/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q47 E Example聽\(7.11\)聽gave data on ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Example\(7.11\)gave data on the modulus of elasticity obtained\(1\)minute after loading in a certain configuration. The cited article also gave the values of modulus of elasticity obtained\(4\)weeks after loading for the same lumber specimens. The data is presented here. \(\begin{array}{l} Type\\ \begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{}&1&2&3&4&5&6\\{ M: }&{82.6}&{87.1}&{89.5}&{88.8}&{94.3}&{80.0}\\{ LD: }&{86.9}&{87.3}&{92.0}&{89.3}&{91.4}&{85.9}\\{}&7&8&9&{10}&{11}&{12}\\{ M: }&{86.7}&{92.5}&{97.8}&{90.4}&{94.6}&{91.6}\\{ LD: }&{89.4}&{91.8}&{94.3}&{92.0}&{93.1}&{91.3}\\{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}\end{array}\end{array}\)

a. Estimate the difference in true average strength under the two drying conditions in a way that conveys information about reliability and precision, and interpret the estimate. What does the estimate suggest about how true average strength under moist drying conditions compares to that under laboratory drying conditions?

b. Check the plausibility of any assumptions that underlie your analysis of (a).

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) \(( - 2.5174,1.0508)\)

(b) Plausibly satisfied

Step by step solution

01

a)Step 1: Find the difference

Given:

\(n = 12\)

I will calculate a\(95\% \)confidence interval. Other confidence bounds can be obtained similarly.

\(c = 95\% = 0.95\)

Sample1

Sample 2

Difference D

\(82.6\)

\(86.9\)

\( - 4.3\)

\(87.1\)

\(87.3\)

\( - 0.2\)

\(89.5\)

\(92\)

\( - 2.5\)

\(88.8\)

\(89.3\)

\( - 0.5\)

\(94.3\)

\(91.4\)

\(2.9\)

\(80\)

\(85.9\)

\( - 5.9\)

\(86.7\)

\(89.4\)

\( - 2.7\)

\(92.5\)

\(91.8\)

\(0.7\)

\(97.8\)

\(94.3\)

\(3.5\)

\(90.4\)

\(92\)

\( - 1.6\)

\(94.6\)

\(93.1\)

\(1.5\)

\(91.6\)

\(91.3\)

\(0.3\)

Mean

\( - 0.7333\)

Sd

\(2.8079\)

02

Find the boundaries of confidence interval

Determine the sample mean of the differences. The mean is the sum of all values divided by the number of values.

\(\bar d = \frac{{ - 4.3 - 0.2 - 2.5 + \ldots - 1.6 + 1.5 + 0.3}}{{12}} \approx - 0.7333\)

Determine the sample standard deviation of the differences:

\({s_d} = \sqrt {\frac{{{{( - 4.3 - ( - 0.7333))}^2} + \ldots + {{(0.3 - ( - 0.7333))}^2}}}{{12 - 1}}} \approx 2.8079\)

Determine the\({t_{\alpha /2}}\) using the Student's T distribution table in the appendix with\(df = n - 1 = 12 - 1 = 11\):

\({t_{\alpha /2}} = {t_{1 - c/2}} = {t_{0.025}} = 2.201\)

The margin of error is then:

\(E = {t_{\alpha /2}} \cdot \frac{{{s_d}}}{{\sqrt n }} = 2.201 \cdot \frac{{2.8079}}{{\sqrt {12} }} \approx 1.7841\)

The boundaries of the confidence interval for \({\mu _d}\) are then: \(\begin{array}{l}\bar d + E = - 0.7333 - 1.7841 = - 2.5174\\\bar d + E = - 0.7333 + 1.7841 = 1.0508\end{array}\)

03

b)Step 3: Plot the normal probability

(b) Normal probability plot

The data values are on the horizontal axis and the standardized normal scores are on the vertical axis.

If the data contains\(n\)data values, then the standardized normal scores are the z-scores in the normal probability table of the appendix corresponding to an area of\(\frac{{j - 0.5}}{n}\)(or the closest area) with\(j \in \{ 1,2,3, \ldots .,n\} \)(these z-scores are given in the given table).

The smallest standardized score corresponds with the smallest data value, the second smallest standardized score corresponds with the second smallest data value, and so on.

If the pattern in the normal probability plot is roughly linear and does not contain strong curvature, then it is appropriate to assume that the population distribution is approximately normal.

The plot does not contain strong curvature and is roughly linear, thus it is plausible that the differences originate from a normal distribution.

Thus the assumptions underlying the analysis in part (a) appear to be satisfied.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

To decide whether two different types of steel have the same true average fracture toughness values, n specimens of each type are tested, yielding the following results:

\(\begin{array}{l}\underline {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{ Type }&{ Sample Average }&{ Sample SD }\\1&{60.1}&{1.0}\\2&{59.9}&{1.0}\\{}&{}&{}\end{array}} \\\end{array}\)

Calculate the P-value for the appropriate two-sample \(z\) test, assuming that the data was based on \(n = 100\). Then repeat the calculation for \(n = 400\). Is the small P-value for \(n = 400\) indicative of a difference that has practical significance? Would you have been satisfied with just a report of the P-value? Comment briefly.a

Hexavalent chromium has been identified as an inhalation carcinogen and an air toxin of concern in a number of different locales. The article "Airborne Hexavalent Chromium in Southwestern Ontario"(J . of Air and Waste Mgmnt. Assoc., \(1997: 905 - 910\)) gave the accompanying data on both indoor and outdoor concentration (nanograms\(/{m^3}\)) for a sample of houses selected from a certain

