/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q60E One of the assumptions underlyin... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

One of the assumptions underlying the theory of control charting is that successive plotted points are independent of one another. Each plotted point can signal either that a manufacturing process is operating correctly or that there is some sort of malfunction.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The solution is

\(\begin{array}{l}P\left( {{A_1} \cup {A_2} \cup \ldots \cup {A_{10}}} \right) = 0.401\\P\left( {{A_1} \cup {A_2} \cup \ldots \cup {A_{25}}} \right) = 0.723\end{array}\)

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

The updated chance of an event occurring after additional information is taken into account is known as posterior probability.

02

Explanation

Denote events:

\({{\rm{A}}_{\rm{i}}}{\rm{ = \{ }}\)point i error was signaled incorrectly\({\rm{\} ,i = 1,2, \ldots ,25}}\).

The probabilities of each of the events is the same and it is \({\rm{0}}{\rm{.05}}\) (given in the exercise).

We are asked to find the probability that at least one of \({\rm{10}}\) successive points indicate a problem when in fact the process is operating correctly which is the union of events \({{\rm{A}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{,}}{{\rm{A}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{, \ldots ,}}{{\rm{A}}_{{\rm{10}}}}\) (at least one)

\(\begin{array}{l}P\left( {{A_1} \cup {A_2} \cup \ldots \cup {A_{10}}} \right)\\\mathop = \limits^{(1)} P\left( {{{\left( {A_1^\prime \cap A_2^\prime \cap \ldots \cap A_{10}^\prime } \right)}^\prime }} \right)\\\mathop = \limits^{(2)} 1 - P\left( {A_1^\prime \cap A_2^\prime \cap \ldots \cap A_{10}^\prime } \right)\\\mathop = \limits^{(3)} 1 - P\left( {A_1^\prime } \right) \cdot P\left( {A_2^\prime } \right) \cdot \ldots \cdot P\left( {A_{10}^\prime } \right)\\\mathop = \limits^{(4)} 1 - (1 - 0.05) \cdot (1 - 0.05) \cdot \ldots \cdot (1 - 0.05)\\ = 1 - {0.95^{10}}\\ = 0.401\end{array}\)

(1): here we use De Morgan's Law,

(2): for any event\(A,P\left( {{A^\prime }} \right) + P(A) = 1\),

(3): the events (points) are independent, so we can use the multiplication property given below,

(4): using\(A,P\left( {{A^\prime }} \right) + P(A) = 1\).

03

Explanation of multiplication property

Multiplication Property:

For events \({A_1},{A_2}, \ldots ,{A_n},n \in \mathbb{N}\)we say that they are mutually independent if

\(\begin{array}{l}P\left( {{A_{{i_1}}} \cap {A_{{i_2}}} \ldots {A_{{i_k}}}} \right)\\ = P\left( {{A_{{i_1}}}} \right) \cdot P\left( {{A_{{i_2}}}} \right) \cdot \ldots \cdot P\left( {{A_{{i_k}}}} \right)\end{array}\)

for every\(k \in \{ 2,3, \ldots ,n\} \), and every subset of indices\({{\rm{i}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{,}}{{\rm{i}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{, \ldots ,}}{{\rm{i}}_{\rm{k}}}\).

Given \({\rm{25}}\) successive points, similarly we obtain

\(\begin{array}{l}P\left( {{A_1} \cup {A_2} \cup \ldots \cup {A_{25}}} \right)\\\mathop = \limits^{(1)} P\left( {{{\left( {A_1^\prime \cap A_2^\prime \cap \ldots \cap A_{25}^\prime } \right)}^\prime }} \right)\\\mathop = \limits^{(2)} 1 - P\left( {A_1^\prime \cap A_2^\prime \cap \ldots \cap A_{25}^\prime } \right)\\\mathop = \limits^{(3)} 1 - P\left( {A_1^\prime } \right) \cdot P\left( {A_2^\prime } \right) \cdot \ldots \cdot P\left( {A_{25}^\prime } \right)\\\mathop = \limits^{(4)} 1 - (1 - 0.05) \cdot (1 - 0.05) \cdot \ldots \cdot (1 - 0.05)\\ = 1 - {0.95^{25}}\\ = 0.723.\end{array}\)

(1): here we use De Morgan's Law,

(2): for any event\(A,P\left( {{A^\prime }} \right) + P(A) = 1\),

(3): the events (points) are independent, so we can use the multiplication property given above,

(4): using\(A,P\left( {{A^\prime }} \right) + P(A) = 1\)

