/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q94E The accompanying observations ar... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

The accompanying observations are precipitation values during March over a \(30\)-year period in Minneapolis-St. Paul.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{.77\;\;1.20\;\;3.00\;\;1.62\;\;2.81\;\;2.48}\\{1.74\;\;.47\;\;3.09\;\;1.31\;\;1.87\;\;\;\;.96}\\{.81\;\;1.43\;\;1.51\;\;\;\;.32\;\;1.18\;\;1.89}\\{1.20 3.37\;\;2.10\;\;\;\;.59\;\;1.35\;\;\;\;.90}\\{1.95 2.20\;\;\;\;.52\;\;\;\;\;.81\;\;4.75\;\;2.05}\end{array}\)

a. Construct and interpret a normal probability plot for this data set. b. Calculate the square root of each value and then construct a normal probability plot based on this transformed data. Does it seem plausible that the square root of precipitation is normally distributed? c. Repeat part (b) after transforming by cube roots.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The distributions of the observations it not normally distributed.

(b) It is plausible that the square root of precipitation is normally distributed.

(c) It is plausible that the cubic root of precipitation is normally distributed.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Probability

The probability of an event occurring is defined by probability. There are many scenarios in which we must forecast the outcome of an event in real life. The outcome of an event may be certain or uncertain. In such instances, we say that the event has a chance of happening or not happening.

02

Construction and Interpretation of normal probability plot for part a.

Given observations:

\(\begin{array}{l}0.77,\;1.2,\;3,\;1.62,\;2.81,\;2.48,\;1.74,\;0.47,\;3.09,\;1.31,\;1.87,\\0.96,\;0.81,\;1.43,\;1.51,\;0.32,\;1.18,\;1.89,\;1.2,\;3.37,\;2.1,\;0.59,\\1.35,\;0.9,1.95,\;2.2,\;0.52,\;0.81,\;4.75,2.05\end{array}\)

We note that the data contains 30 data values.

We then need to determine the z-percentiles, which are the z-scores corresponding to the probability

\(\frac{{i - 0.5}}{{24}}\)(or the closest probability):

\(\begin{array}{l}i = 1 \Rightarrow \frac{{1 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.0167 \Rightarrow z = - 2.13\\i = 2 \Rightarrow \frac{{2 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.05 \Rightarrow z = - 1.645\\i = 3 \Rightarrow \frac{{3 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.0833 \Rightarrow z = - 1.38\\i = 4 \Rightarrow \frac{{4 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.1167 \Rightarrow z = - 1.19\\i = 5 \Rightarrow \frac{{5 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.15 \Rightarrow z = - 1.04\\i = 6 \Rightarrow \frac{{6 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.1833 \Rightarrow z = - 0.90\end{array}\)

03

Construction and Interpretation of normal probability plot for part a.

\(\begin{array}{l}i = 7 \Rightarrow \frac{{7 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.2167 \Rightarrow z = - 0.78\\i = 8 \Rightarrow \frac{{8 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.25 \Rightarrow z = - 0.67\\i = 9 \Rightarrow \frac{{9 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.2833 \Rightarrow z = - 0.57\\i = 10 \Rightarrow \frac{{10 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.3167 \Rightarrow z = - 0.48\\i = 11 \Rightarrow \frac{{11 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.35 \Rightarrow z = - 0.39\\i = 12 \Rightarrow \frac{{12 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.3833 \Rightarrow z = - 0.30\\i = 13 \Rightarrow \frac{{13 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.4167 \Rightarrow z = - 0.22\\i = 14 \Rightarrow \frac{{14 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.45 \Rightarrow z = - 0.13\\i = 15 \Rightarrow \frac{{15 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.4833 \Rightarrow z = - 0.04\\i = 16 \Rightarrow \frac{{16 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.5167 \Rightarrow z = 0.04\end{array}\)

04

Construction and Interpretation of normal probability plot for part a.