House

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;1\;\;\;\;\;\;2\;\;\;\;\;3\;\;\;\;\;\;\;4\;\;\;\;\;5\;\;\;\;\;\;\;6\;\;\;\;\;\;\;7\;\;\;\;\;\;\;8\;\;\;\;\;\;\;9}\\{Indoor\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;.07\;\;\;\;.08\;\;\;\;.09\;\;\;\;.12\;\;\;\;.12\;\;\;\;.12\;\;\;\;.13\;\;\;\;.14\;\;\;\;.15}\\{Outdoor\;\;\;\;\;\;.29\;\;\;\;.68\;\;\;\;.47\;\;\;\;.54\;\;\;\;.97\;\;\;\;.35\;\;\;\;.49\;\;\;\;.84\;\;\;\;.86}\end{array}\)

House

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;10\;\;\;\;\;11\;\;\;\;\;12\;\;\;\;\;13\;\;\;\;\;14\;\;\;\;\;15\;\;\;\;\;16\;\;\;\;\;17}\\{Indoor\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;.15\;\;\;\;.17\;\;\;\;.17\;\;\;\;.18\;\;\;\;.18\;\;\;\;.18\;\;\;\;.18\;\;\;\;.19}\\{Outdoor\;\;\;\;\;\;.28\;\;\;\;.32\;\;\;\;.32\;\;\;\;1.55\;\;\;.66\;\;\;\;.29\;\;\;\;.21\;\;\;\;1.02}\end{array}\)

House

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{}&{18}&{19}&{20}&{21}&{22}&{23}&{24}&{25}\\{Indoor}&{.20}&{.22}&{.22}&{.23}&{.23}&{.25}&{.26}&{.28}\\{Outdoor}&{1.59}&{.90}&{.52}&{.12}&{.54}&{.88}&{.49}&{1.24}\end{array}\)

House

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{}&{26}&{27}&{28}&{29}&{30}&{31}&{32}&{33}\\{Indoor}&{.28}&{.29}&{.34}&{.39}&{.40}&{.45}&{.54}&{.62}\\{Outdoor}&{.48}&{.27}&{.37}&{1.26}&{.70}&{.76}&{.99}&{.36}\end{array}\)

a. Calculate a confidence interval for the population mean difference between indoor and outdoor concentrations using a confidence level of\(95\% \), and interpret the resulting interval.

b. If a\(34\)th house were to be randomly selected from the population, between what values would you predict the difference in concentrations to lie?region.

The accompanying data on response time appeared in the article "'The Extinguishment of Fires Using Low-Flow Water Hose Streams-Part II" (Fire Technology, 1991: 291-320).

Good visibility

.43 1.17 .37 .47 .68 .58 .50 2.75

Poor visibility

1.47 .80 1.58 1.53 4.33 4.23 3.25 3.22

The authors analyzed the data with the pooled t test. Does the use of this test appear justified? (Hint: Check for normality.

The z percentiles for n=8 are -1.53, -.89, -.49, -.15 , .15, .49, .89, and 1.53.)

Pilates is a popular set of exercises for the treatment of individuals with lower back pain. The method has six basic principles: centering, concentration, control, precision, flow, and breathing. The article 鈥淓fficacy of the Addition of Modified Pilates Exercises to a Minimal Intervention in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial鈥 (Physical Therapy, \(2013:309 - 321\)) reported on an experiment involving \(86\) subjects with nonspecific low back pain. The participants were randomly divided into two groups of equal size. The first group received just educational materials, whereas the second group participated in \(6\) weeks of Pilates exercises. The sample mean level of pain (on a scale from \(0\) to \(10\)) for the control group at a \(6\)-week follow-up was \(5.2\) and the sample mean for the treatment group was \(3.1\); both sample standard deviations were \(2.3\).

a. Does it appear that true average pain level for the control condition exceeds that for the treatment condition? Carry out a test of hypotheses using a significance level of \(.01\) (the cited article reported statistical significance at this a, and a sample mean difference of \(2.1\) also suggests practical significance)

b. Does it appear that true average pain level for the control condition exceeds that for the treatment condition by more than \(1\)? Carry out a test of appropriate hypotheses

Adding computerized medical images to a database promises to provide great resources for physicians. However, there are other methods of obtaining such information, so the issue of efficiency of access needs to be investigated. The article "The Comparative Effectiveness of Conventional and Digital Image Libraries" J. of Audiovisual Media in Medicine, 2001: 8-15) reported on an experiment in which 13 computerproficient medical professionals were timed both while retrieving an image from a library of slides and while retrieving the same image from a computer database with a Web front end.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{\;Subject\;\;\;\;\;1\;\;\;2\;\;3\;\;\;4\;\;\;5\;\;\;6\;\;\;\;\;7}\\{\;Slide\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;30\;35\;40\;25\;20\;30\;\;35}\\{\;Digital\;\;\;\;\;\;\;25\;16\;15\;15 10\;20\;\;\;7}\\{\;Difference\;\;5\;19\;25\;10\;10\;10\;28}\\{\;Subject\;\;\;\;\;8\;\;9\;\;10\;11\;12\;13}\\{\;Slide\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;62\;40\;51\;25\;42\;33\;}\\{Digital\;\;\;\;\;\;\;16\;15\;13\;11\;19\;19}\\{Difference\;46\;25\;38\;14\;23\;14}\end{array}\)

a. Construct a comparative boxplot of times for the two types of retrieval, and comment on any interesting features.

b. Estimate the difference between true average times for the two types of retrieval in a way that conveys information about precision and reliability. Be sure to check the plausibility of any assumptions needed in your analysis. Does it appear plausible that the true average times for the two types of retrieval are identical? Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.