/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 3 Bivariate data often arises from... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Bivariate data often arises from the use of two different techniques to measure the same quantity. As an example, the accompanying observations on \(x=\) hydrogen concentration (ppm) using a gas chromatography method and \(y=\) concentration using a new sensor method were read from a graph in the article "A New Method to Measure the Diffusible Hydrogen Content in Steel Weldments Using a Polymer Electrolyte-Based Hydrogen Sensor" (Welding Res., July 1997: \(251 \mathrm{~s}-256 \mathrm{~s})\). $$ \begin{array}{l|llllllllll} x & 47 & 62 & 65 & 70 & 70 & 78 & 95 & 100 & 114 & 118 \\ \hline y & 38 & 62 & 53 & 67 & 84 & 79 & 93 & 106 & 117 & 116 \\ x & 124 & 127 & 140 & 140 & 140 & 150 & 152 & 164 & 198 & 221 \\ \hline y & 127 & 114 & 134 & 139 & 142 & 170 & 149 & 154 & 200 & 215 \end{array} $$ Construct a scatter plot. Does there appear to be a very strong relationship between the two types of concentration measurements? Do the two methods appear to be measuring roughly the same quantity? Explain your reasoning.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The scatter plot shows a strong, positive linear relationship indicating both methods measure the same quantity effectively.

Step by step solution

01

Compile Data for Plotting

Collect the provided bivariate data into two lists, one for the gas chromatography method and one for the new sensor method. These correspond to the variables \( x \) and \( y \) respectively.
02

Set Up the Scatter Plot

Choose axes for the scatter plot where the \( x \)-axis represents the gas chromatography measurements and the \( y \)-axis represents the sensor method measurements.
03

Plot the Data Points

For each pair \((x, y)\), plot a point on the graph. Use the pairs \((47, 38), (62, 62), (65, 53), (70, 67), (70, 84), (78, 79), \ldots (221, 215)\) as your data points.
04

Analyze the Scatter Plot

Examine the scatter plot to see how closely the points cluster around a straight line. A strong correlation will be evident if the points closely follow a linear form.
05

Interpret the Relationship

Assess whether a strong linear relationship exists based on the scatter plot. If the points lie close to a straight line with a steep positive slope and minimal scatter, they likely indicate a strong positive correlation between the two measurement methods.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Scatter Plot
A scatter plot is an essential visualization tool in bivariate data analysis. It helps us understand the relationship between two variables by representing each pair of observations as a point in a two-dimensional space. In this exercise, the scatter plot showcases the relationship between hydrogen concentration measurements using two different techniques: gas chromatography and a new sensor method.

To create a scatter plot, you start by plotting each \(x, y\) pair on a graph, where the x-axis typically represents the independent variable (in this case, gas chromatography measurements), and the y-axis represents the dependent variable (the sensor method measurements).
  • Each point on the plot comes from a pair of measurements: one from each method.
  • The placement and spread of these points reveal any patterns or correlations.
Observing the scatter plot allows for initial insights into whether there is a visible pattern or trend, signifying potential correlations. A tight clustering of points around a straight line suggests a strong relationship between the variables, whereas a more scattered pattern indicates a weaker relationship.
Correlation Analysis
Correlation analysis helps quantify the strength and direction of the relationship between two variables. In the context of this exercise, it is crucial to analyze how closely the measurements from gas chromatography and the new sensor method relate to one another.

A scatter plot visually indicates the presence of correlation, but quantifying this relationship requires a measure, usually the correlation coefficient. This coefficient ranges from -1 to 1:
  • If the correlation coefficient is close to 1, it means there is a strong positive relationship, where both variables increase together.
  • A coefficient near -1 indicates a strong negative relationship, where one variable increases as the other decreases.
  • A coefficient around 0 suggests no linear relationship between the variables.
While analyzing the scatter plot, look for a formation of points that seem to trace a straight line, particularly in a positive direction, as this could indicate a strong positive correlation.

If such a linear pattern is evident with minimal scatter around the line, we can conclude the two measurement methods likely assess the same underlying quantity consistently.
Measurement Techniques
Different measurement techniques can lead to variations in data even when measuring the same quantity. The exercise involves comparing two such methods: gas chromatography and a new sensor method, each having its own unique characteristics.

Understanding these techniques is crucial for analyzing data accurately.
  • Gas Chromatography: This is a common analytical technique used for separating and analyzing compounds that can be vaporized. It is known for its accuracy in measuring concentrations.
  • New Sensor Method: This involves using a polymer electrolyte-based hydrogen sensor, which might offer advantages such as faster measurements or sensitivity to specific conditions.
Each method's precision, sensitivity, and potential sources of error play a role in the bivariate analysis. By examining how similar the results from these two methods are, both visually (via scatter plots) and mathematically (via correlation analysis), we can determine if they are measuring the same underlying phenomenon.

