/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q60E Observations on burst strength (... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Observations on burst strength (lb/in 2) were obtained both for test nozzle closure welds and for production cannister nozzle welds (鈥淧roper Procedures Are the Key to Welding Radioactive Waste Cannisters,鈥
Welding J., Aug. 1997: 61鈥67).
Test 7200 6100 7300 7300 8000 7400
7300 7300 8000 6700 8300
Cannister 5250 5625 5900 5900 5700 6050
5800 6000 5875 6100 5850 6600


Construct a comparative boxplot and comment on interesting features (the cited article did not include such a picture, but the authors commented that they had looked
at one).

Short Answer

Expert verified

Both have differing burst strengths, as evidenced by the comparative boxplot. Cannister nozzle weld distribution is more constant, with negligible skewness to the right. In contrast, the distribution of Test nozzle welds is skewed to the right, resulting in more unpredictability.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The data are provided that consists of 11 observations on burst strength for test nozzle closure welds and 12 observations on burst strength for production cannister nozzle welds.

02

Compute five-number summary for Test nozzle closure welds

The five-summary are smallest\({x_i}\), lower fourth, median, upper fourth and largest\({x_i}\).Since sample size of test is odd, the median is the\({\left( {\frac{{n + 1}}{2}} \right)^{th}}\)ordered value when the data are in ascending order as below.

6100

6700

7200

7300

7300

7300

7300

7400

8000

8000

8300

The smallest value is: 6100 and the largest value is: 8300.

Let\(\tilde x\)be the required median. Use the formula to calculate median,

\(\begin{aligned}\tilde x &= {\left( {\frac{{n + 1}}{2}} \right)^{th}}\,ordered\,value\\ &= {\left( {\frac{{11 + 1}}{2}} \right)^{th}}\\ &= {6^{th\,}}observation\\ &= 7300\end{aligned}\)

The lower fourth is the median of smallest half of the data as the median of the data is\(\tilde x = 7300\)so lower half contains 7 values.

6100

6700

7200

7300

7300

7300

7300

Since\(n = 6\)is odd, calculate the median using the formula:

\(\begin{aligned}\tilde x &= {\left( {\frac{{n + 1}}{2}} \right)^{th}}\,ordered\,value\\ &= {\left( {\frac{{7 + 1}}{2}} \right)^{th}}\,ordered\,value\\ &= {4^{th\,}}observation\\ &= 7300\end{aligned}\)

Since 7300 is the median value, so the lower fourth becomes 7200.

Similarly, the upper fourth is the median of largest half of the data as the median of the data is\(\tilde x = 7300\)so it contains 4 values.

7400

8000

8000

8300

Since\(n = 4\)is even, calculate the median using the formula:

\(\begin{aligned}\tilde x &= \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{n}{2}} \right)}^{th}} + {{\left( {\frac{n}{2} + 1} \right)}^{th}}\,ordered\,value}}{2}\\ &= \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{4}{2}} \right)}^{th}} + {{\left( {\frac{4}{2} + 1} \right)}^{th}}ordered\,value}}{2}\\ &= \frac{{\left( {8000 + 8000} \right)}}{2}\\ &= 8000\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the five-number summary to construct boxplot are as follows:

Smallest\({x_i}\): 6100, lower fourth: 7200, median: 7300, upper fourth: 8000,

Largest \({x_i}\): 8300.

03

Compute five-number summary for Cannister nozzle welds

The five-summary are smallest\({x_i}\), lower fourth, median, upper fourth and largest\({x_i}\).Since sample size of test is odd, the median is the\({\left( {\frac{{n + 1}}{2}} \right)^{th}}\)ordered value when the data are in ascending order as below.

5250

5625

5700

5800

5850

5875

5900

5900

6000

6050

6100

6600

The smallest value is: 5250 and the largest value is: 6600.

Let\(\tilde x\)be the required median. Use the formula to calculate median,

\(\begin{aligned}\tilde x &= \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{n}{2}} \right)}^{th}} + {{\left( {\frac{n}{2} + 1} \right)}^{th}}\,ordered\,value}}{2}\\ &= \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{12}}{2}} \right)}^{th}} + {{\left( {\frac{{12}}{2} + 1} \right)}^{th}}ordered\,value}}{2}\\ &= \frac{{{6^{th\,}}observation + {7^{th}}observation}}{2}\\ &= \frac{{5875 + 5900}}{2}\\ &= 5887.5\end{aligned}\)

The lower fourth is the median of smallest half of the data as the median of the data is\(\tilde x = 5887.5\)so each half contains 6 values.

5250

5625

5700

5800

5850

5875

Since\(n = 6\)is even, calculate the median using the formula:

\(\begin{aligned}\tilde x &= \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{n}{2}} \right)}^{th}} + {{\left( {\frac{n}{2} + 1} \right)}^{th}}\,ordered\,value}}{2}\\ &= \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{6}{2}} \right)}^{th}} + {{\left( {\frac{6}{2} + 1} \right)}^{th}}ordered\,value}}{2}\\ &= \frac{{\left( {5700 + 5800} \right)}}{2}\\ &= 5750\end{aligned}\)

Similarly, the upper fourth is the median of largest half of the data as the median of the data is\(\tilde x = 5887.5\)so it contains 6 values.

