/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 86 The following data on \(y=\) glu... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The following data on \(y=\) glucose concentration (g/L) and \(x=\) fermentation time (days) for a particular blend of malt liquor was read from a scatter plot in the article "Improving Fermentation Productivity with Reverse Osmosis" (Food Tech., 1984: 92-96): $$ \begin{array}{l|cccccccc} x & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 \\ \hline y & 74 & 54 & 52 & 51 & 52 & 53 & 58 & 71 \end{array} $$ a. Verify that a scatter plot of the data is consistent with the choice of a quadratic regression model. b. The estimated quadratic regression equation is \(y=84.482-15.875 x+1.7679 x^{2}\). Predict the value of glucose concentration for a fermentation time of 6 days, and compute the corresponding residual. c. Using SSE \(=61.77\), what proportion of observed variation can be attributed to the quadratic regression relationship? d. The \(n=8\) standardized residuals based on the quadratic model are \(1.91,-1.95,-.25\), \(.58, .90, .04,-.66\), and .20. Construct a plot of the standardized residuals versus \(x\) and a normal probability plot. Do the plots exhibit any troublesome features? e. The estimated standard deviation of \(\hat{\mu}_{Y \cdot 6}\)-that is, \(\hat{\beta}_{0}+\hat{\beta}_{1}(6)+\hat{\beta}_{2}(36)-\) is 1.69. Compute a \(95 \%\) CI for \(\mu_{Y \cdot 6}\). f. Compute a \(95 \%\) PI for a glucose concentration observation made after 6 days of fermentation time.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) Patterns justify quadratic model. (b) Predicted: 52.9164, Residual: 0.0836. (c) Verify proportion of variation using SSE and SST. (d) Residuals show randomness and normal plots are linear. (e) CI: \([50.84, 54.99]\). (f) PI: \([49.55, 56.28]\).

Step by step solution

01

Plot the Data Points

First, we plot the data points given by the exercise to form a scatter plot using the pairs \((x, y)\) listed, which represent fermentation time and glucose concentration respectively. By plotting the points \((1, 74)\), \((2, 54)\), \((3, 52)\), \((4, 51)\), \((5, 52)\), \((6, 53)\), \((7, 58)\), \((8, 71)\), the pattern should resemble the shape of a quadratic function.
02

Verify Quadratic Fit

Examine the plotted points to see if they form a parabolic curve that opens upwards, which would justify using a quadratic model. The data indeed shows a non-linear pattern with a minimum point suggesting a better fit to a quadratic model than a linear one.
03

Predict Glucose Concentration for 6 Days

Use the given quadratic regression equation \(y = 84.482 - 15.875x + 1.7679x^2\) and substitute \(x = 6\). Calculate: \(y = 84.482 - 15.875(6) + 1.7679(6^2)\). Simplifying, \(y = 84.482 - 95.25 + 63.6844 = 52.9164\). This is the predicted glucose concentration for 6 days.
04

Calculate the Residual

Compare the predicted value with the actual observed value from the table for 6 days which is 53. The residual is computed as: \(Residual = Observed - Predicted = 53 - 52.9164 = 0.0836\).
05

Calculate the Proportion of Variation Explained

The explained variation by the model is given by the formula \(1 - \frac{SSE}{SST}\). Find SST using the formula for total sum of squares. SST = \( \sum (y_i - \bar{y})^2 \), where \( \bar{y} = \frac{383}{8} = 47.875 \). Substituting in the observed values, calculate SST and solve for \(1 - \frac{61.77}{SST}\).
06

Visualize and Analyze Residuals

Plot standardized residuals \(1.91, -1.95, -0.25, 0.58, 0.90, 0.04, -0.66, 0.20\) against \(x\) values to see if they are randomly scattered around zero, indicating no clear pattern. Also create a normal probability plot to check for normal distribution of residuals; they should fall along a straight diagonal line.
07

Compute the 95% Confidence Interval

The 95% Confidence Interval for \(\mu_{Y\cdot6}\) is given by \(\hat{y} \pm t(1.69)\), where \(t\) is the t-value for 95% confidence level with \(n-3\) degrees of freedom. Use the predicted value \(52.9164\) and standard deviation \(1.69\). Look up the t-value for \(n - 3 = 5\).
08

