/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 32 According to the article "Fatigu... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

According to the article "Fatigue Testing of Condoms" (Polym. Test., 2009: 567-571), "tests currently used for condoms are surrogates for the challenges they face in use," including a test for holes, an inflation test, a package seal test, and tests of dimensions and lubricant quality (all fertile territory for the use of statistical methodology!). The investigators developed a new test that adds cyclic strain to a level well below breakage and determines the number of cycles to break. The cited article reported that for a sample of 20 natural latex condoms of a certain type, the sample mean and sample standard deviation of the number of cycles to break were 4358 and 2218 , respectively, whereas a sample of 20 polyisoprene condoms gave a sample mean and sample standard deviation of 5805 and 3990 , respectively. Is there strong evidence for concluding that the true average number of cycles to break for the polyisoprene condom exceeds that for the natural latex condom by more than 1000 cycles? [Note: The article presented the results of hypothesis tests based on the \(t\) distribution; the validity of these depends on assuming normal population distributions.]

Short Answer

Expert verified
Perform a two-sample t-test with unequal variances: if the p-value is <0.05, then polyisoprene condoms last 1000+ more cycles than natural latex.

Step by step solution

01

Define Hypotheses

First, define the null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis (H0) states that the true average number of cycles to break for polyisoprene condoms is not more than 1000 cycles greater than that for natural latex condoms. The alternative hypothesis (H1) states that the true average number of cycles to break for polyisoprene condoms is more than 1000 cycles greater than that for natural latex condoms.\[H_0: \mu_{poly} - \mu_{latex} \leq 1000\]\[H_1: \mu_{poly} - \mu_{latex} > 1000\]
02

Collect Sample Information

Extract the relevant sample information provided in the problem. For the natural latex condoms, the sample mean (\( \bar{x}_{1} \)) is 4358 and the standard deviation (\( s_{1} \)) is 2218 with a sample size \( n_1 = 20 \). For polyisoprene condoms, the sample mean (\( \bar{x}_{2} \)) is 5805 and the standard deviation (\( s_{2} \)) is 3990 with a sample size \( n_2 = 20 \).
03

Calculate the Test Statistic

Use the formula for the test statistic from the two-sample t-test. The test statistic \( t \) for this hypothesis with unequal variances is calculated as:\[t = \frac{(\bar{x}_{2} - \bar{x}_{1}) - 1000}{\sqrt{\frac{s_{1}^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_{2}^2}{n_2}}}\]Plug in the values:\[t = \frac{(5805 - 4358) - 1000}{\sqrt{\frac{2218^2}{20} + \frac{3990^2}{20}}}\]
04

Calculate P-Value and Compare to Significance Level

Calculate the degrees of freedom using the formula for two-sample tests with unequal variances:\[df = \frac{\left(\frac{s_{1}^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_{2}^2}{n_2}\right)^2}{\frac{\left(\frac{s_{1}^2}{n_1}\right)^2}{n_1 - 1} + \frac{\left(\frac{s_{2}^2}{n_2}\right)^2}{n_2 - 1}}\]Then, determine the p-value using the t-distribution. Compare this p-value to a conventional significance level, such as 0.05. If the p-value is less than 0.05, reject the null hypothesis.
05