5900

5900

6000

6050

6100

6600

Since\(n = 6\)is even, calculate the median using the formula:

\(\begin{aligned}\tilde x &= \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{n}{2}} \right)}^{th}} + {{\left( {\frac{n}{2} + 1} \right)}^{th}}\,ordered\,value}}{2}\\ &= \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{6}{2}} \right)}^{th}} + {{\left( {\frac{6}{2} + 1} \right)}^{th}}ordered\,value}}{2}\\ &= \frac{{\left( {6000 + 6050} \right)}}{2}\\ &= 6025\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the five-number summary to construct boxplot are as follows:

Smallest\({x_i}\): 5250, lower fourth: 5750, median: 5887.5, upper fourth: 6025,

Largest \({x_i}\): 6600.

04

Construct box plot of measurements for the distilled alcohol content(%):

Following are the steps to make comparative boxplot by hand:

  1. Draw a plot line of range 5000 to 8500.
  2. Draw three horizontal lines that consists of first quartile, second quartile and third quartile and make two vertical lines to make it in rectangular form like a box for Test nozzle closure welds.
  3. Do the Step 2 again for Cannister nozzle welds.
  4. Draw whiskers on both sides of two boxplots and set the minimum and maximum value with respect to the obtained lower fence and upper fence.
  5. Mark the two outliers of Cannister nozzle welds.

05

Conclusion

From the comparative boxplot, one can see that both have different burst strengths. The distribution of cannister nozzle welds is more consistent and have little skewness to the right. The distribution of Test nozzle welds, on the other hand, is skewed to the right, resulting in more variability.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A sample of 77 individuals working at a particular office wasselected and the noise level (dBA) experienced by each individual was determined, yielding the followingdata (鈥淎cceptable Noise Levels for Construction Site Offices,鈥 Building Serv. Engr. Research and Technology, 2009: 87鈥94).

55.3

55.3

55.3

55.9

55.9

55.9

55.9

56.1

56.1

56.1

56.1

56.1

56.1

56.8

56.8

57.0

57.0

57.0

57.8

57.8

57.8

57.9

57.9

57.9

58.8

58.8

58.8

59.8

59.8

59.8

62.2

62.2

63.8

63.8

63.8

63.9

63.9

63.9

64.7

64.7

64.7

65.1

65.1

65.1

65.3

65.3

65.3

65.3

67.4

67.4

67.4

67.4

68.7

68.7

68.7

68.7

69.0

70.4

70.4

71.2

71.2

71.2

73.0

73.0

73.1

73.1

74.6

74.6

74.6

74.6

79.3

79.3

79.3

79.3

83.0

83.0

83.0

Use various techniques discussed in this chapter to organize, summarize, and describe the data.

If the amount of soft drink that I consume on any given day is independent of consumption on any other day and is normally distributed with\(\mu = 13\)oz and\(\sigma = 2\)and if I currently have two six-packs of\({\bf{16}}\)-oz bottles, what is the probability that I still have some soft drink left at the end of\({\bf{2}}\)weeks?

The actual tracking weight of a stereo cartridge that is set to track at \({\rm{3 g}}\) on a particular changer can be regarded as a continuous rv \({\rm{X}}\) with pdf

\({\rm{f(x) = \{ }}\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{{\rm{k(1 - (x - 3}}{{\rm{)}}^2})}&{{\rm{2}} \le {\rm{x}} \le {\rm{4}}}\\{\rm{0}}&{{\rm{otherwise}}}\end{array}\)

a. Sketch the graph of \({\rm{f(x)}}\).

b. Find the value of \({\rm{k}}\).

c. What is the probability that the actual tracking weight is greater than the prescribed weight?

d. What is the probability that the actual weight is within \({\rm{.25 g}}\) of the prescribed weight?

e. What is the probability that the actual weight differs from the prescribed weight by more than \({\rm{.5 g}}\)?

A sample of n=10 automobiles was selected, and eachwas subjected to a 5-mph crash test. Denoting a car withno visible damage by S (for success) and a car with suchdamage by F, results were as follows:

S S F S SS F F S S

  1. What is the value of the sample proportion of successes x/n?
  2. Replace each S with a 1 and each F with a 0. Then calculate for this numerically coded sample. How does compare to x/n?
  3. Suppose it is decided to include 15 more cars in the experiment. How many of these would have to be S鈥檚 to give x/n = .80 for the entire sample of 25 cars?

Using a long rod that has length \({\rm{\mu }}\)you are going to lay out a square plot in which the length of each side is \({\rm{\mu }}\).Thus the area of the plot will be \({{\rm{\mu }}^{\rm{2}}}\)However, you do not know the value of \({\rm{\mu }}\), so you decide to make \({\rm{n}}\)independent measurements \({{\rm{X}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{,}}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{, \ldots ,}}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{n}}}\)of the length. Assume that each \({{\rm{X}}_{\rm{i}}}\)has mean \({\rm{\mu }}\) (unbiased measurements) and variance \({{\rm{\sigma }}^{\rm{2}}}\).

a. Show that \({{\rm{\bar X}}^{\rm{2}}}\)is not an unbiased estimator for \({{\rm{\mu }}^{\rm{2}}}\). (Hint: For any \({\rm{Y,E}}\left( {{{\rm{Y}}^{\rm{2}}}} \right){\rm{ = V(Y) + (E(Y)}}{{\rm{)}}^{\rm{2}}}\)Apply this with \({\rm{Y = \bar X}}\))

b. For what value of \({\rm{k}}\)is the estimator \({{\rm{\bar X}}^{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ - k}}{{\rm{S}}^{\rm{2}}}\)unbiased for \({{\rm{\mu }}^{\rm{2}}}\)? (Hint: Compute \({\rm{E}}\left( {{{{\rm{\bar X}}}^{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ - k\;}}{{\rm{S}}^{\rm{2}}}} \right)\))

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.