\(\begin{array}{l}i = 17 \Rightarrow \frac{{17 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.55 \Rightarrow z = 0.13\\i = 18 \Rightarrow \frac{{18 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.5833 \Rightarrow z = 0.22\\i = 19 \Rightarrow \frac{{19 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.6167 \Rightarrow z = 0.30\\i = 20 \Rightarrow \frac{{20 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.65 \Rightarrow z = 0.39\\i = 21 \Rightarrow \frac{{21 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.6833 \Rightarrow z = 0.48\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{l}i = 22 \Rightarrow \frac{{22 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.7167 \Rightarrow z = 0.57\\i = 23 \Rightarrow \frac{{23 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.75 \Rightarrow z = 0.67\\i = 24 \Rightarrow \frac{{24 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.7833 \Rightarrow z = 0.78\\i = 25 \Rightarrow \frac{{25 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.8167 \Rightarrow z = 0.90\\i = 26 \Rightarrow \frac{{26 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.85 \Rightarrow z = 1.04\\i = 27 \Rightarrow \frac{{27 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.8833 \Rightarrow z = 1.19\\i = 28 \Rightarrow \frac{{28 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.9167 \Rightarrow z = 1.38\end{array}\)

05

Construction and Interpretation of normal probability plot for part a.

\(\begin{array}{l}i = 29 \Rightarrow \frac{{29 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.95 \Rightarrow z = 1.645\\i = 30 \Rightarrow \frac{{30 - 0.5}}{{30}} = 0.9833 \Rightarrow z = 2.13\end{array}\)

(a) NORMAL PROBABILITY PLOT

To determine if the distribution of values is approximately normally distributed, we have to create a normal probability plot.

A normal probability plot is a scatterplot with the observations on the horizontal axis and the z-percentiles on the vertical axis.

If the pattern in the normal probability plot is roughly linear and does not contain strong curvature, then it is safe to assume that the distribution of the observations is approximately normal.

The created normal probability plot contains strong curvature, thus the distributions of the observations it not normally distributed.

06

Construction and Interpretation of normal probability plot for part b.

(b) Determine the square root of every data value:

\(\begin{array}{l}0.8775,1.0954,1.7321,1.2728,1.6763,1.5748,1.3191,0.6856,1.7578,1.1446,1.3675,0.09798,\\0.9,1.1958,1.2288,0.5657,1.0863,1.3748,\\1.0954,1.8358,1.4491,0.7681,1.1619,\\0.9487,1.3964,1.4832,0.7211,0.9,2.1794,1.4318\end{array}\)

NORMAL PROBABILITY PLOT

To determine if the distribution of values is approximately normally distributed, we have to create a normal probability plot.

A normal probability plot is a scatterplot with the square root of the observations on the horizontal axis and the z-percentiles on the vertical axis.

If the pattern in the normal probability plot is roughly linear and does not contain strong curvature, then it is safe to assume that the distribution of the observations is approximately normal.

The created normal probability plot contains no strong curvature Thus, the distributions of the squared observations are approximately normally distributed. Thus, it is plausible that the square root of precipitation is normally distributed.

07

Construction and Interpretation of normal probability plot for part c.

(c) Take the cubic root of every data value:

\(\begin{array}{l}0.9166,1.0627,1.4422,1.1745,1.4111,1.3536,1.2028,0.7775,\\1.4565,1.0942,1.232,0.9865,0.9322,1.1266,1.1473,0.684,1.0567,1.2364\\1.0627,1.4993,1.2806,0.8387,1.1052,0.9655,1.2493,1.3006,0.8041,0.9322,1.681,1.2703\end{array}\)

NORMAL PROBABILITY PLOT

To determine if the distribution of values is approximately normally distributed, we have to create a normal probability plot.

A normal probability plot is a scatterplot with the cubic root of the observations on the horizontal axis and the z-percentiles on the vertical axis.

If the pattern in the normal probability plot is roughly linear and does not contain strong curvature, then it is safe to assume that the distribution of the observations is approximately normal.