Consistency in the readings from both methods would suggest reliability and validation of the new sensor method, providing confidence in its use alongside more traditional techniques.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The flow rate \(y\left(\mathrm{~m}^{3} / \mathrm{min}\right)\) in a device used for airquality measurement depends on the pressure drop \(x\) (in. of water) across the device's filter. Suppose that for \(x\) values between 5 and 20 , the two variables are related according to the simple linear regression model with true regression line \(y=-.12+.095 x\). a. What is the expected change in flow rate associated with a 1-in. increase in pressure drop? Explain. b. What change in flow rate can be expected when pressure drop decreases by 5 in.? c. What is the expected flow rate for a pressure drop of 10 in.? A drop of 15 in.? d. Suppose \(\sigma=.025\) and consider a pressure drop of \(10 \mathrm{in}\). What is the probability that the observed value of flow rate will exceed \(.835\) ? That observed flow rate will exceed .840? e. What is the probability that an observation on flow rate when pressure drop is 10 in. will exceed an observation on flow rate made when pressure drop is 11 in.?

An investigation was carried out to study the relationship between speed (ft/s) and stride rate (number of steps taken/s) among female marathon runners. Resulting summary quantities included \(n=11, \Sigma(\) speed \()=205.4, \Sigma(\text { speed })^{2}\) \(=3880.08, \quad \Sigma(\) rate \()=35.16, \quad \Sigma(\text { rate })^{2}\) \(=112.681\), and \(\Sigma(\) speed \()(\) rate \()=660.130 .\) a. Calculate the equation of the least squares line that you would use to predict stride rate from speed. b. Calculate the equation of the least squares line that you would use to predict speed from stride rate. c. Calculate the coefficient of determination for the regression of stride rate on speed of part (a) and for the regression of speed on stride rate of part (b). How are these related? d. How is the product of the two slope estimates related to the value calculated in (c)?

The following data on \(y=\) glucose concentration (g/L) and \(x=\) fermentation time (days) for a particular blend of malt liquor was read from a scatter plot in the article "Improving Fermentation Productivity with Reverse Osmosis" (Food Tech., 1984: 92-96): $$ \begin{array}{l|cccccccc} x & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 \\ \hline y & 74 & 54 & 52 & 51 & 52 & 53 & 58 & 71 \end{array} $$ a. Verify that a scatter plot of the data is consistent with the choice of a quadratic regression model. b. The estimated quadratic regression equation is \(y=84.482-15.875 x+1.7679 x^{2}\). Predict the value of glucose concentration for a fermentation time of 6 days, and compute the corresponding residual. c. Using SSE \(=61.77\), what proportion of observed variation can be attributed to the quadratic regression relationship? d. The \(n=8\) standardized residuals based on the quadratic model are \(1.91,-1.95,-.25\), \(.58, .90, .04,-.66\), and .20. Construct a plot of the standardized residuals versus \(x\) and a normal probability plot. Do the plots exhibit any troublesome features? e. The estimated standard deviation of \(\hat{\mu}_{Y \cdot 6}\)-that is, \(\hat{\beta}_{0}+\hat{\beta}_{1}(6)+\hat{\beta}_{2}(36)-\) is 1.69. Compute a \(95 \%\) CI for \(\mu_{Y \cdot 6}\). f. Compute a \(95 \%\) PI for a glucose concentration observation made after 6 days of fermentation time.

The accompanying data on \(x=\) current density \(\left(\mathrm{mA} / \mathrm{cm}^{2}\right)\) and \(y=\) rate of deposition \((\mathrm{mm} / \mathrm{min})\) appeared in the article "Plating of 60/40 Tin/ Lead Solder for Head Termination Metallurgy" (Plating and Surface Finishing, Jan. 1997: 38-40). Do you agree with the claim by the article's author that "a linear relationship was obtained from the tin-lead rate of deposition as a function of current density"? Explain your reasoning. $$ \begin{array}{l|cccc} x & 20 & 40 & 60 & 80 \\ \hline y & .24 & 1.20 & 1.71 & 2.22 \end{array} $$

The invasive diatom species Didymosphenia Geminata has the potential to inflict substantial ecological and economic damage in rivers. The article "Substrate Characteristics Affect Colonization by the Bloom-Forming Diatom Didymosphenia Geminata" (Aquatic Ecology, 2010: 33-40) described an investigation of colonization behavior. One aspect of particular interest was whether \(y=\) colony density was related to \(x=\) rock surface area. The article contained a scatter plot and summary of a regression analysis. Here is representative data: $$ \begin{aligned} &\begin{array}{c|ccccccc} x & 50 & 71 & 55 & 50 & 33 & 58 & 79 \\ \hline y & 152 & 1929 & 48 & 22 & 2 & 5 & 35 \end{array}\\\ &\begin{array}{l|cccccccc} x & 26 & 69 & 44 & 37 & 70 & 20 & 45 & 49 \\ \hline y & 7 & 269 & 38 & 171 & 13 & 43 & 185 & 25 \end{array} \end{aligned} $$ a. Fit the simple linear regression model to this data, and then calculate and interpret the coefficient of determination. b. Carry out a test of hypotheses to determine whether there is a useful linear relationship between density and rock area. c. The second observation has a very extreme \(y\) value (in the full data set consisting of 72 observations, there were two of these). This observation may have had a substantial impact on the fit of the model and subsequent conclusions. Eliminate it and redo parts (a) and (b). What do you conclude?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.