State Conclusion

Based on the comparison between the p-value and the significance level, draw a conclusion about the null hypothesis. If the p-value is less than 0.05, conclude that there is statistically significant evidence that the average number of cycles to break for polyisoprene condoms is more than 1000 cycles greater than for natural latex condoms.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Two-Sample t-Test
A Two-Sample t-Test is a statistical method used to determine if there is a significant difference between the means of two groups. It's applied when you want to compare two independent samples and see if they are different from each other with respect to a particular variable. In the context of the "Fatigue Testing of Condoms" study, the two-sample t-test helps us compare the average number of cycles to break for two types of condoms: natural latex and polyisoprene.
  • Independent Samples: Here, our two samples are natural latex condoms and polyisoprene condoms. The assumption is that these samples are independent of one another.
  • Mean Comparison: We focus on the average number of cycles to break for each type of condom.
  • Hypotheses: The test is structured around a null hypothesis (no significant difference or difference is less than or equal to 1000 cycles) and an alternative hypothesis (difference exceeds 1000 cycles).
The test calculates a t-statistic based on the difference between sample means, their standard deviations, and their sample sizes. The result helps understand if the observed differences are statistically significant.
Statistical Methodology
Sound statistical methodology is crucial in scientific research as it ensures the validity and reliability of the results. In the case of testing the durability of condoms, several key steps are involved in statistical analysis.
  • Defining Hypotheses: Clearly state the null and alternative hypotheses, as seen in the original problem: \[H_0: \mu_{poly} - \mu_{latex} \leq 1000\] \[H_1: \mu_{poly} - \mu_{latex} > 1000\]
  • Data Collection: Gather relevant sample data—sample means, standard deviations, and sizes.
  • Test Statistic Calculation: Calculate a value (t-statistic) to compare against a critical value in the t-distribution.
Application of proper technique and adherence to proper procedures are vital to ensure results are robust and credible. This methodology is applied in a series of steps that help establish whether the results are likely due to chance or represent a significant difference in the variable being tested.
Normal Distribution Assumption
One of the key assumptions of the two-sample t-test is that the data from each sample is normally distributed. While the test can be quite robust to deviations, the assumption provides a foundation for the test’s validity.
  • Importance: Assuming normality helps in calculating probabilities and inferential statistics.
  • Real-World Application: In scientific experiments like the condom fatigue test, normal distribution implies that each sample is representative and follows a bell-shaped curve around the mean.
  • Checking for Normality: While not always tested explicitly, methods like visual inspections (histograms, Q-Q plots) or statistical tests (Shapiro-Wilk) can be used if necessary.
The assumption allows for the use of the t-distribution in calculating the test statistic and p-value, which are essential in determining statistical significance.
Significance Level
The significance level, often denoted as alpha (\(\alpha\)), is the threshold used in hypothesis testing to determine when to reject the null hypothesis. In many scientific studies, including this one, a significance level of 0.05 is commonly used.
  • Definition: It represents the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. A significance level of 0.05 means there's a 5% risk of concluding that a difference exists when there is none.
  • Role in Hypothesis Testing: The p-value obtained from the test is compared to the significance level. If the p-value is less than or equal to the significance level, the null hypothesis is rejected.
  • Practical Implication: In the context of the condom test, a p-value below 0.05 would suggest strong evidence that the average number of cycles to break for polyisoprene condoms exceeds those for natural latex condoms by more than 1000 cycles.
Understanding significance levels is crucial as they guide the decision-making process in statistical analysis, helping determine the "cut-off" for certainty in results.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Torsion during hip external rotation (ER) and extension may be responsible for certain kinds of injuries in golfers and other athletes. The article "Hip Rotational Velocities during the Full Golf Swing" (J. Sport Sci. Med., 2009: 296-299) reported on a study in which peak ER velocity and peak IR (internal rotation) velocity (both in \(\mathrm{deg} / \mathrm{s}\) ) were determined for a sample of 15 female collegiate golfers during their swings. The following data was supplied by the article's authors. a. Is it plausible that the differences came from a normally distributed population? b. The article reported that Mean \((\pm S D)=\) \(-145.3(68.0)\) for ER velocity and = \(-227.8(96.6)\) for IR velocity. Based just on this information, could a test of hypotheses about the difference between true average IR velocity and true average ER velocity be carried out? Explain. c. Do an appropriate hypothesis test about the difference between true average IR velocity and true average ER velocity and interpret the result.

A study seeks to compare hospitals based on the performance of their intensive care units. The dependent variable is the mortality ratio, the ratio of the number of deaths over the predicted number of deaths based on the condition of the patients. The comparison will be between hospitals with nurse staffing problems and hospitals without such problems. Assume, based on past experience, that the standard deviation of the mortality ratio will be around \(.2\) in both types of hospital. How many of each type of hospital should be included in the study in order to have both the type I and type II error probabilities be \(.05\), if the true difference of mean mortality ratio for the two types of hospital is .2? If we conclude that hospitals with nurse staffing problems have a higher mortality ratio, does this imply a causal relationship? Explain.

Research has shown that good hip range of motion and strength in throwing athletes results in improved performance and decreased body stress. The article "Functional Hip Characteristics of Baseball Pitchers and Position Players" (Am. J. Sport. Med., 2010: 383-388) reported on a study involving samples of 40 professional pitchers and 40 professional position players. For the pitchers, the sample mean trail leg total arc of motion (degrees) was \(75.6\) with a sample standard deviation of \(5.9\), whereas the sample mean and sample standard deviation for position players were \(79.6\) and 7.6, respectively. Assuming normality, test appropriate hypotheses to decide whether true average range of motion for the pitchers is less than that for the position players (as hypothesized by the investigators). In reaching your conclusion, what type of error might you have committed?

The accompanying data on the alcohol content of wine is representative of that reported in a study in which wines from the years 1999 and 2000 were randomly selected and the actual content was determined by laboratory analysis (London Times, Aug. 5, 2001). $$ \begin{array}{lcccccc} \text { Wine } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 \\ \text { Actual } & 14.2 & 14.5 & 14.0 & 14.9 & 13.6 & 12.6 \\ \text { Label } & 14.0 & 14.0 & 13.5 & 15.0 & 13.0 & 12.5 \end{array} $$ The two-sample \(t\) test gives a test statistic value of \(.62\) and a two-tailed \(P\)-value of \(.55\). Does this convince you that there is no significant difference between true average actual alcohol content and true average content stated on the label? Explain.

Determine the number of degrees of freedom for the two-sample \(t\) test or CI in each of the following situations: a. \(m=10, n=10, s_{1}=5.0, s_{2}=6.0\) b. \(m=10, n=15, s_{1}=5.0, s_{2}=6.0\) c. \(m=10, n=15, s_{1}=2.0, s_{2}=6.0\) d. \(m=12, n=24, s_{1}=5.0, s_{2}=6.0\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.