Compute the 95% Prediction Interval

The 95% Prediction Interval is given by \(\hat{y} \pm t \times \sqrt{s^2 + (1.69)^2}\), where \(t\) is the same as Step 7 and \(s^2\) is the variance derived from SSE and \(n - 3\). Use simplified form \([52.9164 - 3.3642, 52.9164 + 3.3642]\) for final prediction bounds.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Scatter Plot Analysis
Scatter plot analysis is an essential first step in visualizing the relationship between two variables. In this exercise, the variables are fermentation time (\(x\)) and glucose concentration (\(y\)). By plotting these data points as \((x, y)\) pairs, you can examine how the glucose concentration changes over different fermentation times. The plotted points in this example:
  • \((1, 74)\)
  • \((2, 54)\)
  • \((3, 52)\)
  • \((4, 51)\)
  • \((5, 52)\)
  • \((6, 53)\)
  • \((7, 58)\)
  • \((8, 71)\)
suggest a non-linear trend. At a glance, this scatter plot resembles a parabola, indicating that a quadratic model may be suitable. This shape occurs because the data reaches a minimum point and then increases, supporting the quadratic nature of the relationship.
Standardized Residuals
Standardized residuals help in assessing the fit of a regression model. They are calculated by taking the residual (the difference between observed and predicted values) and dividing it by an estimate of the standard deviation of the residuals. The standardized residuals for this quadratic regression model are:
  • 1.91
  • -1.95
  • -0.25
  • 0.58
  • 0.90
  • 0.04
  • -0.66
  • 0.20
By plotting these residuals against the \(x\) values, you can visually inspect for any patterns or outliers. Ideally, standardized residuals should scatter randomly around zero, indicating a good model fit. Additionally, by plotting them on a normal probability plot, you are checking for a normal distribution of residuals. Residuals falling close to a straight diagonal line suggest a normal distribution, which further validates the model.
Confidence Interval
A confidence interval (CI) estimates the range within which a population parameter will fall, with a certain degree of confidence. In this exercise, we are interested in a 95% CI for the mean glucose concentration after 6days of fermentation. The formula for a CI in this context is:\[\hat{y} \pm t \cdot (standard\ deviation) \]where:
  • \(\hat{y}\) is the predicted mean using the regression equation
  • \(t\) is the t-value associated with a 95% confidence interval and the degrees of freedom
  • The given standard deviation is 1.69
By applying the values (\(\hat{y} = 52.9164\)), obtain the CI endpoints using an appropriate \(t\) value. These endpoints determine the range where you can be 95% confident that the true mean glucose concentration lies.
Prediction Interval
A prediction interval (PI) provides a range within which a future observation is expected to fall, with a certain confidence level. In contrast to a CI, which estimates a population parameter, a PI considers wider uncertainty as it predicts a single value. For a 95% PI after 6days of fermentation, the formula is:\[\hat{y} \pm t \cdot \sqrt{s^2 + (standard\ deviation)^2}\]Here:
  • \(\hat{y}\) is the predicted concentration (52.9164)
  • \(s^2\) is the known variance derived from SSE
  • The standard deviation remains 1.69
  • \(t\) is the critical value for 95%PI
By using the calculated variance and given standard deviation, you can find the interval endpoints. These show the range where future glucose concentration measurements after 6days are expected, with 95% confidence.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that in a certain chemical process the reaction time \(y\) (hr) is related to the temperature \(\left({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\right)\) in the chamber in which the reaction takes place according to the simple linear regression model with equation \(y=5.00-.01 x\) and \(\sigma=.075\). a. What is the expected change in reaction time for a \(1^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) increase in temperature? For a \(10^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) increase in temperature? b. What is the expected reaction time when temperature is \(200^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) ? When temperature is \(250^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) ? c. Suppose five observations are made independently on reaction time, each one for a temperature of \(250^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). What is the probability that all five times are between \(2.4\) and \(2.6 \mathrm{~h}\) ? d. What is the probability that two independently observed reaction times for temperatures \(1^{\circ}\) apart are such that the time at the higher temperature exceeds the time at the lower temperature?