The created normal probability plot contains no strong curvature, thus the distributions of the squared observations are approximately normally distributed, and thus it is plausible that the cubic root of precipitation is normally distributed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A college professor never finishes his lecture before the end of the hour and always finishes his lectures within \({\rm{2}}\) min after the hour. Let \({\rm{X = }}\)the time that elapses between the end of the hour and the end of the lecture and suppose the pdf of \({\rm{X}}\) is

\({\rm{f(x) = \{ }}\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{{\rm{k}}{{\rm{x}}^2}}&{{\rm{0}} \le {\rm{x}} \le {\rm{2}}}\\{\rm{0}}&{{\rm{otherwise}}}\end{array}\)

a. Find the value of \({\rm{k}}\) and draw the corresponding density curve. (Hint: Total area under the graph of \({\rm{f(x)}}\) is \({\rm{1}}\).)

b. What is the probability that the lecture ends within \({\rm{1}}\) min of the end of the hour?

c. What is the probability that the lecture continues beyond the hour for between \({\rm{60}}\) and \({\rm{90}}\) sec?

d. What is the probability that the lecture continues for at least \({\rm{90}}\) sec beyond the end of the hour?

A machine that produces ball bearings has initially been set so that the true average diameter of the bearings it produces is \({\rm{.500}}\)in. A bearing is acceptable if its diameter is within \({\rm{.004}}\)in. of this target value. Suppose, however, that the setting has changed during the course of production, so that the bearings have normally distributed diameters with mean value \({\rm{.499}}\)in. and standard deviation \({\rm{.002}}\)in. What percentage of the bearings produced will not be acceptable?

The article 鈥淩eliability of Domestic颅Waste Biofilm Reactors鈥 (J. of Envir. Engr., \({\rm{1995: 785--790}}\)) suggests that substrate concentration (mg/cm\({\rm{3}}\)) of influent to a reactor is normally distributed with m \({\rm{5 }}{\rm{.30}}\)and s\({\rm{5 }}{\rm{.06}}\).

a. What is the probability that the concentration exceeds. \({\rm{50}}\)?

b. What is the probability that the concentration is at most. \({\rm{20}}\)?

c. How would you characterize the largest \({\rm{5\% }}\)of all concentration values?

The article 鈥淢odelling Sediment and Water Column Interactions for Hydrophobic Pollutants鈥 (Water Research, \({\rm{1984: 1169 - 1174}}\)) suggests the uniform distribution on the interval \({\rm{(7}}{\rm{.5,20)}}\)as a model for depth (cm) of the bioturbation layer in sediment in a certain region. a. What are the mean and variance of depth? b. What is the cdf of depth? c. What is the probability that observed depth is at most \({\rm{10}}\)? Between \({\rm{10}}\) and \({\rm{15}}\)? d. What is the probability that the observed depth is within \({\rm{1}}\) standard deviation of the mean value? Within \({\rm{2 }}\) standard deviations?

Spray drift is a constant concern for pesticide applicators and agricultural producers. The inverse relationship between droplet size and drift potential is well known. The paper "Effects of\({\rm{2,4 - D}}\)Formulation and Quinclorac on Spray Droplet Size and Deposition" (Weed Technology, \({\rm{2005: 1030 - 1036}}\)) investigated the effects of herbicide formulation on spray atomization. A figure in the paper suggested the normal distribution with mean\({\rm{1500\mu m}}\)and standard deviation\({\rm{1500\mu m}}\)was a reasonable model for droplet size for water (the "control treatment") sprayed through a\({\rm{760ml/min}}\)nozzle.

a. What is the probability that the size of a single droplet is less than\({\rm{1500\mu m}}\)? At least\({\rm{1000\mu m}}\)?

b. What is the probability that the size of a single droplet is between 1000 and\({\rm{1500\mu m}}\)?

c. How would you characterize the smallest\({\rm{2\% }}\)of all droplets?

d. If the sizes of five independently selected droplets are measured, what is the probability that exactly two of them exceed\({\rm{1500\mu m}}\)?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.