/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 40 A professor who teaches a large ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A professor who teaches a large introductory statistics class (197 students) with eight discussion sections would like to test if student performance differs by discussion section, where each discussion section has a different teaching assistant. The summary table below shows the average final exam score for each discussion section as well as the standard deviation of scores and the number of students in each section. $$ \begin{array}{rrrrrrrrrr} \hline & \text { Sec 1 } & \text { Sec 2 } & \text { Sec 3 } & \text { Sec 4 } & \text { Sec 5 } & \text { Sec 6 } & \text { Sec 7 } & \text { Sec 8 } \\ \hline n_{i} & 33 & 19 & 10 & 29 & 33 & 10 & 32 & 31 \\ \bar{x}_{i} & 92.94 & 91.11 & 91.80 & 92.45 & 89.30 & 88.30 & 90.12 & 93.35 \\\ s_{i} & 4.21 & 5.58 & 3.43 & 5.92 & 9.32 & 7.27 & 6.93 & 4.57 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ The ANOVA output below can be used to test for differences between the average scores from the different discussion sections. $$ \begin{array}{lrrrrr} \hline & \text { Df } & \text { Sum Sq } & \text { Mean Sq } & \text { F value } & \operatorname{Pr}(>\mathrm{F}) \\ \hline \text { section } & 7 & 525.01 & 75.00 & 1.87 & 0.0767 \\ \text { Residuals } & 189 & 7584.11 & 40.13 & & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Conduct a hypothesis test to determine if these data provide convincing evidence that the average score varies across some (or all) groups. Check conditions and describe any assumptions you must make to proceed with the test.

Short Answer

Expert verified
No significant difference in average scores between sections at \( \alpha = 0.05 \).

Step by step solution

01

State the Hypotheses

The hypothesis test for ANOVA involves checking if there is a difference between group means. The null hypothesis \(H_0\) states that all group means are equal: \( \mu_1 = \mu_2 = \cdots = \mu_8 \). The alternative hypothesis \(H_A\) is that at least one group mean is different: \( \exists\ i,j \text{ such that } \mu_i eq \mu_j \).
02

Check ANOVA Assumptions

For ANOVA, we assume independence of observations, normality of distributions within groups, and homogeneity of variances. Given the large sample size in most groups, the Central Limit Theorem suggests normality is a reasonable assumption. We assume independence since students are in separate sections. We will proceed assuming variances are approximately equal.
03

Analyze ANOVA Table

Look at the ANOVA table provided. The F statistic is 1.87 and the p-value is 0.0767. The p-value is the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme as, or more extreme than, the observed F statistic assuming the null hypothesis is true.
04

Make a Decision

Set a significance level, typically \( \alpha = 0.05 \). Compare the p-value to \( \alpha \). Here, \( \text{Pr}(>F) = 0.0767 \) is greater than \( 0.05 \), so we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
05