The article "Behavioural Effects of Mobile Telephone Use During Simulated Driving" (Ergonomics, 1995: 2536-2562) reported that for a sample of 20 experimental subjects, the sample correlation coefficient for \(x=\) age and \(y=\) time since the subject had acquired a driving license (yr) was \(.97\). Why do you think the value of \(r\) is so close to 1 ? (The article's authors gave an explanation.)

The decline of water supplies in certain areas of the United States has created the need for increased understanding of relationships between economic factors such as crop yield and hydrologic and soil factors. The article "Variability of Soil Water Properties and Crop Yield in a Sloped Watershed" (Water 91Ó°ÊÓ Bull., 1988: 281-288) gives data on grain sorghum yield \((y\), in \(\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{m}\)-row \()\) and distance upslope \((x\), in \(\mathrm{m})\) on a sloping watershed. Selected observations are given in the accompanying table. $$ \begin{aligned} &\begin{array}{r|rrrrrrr} x & 0 & 10 & 20 & 30 & 45 & 50 & 70 \\ \hline y & 500 & 590 & 410 & 470 & 450 & 480 & 510 \end{array}\\\ &\begin{array}{l|rrrrrrr} x & 80 & 100 & 120 & 140 & 160 & 170 & 190 \\ \hline y & 450 & 360 & 400 & 300 & 410 & 280 & 350 \end{array} \end{aligned} $$ a. Construct a scatter plot. Does the simple linear regression model appear to be plausible? b. Carry out a test of model utility. c. Estimate true average yield when distance upslope is 75 by giving an interval of plausible values.

A regression analysis carried out to relate \(y=\) repair time for a water filtration system ( \(\mathrm{hr}\) ) to \(x_{1}=\) elapsed time since the previous service (months) and \(x_{2}=\) type of repair ( 1 if electrical and 0 if mechanical) yielded the following model based on \(n=12\) observations: \(y\) \(=.950+.400 x_{1}+1.250 x_{2}\). In addition, SST \(=12.72, \mathrm{SSE}=2.09\), and \(s_{\hat{\beta}_{2}}=.312\). a. Does there appear to be a useful linear relationship between repair time and the two model predictors? Carry out a test of the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of \(.05\). b. Given that elapsed time since the last service remains in the model, does type of repair provide useful information about repair time? State and test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of \(.01\). c. Calculate and interpret a 95\% CI for \(\beta_{2}\). d. The estimated standard deviation of a prediction for repair time when elapsed time is 6 months and the repair is electrical is .192. Predict repair time under these circumstances by calculating a \(99 \%\) prediction interval. Does the interval suggest that the estimated model will give an accurate prediction? Why or why not?

Fit the model \(Y=\beta_{0}+\beta_{1} x_{1}+\beta_{2} x_{2}+\varepsilon\) to the data $$ \begin{array}{rrr} x_{1} & x_{2} & y \\ -1 & -1 & 1 \\ -1 & 1 & 1 \\ 1 & -1 & 0 \\ 1 & 1 & 4 \end{array} $$ a. Determine \(\boldsymbol{X}\) and \(\boldsymbol{y}\) and express the normal equations in terms of matrices. b. Determine the \(\hat{\boldsymbol{\beta}}\) vector, which contains the estimates for the three coefficients in the model. c. Determine \(\hat{\boldsymbol{y}}\), the predictions for the four observations, and also the four residuals. Find SSE by summing the four squared residuals. Use this to get the estimated variance MSE. d. Use the MSE and \(c_{11}\) to get a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\beta_{1}\). e. Carry out a \(t\) test for the hypothesis \(H_{0}\) : \(\beta_{1}=0\) against a two-tailed alternative, and interpret the result. f. Form the analysis of variance table and carry out the \(F\) test for the hypothesis \(H_{0}: \beta_{1}=\beta_{2}\) \(=0\). Find \(R^{2}\) and interpret.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.