqrt {\frac{{MSE}}{J}} = 4.1.\sqrt {\frac{{13.929}}{{26}}} = 3\)

First order the sample means

\({\overline x _{3.}} < {\overline x _{1.}}\,\,\, < {\overline x _{4.}}\,\, < {\overline x _{2.}} < {\overline x _{5.}} < {\overline x _{6.}}\,{\overline x _{7.}}\,\)

The bold value are smaller than w

02

following the table

The following table

Treatment Mixture i

Sample mean

\({\overline x _{i.}} - {\overline x _{1.}}\)

\({\overline x _{i.}} - {\overline x _{2.}}\)

\({\overline x _{i.}} - {\overline x _{3.}}\)

\({\overline x _{i.}} - {\overline x _{4.}}\)

\({\overline x _{i.}} - {\overline x _{5.}}\)

\(1\)

\(14.18\)

\(2\)

\(17.94\)

\(3.76\)

\(3\)

\(18\)

\(3.82\)

\(0.06\)

\(4\)

\(18\)

\(3.82\)

\(0.06\)

\(0\)

\(5\)

\(25.74\)

\(11.56\)

\(7.8\)

\(7.74\)

\(7.74\)

\(6\)

\(27.67\)

\(13.49\)

\(9.73\)

\(9.67\)

\(9.67\)

\(1.93\)

Differences can be computed manually very easy thus there is not going to be an explanation of the part.conclusion is that three group have been created,first group containing only mixture\(1\),second group containing mixture\(2,3\,and\,4\)third group containing mixture\(5,6\) between the group there is significant difference but within the groups there are no significant differences.This can be represented using line .

\(\begin{aligned}{l}\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{1.}}\\\underline {14.18} \end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned}{l}\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{2.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{3.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{4.}}\\\underline {\,\,17.94\,\,\,\,\,18\,\,\,\,\,\,18\,\,} \,\,\end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned}{l}\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{5.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{6.}}\,\,\,\,\,\\\underline {\,\,25.74\,\,\,\,\,26.67\,\,\,} \end{aligned}\)

Hence,

\(\begin{aligned}{l}\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{1.}}\\\underline {14.18} \end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned}{l}\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{2.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{3.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{4.}}\\\underline {\,\,17.94\,\,\,\,\,18\,\,\,\,\,\,18\,\,} \,\,\end{aligned}\)\(\begin{aligned}{l}\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{5.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{6.}}\,\,\,\,\,\\\underline {\,\,25.74\,\,\,\,\,26.67\,\,\,} \end{aligned}\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Repeat Exercise supposing that \(\,\,{\overline x _{2.}} = 502.8\)in addition to\(\,\,{\overline x _{3.}} = 427.5.\)

Let \({c_1},{c_2},...{c_l}\) be numbers satisfying \(\sum {{c_i} = 0} \). Then \(\sum {{c_i}{\mu _i} = {c_1}{\mu _1} + .. + {c_l}{\mu _l}} \) is called a contrast in the \({\mu _i}'s\). Notice that with \({c_1} = 1,{c_2} = - 1,{c_3} = ... = {c_1} = 0,\sum {{c_{i{\mu _i}}} = {\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \)which implies that every pairwise difference between \({\mu _i}'s\)is a contrast. A method attributed to Scheffe鈥檚 gives simultaneous CI鈥檚 with simultaneous confidence level \(100\left( {1 - \alpha } \right)\% \) for all possible contrast. The interval for \(\sum {{c_i}{\mu _i}} \)is

\({\sum {{c_i}{{\overline x }_{i.}} \pm \left( {\sum {{\raise0.7ex\hbox{\({{c_i}^2}\)} \!\mathord{\left/

{\vphantom {{{c_i}^2} {{J_i}}}}\right.\kern-\nulldelimiterspace}

\!\lower0.7ex\hbox{\({{J_i}}\)}}} } \right)} ^{{\raise0.7ex\hbox{\(1\)} \!\mathord{\left/

{\vphantom {1 2}}\right.\kern-\nulldelimiterspace}

\!\lower0.7ex\hbox{\(2\)}}}} \times {\left( {\left( {I - 1} \right) \times MSE \times {F_{\alpha ,I - 1,n - I}}} \right)^{{\raise0.7ex\hbox{\(1\)} \!\mathord{\left/

{\vphantom {1 2}}\right.\kern-\nulldelimiterspace}

\!\lower0.7ex\hbox{\(2\)}}}}\)

Using the critical flicker frequency data of Exercise \(42\), calculate the Scheffe interval for the contrast \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2},{\mu _1} - {\mu _3},{\mu _2} - {\mu _3}and5{\mu _1} + 5{\mu _2} - {\mu _3}\). Which contrast appear to differ significantly from \(0\), and why?

The article 鈥渙rigin of Precambrian iron formations鈥(Econ,Geology,1964;1025-1057)reports the following data on total Fe for four types of iron formation\((1 = carbonate,\,2 = silicate,\,3 = magnetite,\,4 = hematite).\)

\(\begin{aligned}{l}1:\,\,\,20.5\,\,\,\,\,\\\,\,\,\,\,\,25.2\\2:26.3\\\,\,\,\,\,\,34.0\\3:29.5\\\,\,\,\,\,\,\,26.2\\4:36.5\\\,\,\,\,\,\,33.1\end{aligned}\)\(\begin{aligned}{l}28.1\\25.3\\24.0\\17.1\\34.0\\29.9\\44.2\\34.1\end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned}{l}27.8\\27.1\\26.2\\26.8\\27.5\\29.5\\34.1\\32.9\end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned}{l}27.0\\20.5\\20.2\\23.7\\29.4\\30.0\\30.3\\36.3\end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned}{l}28.0\\31.3\\23.7\\24.9\\27.9\\35.6\\31.4\\25.5\end{aligned}\)

Carry out analysis of variance F test at significance level \(.01,\) and summarize the results in an ANOVA table.

The lumen output was determined for each of \(I = 3\)different brands of light bulbs having the same wattage, with \(J = 8\) bulbs of each brand tested. The sums of squares were computed as \(SSE = 4773.3\,and\,SS{T_r} = 591.2.\)state hypothese of intrest (including word definitions of parameters),and use the F test of ANOVA \(\left( {\alpha = .05} \right)\)to decide whether there are any differences in true average lumen outputs among the three brands for this type of bulb by obtaining as much information as possible about the p-values.

The following data refers to yield of tomatoes (kg/plot) for four different levels of salinity. Salinity level here refers to electrical conductivity (EC), where the chosen levels were EC = 1.6, 3.8, 6.0, and 10.2 nmhos/cm.

Use the F test at level\(\alpha \)=.05 to test for any differences in true average yield due to the different salinity levels.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.