State the Conclusion

Since we failed to reject the null hypothesis, we do not have convincing evidence at the \( \alpha = 0.05 \) level that the average exam scores differ between discussion sections.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis serves as a starting point for any statistical analysis. It is a statement that assumes there is no effect or no difference in the context of the test. For the professor's statistics class example, the null hypothesis (H_0) claims that the average exam scores are identical across all discussion sections.So, if you were to write it out fully in terms of the example, it looks like this: H_0: \( \mu_1 = \mu_2 = \cdots = \mu_8 \). This expression indicates that all the group means (average scores for each discussion section) are equal.Rejecting the null hypothesis means there is enough statistical evidence to suggest that not all group means are equal. However, in hypothesis testing, we begin with the assumption that the null hypothesis is true until proven otherwise. In this exercise, the null hypothesis serves as a benchmark for comparison against the alternative hypothesis.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis offers a clear contrast to the null hypothesis. It suggests that there is a significant difference in the average scores among at least some of the discussion sections. In shorthand for our scenario, the alternative hypothesis (H_A) can be stated as: \( \exists\ i,j \text{ such that } \mu_i eq \mu_j \). This means that, for at least one pair of discussion sections, the average scores are not the same.The alternative hypothesis is important because it underpins the goal of our ANOVA test: to find evidence that there is variation among the group means. By doing so, it opens up the possibility that different teaching assistants might have influenced student performances differently. In the context of the professor's study, supporting the alternative hypothesis implies a potential teaching discrepancy needing further investigation.
P-Value
The p-value plays a crucial role in hypothesis testing as it measures the evidence against the null hypothesis. Specifically, it is the probability of observing a test statistic at least as extreme as the one calculated, under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true.In this exercise, the calculated p-value is 0.0767. To make a decision, we need a chosen significance level, commonly expressed as \( \alpha \). Popular choices for \( \alpha \) include 0.05 or 0.01. When the p-value is smaller than \( \alpha \), we reject the null hypothesis because it suggests the data are inconsistent with the null hypothesis.In this scenario, since the p-value of 0.0767 exceeds 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Essentially, this means there isn't sufficiently strong evidence in the data to conclude that the average exam scores differ by discussion section.
Homogeneity of Variances
Homogeneity of variances, also known as homoscedasticity, is an essential assumption in ANOVA tests. It implies that the variance within each group should be similar across all groups. This assumption ensures that the F statistic, used in ANOVA testing, follows the appropriate distribution under the null hypothesis. Why is this important? Homogeneity of variances assures us that any observed differences among the group means are not masked or confounded by unequal variability within the groups. In our exercise, the summary table provides clues about homogeneity. We see different standard deviations for each section, but to apply the ANOVA appropriately, we assume these differences are not substantial enough to affect the F test's reliability significantly. Meeting this assumption bolsters our confidence in the test results. However, if unequal variances were suspected, other methods like Welch’s ANOVA might be considered for more accurate conclusions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Researchers interested in lead exposure due to car exhaust sampled the blood of 52 police officers subjected to constant inhalation of automobile exhaust fumes while working traffic enforcement in a primarily urban environment. The blood samples of these officers had an average lead concentration of \(124.32 \mu \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{l}\) and a SD of \(37.74 \mu \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{l} ;\) a previous study of individuals from a nearby suburb, with no history of exposure, found an average blood level concentration of \(35 \mu \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{l} .\) (a) Write down the hypotheses that would be appropriate for testing if the police officers appear to have been exposed to a different concentration of lead. (b) Explicitly state and check all conditions necessary for inference on these data. (c) Regardless of your answers in part (b), test the hypothesis that the downtown police officers have a higher lead exposure than the group in the previous study. Interpret your results in context.

Georgianna claims that in a small city renowned for its music school, the average child takes less than 5 years of piano lessons. We have a random sample of 20 children from the city, with a mean of 4.6 years of piano lessons and a standard deviation of 2.2 years. (a) Evaluate Georgianna's claim (or that the opposite might be true) using a hypothesis test. (b) Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the number of years students in this city take piano lessons, and interpret it in context of the data. (c) Do your results from the hypothesis test and the confidence interval agree? Explain your reasoning.

Determine if the following statements are true or false, and explain your reasoning for statements you identify as false. (a) When comparing means of two samples where \(n_{1}=20\) and \(n_{2}=40,\) we can use the normal model for the difference in means since \(n_{2} \geq 30\). (b) As the degrees of freedom increases, the \(t\) -distribution approaches normality. (c) We use a pooled standard error for calculating the standard error of the difference between means when sample sizes of groups are equal to each other.

Caffeine is the world's most widely used stimulant, with approximately \(80 \%\) consumed in the form of coffee. Participants in a study investigating the relationship between coffee consumption and exercise were asked to report the number of hours they spent per week on moderate (e.g., brisk walking) and vigorous (e.g., strenuous sports and jogging) exercise. Based on these data the researchers estimated the total hours of metabolic equivalent tasks (MET) per week, a value always greater than \(0 .\) The table below gives summary statistics of MET for women in this study based on the amount of coffee consumed. \(^{36}\) (a) Write the hypotheses for evaluating if the average physical activity level varies among the different levels of coffee consumption. (b) Check conditions and describe any assumptions you must make to proceed with the test. (c) Below is part of the output associated with this test. Fill in the empty cells. (d) What is the conclusion of the test?

Determine if the following statements are true or false, and explain your reasoning for statements you identify as false. If the null hypothesis that the means of four groups are all the same is rejected using ANOVA at a \(5 \%\) significance level, then ... (a) we can then conclude that all the means are different from one another. (b) the standardized variability between groups is higher than the standardized variability within groups. (c) the pairwise analysis will identify at least one pair of means that are significantly different. (d) the appropriate \(\alpha\) to be used in pairwise comparisons is \(0.05 / 4=0.0125\) since there are four groups.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.