Therefore, the result is

\(\begin{array}{l}P\left( {{A_1} \cup {A_2} \cup \ldots \cup {A_{10}}} \right) = 0.401\\P\left( {{A_1} \cup {A_2} \cup \ldots \cup {A_{25}}} \right) = 0.723\end{array}\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Refer back to the series-parallel system configuration introduced in, and suppose that there are only two cells rather than three in each parallel subsystem eliminate cells 3 and\({\bf{6}}\), and renumber cells \(4\) and \(5\) as \(3\) and \(4\). The probability that system lifetime exceeds t0 is easily seen to be \(.{\bf{9639}}\). To what value would \(.9\) have to be changed in order to increase the system lifetime reliability from \(.{\bf{9639}}\)to \(.{\bf{99}}\)? (Hint: Let P(Ai ) 5 p, express system reliability in terms of p, and then let x 5 p2 .)

a. A lumber company has just taken delivery on a shipment of \({\rm{10,000 2 \times 4}}\)boards. Suppose that 20% of these boards (\({\rm{2000}}\)) are actually too green to be used in first-quality construction. Two boards are selected at random, one after the other. Let A 5 {the first board is green} and B 5 {the second board is green}. Compute \({\rm{P(A),P(B)}}\), and \({\rm{P(A}} \cap {\rm{B)}}\) (a tree diagram might help). Are \({\rm{A}}\) and \({\rm{B}}\) independent?

b. With \({\rm{A}}\) and \({\rm{B}}\) independent and \({\rm{P(A) = P(B) = }}{\rm{.2,}}\) what is \({\rm{P(A}} \cap {\rm{B)}}\)? How much difference is there between this answer and \({\rm{P(A}} \cap {\rm{B)}}\)part (a)? For purposes of calculating \({\rm{P(A}} \cap {\rm{B)}}\), can we assume that \({\rm{A}}\)and \({\rm{B}}\) of part (a) are independent to obtain essentially the correct probability?

c. Suppose the shipment consists of ten boards, of which two are green. Does the assumption of independence now yield approximately the correct answer for \({\rm{P(A}} \cap {\rm{B)}}\)? What is the critical difference between the situation here and that of part (a)? When do you think an independence assumption would be valid in obtaining an approximately correct answer to \({\rm{P(A}} \cap {\rm{B)}}\)?

A friend who lives in Los Angeles makes frequent consulting trips to Washington, D.C.; \({\rm{50\% }}\)of the time she travels on airline\({\rm{\# 1}}\), \({\rm{30\% }}\) of the time on airline \({\rm{\# 2}}\), and the remaining \({\rm{20\% }}\) of the time on airline #3. For airline \({\rm{\# 1}}\), flights are late into D.C. \({\rm{30\% }}\) of the time and late into L.A. \({\rm{10\% }}\) of the time. For airline\({\rm{\# 3}}\), these percentages are \({\rm{25\% }}\) and \({\rm{20\% }}\), whereas for airline #3 the percentages are \({\rm{40\% }}\) and \({\rm{25\% }}\). If we learn that on a particular trip she arrived late at exactly one of the two destinations, what are the posterior probabilities of having flown on airlines \({\rm{\# 1}}\), \({\rm{\# 2}}\), and \({\rm{\# 3}}\)? Assume that the chance of a late arrival in L.A. is unaffected by what happens on the flight to D.C. (Hint: From the tip of each first-generation branch on a tree diagram, draw three second-generation branches labeled, respectively, \({\rm{2}}\) late, \({\rm{2}}\) late, and \({\rm{2}}\) late.)

Again, consider a Little League team that has \({\rm{15}}\) players on its roster.

a. How many ways are there to select \({\rm{9}}\) players for the starting lineup?

b. How many ways are there to select \({\rm{9}}\)players for the starting lineup and a batting order for the \({\rm{9}}\) starters?

c. Suppose \({\rm{5}}\) of the \({\rm{15}}\) players are left-handed. How many ways are there to select \({\rm{3}}\) left-handed outfielders and have all \({\rm{6}}\) other positions occupied by right-handed players?

A quality control inspector is examining newly produced items for faults. The inspector searches an item for faults in a series of independent fixations, each of a fixed duration. Given that a flaw is actually present, let p denote the probability that the flaw is detected during any one fixation (this model is discussed in 鈥淗uman Performance in Sampling Inspection,鈥 Human Factors, \({\rm{1979: 99--105)}}{\rm{.}}\)

a. Assuming that an item has a flaw, what is the probability that it is detected by the end of the second fixation (once a flaw has been detected, the sequence of fixations terminates)?

b. Give an expression for the probability that a flaw will be detected by the end of the nth fixation.

c. If when a flaw has not been detected in three fixations, the item is passed, what is the probability that a flawed item will pass inspection?

d. Suppose \({\rm{10\% }}\) of all items contain a flaw (P(randomly chosen item is flawed) . \({\rm{1}}\)). With the assumption of part (c), what is the probability that a randomly chosen item will pass inspection (it will automatically pass if it is not flawed, but could also pass if it is flawed)?

e. Given that an item has passed inspection (no flaws in three fixations), what is the probability that it is actually flawed? Calculate for \({\rm{p = 5}}\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.