/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 21 Beweisen Sie die Absorptionsgese... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Beweisen Sie die Absorptionsgesetze: $$ \begin{aligned} &M_{1} \cap\left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right)=M_{1} \\ &M_{1} \cup\left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right)=M_{1} \end{aligned} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Prove the Absorption Laws in set theory, which are: \(M_{1} \cap\left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right) = M_{1}\) and \(M_{1} \cup\left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right) = M_{1}\). Answer: To prove the Absorption Laws, we analyzed each equation separately. For Law 1, we showed that every element in \(M_{1} \cap\left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right)\) is in \(M_{1}\), and every element in \(M_{1}\) is in \(M_{1} \cap\left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right)\). For Law 2, we showed that every element in \(M_{1} \cup\left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right)\) is in \(M_{1}\), and every element in \(M_{1}\) is in \(M_{1} \cup\left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right)\). Thus, we have proven both Absorption Laws in set theory.

Step by step solution

01

Proof of Law 1: \(M_{1} \cap\left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right) = M_{1}\)

In order to prove the first Absorption Law, that \(M_{1} \cap\left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right) = M_{1}\), we need to show that every element in \(M_{1} \cap\left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right)\) is in \(M_{1}\), and every element in \(M_{1}\) is in \(M_{1} \cap\left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right)\). Let's analyze both cases: 1. If \(x \in M_{1} \cap\left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right)\), then \(x \in M_{1}\) and \(x \in\left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right)\). Since \(x \in M_{1}\), we can say that \(x \in M_{1}\). 2. If \(x \in M_{1}\), then \(x \in M_{1}\) or \(x \in M_{2}\), which means \(x \in\left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right)\). Since \(x \in M_{1}\) and \(x \in\left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right)\), we have \(x \in M_{1} \cap\left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right)\). Since all elements in \(M_{1} \cap\left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right)\) are in \(M_{1}\), and all elements in \(M_{1}\) are in \(M_{1} \cap\left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right)\), we have proven the first Absorption Law.
02

Proof of Law 2: \(M_{1} \cup\left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right) = M_{1}\)

In order to prove the second Absorption Law, that \(M_{1} \cup\left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right) = M_{1}\), we need to show that every element in \(M_{1} \cup\left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right)\) is in \(M_{1}\), and every element in \(M_{1}\) is in \(M_{1} \cup\left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right)\). Let's analyze both cases: 1. If \(x \in M_{1} \cup\left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right)\), then \(x \in M_{1}\) or \(x \in\left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right)\). If \(x \in\left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right)\), then \(x \in M_{1}\). In both cases, we can say that \(x \in M_{1}\). 2. If \(x \in M_{1}\), then \(x \in M_{1}\) or \(x \in\left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right)\), which means \(x \in M_{1} \cup\left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right)\). Since all elements in \(M_{1} \cup\left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right)\) are in \(M_{1}\), and all elements in \(M_{1}\) are in \(M_{1} \cup\left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right)\), we have proven the second Absorption Law.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Beweisen Sie die Assoziativgesetze: $$ \begin{aligned} &(A \wedge B) \wedge C \Leftrightarrow A \wedge(B \wedge C) \\ &(A \vee B) \vee C \Leftrightarrow A \vee(B \vee C) \end{aligned} $$

Welche der folgenden Schlüsse sind auf formaler Ebene (d. h. noch ohne tatsächliche Betrachtung der Wahrheitswerte der Aussagen) richtig? Welche sind als Implikationen wahre Aussagen, wenn man auch die Wahrheitswerte der jeweils verknuipften Aussagen betrachtet? 1\. Alle Vögel können fliegen. Möwen sind Vögel. \(\Rightarrow\) Möwen können fliegen. 2\. Alle Vögel können fliegen. Pinguine sind Vögel. \(\Rightarrow\) Pinguine können fliegen. 3\. Alle Vögel können fliegen. Möwen können fliegen. \(\Rightarrow\) Möwen sind Vögel. 4\. Alle Vögel können fliegen. Libellen können fliegen. \(\Rightarrow\) Libellen sind Vögel.

Beweisen Sie die Äquivalenzen: $$ \begin{aligned} (A \vee B) & \Leftrightarrow \neg(\neg A \wedge \neg B) \\ (A \wedge B) & \Leftrightarrow \neg(\neg A \vee \neg B) \\ (A \Rightarrow B) & \Leftrightarrow((\neg A) \vee B) \end{aligned} $$

An einer Weggabelung in der Wüste leben zwei Brüder, die vollkommen gleich aussehen, zwischen denen es aber einen gewaltigen Unterschied gibt: Der eine sagt immer die Wahrheit, der andere lügt immer. Schon halb verdurstet kommt man zu dieser Weggabelung und weiß genau: Einer der beiden Wege führt zu einer Oase, der andere hingegen immer tiefer in die Wüste hinein. Man darf aber nur einem der Brüder (man weiB nicht, welcher es ist) genau eine Frage stellen. Was muss man fragen, um sicher den Weg zur Oase zu finden?

Wir betrachten die Teilmengen \(X, Y\) und \(Z\) von \(\mathbb{R}\). Verneinen Sie die Aussage $$ \forall x \in X \exists y \in Y \forall z \in Z: x \cdot y

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.